<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings for Thur, Feb 28: FOX Cannot Be Stopped</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:01:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kayarn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5609</link>
		<dc:creator>kayarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5609</guid>
		<description>from a business perspective obviously they matter. but i think most of us are simply fans of these show, and could really care less if disney pulls in $50 million in profit off the show or $55 million or $30 million. so long is the show is on the air and we can see it, thats what matters.

and lost doesnt have to worry about its life on the air, it&#039;ll play out as intended and we&#039;ll get the all the episodes that the producers wanted to make (even with the strike, they said they will give us those extra 3 episodes at some point).

its more interesting to focus on jericho and fnl because they live and die week to week with these numbers. lost doesnt. so kind of worrying about if they are up or down or whatever is more or less irrelevant to the tv fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from a business perspective obviously they matter. but i think most of us are simply fans of these show, and could really care less if disney pulls in $50 million in profit off the show or $55 million or $30 million. so long is the show is on the air and we can see it, thats what matters.</p>
<p>and lost doesnt have to worry about its life on the air, it&#8217;ll play out as intended and we&#8217;ll get the all the episodes that the producers wanted to make (even with the strike, they said they will give us those extra 3 episodes at some point).</p>
<p>its more interesting to focus on jericho and fnl because they live and die week to week with these numbers. lost doesnt. so kind of worrying about if they are up or down or whatever is more or less irrelevant to the tv fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayarn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17106</link>
		<dc:creator>kayarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17106</guid>
		<description>from a business perspective obviously they matter. but i think most of us are simply fans of these show, and could really care less if disney pulls in $50 million in profit off the show or $55 million or $30 million. so long is the show is on the air and we can see it, thats what matters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and lost doesnt have to worry about its life on the air, it&#039;ll play out as intended and we&#039;ll get the all the episodes that the producers wanted to make (even with the strike, they said they will give us those extra 3 episodes at some point).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;its more interesting to focus on jericho and fnl because they live and die week to week with these numbers. lost doesnt. so kind of worrying about if they are up or down or whatever is more or less irrelevant to the tv fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from a business perspective obviously they matter. but i think most of us are simply fans of these show, and could really care less if disney pulls in $50 million in profit off the show or $55 million or $30 million. so long is the show is on the air and we can see it, thats what matters.</p>
<p>and lost doesnt have to worry about its life on the air, it&#39;ll play out as intended and we&#39;ll get the all the episodes that the producers wanted to make (even with the strike, they said they will give us those extra 3 episodes at some point).</p>
<p>its more interesting to focus on jericho and fnl because they live and die week to week with these numbers. lost doesnt. so kind of worrying about if they are up or down or whatever is more or less irrelevant to the tv fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>Bryan, et al.  When I comment on LOST&#039;s ratings, it is not relevant (at least not currently) at all in terms of being canceled.  The show has well over 10m viewers still regardless, and always seems to win the 18-49 demo.  Further, unlike Jericho where we can talk about the online viewing and whatnot, we KNOW Lost sells over a million units of its DVD seasons (another $50 millionish per season in revenue stream).

However, diminishing viewers are indicative of what will likely be diminishing advertising rates and that&#039;s fair game for us to look at.

It will be interesting to see what happens when the show moves to 10pm.  While I have no doubt it will win the timeslot and the 18-49 demo, I&#039;m curious about how many more viewers, if any, will bleed away.

Let me reaffirm my love of LOST.  Last Thursday&#039;s episode was one of the best hours (43 minutes) of episodic television I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, et al.  When I comment on LOST&#8217;s ratings, it is not relevant (at least not currently) at all in terms of being canceled.  The show has well over 10m viewers still regardless, and always seems to win the 18-49 demo.  Further, unlike Jericho where we can talk about the online viewing and whatnot, we KNOW Lost sells over a million units of its DVD seasons (another $50 millionish per season in revenue stream).</p>
<p>However, diminishing viewers are indicative of what will likely be diminishing advertising rates and that&#8217;s fair game for us to look at.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what happens when the show moves to 10pm.  While I have no doubt it will win the timeslot and the 18-49 demo, I&#8217;m curious about how many more viewers, if any, will bleed away.</p>
<p>Let me reaffirm my love of LOST.  Last Thursday&#8217;s episode was one of the best hours (43 minutes) of episodic television I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 17:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>LOST does not have to worry about rating. they are in till the end 2010 i think. They made a deal to end the show then with ABC so they can actually have a finish. ABC is committed and LOST stays even if it was under 10m people. Although as we get toward the end I think more and more people will tune in and want to see how it ends.  So everyone move on and start saving Jerhico and Friday night lights They need our support!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOST does not have to worry about rating. they are in till the end 2010 i think. They made a deal to end the show then with ABC so they can actually have a finish. ABC is committed and LOST stays even if it was under 10m people. Although as we get toward the end I think more and more people will tune in and want to see how it ends.  So everyone move on and start saving Jerhico and Friday night lights They need our support!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17105</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17105</guid>
		<description>Bryan, et al.  When I comment on LOST&#039;s ratings, it is not relevant (at least not currently) at all in terms of being canceled.  The show has well over 10m viewers still regardless, and always seems to win the 18-49 demo.  Further, unlike Jericho where we can talk about the online viewing and whatnot, we KNOW Lost sells over a million units of its DVD seasons (another $50 millionish per season in revenue stream).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, diminishing viewers are indicative of what will likely be diminishing advertising rates and that&#039;s fair game for us to look at.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will be interesting to see what happens when the show moves to 10pm.  While I have no doubt it will win the timeslot and the 18-49 demo, I&#039;m curious about how many more viewers, if any, will bleed away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Let me reaffirm my love of LOST.  Last Thursday&#039;s episode was one of the best hours (43 minutes) of episodic television I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan, et al.  When I comment on LOST&#39;s ratings, it is not relevant (at least not currently) at all in terms of being canceled.  The show has well over 10m viewers still regardless, and always seems to win the 18-49 demo.  Further, unlike Jericho where we can talk about the online viewing and whatnot, we KNOW Lost sells over a million units of its DVD seasons (another $50 millionish per season in revenue stream).</p>
<p>However, diminishing viewers are indicative of what will likely be diminishing advertising rates and that&#39;s fair game for us to look at.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what happens when the show moves to 10pm.  While I have no doubt it will win the timeslot and the 18-49 demo, I&#39;m curious about how many more viewers, if any, will bleed away.</p>
<p>Let me reaffirm my love of LOST.  Last Thursday&#39;s episode was one of the best hours (43 minutes) of episodic television I&#39;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17104</guid>
		<description>LOST does not have to worry about rating. they are in till the end 2010 i think. They made a deal to end the show then with ABC so they can actually have a finish. ABC is committed and LOST stays even if it was under 10m people. Although as we get toward the end I think more and more people will tune in and want to see how it ends.  So everyone move on and start saving Jerhico and Friday night lights They need our support!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOST does not have to worry about rating. they are in till the end 2010 i think. They made a deal to end the show then with ABC so they can actually have a finish. ABC is committed and LOST stays even if it was under 10m people. Although as we get toward the end I think more and more people will tune in and want to see how it ends.  So everyone move on and start saving Jerhico and Friday night lights They need our support!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5574</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5574</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone making a huge deal out of the fact that Lost is losing its viewerships. So what, some of them are even bringing out ridiculous theory as to why Lost is losing its viewership. 

The season premiere of New Lost might have sparked some positive reviews but the fact is that people are watching it on their own time. That means that some Tivo it, or download and watch it later, or even watch it online. These shows can be watched later when we have all these internet to watch it with COMMERCIAL free.

There are other shows like American Idol, Survivor: Fans vs Favorites which are consistent or doing better week to week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone making a huge deal out of the fact that Lost is losing its viewerships. So what, some of them are even bringing out ridiculous theory as to why Lost is losing its viewership. </p>
<p>The season premiere of New Lost might have sparked some positive reviews but the fact is that people are watching it on their own time. That means that some Tivo it, or download and watch it later, or even watch it online. These shows can be watched later when we have all these internet to watch it with COMMERCIAL free.</p>
<p>There are other shows like American Idol, Survivor: Fans vs Favorites which are consistent or doing better week to week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5573</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5573</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100% (although Dick Wolf, NBC, USA et al are an exceptional situation).

I think the main reason is that there is not enough profit room for big production-cost shows that you mentioned to make money on cable... yet.  If the networks keep losing share to cable that may change things.

Greedy producers are once again the problem.  To get &#039;good&#039; talent, you have to pay.  To have a &#039;good&#039; show you have to have talent.
Most producers would rather try another, new premise than continue on with a marginally profitable older show that hasn&#039;t shown that snap, crackle, pop they were hoping for. They all want that &#039;Next, Big Thing&#039;.  Also, no one is building new studios in Hollywood.  You need a &#039;big&#039; hit to keep your square footage.

The whole landscape needs to change... and that just might happen with these new Guild contracts, the ratings on Reality, Net-to-TV (and vice-versa), cable-viewer inroads, etc.  It&#039;s gonna be a new age for TV, shortly and I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m gonna like it if &#039;only&#039; profit-margin is still the number one driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100% (although Dick Wolf, NBC, USA et al are an exceptional situation).</p>
<p>I think the main reason is that there is not enough profit room for big production-cost shows that you mentioned to make money on cable&#8230; yet.  If the networks keep losing share to cable that may change things.</p>
<p>Greedy producers are once again the problem.  To get &#8216;good&#8217; talent, you have to pay.  To have a &#8216;good&#8217; show you have to have talent.<br />
Most producers would rather try another, new premise than continue on with a marginally profitable older show that hasn&#8217;t shown that snap, crackle, pop they were hoping for. They all want that &#8216;Next, Big Thing&#8217;.  Also, no one is building new studios in Hollywood.  You need a &#8216;big&#8217; hit to keep your square footage.</p>
<p>The whole landscape needs to change&#8230; and that just might happen with these new Guild contracts, the ratings on Reality, Net-to-TV (and vice-versa), cable-viewer inroads, etc.  It&#8217;s gonna be a new age for TV, shortly and I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m gonna like it if &#8216;only&#8217; profit-margin is still the number one driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17103</guid>
		<description>Why is everyone making a huge deal out of the fact that Lost is losing its viewerships. So what, some of them are even bringing out ridiculous theory as to why Lost is losing its viewership. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The season premiere of New Lost might have sparked some positive reviews but the fact is that people are watching it on their own time. That means that some Tivo it, or download and watch it later, or even watch it online. These shows can be watched later when we have all these internet to watch it with COMMERCIAL free.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are other shows like American Idol, Survivor: Fans vs Favorites which are consistent or doing better week to week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone making a huge deal out of the fact that Lost is losing its viewerships. So what, some of them are even bringing out ridiculous theory as to why Lost is losing its viewership. </p>
<p>The season premiere of New Lost might have sparked some positive reviews but the fact is that people are watching it on their own time. That means that some Tivo it, or download and watch it later, or even watch it online. These shows can be watched later when we have all these internet to watch it with COMMERCIAL free.</p>
<p>There are other shows like American Idol, Survivor: Fans vs Favorites which are consistent or doing better week to week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17102</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100% (although Dick Wolf, NBC, USA et al are an exceptional situation).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the main reason is that there is not enough profit room for big production-cost shows that you mentioned to make money on cable... yet.  If the networks keep losing share to cable that may change things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Greedy producers are once again the problem.  To get &#039;good&#039; talent, you have to pay.  To have a &#039;good&#039; show you have to have talent.&lt;br&gt;Most producers would rather try another, new premise than continue on with a marginally profitable older show that hasn&#039;t shown that snap, crackle, pop they were hoping for. They all want that &#039;Next, Big Thing&#039;.  Also, no one is building new studios in Hollywood.  You need a &#039;big&#039; hit to keep your square footage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole landscape needs to change... and that just might happen with these new Guild contracts, the ratings on Reality, Net-to-TV (and vice-versa), cable-viewer inroads, etc.  It&#039;s gonna be a new age for TV, shortly and I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m gonna like it if &#039;only&#039; profit-margin is still the number one driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100% (although Dick Wolf, NBC, USA et al are an exceptional situation).</p>
<p>I think the main reason is that there is not enough profit room for big production-cost shows that you mentioned to make money on cable&#8230; yet.  If the networks keep losing share to cable that may change things.</p>
<p>Greedy producers are once again the problem.  To get &#39;good&#39; talent, you have to pay.  To have a &#39;good&#39; show you have to have talent.<br />Most producers would rather try another, new premise than continue on with a marginally profitable older show that hasn&#39;t shown that snap, crackle, pop they were hoping for. They all want that &#39;Next, Big Thing&#39;.  Also, no one is building new studios in Hollywood.  You need a &#39;big&#39; hit to keep your square footage.</p>
<p>The whole landscape needs to change&#8230; and that just might happen with these new Guild contracts, the ratings on Reality, Net-to-TV (and vice-versa), cable-viewer inroads, etc.  It&#39;s gonna be a new age for TV, shortly and I&#39;m not sure I&#39;m gonna like it if &#39;only&#39; profit-margin is still the number one driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5570</guid>
		<description>Jon, of course I understand the economics to that extent.

What I don&#039;t understand is why a borderline successful show, like Jericho, Cane, Friday Night Lights, Journeyman typically simply disappears if it is unable to make its economics work on broadcast TV.

Why aren&#039;t shows like that *routinely* dropped down to a cable channel, with their costs trimmed at the same time?

That&#039;s my understanding of what happened to Law &amp; Order: CI&#039;s move to USA. NBC didn&#039;t want to pay Dick Wolf the &quot;broadcast&quot; price, but they&#039;d pay him the &quot;USA Cable&quot; price, which was obviously more than the &quot;cancelled&quot; price.

Why doesn&#039;t that happen more often?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, of course I understand the economics to that extent.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is why a borderline successful show, like Jericho, Cane, Friday Night Lights, Journeyman typically simply disappears if it is unable to make its economics work on broadcast TV.</p>
<p>Why aren&#8217;t shows like that *routinely* dropped down to a cable channel, with their costs trimmed at the same time?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my understanding of what happened to Law &#038; Order: CI&#8217;s move to USA. NBC didn&#8217;t want to pay Dick Wolf the &#8220;broadcast&#8221; price, but they&#8217;d pay him the &#8220;USA Cable&#8221; price, which was obviously more than the &#8220;cancelled&#8221; price.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t that happen more often?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayarn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator>kayarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5568</guid>
		<description>Lost&#039;s ratings are more or less meaningless. The show has been picked up for a 5th season. There is a 0% chance that the 6th and final season doesn&#039;t get picked up by ABC. I mean, if they don&#039;t, plenty of other networks would bend of backwards to pick up the show, complete with a ridiculous fan campaign.

So yea, who cares. Other shows ratings are interesting because their lives depend on it. But that is not the case with LOST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost&#8217;s ratings are more or less meaningless. The show has been picked up for a 5th season. There is a 0% chance that the 6th and final season doesn&#8217;t get picked up by ABC. I mean, if they don&#8217;t, plenty of other networks would bend of backwards to pick up the show, complete with a ridiculous fan campaign.</p>
<p>So yea, who cares. Other shows ratings are interesting because their lives depend on it. But that is not the case with LOST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5566</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5566</guid>
		<description>Lost could never sustain a HUGE following because of the nature of the show.  It can&#039;t gain new viewers so easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost could never sustain a HUGE following because of the nature of the show.  It can&#8217;t gain new viewers so easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17101</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17101</guid>
		<description>Jon, of course I understand the economics to that extent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I don&#039;t understand is why a borderline successful show, like Jericho, Cane, Friday Night Lights, Journeyman typically simply disappears if it is unable to make its economics work on broadcast TV.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why aren&#039;t shows like that *routinely* dropped down to a cable channel, with their costs trimmed at the same time?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s my understanding of what happened to Law &amp; Order: CI&#039;s move to USA. NBC didn&#039;t want to pay Dick Wolf the &quot;broadcast&quot; price, but they&#039;d pay him the &quot;USA Cable&quot; price, which was obviously more than the &quot;cancelled&quot; price.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why doesn&#039;t that happen more often?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, of course I understand the economics to that extent.</p>
<p>What I don&#39;t understand is why a borderline successful show, like Jericho, Cane, Friday Night Lights, Journeyman typically simply disappears if it is unable to make its economics work on broadcast TV.</p>
<p>Why aren&#39;t shows like that *routinely* dropped down to a cable channel, with their costs trimmed at the same time?</p>
<p>That&#39;s my understanding of what happened to Law &#038; Order: CI&#39;s move to USA. NBC didn&#39;t want to pay Dick Wolf the &#8220;broadcast&#8221; price, but they&#39;d pay him the &#8220;USA Cable&#8221; price, which was obviously more than the &#8220;cancelled&#8221; price.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#39;t that happen more often?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayarn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17100</link>
		<dc:creator>kayarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17100</guid>
		<description>Lost&#039;s ratings are more or less meaningless. The show has been picked up for a 5th season. There is a 0% chance that the 6th and final season doesn&#039;t get picked up by ABC. I mean, if they don&#039;t, plenty of other networks would bend of backwards to pick up the show, complete with a ridiculous fan campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So yea, who cares. Other shows ratings are interesting because their lives depend on it. But that is not the case with LOST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost&#39;s ratings are more or less meaningless. The show has been picked up for a 5th season. There is a 0% chance that the 6th and final season doesn&#39;t get picked up by ABC. I mean, if they don&#39;t, plenty of other networks would bend of backwards to pick up the show, complete with a ridiculous fan campaign.</p>
<p>So yea, who cares. Other shows ratings are interesting because their lives depend on it. But that is not the case with LOST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17099</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17099</guid>
		<description>Lost could never sustain a HUGE following because of the nature of the show.  It can&#039;t gain new viewers so easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost could never sustain a HUGE following because of the nature of the show.  It can&#39;t gain new viewers so easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5564</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5564</guid>
		<description>I can understand Lost not gaining in viewership, but how in the world can it be losing viewers? This is the best season yet - IMO. It has to be attributed to DVR/Tivo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand Lost not gaining in viewership, but how in the world can it be losing viewers? This is the best season yet &#8211; IMO. It has to be attributed to DVR/Tivo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5563</guid>
		<description>Bill - There is a real bottom line on determining whether a show is profitable for a network.

How much does a 1/2 hour of programming cost to buy or put on the air vs. how much advertising money can it bring in p/hh.

If a  show cost $4 million per 1/2 hour and I sell $6m in advertising, I&#039;ve made $2m for the 30 minutes.  If I can get one hour for only $3m and I sell only $8m for the hour, I&#039;ve made $2.5m per 30 minutes.

That&#039;s why &#039;According to Jim&#039; can stay on when another, better show might get cancelled.  Does everyone remember when the six &quot;Friends&quot; wanted $1m each per episode.  That had to have cost NBC $8-10m for a half hour show.  But the advertisers were on board (although, not for long).

AmIdol doesn&#039;t cost that much to make (although Crowell prob makes a mint... he&#039;s in a very nimble negotiating position because he has next to no &#039;talent&#039; to pay).  Popular ensemble-cast shows have their cost go up every year (through contract renegotiations) until they finally become to expensive to produce and there is no room for the network to make money.

Cost per half hour vs. revenue per half hour - Deal or No Deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; There is a real bottom line on determining whether a show is profitable for a network.</p>
<p>How much does a 1/2 hour of programming cost to buy or put on the air vs. how much advertising money can it bring in p/hh.</p>
<p>If a  show cost $4 million per 1/2 hour and I sell $6m in advertising, I&#8217;ve made $2m for the 30 minutes.  If I can get one hour for only $3m and I sell only $8m for the hour, I&#8217;ve made $2.5m per 30 minutes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why &#8216;According to Jim&#8217; can stay on when another, better show might get cancelled.  Does everyone remember when the six &#8220;Friends&#8221; wanted $1m each per episode.  That had to have cost NBC $8-10m for a half hour show.  But the advertisers were on board (although, not for long).</p>
<p>AmIdol doesn&#8217;t cost that much to make (although Crowell prob makes a mint&#8230; he&#8217;s in a very nimble negotiating position because he has next to no &#8216;talent&#8217; to pay).  Popular ensemble-cast shows have their cost go up every year (through contract renegotiations) until they finally become to expensive to produce and there is no room for the network to make money.</p>
<p>Cost per half hour vs. revenue per half hour &#8211; Deal or No Deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17098</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17098</guid>
		<description>I can understand Lost not gaining in viewership, but how in the world can it be losing viewers? This is the best season yet - IMO. It has to be attributed to DVR/Tivo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand Lost not gaining in viewership, but how in the world can it be losing viewers? This is the best season yet &#8211; IMO. It has to be attributed to DVR/Tivo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5562</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5562</guid>
		<description>Brian, the same reasons that make it hard to pick up Lost mid-stream would make it terrible for syndication [that plus the 60 min run time].

Look at any of our &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/top-syndicated-shows-february-11-17/2780&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 20 Syndicated shows&lt;/a&gt;. Just 2 hour long dramas, and neither of them really has any back story requirement to understand what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, the same reasons that make it hard to pick up Lost mid-stream would make it terrible for syndication [that plus the 60 min run time].</p>
<p>Look at any of our <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/top-syndicated-shows-february-11-17/2780" rel="nofollow">Top 20 Syndicated shows</a>. Just 2 hour long dramas, and neither of them really has any back story requirement to understand what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5561</guid>
		<description>Lost is easily my favorite TV drama ever...

BUT, from talking to people about the show, there really is a cap to how many viewers it can pull in each week.

Lost&#039;s potential viewers can be pooled into 4 groups:
1. Diehards - will watch every week - probably 10 million people.
2. In-and-Outs - watch occasionally but do not plan their schedule around seeing the show - watch every other week or so - probably 3-7 million people.
3. Flakes - people who started out watching but got confused or frustrated and stopped watching - probably another 5-10 million people who are not watching anymore.
4. Ignorants - people who never gave it a chance and have never seen it - the rest of the population.

Lost&#039;s problem is that it has so much depth that it&#039;s hard to pick it up after one episode in the 4th season.  In order for anyone to start watching the show, they need to start from the beginning with DVDs.

ABC needs to seriously consider putting the first 3 seasons into syndication.  This would allow the 4th group of people to start watching the show without having to spend $200+ for the DVDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost is easily my favorite TV drama ever&#8230;</p>
<p>BUT, from talking to people about the show, there really is a cap to how many viewers it can pull in each week.</p>
<p>Lost&#8217;s potential viewers can be pooled into 4 groups:<br />
1. Diehards &#8211; will watch every week &#8211; probably 10 million people.<br />
2. In-and-Outs &#8211; watch occasionally but do not plan their schedule around seeing the show &#8211; watch every other week or so &#8211; probably 3-7 million people.<br />
3. Flakes &#8211; people who started out watching but got confused or frustrated and stopped watching &#8211; probably another 5-10 million people who are not watching anymore.<br />
4. Ignorants &#8211; people who never gave it a chance and have never seen it &#8211; the rest of the population.</p>
<p>Lost&#8217;s problem is that it has so much depth that it&#8217;s hard to pick it up after one episode in the 4th season.  In order for anyone to start watching the show, they need to start from the beginning with DVDs.</p>
<p>ABC needs to seriously consider putting the first 3 seasons into syndication.  This would allow the 4th group of people to start watching the show without having to spend $200+ for the DVDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5560</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5560</guid>
		<description>Survivor: Micronesia is the best show of 8pm hour than American Idol. Last Night episode has things changing in Survivor and things are going to get more intense and interesting. People should watch Survivor: Micronesia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Survivor: Micronesia is the best show of 8pm hour than American Idol. Last Night episode has things changing in Survivor and things are going to get more intense and interesting. People should watch Survivor: Micronesia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5559</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-5559</guid>
		<description>After having done some reading about the history of television, from the early 50&#039;s to the mid 80&#039;s ( people seemed to stop writinmg much about it since then), it is axiomatic that TV is for the lowest common denominator ( the actual original programming term was Least Objectionable Programming.) Only when the garbage really reeks, ie, when network shares are declining and ad rates seem too high to sponsors, does the complaining get acerbic. A good book could be written about how bad the modern media in general have become, and will be, probably. I&#039;d say, just relax and enjoy Rome&#039;s nice pretty flames. What choice do we have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having done some reading about the history of television, from the early 50&#8217;s to the mid 80&#8217;s ( people seemed to stop writinmg much about it since then), it is axiomatic that TV is for the lowest common denominator ( the actual original programming term was Least Objectionable Programming.) Only when the garbage really reeks, ie, when network shares are declining and ad rates seem too high to sponsors, does the complaining get acerbic. A good book could be written about how bad the modern media in general have become, and will be, probably. I&#8217;d say, just relax and enjoy Rome&#8217;s nice pretty flames. What choice do we have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17097</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17097</guid>
		<description>Bill - There is a real bottom line on determining whether a show is profitable for a network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How much does a 1/2 hour of programming cost to buy or put on the air vs. how much advertising money can it bring in p/hh.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If a  show cost $4 million per 1/2 hour and I sell $6m in advertising, I&#039;ve made $2m for the 30 minutes.  If I can get one hour for only $3m and I sell only $8m for the hour, I&#039;ve made $2.5m per 30 minutes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s why &#039;According to Jim&#039; can stay on when another, better show might get cancelled.  Does everyone remember when the six &quot;Friends&quot; wanted $1m each per episode.  That had to have cost NBC $8-10m for a half hour show.  But the advertisers were on board (although, not for long).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AmIdol doesn&#039;t cost that much to make (although Crowell prob makes a mint... he&#039;s in a very nimble negotiating position because he has next to no &#039;talent&#039; to pay).  Popular ensemble-cast shows have their cost go up every year (through contract renegotiations) until they finally become to expensive to produce and there is no room for the network to make money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cost per half hour vs. revenue per half hour - Deal or No Deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill &#8211; There is a real bottom line on determining whether a show is profitable for a network.</p>
<p>How much does a 1/2 hour of programming cost to buy or put on the air vs. how much advertising money can it bring in p/hh.</p>
<p>If a  show cost $4 million per 1/2 hour and I sell $6m in advertising, I&#39;ve made $2m for the 30 minutes.  If I can get one hour for only $3m and I sell only $8m for the hour, I&#39;ve made $2.5m per 30 minutes.</p>
<p>That&#39;s why &#39;According to Jim&#39; can stay on when another, better show might get cancelled.  Does everyone remember when the six &#8220;Friends&#8221; wanted $1m each per episode.  That had to have cost NBC $8-10m for a half hour show.  But the advertisers were on board (although, not for long).</p>
<p>AmIdol doesn&#39;t cost that much to make (although Crowell prob makes a mint&#8230; he&#39;s in a very nimble negotiating position because he has next to no &#39;talent&#39; to pay).  Popular ensemble-cast shows have their cost go up every year (through contract renegotiations) until they finally become to expensive to produce and there is no room for the network to make money.</p>
<p>Cost per half hour vs. revenue per half hour &#8211; Deal or No Deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17096</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/nielsen-ratings-for-thur-feb-28-fox-cannot-be-stopped/2799#comment-17096</guid>
		<description>Brian, the same reasons that make it hard to pick up Lost mid-stream would make it terrible for syndication [that plus the 60 min run time].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look at any of our &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/top-syndicated-shows-february-11-17/2780&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Top 20 Syndicated shows&lt;/a&gt;. Just 2 hour long dramas, and neither of them really has any back story requirement to understand what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, the same reasons that make it hard to pick up Lost mid-stream would make it terrible for syndication [that plus the 60 min run time].</p>
<p>Look at any of our <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/27/top-syndicated-shows-february-11-17/2780" rel="nofollow">Top 20 Syndicated shows</a>. Just 2 hour long dramas, and neither of them really has any back story requirement to understand what&#39;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
