<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Cable Shows Feb 4-10: WWE vs. Future President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:24:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vinnyg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>Aww i was looking for SGA ratings as well :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww i was looking for SGA ratings as well <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnyg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15611</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15611</guid>
		<description>Aww i was looking for SGA ratings as well :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww i was looking for SGA ratings as well <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4997</guid>
		<description>Thanks Robert, I figured it was a longshot. Sadly we have to wait for SCI FI and they only release the ratings and not the actual viewers. Thanks for replying though. Oh and yes, great episode Indeed! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Robert, I figured it was a longshot. Sadly we have to wait for SCI FI and they only release the ratings and not the actual viewers. Thanks for replying though. Oh and yes, great episode Indeed! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15610</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15610</guid>
		<description>Thanks Robert, I figured it was a longshot. Sadly we have to wait for SCI FI and they only release the ratings and not the actual viewers. Thanks for replying though. Oh and yes, great episode Indeed! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Robert, I figured it was a longshot. Sadly we have to wait for SCI FI and they only release the ratings and not the actual viewers. Thanks for replying though. Oh and yes, great episode Indeed! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4991</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4991</guid>
		<description>Marc, all we get is the weekly cable top 40 and due to the President&#039;s Day holiday we won&#039;t get them until tomorrow. There is ZERO chance Stargate Atlantis will be among the top 40 programs so unless the SciFi channel releases a press release, we won&#039;t see the #s.

Great episode though and I LOVED the whole &quot;You say indeed a lot&quot;  &quot;Really?  I was not aware of that.&quot; exchange! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, all we get is the weekly cable top 40 and due to the President&#8217;s Day holiday we won&#8217;t get them until tomorrow. There is ZERO chance Stargate Atlantis will be among the top 40 programs so unless the SciFi channel releases a press release, we won&#8217;t see the #s.</p>
<p>Great episode though and I LOVED the whole &#8220;You say indeed a lot&#8221;  &#8220;Really?  I was not aware of that.&#8221; exchange! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4990</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4990</guid>
		<description>This is a longshot, but the folks here have always been friendly. Are there any numbers/ratings for Stargate Atlantis which aired on Friday @ 10/9C? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a longshot, but the folks here have always been friendly. Are there any numbers/ratings for Stargate Atlantis which aired on Friday @ 10/9C? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15609</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15609</guid>
		<description>Marc, all we get is the weekly cable top 40 and due to the President&#039;s Day holiday we won&#039;t get them until tomorrow. There is ZERO chance Stargate Atlantis will be among the top 40 programs so unless the SciFi channel releases a press release, we won&#039;t see the #s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great episode though and I LOVED the whole &quot;You say indeed a lot&quot;  &quot;Really?  I was not aware of that.&quot; exchange! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, all we get is the weekly cable top 40 and due to the President&#39;s Day holiday we won&#39;t get them until tomorrow. There is ZERO chance Stargate Atlantis will be among the top 40 programs so unless the SciFi channel releases a press release, we won&#39;t see the #s.</p>
<p>Great episode though and I LOVED the whole &#8220;You say indeed a lot&#8221;  &#8220;Really?  I was not aware of that.&#8221; exchange! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15608</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15608</guid>
		<description>This is a longshot, but the folks here have always been friendly. Are there any numbers/ratings for Stargate Atlantis which aired on Friday @ 10/9C? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a longshot, but the folks here have always been friendly. Are there any numbers/ratings for Stargate Atlantis which aired on Friday @ 10/9C? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenda francis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>thanks so much for answering the question.  is there on ranking that&#039;s more important than another in regards to how the show is doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much for answering the question.  is there on ranking that&#8217;s more important than another in regards to how the show is doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brenda francis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15607</link>
		<dc:creator>brenda francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15607</guid>
		<description>thanks so much for answering the question.  is there on ranking that&#039;s more important than another in regards to how the show is doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks so much for answering the question.  is there on ranking that&#39;s more important than another in regards to how the show is doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4697</guid>
		<description>Nielsen measures multiple things.  One thing they measure is the # of Households tuned into the show.  Based on the HH rankings, Nip Tuck ranked 14th.  

But Nielsen also measures total viewers.  Sometimes shows with a higher household rating have fewer viewers watching per house than other shows.

We believe in viewer numbers so we rank that way usually instead of by the household data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen measures multiple things.  One thing they measure is the # of Households tuned into the show.  Based on the HH rankings, Nip Tuck ranked 14th.  </p>
<p>But Nielsen also measures total viewers.  Sometimes shows with a higher household rating have fewer viewers watching per house than other shows.</p>
<p>We believe in viewer numbers so we rank that way usually instead of by the household data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Francis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>question regarding Nip/Tuck.  &quot;it ranked 14th on a cable HH ratings basis, but in viewers it ranked 27th.&quot;.  Can you explain what this means.  I don&#039;t understand this, any insight is appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>question regarding Nip/Tuck.  &#8220;it ranked 14th on a cable HH ratings basis, but in viewers it ranked 27th.&#8221;.  Can you explain what this means.  I don&#8217;t understand this, any insight is appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15606</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15606</guid>
		<description>Nielsen measures multiple things.  One thing they measure is the # of Households tuned into the show.  Based on the HH rankings, Nip Tuck ranked 14th.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Nielsen also measures total viewers.  Sometimes shows with a higher household rating have fewer viewers watching per house than other shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We believe in viewer numbers so we rank that way usually instead of by the household data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen measures multiple things.  One thing they measure is the # of Households tuned into the show.  Based on the HH rankings, Nip Tuck ranked 14th.  </p>
<p>But Nielsen also measures total viewers.  Sometimes shows with a higher household rating have fewer viewers watching per house than other shows.</p>
<p>We believe in viewer numbers so we rank that way usually instead of by the household data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Francis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15605</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15605</guid>
		<description>question regarding Nip/Tuck.  &quot;it ranked 14th on a cable HH ratings basis, but in viewers it ranked 27th.&quot;.  Can you explain what this means.  I don&#039;t understand this, any insight is appreciated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>question regarding Nip/Tuck.  &#8220;it ranked 14th on a cable HH ratings basis, but in viewers it ranked 27th.&#8221;.  Can you explain what this means.  I don&#39;t understand this, any insight is appreciated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4688</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4688</guid>
		<description>Phineas and Ferb is doing pretty well I&#039;d say.  It didn&#039;t make the top 20 this week, but it did make the top 40 with 3.31 million viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phineas and Ferb is doing pretty well I&#8217;d say.  It didn&#8217;t make the top 20 this week, but it did make the top 40 with 3.31 million viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15604</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15604</guid>
		<description>Phineas and Ferb is doing pretty well I&#039;d say.  It didn&#039;t make the top 20 this week, but it did make the top 40 with 3.31 million viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phineas and Ferb is doing pretty well I&#39;d say.  It didn&#39;t make the top 20 this week, but it did make the top 40 with 3.31 million viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaems</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>jaems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>wow! Psych dropped a good number of viewers without Monk as a lead in.  That makes me question the wisdom of burning a new Psych without pairing it with a new Monk.  Seems like USA would&#039;ve been better off having the 2 hour Monk spread over two weeks than saving for this Friday.  Of course, if Monk and Psych pick up a significant amount of viewers this week, that would be a win for the network.

Also, I&#039;m interested in how the Phineas and Ferb show is doing for Disney.  My family has had a blast with that show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! Psych dropped a good number of viewers without Monk as a lead in.  That makes me question the wisdom of burning a new Psych without pairing it with a new Monk.  Seems like USA would&#8217;ve been better off having the 2 hour Monk spread over two weeks than saving for this Friday.  Of course, if Monk and Psych pick up a significant amount of viewers this week, that would be a win for the network.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m interested in how the Phineas and Ferb show is doing for Disney.  My family has had a blast with that show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaems</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15603</link>
		<dc:creator>jaems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/12/top-cable-shows-feb-4-10-wwe-vs-future-president/2656#comment-15603</guid>
		<description>wow! Psych dropped a good number of viewers without Monk as a lead in.  That makes me question the wisdom of burning a new Psych without pairing it with a new Monk.  Seems like USA would&#039;ve been better off having the 2 hour Monk spread over two weeks than saving for this Friday.  Of course, if Monk and Psych pick up a significant amount of viewers this week, that would be a win for the network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, I&#039;m interested in how the Phineas and Ferb show is doing for Disney.  My family has had a blast with that show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! Psych dropped a good number of viewers without Monk as a lead in.  That makes me question the wisdom of burning a new Psych without pairing it with a new Monk.  Seems like USA would&#39;ve been better off having the 2 hour Monk spread over two weeks than saving for this Friday.  Of course, if Monk and Psych pick up a significant amount of viewers this week, that would be a win for the network.</p>
<p>Also, I&#39;m interested in how the Phineas and Ferb show is doing for Disney.  My family has had a blast with that show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
