<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Bowl: Is it Really Still Super?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:50:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veep Debate TV &#8212; Beyond Boffo! &#171; NotionsCapital</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-25460</link>
		<dc:creator>Veep Debate TV &#8212; Beyond Boffo! &#171; NotionsCapital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-25460</guid>
		<description>[...] Super Bowl XLI (Feb 4 2007) only pulled Nielsen numbers of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Super Bowl XLI (Feb 4 2007) only pulled Nielsen numbers of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva G.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>Go patriots! I could care less about east coast teams, but I have to admit a monopoly-type dynasty that gets caught for cheating the game, with no consequences is pretty grossly admirable, and dare I say, American? Hell they are the Patriots:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go patriots! I could care less about east coast teams, but I have to admit a monopoly-type dynasty that gets caught for cheating the game, with no consequences is pretty grossly admirable, and dare I say, American? Hell they are the Patriots:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva G.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-17822</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-17822</guid>
		<description>Go patriots! I could care less about east coast teams, but I have to admit a monopoly-type dynasty that gets caught for cheating the game, with no consequences is pretty grossly admirable, and dare I say, American? Hell they are the Patriots:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go patriots! I could care less about east coast teams, but I have to admit a monopoly-type dynasty that gets caught for cheating the game, with no consequences is pretty grossly admirable, and dare I say, American? Hell they are the Patriots:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-3923</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-3923</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is a GREAT catch.  I may want to revise my 100 million prediction.  In the meanwhile I&#039;ll google terms like:

&lt;i&gt;Nielsen Fox Murdoch Super Bowl Ratings conspiracy&lt;/i&gt;.

Kidding! ;)  I think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is a GREAT catch.  I may want to revise my 100 million prediction.  In the meanwhile I&#8217;ll google terms like:</p>
<p><i>Nielsen Fox Murdoch Super Bowl Ratings conspiracy</i>.</p>
<p>Kidding! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-3921</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-3921</guid>
		<description>Now that I look at it with the networks included, the broadcast network may have a very large influence on the ratings.

In the last 11 years, the 4 Super Bowls that Fox broadcast are in the bottom 5 for viewership.

I&#039;m ready to call that cause and effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I look at it with the networks included, the broadcast network may have a very large influence on the ratings.</p>
<p>In the last 11 years, the 4 Super Bowls that Fox broadcast are in the bottom 5 for viewership.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m ready to call that cause and effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-17821</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-17821</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is a GREAT catch.  I may want to revise my 100 million prediction.  In the meanwhile I&#039;ll google terms like:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;Nielsen Fox Murdoch Super Bowl Ratings conspiracy&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Kidding! ;)  I think...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is a GREAT catch.  I may want to revise my 100 million prediction.  In the meanwhile I&#39;ll google terms like:</p>
<p><i>Nielsen Fox Murdoch Super Bowl Ratings conspiracy</i>.</p>
<p>Kidding! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-17820</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/01/21/super-bowl-is-it-really-still-super/2430#comment-17820</guid>
		<description>Now that I look at it with the networks included, the broadcast network may have a very large influence on the ratings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the last 11 years, the 4 Super Bowls that Fox broadcast are in the bottom 5 for viewership.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m ready to call that cause and effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I look at it with the networks included, the broadcast network may have a very large influence on the ratings.</p>
<p>In the last 11 years, the 4 Super Bowls that Fox broadcast are in the bottom 5 for viewership.</p>
<p>I&#39;m ready to call that cause and effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
