<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly vs. Olbermann Through Thursday, February 28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:25:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6606</guid>
		<description>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI....Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#039;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI&#8230;.Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#8217;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15286</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15286</guid>
		<description>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI....Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#039;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapists????  Thanks for proving my point and calling Fox news viewers macho rapists. Not sure where you pulled that one from?  Just an FYI&#8230;.Feminists and Lesbians are just proud of those names as right-wing republicans.  You obviously missed the whole point.  Rachel Maddow is very impressive, but she is a left winger.  When you fire 1 of 2 conservatives and replace them with another liberal democrat, there is no balance to the coverage.  A big part of MSNBC&#39;s success is being anti Fox news. They consistently condemn Fox news as being biased, but in truth MSNBC is unapologetically biased as shown by their current lineup of liberal commentators and guests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooper</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6562</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6562</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#039;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.

I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#8217;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.</p>
<p>I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooper</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15285</link>
		<dc:creator>Hooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#039;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s awesome that everyone who disagrees with your politics and watches news media you don&#39;t like are automatically man-hating feminist lesbians.</p>
<p>I assume that makes the Fox News viewers macho, red-blooded, he-man, way way hetero rapists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6521</guid>
		<description>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS....very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &quot;EAT SHIT&quot;

Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#039;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.
  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. 

1. Tucker Carlson - Fired
2. Joe Scarborough - Becoming more Hollywood every day
3 Pat Buchanan - Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  

I see Air America&#039;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right......Feminist Lesbians we&#039;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?

Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#039;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS&#8230;.very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &#8220;EAT SHIT&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#8217;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.<br />
  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. </p>
<p>1. Tucker Carlson &#8211; Fired<br />
2. Joe Scarborough &#8211; Becoming more Hollywood every day<br />
3 Pat Buchanan &#8211; Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  </p>
<p>I see Air America&#8217;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right&#8230;&#8230;Feminist Lesbians we&#8217;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?</p>
<p>Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#8217;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15284</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15284</guid>
		<description>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS....very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &quot;EAT SHIT&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#039;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.&lt;br&gt;  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Tucker Carlson - Fired&lt;br&gt;2. Joe Scarborough - Becoming more Hollywood every day&lt;br&gt;3 Pat Buchanan - Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I see Air America&#039;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right......Feminist Lesbians we&#039;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#039;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Pete.  Did you come up with that all by yourself?  Nice use of CAPS&#8230;.very effective. I liked the way you bolstered your argument with facts before you told us to &#8220;EAT SHIT&#8221;</p>
<p>Democrats need to moved on. The Florida recount is over let it go.  The rhetoric ever since the 1st Bush victory has gotten out of hand.  As far is Fox news is concerned, I could list 20 well known, liberal democrats that consistently appear on Fox news and add to the debate.  Could you do the same for MSNBC?  MSNBC&#39;s rating are in the tank for a reason.  They only appeal to liberals.  That is why they get slaughtered by FOX.<br />  I can only name 3 semi conservatives on MSNBC. Of course they were neutered before they were allowed to speak. </p>
<p>1. Tucker Carlson &#8211; Fired<br />2. Joe Scarborough &#8211; Becoming more Hollywood every day<br />3 Pat Buchanan &#8211; Isolationist, and has been vocal about the war and his dislike for Bush for years now.  </p>
<p>I see Air America&#39;s host, Rachel Maddow, will be taking over for Tucker Carlson.  Way to capitalize and bring in a new demographic.  Oh, that’s right&#8230;&#8230;Feminist Lesbians we&#39;re already watching MSNBC. My bad.  I know diversity is good, but has MSNBC heard of political diversity?</p>
<p>Whenever truely independent groups take a closer look at bias, Fox news always fares better than the other news outlets. MSNBC is by far the most biased news program.  Just look at the political democraphic  I just wish facts would precede the name calling, but that is the liberal way.  When facts are not on your side(which they usually aren&#39;t), just speak loudly and call them names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6417</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6417</guid>
		<description>O&#039;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV...WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV...EAT SHIT....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#8217;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV&#8230;WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV&#8230;EAT SHIT&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15283</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15283</guid>
		<description>O&#039;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV...WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV...EAT SHIT....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O&#39;REILLY IS THE MOST UNBALANCED, BIASED SPOKEMAN ON TV&#8230;WONT GO AS FAR AS TO CALL HIM A NEWSPERSON..RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT FROM NAZI FOX TV&#8230;EAT SHIT&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV...WHAT AN ASSHOLE...TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ...GET FUCKING REAL.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV&#8230;WHAT AN ASSHOLE&#8230;TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ&#8230;GET FUCKING REAL&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV...WHAT AN ASSHOLE...TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ...GET FUCKING REAL.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O REILLY IS THE BIGGEST FASCIST ON TV&#8230;WHAT AN ASSHOLE&#8230;TAKE HIM AND SEND HIM AND HIS TYPE TO IRAQ&#8230;GET FUCKING REAL&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snakesavage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6116</link>
		<dc:creator>snakesavage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6116</guid>
		<description>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#039;s-- all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#8217;s&#8211; all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snakesavage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15281</link>
		<dc:creator>snakesavage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15281</guid>
		<description>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#039;s-- all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several things Olbermann does on his show are beneath contempt. He frontloads his verbose questions so the interviewee  has no choice but to in essence agree with keith, he leaves tons of pertinent info out so as to give the appearance to unknowing viewers that his take is correct, he ignores important stories if they interfere with his socialist views. This man is not a newsman, but more a propagandist-reminiscent of the communist agitaters of the 50&#39;s&#8211; all rhetoric and passion but no substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loran K</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6104</link>
		<dc:creator>Loran K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6104</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.

Recently O&#039;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  

Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.

Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.
For Hillary it was basically 50-50.

And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#039;Reilly are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.</p>
<p>Recently O&#8217;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  </p>
<p>Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.</p>
<p>Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.<br />
For Hillary it was basically 50-50.</p>
<p>And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#8217;Reilly are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loran K</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15280</link>
		<dc:creator>Loran K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15280</guid>
		<description>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recently O&#039;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.&lt;br&gt;For Hillary it was basically 50-50.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#039;Reilly are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the reason people think there is a liberal bias is that for the most part unless consertatives really scream about it you will not hear about things that happen that are bad.</p>
<p>Recently O&#39;Reilly reported that from Dec till March a study was done on the favaroble reports on Hillary and Obama.  </p>
<p>Overall the reports for Obama was equal to 84% favaroble from mainstream media and for Hillary it was 51% favorable.</p>
<p>Where is the balance in this kind of reporting.<br />For Hillary it was basically 50-50.</p>
<p>And when it came to the Republican candiates McCain got about a 40% favorable and much less for the rest of the candiates.  We nee much more balance in the mainstream media otherwise what guys like O&#39;Reilly are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rock</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6102</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6102</guid>
		<description>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &quot;trolls&quot; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.

People....don&#039;t be so EASY!

When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.

Here, let me give you an example.....

Billo&#039;s rating don&#039;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!

See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#039;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest! 
All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted...have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.

We should all be SO proud! 

If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &quot;NOT Great American&quot;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.

If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!

:-i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &#8220;trolls&#8221; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.</p>
<p>People&#8230;.don&#8217;t be so EASY!</p>
<p>When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.</p>
<p>Here, let me give you an example&#8230;..</p>
<p>Billo&#8217;s rating don&#8217;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!</p>
<p>See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#8217;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest!<br />
All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted&#8230;have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.</p>
<p>We should all be SO proud! </p>
<p>If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &#8220;NOT Great American&#8221;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.</p>
<p>If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!</p>
<p>:-i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Rock</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15279</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15279</guid>
		<description>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &quot;trolls&quot; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People....don&#039;t be so EASY!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here, let me give you an example.....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Billo&#039;s rating don&#039;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#039;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest! &lt;br&gt;All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted...have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We should all be SO proud! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &quot;NOT Great American&quot;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amuses me is how easily people can be drawn away from rational and interesting debates by a few &#8220;trolls&#8221; who have nothing better to do than goad people into becoming hate-spewing vile excuses for human beings, and who simply exist to serve their own twisted pleasure at pissing others off and stirring up sh*t.</p>
<p>People&#8230;.don&#39;t be so EASY!</p>
<p>When you see a Troll online, it is always best not to feed them, by ignoring them completely so as not to satisfy their sick urges.</p>
<p>Here, let me give you an example&#8230;..</p>
<p>Billo&#39;s rating don&#39;t matter because they are just going south once Obama or Clinton get elected in November. Billo is an ass bag!</p>
<p>See, and it works for both sides! THAT&#39;S the beauty of it! A never ending hate fest! <br />All this over some cable TV shows that as one poster noted&#8230;have a combined audience of less than a rerun of Supernatural.</p>
<p>We should all be SO proud! </p>
<p>If you disagree with anything in this post, then I hereby declare you to be a &#8220;NOT Great American&#8221;, with all the shame and self loathing that comes with being viewed, by me, as something less than a truly true and really real (as defined by me),Great American.</p>
<p>If you agree with any part of this post, then YOU are hereby declared truly and really a really and true Great American!</p>
<p>:-i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kay s</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6098</link>
		<dc:creator>kay s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6098</guid>
		<description>marty , 
Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marty ,<br />
Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kay s</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15278</link>
		<dc:creator>kay s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15278</guid>
		<description>marty , &lt;br&gt;Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marty , <br />Just a thought: Could the reason why our great USA is in the state it is in be because of all the non-thinking lefters like yoursef who continue to listen to bone head opinions on a cable news station like FOX NEWS? If you open your mind long enough you will realize there are more stations available to educate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perez Hilton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6092</link>
		<dc:creator>Perez Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6092</guid>
		<description>John Stewart can hand everyone&#039;s asses to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Stewart can hand everyone&#8217;s asses to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perez Hilton</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15277</link>
		<dc:creator>Perez Hilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15277</guid>
		<description>John Stewart can hand everyone&#039;s asses to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Stewart can hand everyone&#39;s asses to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15276</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15276</guid>
		<description>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAIT A MINUTE CHECKED THE CABLE NEWS RATINGS FOR THE ENTIRE MONTH OF FEBRUARY FOW NEWS NUMBER 5 IN ALL OF CABLE PERIOD NOT JUST NEWS  pmsnbc 27 are they still in business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6080</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6080</guid>
		<description>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty k</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15275</link>
		<dc:creator>marty k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-15275</guid>
		<description>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you couldnt be so wrong please dont use your liberal agenda on this site if you do back it up with hard coore facts like FOX NEWS NUMBER 1 CABLE NEWS CHANNEL what 7 years in a row. come back when you have facts. like why do people watch TV .BECAUSE THEY LIKE TO WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Tronsgard</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6068</link>
		<dc:creator>David Tronsgard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/29/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-february-28/2803#comment-6068</guid>
		<description>I watch MSNBC everyday but also other news outlets. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are too must see hosts. I personally find their views usually correct. I find Fox news disengenuous and usually so slanted that it is worthless. The far right conservatives who rail against most media are wrong on every issue they support. Wrong about taxes, the war, moral issues, health care, etc.  They support those of the right who stand for bigotry, ignorance, superstition, jingoism, and above all the right of the top 2 or 3 percent of Americans to have and control 90% of the wealth.  
They stand for greed and against science. Eventually the far right will die off as young people gradually find the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watch MSNBC everyday but also other news outlets. Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman are too must see hosts. I personally find their views usually correct. I find Fox news disengenuous and usually so slanted that it is worthless. The far right conservatives who rail against most media are wrong on every issue they support. Wrong about taxes, the war, moral issues, health care, etc.  They support those of the right who stand for bigotry, ignorance, superstition, jingoism, and above all the right of the top 2 or 3 percent of Americans to have and control 90% of the wealth.<br />
They stand for greed and against science. Eventually the far right will die off as young people gradually find the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
