<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DVR Battle: Private Practice vs. Bionic Woman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:26:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Jay Turney, I&#039;m not sure I exactly understood your comment, but will try to respond anyway.  

(1.) I believe that almost everyone with a DVR fast-forwards through commercials almost all the time.

(2.) There are a variety of reasons people wind up watching commercials.  The limited view of the C3 numbers I&#039;ve seen leads me to believe that most people (well over 50%) wind up watching most of the ads if they don&#039;t have a DVR. 

(3.) Those shows did NOT lose 50% of their timeshifted audience.  The second two weeks of numbers, as noted, were only Live plus same day DVR usage.  The Live+7 day DVR usage numbers lag behind by a couple of weeks. We simply do not have them yet, but it&#039;s reasonable to expect the DVR usage for 10/10 and 10/17 will at least double from what is listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Turney, I&#8217;m not sure I exactly understood your comment, but will try to respond anyway.  </p>
<p>(1.) I believe that almost everyone with a DVR fast-forwards through commercials almost all the time.</p>
<p>(2.) There are a variety of reasons people wind up watching commercials.  The limited view of the C3 numbers I&#8217;ve seen leads me to believe that most people (well over 50%) wind up watching most of the ads if they don&#8217;t have a DVR. </p>
<p>(3.) Those shows did NOT lose 50% of their timeshifted audience.  The second two weeks of numbers, as noted, were only Live plus same day DVR usage.  The Live+7 day DVR usage numbers lag behind by a couple of weeks. We simply do not have them yet, but it&#8217;s reasonable to expect the DVR usage for 10/10 and 10/17 will at least double from what is listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-18031</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-18031</guid>
		<description>Jay Turney, I&#039;m not sure I exactly understood your comment, but will try to respond anyway.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(1.) I believe that almost everyone with a DVR fast-forwards through commercials almost all the time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(2.) There are a variety of reasons people wind up watching commercials.  The limited view of the C3 numbers I&#039;ve seen leads me to believe that most people (well over 50%) wind up watching most of the ads if they don&#039;t have a DVR. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(3.) Those shows did NOT lose 50% of their timeshifted audience.  The second two weeks of numbers, as noted, were only Live plus same day DVR usage.  The Live+7 day DVR usage numbers lag behind by a couple of weeks. We simply do not have them yet, but it&#039;s reasonable to expect the DVR usage for 10/10 and 10/17 will at least double from what is listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay Turney, I&#39;m not sure I exactly understood your comment, but will try to respond anyway.  </p>
<p>(1.) I believe that almost everyone with a DVR fast-forwards through commercials almost all the time.</p>
<p>(2.) There are a variety of reasons people wind up watching commercials.  The limited view of the C3 numbers I&#39;ve seen leads me to believe that most people (well over 50%) wind up watching most of the ads if they don&#39;t have a DVR. </p>
<p>(3.) Those shows did NOT lose 50% of their timeshifted audience.  The second two weeks of numbers, as noted, were only Live plus same day DVR usage.  The Live+7 day DVR usage numbers lag behind by a couple of weeks. We simply do not have them yet, but it&#39;s reasonable to expect the DVR usage for 10/10 and 10/17 will at least double from what is listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Why is it clear only to nonprofessional observers of your scene that (1) it is counterintuitive to believe viewers with a chance to skip ads won&#039;t do so (2) These will be the most likely to be sedentary, ie, the 225% who don&#039;t pick up a magazine or use the john already during the obnoxiously overlong ads (3) by your own numbers these two shows lost respectively 50% and 80% time-shifting and 30% to 50% overall viewers in four weeks. Suits me fine for the leg-crossing skirts execs foisting TV for women only on a 50% plus male viewership to destroy their own feminist propaganda devices through arrogance. Maybe Wolfe should write a new book, Twilight of the Matriarchal Moguls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it clear only to nonprofessional observers of your scene that (1) it is counterintuitive to believe viewers with a chance to skip ads won&#8217;t do so (2) These will be the most likely to be sedentary, ie, the 225% who don&#8217;t pick up a magazine or use the john already during the obnoxiously overlong ads (3) by your own numbers these two shows lost respectively 50% and 80% time-shifting and 30% to 50% overall viewers in four weeks. Suits me fine for the leg-crossing skirts execs foisting TV for women only on a 50% plus male viewership to destroy their own feminist propaganda devices through arrogance. Maybe Wolfe should write a new book, Twilight of the Matriarchal Moguls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-18030</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-18030</guid>
		<description>Why is it clear only to nonprofessional observers of your scene that (1) it is counterintuitive to believe viewers with a chance to skip ads won&#039;t do so (2) These will be the most likely to be sedentary, ie, the 225% who don&#039;t pick up a magazine or use the john already during the obnoxiously overlong ads (3) by your own numbers these two shows lost respectively 50% and 80% time-shifting and 30% to 50% overall viewers in four weeks. Suits me fine for the leg-crossing skirts execs foisting TV for women only on a 50% plus male viewership to destroy their own feminist propaganda devices through arrogance. Maybe Wolfe should write a new book, Twilight of the Matriarchal Moguls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it clear only to nonprofessional observers of your scene that (1) it is counterintuitive to believe viewers with a chance to skip ads won&#39;t do so (2) These will be the most likely to be sedentary, ie, the 225% who don&#39;t pick up a magazine or use the john already during the obnoxiously overlong ads (3) by your own numbers these two shows lost respectively 50% and 80% time-shifting and 30% to 50% overall viewers in four weeks. Suits me fine for the leg-crossing skirts execs foisting TV for women only on a 50% plus male viewership to destroy their own feminist propaganda devices through arrogance. Maybe Wolfe should write a new book, Twilight of the Matriarchal Moguls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>I agree with Sheckman to a point.  It does deserve a different &quot;tone&quot; of shows around it...and it is tough for a new show to have a brand new show, Phenomenon, before it....but in a remote control and DVR world, lead ins and program blocks mean little to me..we flip around the dial like walking through a grocery store, picking out what catches our eye.   I think lead ins are very, very  overrated in today&#039;s TV world.

For me, again, that opening scene was a failure and all we need to know about what is causing this  show to fail....too serious for a comic book adventure about a super-chick who kicks ass....for me, it was one of the most violent and disturbing  cold open of any show in recent memory, with a US Soldier slashing an officer&#039;s head and then shooting up a military hospital with a machine gun.

STOP BEING SO SERIOUS...WHERE IS THE ESCAPISM and drama....?   

thank you for a show without Sarah...although I miss the kid...but can&#039;t we get out of Iraq war sensationalism as plot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sheckman to a point.  It does deserve a different &#8220;tone&#8221; of shows around it&#8230;and it is tough for a new show to have a brand new show, Phenomenon, before it&#8230;.but in a remote control and DVR world, lead ins and program blocks mean little to me..we flip around the dial like walking through a grocery store, picking out what catches our eye.   I think lead ins are very, very  overrated in today&#8217;s TV world.</p>
<p>For me, again, that opening scene was a failure and all we need to know about what is causing this  show to fail&#8230;.too serious for a comic book adventure about a super-chick who kicks ass&#8230;.for me, it was one of the most violent and disturbing  cold open of any show in recent memory, with a US Soldier slashing an officer&#8217;s head and then shooting up a military hospital with a machine gun.</p>
<p>STOP BEING SO SERIOUS&#8230;WHERE IS THE ESCAPISM and drama&#8230;.?   </p>
<p>thank you for a show without Sarah&#8230;although I miss the kid&#8230;but can&#8217;t we get out of Iraq war sensationalism as plot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-18029</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-18029</guid>
		<description>I agree with Sheckman to a point.  It does deserve a different &quot;tone&quot; of shows around it...and it is tough for a new show to have a brand new show, Phenomenon, before it....but in a remote control and DVR world, lead ins and program blocks mean little to me..we flip around the dial like walking through a grocery store, picking out what catches our eye.   I think lead ins are very, very  overrated in today&#039;s TV world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me, again, that opening scene was a failure and all we need to know about what is causing this  show to fail....too serious for a comic book adventure about a super-chick who kicks ass....for me, it was one of the most violent and disturbing  cold open of any show in recent memory, with a US Soldier slashing an officer&#039;s head and then shooting up a military hospital with a machine gun.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;STOP BEING SO SERIOUS...WHERE IS THE ESCAPISM and drama....?   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thank you for a show without Sarah...although I miss the kid...but can&#039;t we get out of Iraq war sensationalism as plot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Sheckman to a point.  It does deserve a different &#8220;tone&#8221; of shows around it&#8230;and it is tough for a new show to have a brand new show, Phenomenon, before it&#8230;.but in a remote control and DVR world, lead ins and program blocks mean little to me..we flip around the dial like walking through a grocery store, picking out what catches our eye.   I think lead ins are very, very  overrated in today&#39;s TV world.</p>
<p>For me, again, that opening scene was a failure and all we need to know about what is causing this  show to fail&#8230;.too serious for a comic book adventure about a super-chick who kicks ass&#8230;.for me, it was one of the most violent and disturbing  cold open of any show in recent memory, with a US Soldier slashing an officer&#39;s head and then shooting up a military hospital with a machine gun.</p>
<p>STOP BEING SO SERIOUS&#8230;WHERE IS THE ESCAPISM and drama&#8230;.?   </p>
<p>thank you for a show without Sarah&#8230;although I miss the kid&#8230;but can&#39;t we get out of Iraq war sensationalism as plot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheckman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s killing me is that BW is killing Life. As she drops, so does Life. Give Life a chance.  Give it a better lead-in, and one that isn&#039;t so radically different in tone/target demo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s killing me is that BW is killing Life. As she drops, so does Life. Give Life a chance.  Give it a better lead-in, and one that isn&#8217;t so radically different in tone/target demo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheckman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/1451#comment-18028</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/24/dvr-battle-private-practice-vs-bionic-woman/#comment-18028</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s killing me is that BW is killing Life. As she drops, so does Life. Give Life a chance.  Give it a better lead-in, and one that isn&#039;t so radically different in tone/target demo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s killing me is that BW is killing Life. As she drops, so does Life. Give Life a chance.  Give it a better lead-in, and one that isn&#39;t so radically different in tone/target demo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
