<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overnight Results 11/8: CBS Sweeps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:39:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>And yes, Matthias, the overnights are based on half-hourly data and overruns (like Grey&#039;s into Big Shots) do artificially inflate the overnight results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, Matthias, the overnights are based on half-hourly data and overruns (like Grey&#8217;s into Big Shots) do artificially inflate the overnight results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 18:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>Barbara, sorry but we don&#039;t update the overnight results with final numbers published later -- though we do use Nielsen&#039;s final LIVE+SD numbers in our &lt;i&gt;weekly&lt;/i&gt; results.

Matthias, the crossover between the CBS shows was extremely effective.  If the writers ever come back to work, I think they&#039;ll try some more of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara, sorry but we don&#8217;t update the overnight results with final numbers published later &#8212; though we do use Nielsen&#8217;s final LIVE+SD numbers in our <i>weekly</i> results.</p>
<p>Matthias, the crossover between the CBS shows was extremely effective.  If the writers ever come back to work, I think they&#8217;ll try some more of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20507</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20507</guid>
		<description>And yes, Matthias, the overnights are based on half-hourly data and overruns (like Grey&#039;s into Big Shots) do artificially inflate the overnight results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yes, Matthias, the overnights are based on half-hourly data and overruns (like Grey&#39;s into Big Shots) do artificially inflate the overnight results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20506</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20506</guid>
		<description>Barbara, sorry but we don&#039;t update the overnight results with final numbers published later -- though we do use Nielsen&#039;s final LIVE+SD numbers in our &lt;i&gt;weekly&lt;/i&gt; results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Matthias, the crossover between the CBS shows was extremely effective.  If the writers ever come back to work, I think they&#039;ll try some more of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barbara, sorry but we don&#39;t update the overnight results with final numbers published later &#8212; though we do use Nielsen&#39;s final LIVE+SD numbers in our <i>weekly</i> results.</p>
<p>Matthias, the crossover between the CBS shows was extremely effective.  If the writers ever come back to work, I think they&#39;ll try some more of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barbara</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>Smallville&#039;s numbers are wrong.  Finals: 4.644</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smallville&#8217;s numbers are wrong.  Finals: 4.644</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barbara</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20505</link>
		<dc:creator>barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20505</guid>
		<description>Smallville&#039;s numbers are wrong.  Finals: 4.644</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smallville&#39;s numbers are wrong.  Finals: 4.644</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Zucker</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Zucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>Grey&#039;s Anatomy ran into the 10 pm hour. I would imagine that (unless this statistic has somehow taken that into account) this artificially increases Big Shots&#039; ratings. The ratings are, after all, measured by the (half-)hour, not the show, right, at least in overnights?

Anyway, CBS made a smart move with the CSI/Without A Trace crossover. And well enough. CSI has been a lot more elegant and worthwhile than the tired Grey&#039;s Anatomy for quite a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy ran into the 10 pm hour. I would imagine that (unless this statistic has somehow taken that into account) this artificially increases Big Shots&#8217; ratings. The ratings are, after all, measured by the (half-)hour, not the show, right, at least in overnights?</p>
<p>Anyway, CBS made a smart move with the CSI/Without A Trace crossover. And well enough. CSI has been a lot more elegant and worthwhile than the tired Grey&#8217;s Anatomy for quite a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Zucker</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20504</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Zucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 10:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20504</guid>
		<description>Grey&#039;s Anatomy ran into the 10 pm hour. I would imagine that (unless this statistic has somehow taken that into account) this artificially increases Big Shots&#039; ratings. The ratings are, after all, measured by the (half-)hour, not the show, right, at least in overnights?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, CBS made a smart move with the CSI/Without A Trace crossover. And well enough. CSI has been a lot more elegant and worthwhile than the tired Grey&#039;s Anatomy for quite a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grey&#39;s Anatomy ran into the 10 pm hour. I would imagine that (unless this statistic has somehow taken that into account) this artificially increases Big Shots&#39; ratings. The ratings are, after all, measured by the (half-)hour, not the show, right, at least in overnights?</p>
<p>Anyway, CBS made a smart move with the CSI/Without A Trace crossover. And well enough. CSI has been a lot more elegant and worthwhile than the tired Grey&#39;s Anatomy for quite a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>^ Everwood, I hope so too. Big Shots is great...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Everwood, I hope so too. Big Shots is great&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20503</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 22:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20503</guid>
		<description>^ Everwood, I hope so too. Big Shots is great...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Everwood, I hope so too. Big Shots is great&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everwood</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>everwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Big Shots did better than ER in total viewers and 18-49.  Not by much but still better, I guess and hope that that is a positive sign for the chances that Big Shots will stick around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Shots did better than ER in total viewers and 18-49.  Not by much but still better, I guess and hope that that is a positive sign for the chances that Big Shots will stick around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everwood</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20502</link>
		<dc:creator>everwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20502</guid>
		<description>Big Shots did better than ER in total viewers and 18-49.  Not by much but still better, I guess and hope that that is a positive sign for the chances that Big Shots will stick around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Shots did better than ER in total viewers and 18-49.  Not by much but still better, I guess and hope that that is a positive sign for the chances that Big Shots will stick around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>For one thing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/29/where-has-the-comedy-genre-gone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comedy genre is waning&lt;/a&gt; and it is also up against the two most highly viewed 60 minute dramas. 

The Office does not seem to resonate with the masses.  I suspect there are a few reasons for this, but I like it the way it is (I don&#039;t resonate with the masses much myself). It consistently has &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/05/top-timeshifted-broadcast-tv-shows-oct-15-21/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a lot of DVR viewers&lt;/a&gt; (as a % of total viewers) but it&#039;s not enough to make it &lt;em&gt;mainstream&lt;/em&gt;.

The only show NBC has that consistently does better than 10 million viewers other than Sunday Night Football is &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/08/top-20-nbc-primetime-shows-oct-29-nov-4/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Heroes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one thing the <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/29/where-has-the-comedy-genre-gone/" rel="nofollow">comedy genre is waning</a> and it is also up against the two most highly viewed 60 minute dramas. </p>
<p>The Office does not seem to resonate with the masses.  I suspect there are a few reasons for this, but I like it the way it is (I don&#8217;t resonate with the masses much myself). It consistently has <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/05/top-timeshifted-broadcast-tv-shows-oct-15-21/" rel="nofollow">a lot of DVR viewers</a> (as a % of total viewers) but it&#8217;s not enough to make it <em>mainstream</em>.</p>
<p>The only show NBC has that consistently does better than 10 million viewers other than Sunday Night Football is <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/08/top-20-nbc-primetime-shows-oct-29-nov-4/" rel="nofollow"><em>Heroes</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>41 million are watching CSI and Grey&#039;s.  The Office is hanging in there considering the competition.  And its 18-49 has to make NBC smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>41 million are watching CSI and Grey&#8217;s.  The Office is hanging in there considering the competition.  And its 18-49 has to make NBC smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Why are people not watching the office? This under 10 million viewers and 6 percent of the share is no good.  I&#039;m just glad to see it&#039;s getting more share than Scrubs.....Scrubs is a fucking joke....unfortunately it isn&#039;t a funny one.  Gives me hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people not watching the office? This under 10 million viewers and 6 percent of the share is no good.  I&#8217;m just glad to see it&#8217;s getting more share than Scrubs&#8230;..Scrubs is a fucking joke&#8230;.unfortunately it isn&#8217;t a funny one.  Gives me hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20501</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20501</guid>
		<description>For one thing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/29/where-has-the-comedy-genre-gone/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comedy genre is waning&lt;/a&gt; and it is also up against the two most highly viewed 60 minute dramas. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Office does not seem to resonate with the masses.  I suspect there are a few reasons for this, but I like it the way it is (I don&#039;t resonate with the masses much myself). It consistently has &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/05/top-timeshifted-broadcast-tv-shows-oct-15-21/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a lot of DVR viewers&lt;/a&gt; (as a % of total viewers) but it&#039;s not enough to make it &lt;em&gt;mainstream&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The only show NBC has that consistently does better than 10 million viewers other than Sunday Night Football is &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/08/top-20-nbc-primetime-shows-oct-29-nov-4/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Heroes&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one thing the <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/29/where-has-the-comedy-genre-gone/" rel="nofollow">comedy genre is waning</a> and it is also up against the two most highly viewed 60 minute dramas. </p>
<p>The Office does not seem to resonate with the masses.  I suspect there are a few reasons for this, but I like it the way it is (I don&#39;t resonate with the masses much myself). It consistently has <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/05/top-timeshifted-broadcast-tv-shows-oct-15-21/" rel="nofollow">a lot of DVR viewers</a> (as a % of total viewers) but it&#39;s not enough to make it <em>mainstream</em>.</p>
<p>The only show NBC has that consistently does better than 10 million viewers other than Sunday Night Football is <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/08/top-20-nbc-primetime-shows-oct-29-nov-4/" rel="nofollow"><em>Heroes</em></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rockey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20500</link>
		<dc:creator>Rockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20500</guid>
		<description>41 million are watching CSI and Grey&#039;s.  The Office is hanging in there considering the competition.  And its 18-49 has to make NBC smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>41 million are watching CSI and Grey&#39;s.  The Office is hanging in there considering the competition.  And its 18-49 has to make NBC smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/1703#comment-20499</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/09/overnight-results-118-cbs-sweeps/#comment-20499</guid>
		<description>Why are people not watching the office? This under 10 million viewers and 6 percent of the share is no good.  I&#039;m just glad to see it&#039;s getting more share than Scrubs.....Scrubs is a fucking joke....unfortunately it isn&#039;t a funny one.  Gives me hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people not watching the office? This under 10 million viewers and 6 percent of the share is no good.  I&#39;m just glad to see it&#39;s getting more share than Scrubs&#8230;..Scrubs is a fucking joke&#8230;.unfortunately it isn&#39;t a funny one.  Gives me hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
