<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Bigshot Strategy Blog Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:49:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vink</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13725</link>
		<dc:creator>Vink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13725</guid>
		<description>Yar. There should be a mutiny then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yar. There should be a mutiny then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13724</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13724</guid>
		<description>Vink, We neither make nor enforce the rules of the game, we just write the strategy blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vink, We neither make nor enforce the rules of the game, we just write the strategy blog <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13723</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13723</guid>
		<description>RickNick, We hope they bring it back too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RickNick, We hope they bring it back too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RickNick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13722</link>
		<dc:creator>RickNick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13722</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say that this was a great deal of fun. and ending up in the top 1.5 percent of the field was very satisfying. I would play again next year. I hope they bring it back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say that this was a great deal of fun. and ending up in the top 1.5 percent of the field was very satisfying. I would play again next year. I hope they bring it back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deadeye</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13721</link>
		<dc:creator>deadeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13721</guid>
		<description>Let me get this straight. Although the contest ends June 1st, shows that air May 25-31 do not count? Is this certain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight. Although the contest ends June 1st, shows that air May 25-31 do not count? Is this certain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13720</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13720</guid>
		<description>Thanks! You are correct, and I have edited the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! You are correct, and I have edited the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13719</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-13719</guid>
		<description>NN, I did read your earlier comments, thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the heads up on the ER and Supernatural finales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, I did read your earlier comments, thanks.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on the ER and Supernatural finales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11734</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11734</guid>
		<description>Night Nymph, I agree 100% with you in terms of preferring more LOST, but, if I was a real TV BigShot at ABC, I&#039;d definitely prefer to try and squeeze in an extra commercial pod during my most expensive show advertising wise.  LOST is one of ABC&#039;s better performers, but Grey&#039;s draws a higher premium on advertising, I believe because of its concentration of 18-34 year old women.

When it comes to making the most money possible, I&#039;d say they&#039;re doing the right thing when it comes to Grey&#039;s overrun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night Nymph, I agree 100% with you in terms of preferring more LOST, but, if I was a real TV BigShot at ABC, I&#8217;d definitely prefer to try and squeeze in an extra commercial pod during my most expensive show advertising wise.  LOST is one of ABC&#8217;s better performers, but Grey&#8217;s draws a higher premium on advertising, I believe because of its concentration of 18-34 year old women.</p>
<p>When it comes to making the most money possible, I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re doing the right thing when it comes to Grey&#8217;s overrun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11732</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11732</guid>
		<description>Bill:
Oh wow, thanks, because I never would&#039;ve figured that out on my own. But now that you explain it it makes sense, even if the overrun stuff is pretty annoying in my opinion. It seems that it would be so arbitrary and/or influenced by whatever show comes next - otherwise it would make little sense to me that all of a sudden Grey&#039;s would pick up a whole bunch of viewers for the last 2 or 3 minutes. And if LOST came next would people then turn the channel after 2 or 3 minutes? (I&#039;d watch LOST myself). Very weird and confusing.

Personally, I wish the networks would cut it out with all of the overrun stuff - especially since in the Grey&#039;s case, I&#039;d rather have a couple more minutes of LOST if I had my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill:<br />
Oh wow, thanks, because I never would&#8217;ve figured that out on my own. But now that you explain it it makes sense, even if the overrun stuff is pretty annoying in my opinion. It seems that it would be so arbitrary and/or influenced by whatever show comes next &#8211; otherwise it would make little sense to me that all of a sudden Grey&#8217;s would pick up a whole bunch of viewers for the last 2 or 3 minutes. And if LOST came next would people then turn the channel after 2 or 3 minutes? (I&#8217;d watch LOST myself). Very weird and confusing.</p>
<p>Personally, I wish the networks would cut it out with all of the overrun stuff &#8211; especially since in the Grey&#8217;s case, I&#8217;d rather have a couple more minutes of LOST if I had my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11606</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11606</guid>
		<description>NN, I asked the TVBigshot folks and here&#039;s the situation.

Both shows ran a bit past 10pm.

For the 9-10pm hour, CSI won with a 10.66 vs. Grey&#039;s 10.65.

However, for the 10-11 overrun Grey&#039;s had a 13.52 and CSI a 9.51. The overrun doesn&#039;t count for the timeslot points for TVBS though.

The overrun did boost Grey&#039;s overall to 10.74 HH rating while CSI had a 10.64, that&#039;s how it could make the top 5 without winning its timeslot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, I asked the TVBigshot folks and here&#8217;s the situation.</p>
<p>Both shows ran a bit past 10pm.</p>
<p>For the 9-10pm hour, CSI won with a 10.66 vs. Grey&#8217;s 10.65.</p>
<p>However, for the 10-11 overrun Grey&#8217;s had a 13.52 and CSI a 9.51. The overrun doesn&#8217;t count for the timeslot points for TVBS though.</p>
<p>The overrun did boost Grey&#8217;s overall to 10.74 HH rating while CSI had a 10.64, that&#8217;s how it could make the top 5 without winning its timeslot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11571</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11571</guid>
		<description>NN, You are correct! I get the Top 5/Timeslot list directly from the TVBigshot folks and didn&#039;t even look at that one before I posted it. I&#039;ll make sure things get corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NN, You are correct! I get the Top 5/Timeslot list directly from the TVBigshot folks and didn&#8217;t even look at that one before I posted it. I&#8217;ll make sure things get corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night Nymph13</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11569</link>
		<dc:creator>Night Nymph13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 05:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11569</guid>
		<description>Hello Bill: 
Though this only has a very, very small thing to do with strategy for people, but the timeslot winners have to be a little off for the top 5/timeslots posted on the 29th.

Though it pains me to say it, because I usually choose CSI over Grey&#039;s Anatomy for my line-up (though I don&#039;t watch either - ever) and this past week it appeared to be a good strategy, it couldn&#039;t have won the 9 o&#039;clock time slot for that week (the one summarized on the 29th in your post) if Grey&#039;s Anatomy was the final top 5 (since the two shows share a timeslot). It appears that it was very close according to the ratings link (Grey&#039;s won by .1 rating point), but for those players who look back at your rankings blogs to help choose their shows, it might be confusing to have CSI as the winner for the 9 o&#039;clock time slot on Thrusday, but Grey&#039;s as the top 5 winner. (It was for me anyway, hence my research - though in the end I&#039;ll likely stick with CSI again, it just won&#039;t be as confident a pick as it was before I found CSI did not win its slot for that time period).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bill:<br />
Though this only has a very, very small thing to do with strategy for people, but the timeslot winners have to be a little off for the top 5/timeslots posted on the 29th.</p>
<p>Though it pains me to say it, because I usually choose CSI over Grey&#8217;s Anatomy for my line-up (though I don&#8217;t watch either &#8211; ever) and this past week it appeared to be a good strategy, it couldn&#8217;t have won the 9 o&#8217;clock time slot for that week (the one summarized on the 29th in your post) if Grey&#8217;s Anatomy was the final top 5 (since the two shows share a timeslot). It appears that it was very close according to the ratings link (Grey&#8217;s won by .1 rating point), but for those players who look back at your rankings blogs to help choose their shows, it might be confusing to have CSI as the winner for the 9 o&#8217;clock time slot on Thrusday, but Grey&#8217;s as the top 5 winner. (It was for me anyway, hence my research &#8211; though in the end I&#8217;ll likely stick with CSI again, it just won&#8217;t be as confident a pick as it was before I found CSI did not win its slot for that time period).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11150</guid>
		<description>Mr. SFTV -

The trick is to take those shows that go on hiatus out of your lineup on Sunday and then go back in and rebuy them on Mon/Tues and then sell them again on Wed/Thurs/Fri to get the added value. Then you replace them by the Sunday.  It costs a million per transaction and it&#039;s a little more work, but that&#039;s what the leaders have been doing since the get go (and me since December).

p.s. I&#039;ve gone from 2500th place to 380th during that stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. SFTV -</p>
<p>The trick is to take those shows that go on hiatus out of your lineup on Sunday and then go back in and rebuy them on Mon/Tues and then sell them again on Wed/Thurs/Fri to get the added value. Then you replace them by the Sunday.  It costs a million per transaction and it&#8217;s a little more work, but that&#8217;s what the leaders have been doing since the get go (and me since December).</p>
<p>p.s. I&#8217;ve gone from 2500th place to 380th during that stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11136</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11136</guid>
		<description>Joslyn, if I were king of the ratings world total eyeballs would be the most important statistic, but the game&#039;s point system is driven off of the Nielsen &quot;household rating&quot;, and Nielsen itself still uses this as it&#039;s default ranking system.  For most of the data on *our* site, we rank by total viewers, but the game ranks by HH ratings points.

While CSI had more viewers per household, Grey&#039;s had more households and so it ranked higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joslyn, if I were king of the ratings world total eyeballs would be the most important statistic, but the game&#8217;s point system is driven off of the Nielsen &#8220;household rating&#8221;, and Nielsen itself still uses this as it&#8217;s default ranking system.  For most of the data on *our* site, we rank by total viewers, but the game ranks by HH ratings points.</p>
<p>While CSI had more viewers per household, Grey&#8217;s had more households and so it ranked higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joslyn Hansen</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11131</link>
		<dc:creator>Joslyn Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-11131</guid>
		<description>I hope this is an ok place to ask this, but looking at the bonus points, etc - how is Grey&#039;s Anatomy a top 5 show without even winning it&#039;s timeslot? If CSI beat it on Thurs in total viewers, shouldn&#039;t CSI be the #5 show of the week behind Idol and DWTS? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this is an ok place to ask this, but looking at the bonus points, etc &#8211; how is Grey&#8217;s Anatomy a top 5 show without even winning it&#8217;s timeslot? If CSI beat it on Thurs in total viewers, shouldn&#8217;t CSI be the #5 show of the week behind Idol and DWTS? Any clarification would be greatly appreciated! Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10833</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10833</guid>
		<description>Ike, I think I &lt;s&gt;may&lt;/s&gt; might just block your ability to comment :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike, I think I <s>may</s> might just block your ability to comment <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10832</guid>
		<description>Apostrophe abuse strikes again: In your advice for 4/30, you say &quot;Law &amp; Order&#039;s did a preliminary 9.0 last night.&quot;  It should be &quot;Law &amp; Order did....&quot;  Or &quot;Law &amp; Order&#039;s new episode did....&quot;  As always, I apologize for being such a nitpicker.  What can I say?  Apostrophe abuse must be fought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apostrophe abuse strikes again: In your advice for 4/30, you say &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8217;s did a preliminary 9.0 last night.&#8221;  It should be &#8220;Law &amp; Order did&#8230;.&#8221;  Or &#8220;Law &amp; Order&#8217;s new episode did&#8230;.&#8221;  As always, I apologize for being such a nitpicker.  What can I say?  Apostrophe abuse must be fought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10549</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10549</guid>
		<description>Indeed, I had confused the CSI price/results and the CSI:NY schedule position, thanks once again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, I had confused the CSI price/results and the CSI:NY schedule position, thanks once again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pretzelgirl</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10537</link>
		<dc:creator>pretzelgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10537</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,
CSI: NY is at 86 million, not 125. It might not be worth the money at that price either, but it&#039;s a little bit more reasonable than a 125 million dollar show would be.
pretzelgirl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,<br />
CSI: NY is at 86 million, not 125. It might not be worth the money at that price either, but it&#8217;s a little bit more reasonable than a 125 million dollar show would be.<br />
pretzelgirl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. SFTV</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10476</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. SFTV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10476</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the inconsistencies of the game.  They put Celebrity Apprentice on hiatus quickly, so it was not available to buy on the Monday and Tuesday before the final price increase.   In order to get the price increase, you would have had to keep it in your lineup through the Sunday night schedule lock, thus getting zero points for it that week, but getting the money boost on Wednesday. I think they also did the same thing with New Adventures of Old Christine.

However, this week, both Oprah and Biggest Loser were left in active status with bogus &quot;next air dates&quot; so that you could buy them on Monday and Tuesday to get the price increase without hanging on to them.

Eli Stone, Amnesia, Just For Laughs, Here Come the Newlyweds, New Amsterdam and a few others that have ended are still listed and active with a bogus &quot;next air date&quot;.  That&#039;s been a major issue with the game that they don&#039;t seem to be able to resolve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one of the inconsistencies of the game.  They put Celebrity Apprentice on hiatus quickly, so it was not available to buy on the Monday and Tuesday before the final price increase.   In order to get the price increase, you would have had to keep it in your lineup through the Sunday night schedule lock, thus getting zero points for it that week, but getting the money boost on Wednesday. I think they also did the same thing with New Adventures of Old Christine.</p>
<p>However, this week, both Oprah and Biggest Loser were left in active status with bogus &#8220;next air dates&#8221; so that you could buy them on Monday and Tuesday to get the price increase without hanging on to them.</p>
<p>Eli Stone, Amnesia, Just For Laughs, Here Come the Newlyweds, New Amsterdam and a few others that have ended are still listed and active with a bogus &#8220;next air date&#8221;.  That&#8217;s been a major issue with the game that they don&#8217;t seem to be able to resolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10327</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10327</guid>
		<description>Looks like both Oprah (+7) &amp; Biggest Loser (+13) got the $ increase, so both would have been a good purchase for this update. I wish I had realized this earlier about &quot;hiatus&quot; shows as I could have made some money on the Celeb. Apprentice finale. Oh well. Live &amp; learn! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like both Oprah (+7) &amp; Biggest Loser (+13) got the $ increase, so both would have been a good purchase for this update. I wish I had realized this earlier about &#8220;hiatus&#8221; shows as I could have made some money on the Celeb. Apprentice finale. Oh well. Live &amp; learn! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10306</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10306</guid>
		<description>Marc, Now that I read your comment, I may have made a mistake with my &quot;correction&quot;.

Oprah and Biggest Loser may still reset their prices upwards on Wednesday morning, even though they are finished for the year. I don&#039;t know, the rules confuse me at times as well.

I&#039;m going to remove both of them from the post entirely since I&#039;m not sure any longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, Now that I read your comment, I may have made a mistake with my &#8220;correction&#8221;.</p>
<p>Oprah and Biggest Loser may still reset their prices upwards on Wednesday morning, even though they are finished for the year. I don&#8217;t know, the rules confuse me at times as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to remove both of them from the post entirely since I&#8217;m not sure any longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10304</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10304</guid>
		<description>If we already have a show(s) in our lineup that are finished for the season &amp; going on &quot;hiatus&quot; would we still get the $ increase in our budgets? Still confused on this, as I dumped Celeb. Apprentice after its finale but before the price change (and it increased). I have Biggest Loser but didn&#039;t dump it yet as I was going to see if I got the $ bump this time THEN would dump it. Thanks for clearing this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we already have a show(s) in our lineup that are finished for the season &amp; going on &#8220;hiatus&#8221; would we still get the $ increase in our budgets? Still confused on this, as I dumped Celeb. Apprentice after its finale but before the price change (and it increased). I have Biggest Loser but didn&#8217;t dump it yet as I was going to see if I got the $ bump this time THEN would dump it. Thanks for clearing this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10293</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10293</guid>
		<description>Deadeye, thanks for the corrections. I have updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deadeye, thanks for the corrections. I have updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10289</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/tv-bigshot-blog-posts-discussion/2785#comment-10289</guid>
		<description>Indeed, last week&#039;s episodes were the finales for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, last week&#8217;s episodes were the finales for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
