<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samantha Who? Tops New Shows, Nov 26 &#8211; Dec 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:56:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rena Moretti</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Moretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies was pushed artificially higher by a bigger lead-in.

The half-hour breakdown showed it lost a lot of it rapidly.

As to Gossip Girl being &quot;#1 on iTunes&quot; or having a high DVR percentage, it&#039;s all rather meaningless in view of the paucity of its ratings.

CW needs to perform major surgery, not only on its lineup, but also on its philosophy because their current approach is clearly failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies was pushed artificially higher by a bigger lead-in.</p>
<p>The half-hour breakdown showed it lost a lot of it rapidly.</p>
<p>As to Gossip Girl being &#8220;#1 on iTunes&#8221; or having a high DVR percentage, it&#8217;s all rather meaningless in view of the paucity of its ratings.</p>
<p>CW needs to perform major surgery, not only on its lineup, but also on its philosophy because their current approach is clearly failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Moretti</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20617</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Moretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20617</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies was pushed artificially higher by a bigger lead-in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The half-hour breakdown showed it lost a lot of it rapidly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to Gossip Girl being &quot;#1 on iTunes&quot; or having a high DVR percentage, it&#039;s all rather meaningless in view of the paucity of its ratings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;CW needs to perform major surgery, not only on its lineup, but also on its philosophy because their current approach is clearly failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies was pushed artificially higher by a bigger lead-in.</p>
<p>The half-hour breakdown showed it lost a lot of it rapidly.</p>
<p>As to Gossip Girl being &#8220;#1 on iTunes&#8221; or having a high DVR percentage, it&#39;s all rather meaningless in view of the paucity of its ratings.</p>
<p>CW needs to perform major surgery, not only on its lineup, but also on its philosophy because their current approach is clearly failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>I really hope GOSSIP GIRL is not cancelled. It&#039;s doing good in DVR ratings and is number 1 on itunes. Hopefully some of those viewers will move to watching it live. 

In canada, its doing pretty well for coming on at 7 pm and based on the number of people that watch tv in canada. In fact a larger proportioN of canadians are watching GOSSIP GIRL THAN AMERICANS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope GOSSIP GIRL is not cancelled. It&#8217;s doing good in DVR ratings and is number 1 on itunes. Hopefully some of those viewers will move to watching it live. </p>
<p>In canada, its doing pretty well for coming on at 7 pm and based on the number of people that watch tv in canada. In fact a larger proportioN of canadians are watching GOSSIP GIRL THAN AMERICANS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20616</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 01:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20616</guid>
		<description>I really hope GOSSIP GIRL is not cancelled. It&#039;s doing good in DVR ratings and is number 1 on itunes. Hopefully some of those viewers will move to watching it live. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In canada, its doing pretty well for coming on at 7 pm and based on the number of people that watch tv in canada. In fact a larger proportioN of canadians are watching GOSSIP GIRL THAN AMERICANS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope GOSSIP GIRL is not cancelled. It&#39;s doing good in DVR ratings and is number 1 on itunes. Hopefully some of those viewers will move to watching it live. </p>
<p>In canada, its doing pretty well for coming on at 7 pm and based on the number of people that watch tv in canada. In fact a larger proportioN of canadians are watching GOSSIP GIRL THAN AMERICANS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Moretti</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Moretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies only went up because of a better lead-in than usual.  If you look at the half-hour breakdowns it lost it in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies only went up because of a better lead-in than usual.  If you look at the half-hour breakdowns it lost it in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Moretti</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20615</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Moretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20615</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies only went up because of a better lead-in than usual.  If you look at the half-hour breakdowns it lost it in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies only went up because of a better lead-in than usual.  If you look at the half-hour breakdowns it lost it in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Moretti</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Moretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-2055</guid>
		<description>In other words, it&#039;s a season with a handful of shows doing mediocrely and all others bombing.

You&#039;d think the networks would re-think their approaches, but judging by Les Moonves&#039; recent comments, it&#039;s spin as usual in Hollywoodland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, it&#8217;s a season with a handful of shows doing mediocrely and all others bombing.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think the networks would re-think their approaches, but judging by Les Moonves&#8217; recent comments, it&#8217;s spin as usual in Hollywoodland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rena Moretti</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20614</link>
		<dc:creator>Rena Moretti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20614</guid>
		<description>In other words, it&#039;s a season with a handful of shows doing mediocrely and all others bombing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#039;d think the networks would re-think their approaches, but judging by Les Moonves&#039; recent comments, it&#039;s spin as usual in Hollywoodland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, it&#39;s a season with a handful of shows doing mediocrely and all others bombing.</p>
<p>You&#39;d think the networks would re-think their approaches, but judging by Les Moonves&#39; recent comments, it&#39;s spin as usual in Hollywoodland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>Between moving to 9pm and the end of DWTS, Samantha Who? is plummeting -- 7.53 million viewers in the overnights for 12/3!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between moving to 9pm and the end of DWTS, Samantha Who? is plummeting &#8212; 7.53 million viewers in the overnights for 12/3!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20613</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/samantha-who-tops-new-shows-nov-26-dec-2/2005#comment-20613</guid>
		<description>Between moving to 9pm and the end of DWTS, Samantha Who? is plummeting -- 7.53 million viewers in the overnights for 12/3!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between moving to 9pm and the end of DWTS, Samantha Who? is plummeting &#8212; 7.53 million viewers in the overnights for 12/3!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
