Comments on: Top Broadcast 10/29-11/4: You’re Still Dancing… http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634 Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:24:38 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-1409 Robert Seidman Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:27:08 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-1409 Michael there are two different "universes" -- the universe of households and the universe of people over the age of 2. In the case of HH, the universe is 112,800,000 for the 2007-2008 season. A HH ratings point = 1% of that universe. The viewership universe is out of 286,300,000 people, but I just provide the total viewers (Nielsen provided) rather than the Viewer Ratings. You won't be able to make the math foot because more than one person per household can watch a show. My inclination was to just to provide viewers, but several people asked for the household data -- I suppose I could provide that total # of households instead of the HH rating. Thoughts? Michael there are two different “universes” — the universe of households and the universe of people over the age of 2. In the case of HH, the universe is 112,800,000 for the 2007-2008 season. A HH ratings point = 1% of that universe.

The viewership universe is out of 286,300,000 people, but I just provide the total viewers (Nielsen provided) rather than the Viewer Ratings.

You won’t be able to make the math foot because more than one person per household can watch a show. My inclination was to just to provide viewers, but several people asked for the household data — I suppose I could provide that total # of households instead of the HH rating. Thoughts?

]]> By: Michael Song http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-1407 Michael Song Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:31:53 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-1407 What's the math to get to viewership numbers if you're given the rating and the HH share? I can't seem to get the same numbers as yours. Thanks, MKS What’s the math to get to viewership numbers if you’re given the rating and the HH share? I can’t seem to get the same numbers as yours.

Thanks,
MKS

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-15664 Robert Seidman Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:27:08 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-15664 Michael there are two different "universes" -- the universe of households and the universe of people over the age of 2. In the case of HH, the universe is 112,800,000 for the 2007-2008 season. A HH ratings point = 1% of that universe. <br><br>The viewership universe is out of 286,300,000 people, but I just provide the total viewers (Nielsen provided) rather than the Viewer Ratings. <br><br>You won't be able to make the math foot because more than one person per household can watch a show. My inclination was to just to provide viewers, but several people asked for the household data -- I suppose I could provide that total # of households instead of the HH rating. Thoughts? Michael there are two different “universes” — the universe of households and the universe of people over the age of 2. In the case of HH, the universe is 112,800,000 for the 2007-2008 season. A HH ratings point = 1% of that universe.

The viewership universe is out of 286,300,000 people, but I just provide the total viewers (Nielsen provided) rather than the Viewer Ratings.

You won't be able to make the math foot because more than one person per household can watch a show. My inclination was to just to provide viewers, but several people asked for the household data — I suppose I could provide that total # of households instead of the HH rating. Thoughts?

]]> By: Michael Song http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-15663 Michael Song Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:31:53 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-15663 What's the math to get to viewership numbers if you're given the rating and the HH share? I can't seem to get the same numbers as yours.<br><br>Thanks,<br>MKS What's the math to get to viewership numbers if you're given the rating and the HH share? I can't seem to get the same numbers as yours.

Thanks,
MKS

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-927 Robert Seidman Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:16:15 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-927 Susie, from a Cable HH Ratings Law & Order: CI was #12 for the week (2.6 HH rating), but did not make our <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-cable-1029-11407-mnf-destroys-competition/" rel="nofollow">Cable Top 20</a> when it comes to actual viewers (3.586 million). You can compare that to the broadcast viewers for last Thursday <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/02/overnight-results-111-greys-vs-csi/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Susie, from a Cable HH Ratings Law & Order: CI was #12 for the week (2.6 HH rating), but did not make our Cable Top 20 when it comes to actual viewers (3.586 million). You can compare that to the broadcast viewers for last Thursday here.

]]> By: Susie http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-922 Susie Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:40:10 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-922 Where did Law & Order Criminal Intent fall on the Cable ratings chart for wk 10/29 - 11/04? What were the actual ratings vs broadcast for Thurs, 11/01/07? thanks Where did Law & Order Criminal Intent fall on the Cable ratings chart for wk 10/29 – 11/04? What were the actual ratings vs broadcast for Thurs, 11/01/07?

thanks

]]> By: Robert Seidman http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-15662 Robert Seidman Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:16:15 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-15662 Susie, from a Cable HH Ratings Law & Order: CI was #12 for the week (2.6 HH rating), but did not make our <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-cable-1029-11407-mnf-destroys-competition/" rel="nofollow">Cable Top 20</a> when it comes to actual viewers (3.586 million). You can compare that to the broadcast viewers for last Thursday <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/02/overnight-results-111-greys-vs-csi/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Susie, from a Cable HH Ratings Law & Order: CI was #12 for the week (2.6 HH rating), but did not make our Cable Top 20 when it comes to actual viewers (3.586 million). You can compare that to the broadcast viewers for last Thursday here.

]]> By: Susie http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/1634#comment-15661 Susie Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:40:10 +0000 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/06/top-broadcast-1029-114-youre-still-dancing/#comment-15661 Where did Law & Order Criminal Intent fall on the Cable ratings chart for wk 10/29 - 11/04? What were the actual ratings vs broadcast for Thurs, 11/01/07?<br><br>thanks Where did Law & Order Criminal Intent fall on the Cable ratings chart for wk 10/29 – 11/04? What were the actual ratings vs broadcast for Thurs, 11/01/07?

thanks

]]>