<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Mon March 17: Dancing is Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:37:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6830</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6830</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, I like thus show. Sesides DH, its all ABC has. Call me a asexist, and kiss my a**, but I love these womens&#039; dancing. This, not AI, is entertainment. Priscella Presley, Monica Seles &#039;&#039;&#039; this is freaking competitiion  Kudos, ABC. This is your best show, along with Desperate housiwives. We guys will watch your shows, if you leave out the victimization crap. American women rule. Show us more strong women. Three cheers for American Dance whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I like thus show. Sesides DH, its all ABC has. Call me a asexist, and kiss my a**, but I love these womens&#8217; dancing. This, not AI, is entertainment. Priscella Presley, Monica Seles &#8221;&#8217; this is freaking competitiion  Kudos, ABC. This is your best show, along with Desperate housiwives. We guys will watch your shows, if you leave out the victimization crap. American women rule. Show us more strong women. Three cheers for American Dance whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18371</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18371</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, I like thus show. Sesides DH, its all ABC has. Call me a asexist, and kiss my a**, but I love these womens&#039; dancing. This, not AI, is entertainment. Priscella Presley, Monica Seles &#039;&#039;&#039; this is freaking competitiion  Kudos, ABC. This is your best show, along with Desperate housiwives. We guys will watch your shows, if you leave out the victimization crap. American women rule. Show us more strong women. Three cheers for American Dance whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I like thus show. Sesides DH, its all ABC has. Call me a asexist, and kiss my a**, but I love these womens&#39; dancing. This, not AI, is entertainment. Priscella Presley, Monica Seles &#39;&#39;&#39; this is freaking competitiion  Kudos, ABC. This is your best show, along with Desperate housiwives. We guys will watch your shows, if you leave out the victimization crap. American women rule. Show us more strong women. Three cheers for American Dance whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6789</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6789</guid>
		<description>HIMYM is definately the best sitcom on TV right now, but as a self described geek I definately enjoy TBBT as a lead in.  I watched both last night.  Please renew &quot;mother&quot; CBS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HIMYM is definately the best sitcom on TV right now, but as a self described geek I definately enjoy TBBT as a lead in.  I watched both last night.  Please renew &#8220;mother&#8221; CBS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18370</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 01:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18370</guid>
		<description>HIMYM is definately the best sitcom on TV right now, but as a self described geek I definately enjoy TBBT as a lead in.  I watched both last night.  Please renew &quot;mother&quot; CBS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HIMYM is definately the best sitcom on TV right now, but as a self described geek I definately enjoy TBBT as a lead in.  I watched both last night.  Please renew &#8220;mother&#8221; CBS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6786</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6786</guid>
		<description>I think that lower ratings are much more acceptable today than before because of the prominence of the 18-49 demographic. Nets like NBC and the CW have focused all of their energy on the coveted demographic, though I personally think it&#039;s because HH ratings have worked against them for a while.

I also think that advertisers are more prone these days to advertise during a show with a &quot;cult&quot; following because they understand the power of these shows...for example, Heroes. The show hasn&#039;t really done well in HHs for a while, but still makes mega bucks for NBC. Advertisers are probably attracted by the numbers the show gets from the men demographic. One can easily tell when Spider Man 3 and Mountain Dew are heavily promoted during it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that lower ratings are much more acceptable today than before because of the prominence of the 18-49 demographic. Nets like NBC and the CW have focused all of their energy on the coveted demographic, though I personally think it&#8217;s because HH ratings have worked against them for a while.</p>
<p>I also think that advertisers are more prone these days to advertise during a show with a &#8220;cult&#8221; following because they understand the power of these shows&#8230;for example, Heroes. The show hasn&#8217;t really done well in HHs for a while, but still makes mega bucks for NBC. Advertisers are probably attracted by the numbers the show gets from the men demographic. One can easily tell when Spider Man 3 and Mountain Dew are heavily promoted during it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18369</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18369</guid>
		<description>I think that lower ratings are much more acceptable today than before because of the prominence of the 18-49 demographic. Nets like NBC and the CW have focused all of their energy on the coveted demographic, though I personally think it&#039;s because HH ratings have worked against them for a while.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also think that advertisers are more prone these days to advertise during a show with a &quot;cult&quot; following because they understand the power of these shows...for example, Heroes. The show hasn&#039;t really done well in HHs for a while, but still makes mega bucks for NBC. Advertisers are probably attracted by the numbers the show gets from the men demographic. One can easily tell when Spider Man 3 and Mountain Dew are heavily promoted during it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that lower ratings are much more acceptable today than before because of the prominence of the 18-49 demographic. Nets like NBC and the CW have focused all of their energy on the coveted demographic, though I personally think it&#39;s because HH ratings have worked against them for a while.</p>
<p>I also think that advertisers are more prone these days to advertise during a show with a &#8220;cult&#8221; following because they understand the power of these shows&#8230;for example, Heroes. The show hasn&#39;t really done well in HHs for a while, but still makes mega bucks for NBC. Advertisers are probably attracted by the numbers the show gets from the men demographic. One can easily tell when Spider Man 3 and Mountain Dew are heavily promoted during it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6779</guid>
		<description>Oh no doubt about that, and I like the show as well. Like I said it&#039;s the geek in me I&#039;m sure that makes it my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no doubt about that, and I like the show as well. Like I said it&#8217;s the geek in me I&#8217;m sure that makes it my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18368</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18368</guid>
		<description>Oh no doubt about that, and I like the show as well. Like I said it&#039;s the geek in me I&#039;m sure that makes it my favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no doubt about that, and I like the show as well. Like I said it&#39;s the geek in me I&#39;m sure that makes it my favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6778</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6778</guid>
		<description>Mark,I like several comedies more than I like Two and a Half Men, but there&#039;s no contesting Men&#039;s current ratings supremacy among sitcoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,I like several comedies more than I like Two and a Half Men, but there&#8217;s no contesting Men&#8217;s current ratings supremacy among sitcoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18367</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18367</guid>
		<description>Mark,I like several comedies more than I like Two and a Half Men, but there&#039;s no contesting Men&#039;s current ratings supremacy among sitcoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,I like several comedies more than I like Two and a Half Men, but there&#39;s no contesting Men&#39;s current ratings supremacy among sitcoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6777</guid>
		<description>Also sorry for not clarifying in my post on Thursday, I just wanted the numbers for Lost last year in the 10 pm slot just to compare to what Eli Stone is doing for my own curiosity, thanks for the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also sorry for not clarifying in my post on Thursday, I just wanted the numbers for Lost last year in the 10 pm slot just to compare to what Eli Stone is doing for my own curiosity, thanks for the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18366</guid>
		<description>Also sorry for not clarifying in my post on Thursday, I just wanted the numbers for Lost last year in the 10 pm slot just to compare to what Eli Stone is doing for my own curiosity, thanks for the data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also sorry for not clarifying in my post on Thursday, I just wanted the numbers for Lost last year in the 10 pm slot just to compare to what Eli Stone is doing for my own curiosity, thanks for the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6776</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6776</guid>
		<description>John Ritter was a genius. The show&#039;s writers, however, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Ritter was a genius. The show&#8217;s writers, however, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18365</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18365</guid>
		<description>John Ritter was a genius. The show&#039;s writers, however, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Ritter was a genius. The show&#39;s writers, however, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6774</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6774</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you on big bang theory, maybe it&#039;s just b/c I&#039;m a bit of a geek myself but I would rather watch it than any 30 min comedy on the air right now. It might not be as great as some of the classic comedies you mentioned but it&#039;s every bit as good as anything else out there currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you on big bang theory, maybe it&#8217;s just b/c I&#8217;m a bit of a geek myself but I would rather watch it than any 30 min comedy on the air right now. It might not be as great as some of the classic comedies you mentioned but it&#8217;s every bit as good as anything else out there currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18364</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18364</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree with you on big bang theory, maybe it&#039;s just b/c I&#039;m a bit of a geek myself but I would rather watch it than any 30 min comedy on the air right now. It might not be as great as some of the classic comedies you mentioned but it&#039;s every bit as good as anything else out there currently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree with you on big bang theory, maybe it&#39;s just b/c I&#39;m a bit of a geek myself but I would rather watch it than any 30 min comedy on the air right now. It might not be as great as some of the classic comedies you mentioned but it&#39;s every bit as good as anything else out there currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6770</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6770</guid>
		<description>CW&#039;s numbers for this week [2.35m average viewers], are below both USA [2.86m] and Disney [2.42m] cable networks from last week. (I&#039;ll get this weeks cable network aggregate data up ASAP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW&#8217;s numbers for this week [2.35m average viewers], are below both USA [2.86m] and Disney [2.42m] cable networks from last week. (I&#8217;ll get this weeks cable network aggregate data up ASAP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18363</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18363</guid>
		<description>CW&#039;s numbers for this week [2.35m average viewers], are below both USA [2.86m] and Disney [2.42m] cable networks from last week. (I&#039;ll get this weeks cable network aggregate data up ASAP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW&#39;s numbers for this week [2.35m average viewers], are below both USA [2.86m] and Disney [2.42m] cable networks from last week. (I&#39;ll get this weeks cable network aggregate data up ASAP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T. Folden</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6768</link>
		<dc:creator>John T. Folden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6768</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that NA could do really well with a better lead-in. For the last two weeks it has had sizable growth over Canterbury&#039;s Law. Where&#039;s the old FOX that would sack CL now and be airing FOX reruns next week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that NA could do really well with a better lead-in. For the last two weeks it has had sizable growth over Canterbury&#8217;s Law. Where&#8217;s the old FOX that would sack CL now and be airing FOX reruns next week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T. Folden</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18362</link>
		<dc:creator>John T. Folden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18362</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that NA could do really well with a better lead-in. For the last two weeks it has had sizable growth over Canterbury&#039;s Law. Where&#039;s the old FOX that would sack CL now and be airing FOX reruns next week?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that NA could do really well with a better lead-in. For the last two weeks it has had sizable growth over Canterbury&#39;s Law. Where&#39;s the old FOX that would sack CL now and be airing FOX reruns next week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6763</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6763</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I can’t stop posting the CW’s numbers though. trainwreck, can’t avert my eyes, etc.&lt;/i&gt;

Just &lt;i&gt;wait&lt;/i&gt; until they do the revival of 90210.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can’t stop posting the CW’s numbers though. trainwreck, can’t avert my eyes, etc.</i></p>
<p>Just <i>wait</i> until they do the revival of 90210.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18361</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18361</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I can’t stop posting the CW’s numbers though. trainwreck, can’t avert my eyes, etc.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just &lt;i&gt;wait&lt;/i&gt; until they do the revival of 90210.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I can’t stop posting the CW’s numbers though. trainwreck, can’t avert my eyes, etc.</i></p>
<p>Just <i>wait</i> until they do the revival of 90210.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6762</guid>
		<description>Good to see that HIMYM grew in audience and out performed TBBT when they switched slots. It tells me that it&#039;s more the slot than it is the show. The Dec 10 8pm HIMYM episode averaged 8.3 million. The 9.73 rating was up to first season numbers! It also tells me that HIMYM has a loyal audience.  HIMYM should see even more ratings with the Britney Spears guest spot. Renew it already CBS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that HIMYM grew in audience and out performed TBBT when they switched slots. It tells me that it&#8217;s more the slot than it is the show. The Dec 10 8pm HIMYM episode averaged 8.3 million. The 9.73 rating was up to first season numbers! It also tells me that HIMYM has a loyal audience.  HIMYM should see even more ratings with the Britney Spears guest spot. Renew it already CBS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-18360</guid>
		<description>Good to see that HIMYM grew in audience and out performed TBBT when they switched slots. It tells me that it&#039;s more the slot than it is the show. The Dec 10 8pm HIMYM episode averaged 8.3 million. The 9.73 rating was up to first season numbers! It also tells me that HIMYM has a loyal audience.  HIMYM should see even more ratings with the Britney Spears guest spot. Renew it already CBS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see that HIMYM grew in audience and out performed TBBT when they switched slots. It tells me that it&#39;s more the slot than it is the show. The Dec 10 8pm HIMYM episode averaged 8.3 million. The 9.73 rating was up to first season numbers! It also tells me that HIMYM has a loyal audience.  HIMYM should see even more ratings with the Britney Spears guest spot. Renew it already CBS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/18/nielsen-ratings-mon-march-17-dancing-is-back/2976#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard that too!

Though considering it&#039;s FOX we&#039;re talking about here...I suppose we&#039;ll all have to hold back the cheering until they actually put out something official.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that too!</p>
<p>Though considering it&#8217;s FOX we&#8217;re talking about here&#8230;I suppose we&#8217;ll all have to hold back the cheering until they actually put out something official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
