<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What You’re Watching on Your DVRs (Cable Networks), March 10-16</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:41:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-8149</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-8149</guid>
		<description>Mia, Yikes! Wisegals was popular, but not that popular! Fixed. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mia, Yikes! Wisegals was popular, but not that popular! Fixed. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-16310</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-16310</guid>
		<description>Mia, Yikes! Wisegals was popular, but not that popular! Fixed. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mia, Yikes! Wisegals was popular, but not that popular! Fixed. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-8147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-8147</guid>
		<description>372,000 ... Million?! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>372,000 &#8230; Million?! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-16309</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-16309</guid>
		<description>372,000 ... Million?! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>372,000 &#8230; Million?! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-8089</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-8089</guid>
		<description>the SpongeBob #s are rather striking.  Seemingly Bob would be ripe for a ton of DVR usage, but it&#039;s as if it were a sporting event that needed to be watched LIVE. 

I went back to look at the LIVE+SD numbers and for the SpongeBob that&#039;s #15 above with 4.179 million LIVE+7, it&#039;s live+SD was 4.175. So of the 116K DVR users, 112K watched the same day anyway.  for Bob, the live+7 numbers seem a rounding error vs. live+sd.

House on the other hand, was 2.912 million on a live+SD basis, so most of its viewership was after the day it aired. given its Friday @11pm timeslot, that&#039;s probably not too surprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the SpongeBob #s are rather striking.  Seemingly Bob would be ripe for a ton of DVR usage, but it&#8217;s as if it were a sporting event that needed to be watched LIVE. </p>
<p>I went back to look at the LIVE+SD numbers and for the SpongeBob that&#8217;s #15 above with 4.179 million LIVE+7, it&#8217;s live+SD was 4.175. So of the 116K DVR users, 112K watched the same day anyway.  for Bob, the live+7 numbers seem a rounding error vs. live+sd.</p>
<p>House on the other hand, was 2.912 million on a live+SD basis, so most of its viewership was after the day it aired. given its Friday @11pm timeslot, that&#8217;s probably not too surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-16308</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/03/31/what-you%e2%80%99re-watching-on-your-dvrs-cable-networks-march-10-16/3130#comment-16308</guid>
		<description>the SpongeBob #s are rather striking.  Seemingly Bob would be ripe for a ton of DVR usage, but it&#039;s as if it were a sporting event that needed to be watched LIVE. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I went back to look at the LIVE+SD numbers and for the SpongeBob that&#039;s #15 above with 4.179 million LIVE+7, it&#039;s live+SD was 4.175. So of the 116K DVR users, 112K watched the same day anyway.  for Bob, the live+7 numbers seem a rounding error vs. live+sd.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;House on the other hand, was 2.912 million on a live+SD basis, so most of its viewership was after the day it aired. given its Friday @11pm timeslot, that&#039;s probably not too surprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the SpongeBob #s are rather striking.  Seemingly Bob would be ripe for a ton of DVR usage, but it&#39;s as if it were a sporting event that needed to be watched LIVE. </p>
<p>I went back to look at the LIVE+SD numbers and for the SpongeBob that&#39;s #15 above with 4.179 million LIVE+7, it&#39;s live+SD was 4.175. So of the 116K DVR users, 112K watched the same day anyway.  for Bob, the live+7 numbers seem a rounding error vs. live+sd.</p>
<p>House on the other hand, was 2.912 million on a live+SD basis, so most of its viewership was after the day it aired. given its Friday @11pm timeslot, that&#39;s probably not too surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
