<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Time-Shifted Broadcast Shows, March 3-9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:18:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sarahconnorsociety.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DVR Time Shifted Ratings: Sarah Connor Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>sarahconnorsociety.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DVR Time Shifted Ratings: Sarah Connor Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>[...] Watching numbers http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045 http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/17/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-feb-25-mar-2/2961 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Watching numbers <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045</a> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/17/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-feb-25-mar-2/2961" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/17/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-feb-25-mar-2/2961</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7312</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7312</guid>
		<description>Those timeshifted numbers TSCC gets every week are very consistent. I also heard New Amsterdam tanked today. With a few slots open for next fall I believe TSCC is the better show. Not only in the ratings but also in the overall quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those timeshifted numbers TSCC gets every week are very consistent. I also heard New Amsterdam tanked today. With a few slots open for next fall I believe TSCC is the better show. Not only in the ratings but also in the overall quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19124</guid>
		<description>Those timeshifted numbers TSCC gets every week are very consistent. I also heard New Amsterdam tanked today. With a few slots open for next fall I believe TSCC is the better show. Not only in the ratings but also in the overall quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those timeshifted numbers TSCC gets every week are very consistent. I also heard New Amsterdam tanked today. With a few slots open for next fall I believe TSCC is the better show. Not only in the ratings but also in the overall quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7255</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7255</guid>
		<description>frankj,

Although we haven&#039;t really assembled any data, when we occasionally have 30 minute breakdowns of the overnight ratings data it&#039;s pretty much guaranteed that the second half hour of a show in the 8-9pm hour gets more viewers than the first. I think that&#039;s just the tardiness of people tuning in.

And you were correct that TSCC was on average better than Prison Break for both 18-49 and total viewers.

Check the numbers here:

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the-bubble-terminatorscc-many-others/3019</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frankj,</p>
<p>Although we haven&#8217;t really assembled any data, when we occasionally have 30 minute breakdowns of the overnight ratings data it&#8217;s pretty much guaranteed that the second half hour of a show in the 8-9pm hour gets more viewers than the first. I think that&#8217;s just the tardiness of people tuning in.</p>
<p>And you were correct that TSCC was on average better than Prison Break for both 18-49 and total viewers.</p>
<p>Check the numbers here:</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the-bubble-terminatorscc-many-others/3019" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the-bubble-terminatorscc-many-others/3019</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19123</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19123</guid>
		<description>frankj,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although we haven&#039;t really assembled any data, when we occasionally have 30 minute breakdowns of the overnight ratings data it&#039;s pretty much guaranteed that the second half hour of a show in the 8-9pm hour gets more viewers than the first. I think that&#039;s just the tardiness of people tuning in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And you were correct that TSCC was on average better than Prison Break for both 18-49 and total viewers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check the numbers here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the-bubble-terminatorscc-many-others/3019&quot;&gt;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frankj,</p>
<p>Although we haven&#39;t really assembled any data, when we occasionally have 30 minute breakdowns of the overnight ratings data it&#39;s pretty much guaranteed that the second half hour of a show in the 8-9pm hour gets more viewers than the first. I think that&#39;s just the tardiness of people tuning in.</p>
<p>And you were correct that TSCC was on average better than Prison Break for both 18-49 and total viewers.</p>
<p>Check the numbers here:</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the-bubble-terminatorscc-many-others/3019"></a><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the.." rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/19/fox-on-the..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7247</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7247</guid>
		<description>By the way, Robert, it looks like FOX just renewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3if57a672cad5367aeeae659752b449bba&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prison Break&lt;/a&gt; for a full season.

I&#039;m correct in remembering that Terminator consistently beat out Prison Break in the 18-49yr demographic, right?  Or was it only total viewership?  If it&#039;s as I remember I&#039;m hoping that bodes well for Sarah Connor getting a full second season.

Then again, this is FOX we&#039;re talking about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Robert, it looks like FOX just renewed <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3if57a672cad5367aeeae659752b449bba" rel="nofollow">Prison Break</a> for a full season.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m correct in remembering that Terminator consistently beat out Prison Break in the 18-49yr demographic, right?  Or was it only total viewership?  If it&#8217;s as I remember I&#8217;m hoping that bodes well for Sarah Connor getting a full second season.</p>
<p>Then again, this is FOX we&#8217;re talking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19122</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19122</guid>
		<description>By the way, Robert, it looks like FOX just renewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3if57a672cad5367aeeae659752b449bba&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Prison Break&lt;/a&gt; for a full season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m correct in remembering that Terminator consistently beat out Prison Break in the 18-49yr demographic, right?  Or was it only total viewership?  If it&#039;s as I remember I&#039;m hoping that bodes well for Sarah Connor getting a full second season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then again, this is FOX we&#039;re talking about...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Robert, it looks like FOX just renewed <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3if57a672cad5367aeeae659752b449bba" rel="nofollow">Prison Break</a> for a full season.</p>
<p>I&#39;m correct in remembering that Terminator consistently beat out Prison Break in the 18-49yr demographic, right?  Or was it only total viewership?  If it&#39;s as I remember I&#39;m hoping that bodes well for Sarah Connor getting a full second season.</p>
<p>Then again, this is FOX we&#39;re talking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7233</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Robert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Robert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19121</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19121</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Robert!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Robert!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7215</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7215</guid>
		<description>Frank, I know you asked Bill, but he&#039;s out of pocket until later this evening.  You read the #s correctly.  The first hour had a higher percentage increase even though the second hour had slightly more absolute DVR viewers.

While I suspect there is some truth to your theory the real reason looks like it was just because almost 600,000 more people (total) watched the 9pm installment, and almost all of the that difference was LIVE viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, I know you asked Bill, but he&#8217;s out of pocket until later this evening.  You read the #s correctly.  The first hour had a higher percentage increase even though the second hour had slightly more absolute DVR viewers.</p>
<p>While I suspect there is some truth to your theory the real reason looks like it was just because almost 600,000 more people (total) watched the 9pm installment, and almost all of the that difference was LIVE viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19120</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19120</guid>
		<description>Frank, I know you asked Bill, but he&#039;s out of pocket until later this evening.  You read the #s correctly.  The first hour had a higher percentage increase even though the second hour had slightly more absolute DVR viewers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While I suspect there is some truth to your theory the real reason looks like it was just because almost 600,000 more people (total) watched the 9pm installment, and almost all of the that difference was LIVE viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, I know you asked Bill, but he&#39;s out of pocket until later this evening.  You read the #s correctly.  The first hour had a higher percentage increase even though the second hour had slightly more absolute DVR viewers.</p>
<p>While I suspect there is some truth to your theory the real reason looks like it was just because almost 600,000 more people (total) watched the 9pm installment, and almost all of the that difference was LIVE viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7212</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-7212</guid>
		<description>Bill, the higher percentage time-shifted viewing for T:SCC was for the first hour of the finale?

Seems like people came into the show late because they knew their DVR was getting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, the higher percentage time-shifted viewing for T:SCC was for the first hour of the finale?</p>
<p>Seems like people came into the show late because they knew their DVR was getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frankj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19119</link>
		<dc:creator>frankj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/24/top-time-shifted-broadcast-shows-march-3-9/3045#comment-19119</guid>
		<description>Bill, the higher percentage time-shifted viewing for T:SCC was for the first hour of the finale?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems like people came into the show late because they knew their DVR was getting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, the higher percentage time-shifted viewing for T:SCC was for the first hour of the finale?</p>
<p>Seems like people came into the show late because they knew their DVR was getting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
