Comments on: O’Reilly vs. Olbermann Through Wednesday, April 9

By: Craig

Craig — Tue, 06 May 2008 00:50:52 +0000

Adam,
My man is it possible for you to come up with one thing on your own and not steal ideas from Mark (Seriously, I footnote everything in my books and can’t have one orginal idea) Levin. Come on Adam, your ripping off someone who just quotes other peoples work and then publishes it as his own, honestly have you ever seen the works cited page in his books. Nothing is his work. Its simply not funny or cleaver unless you came up with it yourself.

By: Craig

Craig — Tue, 06 May 2008 00:50:52 +0000

Adam,
My man is it possible for you to come up with one thing on your own and not steal ideas from Mark (Seriously, I footnote everything in my books and can't have one orginal idea) Levin. Come on Adam, your ripping off someone who just quotes other peoples work and then publishes it as his own, honestly have you ever seen the works cited page in his books. Nothing is his work. Its simply not funny or cleaver unless you came up with it yourself.

By: Ken

Ken — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:12:57 +0000

The reason O’Rielly will always out draw Olberman is because Olberman aims at a higher IQ audience and there are always more imbeciles than intellectuals.

By: Ken

Ken — Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:12:57 +0000

The reason O'Rielly will always out draw Olberman is because Olberman aims at a higher IQ audience and there are always more imbeciles than intellectuals.

By: Waterman

Waterman — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:02:11 +0000

Thought you might like to read the following:

A little over one year ago:

1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:

1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1 .2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in fore closure.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

By: Waterman

Waterman — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:02:11 +0000

Thought you might like to read the following:

A little over one year ago:

1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.

Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:

1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1 .2 trillion dollars;
6) 1% of American homes are in fore closure.

America voted for change in 2006, and we got it!

By: Waterman

Waterman — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:13:17 +0000

Joe, you just said it all. Atheist. As towards FEAR, the only fear I have is from you and your left wing, antiGOD, non-flag waving, communistic ways. If you as such an atheist, why are you quoting the Bible? Joe, it’s wack jobs like you that we are fighting for the freedom in this country, and you just can’t stand it can you. I suggest to you that you go over to one of your leftist wing blogs where you will be welcome ie: the nation, huffington post, jane fonda web site etc.

By: Waterman

Waterman — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:13:17 +0000

Joe, you just said it all. Atheist. As towards FEAR, the only fear I have is from you and your left wing, antiGOD, non-flag waving, communistic ways. If you as such an atheist, why are you quoting the Bible? Joe, it's wack jobs like you that we are fighting for the freedom in this country, and you just can't stand it can you. I suggest to you that you go over to one of your leftist wing blogs where you will be welcome ie: the nation, huffington post, jane fonda web site etc.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:37:54 +0000

Waterman, Waterman, Waterman. I understand that intelligent dialogue is something foreign to you so I’ll try to explain. LEV is short for Leviticus, that’s a chapter in the bible. That’s the same book you use to justify your belief in god and your hatred of people different from you. My admittance of where I got those facts from was just being honest. Unlike your quote earlier that you claimed was from John Glen but clearly was not. If you doubt any of the things I’ve listed- guess what it’s really easy to look up…it’s in the bible. or you can ask Charles Manson if you want(huh?that was pretty stupid by the way) I find it ODD myself that when biggoted people (usually conservative) like yourself use the exuse of “GOD” to hate a group of people. Of course when faced with being dead wrong conservatives always resort to distractions-i.e. “name calling”. You know Waterman I’ve noticed that usually when someone’s really scared of gay people(like you are)that’s because they’re scared of coming out themselves. Maybe you should be the one to take deep breathes and ponder your beliefs since you don’t really know what they’re based on. I’ll give you a hint-FEAR…that’s why you like Fox News so much. btw I’m a heterosexual atheist that thinks San Francisco is a beautiful place but could not afford to live there.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:37:54 +0000

Waterman, Waterman, Waterman. I understand that intelligent dialogue is something foreign to you so I'll try to explain. LEV is short for Leviticus, that's a chapter in the bible. That's the same book you use to justify your belief in god and your hatred of people different from you. My admittance of where I got those facts from was just being honest. Unlike your quote earlier that you claimed was from John Glen but clearly was not. If you doubt any of the things I've listed- guess what it's really easy to look up…it's in the bible. or you can ask Charles Manson if you want(huh?that was pretty stupid by the way) I find it ODD myself that when biggoted people (usually conservative) like yourself use the exuse of “GOD” to hate a group of people. Of course when faced with being dead wrong conservatives always resort to distractions-i.e. “name calling”. You know Waterman I've noticed that usually when someone's really scared of gay people(like you are)that's because they're scared of coming out themselves. Maybe you should be the one to take deep breathes and ponder your beliefs since you don't really know what they're based on. I'll give you a hint-FEAR…that's why you like Fox News so much. btw I'm a heterosexual atheist that thinks San Francisco is a beautiful place but could not afford to live there.

By: Waterman

Waterman — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:33:03 +0000

Joe Joe Joe, do you get to come home for the weekends? What’s with all the LEV: stuff? Get serious. I believe in GOD and that’s all that matters. You’re coming across as a Bible Thumping, Hell & Satin chasin Baptist. Dude, you need to get a life real soon. And to top off your above tiraid, taking facts from an open letter to Dr. Laura? Who wrote that letter to her, Charles Manson? Joe, you need to take deep breathes and slowly. Things were going just fine up until the time certain people came out of the closet, after that, they started pushing their crap and ODD BEHAVIOR on the rest of the NORMAL public. Joe, do you live in San Francisco?

By: Waterman

Waterman — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:33:03 +0000

Joe Joe Joe, do you get to come home for the weekends? What's with all the LEV: stuff? Get serious. I believe in GOD and that's all that matters. You're coming across as a Bible Thumping, Hell & Satin chasin Baptist. Dude, you need to get a life real soon. And to top off your above tiraid, taking facts from an open letter to Dr. Laura? Who wrote that letter to her, Charles Manson? Joe, you need to take deep breathes and slowly. Things were going just fine up until the time certain people came out of the closet, after that, they started pushing their crap and ODD BEHAVIOR on the rest of the NORMAL public. Joe, do you live in San Francisco?

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:26:48 +0000

god’s way? yeah you’re right LEV 18:22 clearly states that so you’re totally correct. That’s one thing we can agree on. so going by that do you also burn livestock on the altar as a sacrifice? (LEV1:9). Would you sell your daughter into slavery as sanctioned by Exodus 21:7? Do women get mad if you ask whether they are on their menstral cycle because according to LEV 15:19-24 you’re not allowed contact with them. Do you have any daughters? because according to Exodus 21:7 you can sell her into slavery. Lev 25:44 states that you can possess slaves provided they are purchased from a neighboring country, you probably think that’s ok as long as they’re from Mexico right? Have you ever worked on Sunday? well according to Exodus 35:2 you should be put to death for that. I got into a debate recently with a friend about which is the lesser abomination, homosexuality or eating shellfish (LEV 11:10). Had any shrimp lately Waterman? LEV 21:20 states you cannot approach the altar of God if you have a defect in your sight, do you wear glasses or contacts Waterman? When you get your hair cut do you get the hair around your temples trimmed?..hope not because LEV 19:27 clearly states this is not God’s way. LEV 11:6-8 states that touching the skin of a dead pig makes you unclean so I sure hope you wore gloves if you ever played football. The vast majority of people in my life that I have come to admire and respect are all people of faith. So I have much respect. However I do think it’s important to point out that not everything in the bible should be taken literally. Maybe you should get one of those wwjd wristbands? being that he was probably the biggest liberal to walk the earth. (btw like you ripped off the quote that was not really from John Glen I ripped these facts off from “an open letter to Dr. Laura” if you want to look it up)

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:26:48 +0000

god's way? yeah you're right LEV 18:22 clearly states that so you're totally correct. That's one thing we can agree on. so going by that do you also burn livestock on the altar as a sacrifice? (LEV1:9). Would you sell your daughter into slavery as sanctioned by Exodus 21:7? Do women get mad if you ask whether they are on their menstral cycle because according to LEV 15:19-24 you're not allowed contact with them. Do you have any daughters? because according to Exodus 21:7 you can sell her into slavery. Lev 25:44 states that you can possess slaves provided they are purchased from a neighboring country, you probably think that's ok as long as they're from Mexico right? Have you ever worked on Sunday? well according to Exodus 35:2 you should be put to death for that. I got into a debate recently with a friend about which is the lesser abomination, homosexuality or eating shellfish (LEV 11:10). Had any shrimp lately Waterman? LEV 21:20 states you cannot approach the altar of God if you have a defect in your sight, do you wear glasses or contacts Waterman? When you get your hair cut do you get the hair around your temples trimmed?..hope not because LEV 19:27 clearly states this is not God's way. LEV 11:6-8 states that touching the skin of a dead pig makes you unclean so I sure hope you wore gloves if you ever played football. The vast majority of people in my life that I have come to admire and respect are all people of faith. So I have much respect. However I do think it's important to point out that not everything in the bible should be taken literally. Maybe you should get one of those wwjd wristbands? being that he was probably the biggest liberal to walk the earth. (btw like you ripped off the quote that was not really from John Glen I ripped these facts off from “an open letter to Dr. Laura” if you want to look it up)

By: Waterman

Waterman — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:10:26 +0000

Joe: you’re right, Rachel’s sexual preference is not normal, mature, or Gods way. As for an example of despicable, contributing comments and being a member to a Hate America group called the Nation. Being affiliated with michael moore, unlike Fox News, she won’t ever get her facts from other sources other than the extreme leftists groups just like K.O. does.

By: Waterman

Waterman — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:10:26 +0000

Joe: you're right, Rachel's sexual preference is not normal, mature, or Gods way. As for an example of despicable, contributing comments and being a member to a Hate America group called the Nation. Being affiliated with michael moore, unlike Fox News, she won't ever get her facts from other sources other than the extreme leftists groups just like K.O. does.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:07:03 +0000

Bushlies-I think I understand what you’re trying to say but it doesn’t seem to make a whole ton of sense. In what rule book is it written that someone that actually does speak out for the little guy have to take a vow of poverty. This is not hypocrisy. Who on TV is poor? Does that mean Bryant Gumbel can’t talk about sports because he was never a professional athelete? Your logic as well as those that routinely bring up the hypocrisy in people that have money speaking on behalf of those that have very little is totally flawed. When’s the last time you saw a poor person on TV with a mic in their hand & their own show? This does not make sense. fascist & racist? that’s rather silly. and again makes little sense.
Waterman:give me one example of something that Rachel Maddow did that actually fits the definition of despicable and I’ll give you 10 from Billo….oh wait Keith already does that.
and you should drop the personal attacks about Rachel’s sexuality. It’s not very becoming or mature.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:07:03 +0000

Bushlies-I think I understand what you're trying to say but it doesn't seem to make a whole ton of sense. In what rule book is it written that someone that actually does speak out for the little guy have to take a vow of poverty. This is not hypocrisy. Who on TV is poor? Does that mean Bryant Gumbel can't talk about sports because he was never a professional athelete? Your logic as well as those that routinely bring up the hypocrisy in people that have money speaking on behalf of those that have very little is totally flawed. When's the last time you saw a poor person on TV with a mic in their hand & their own show? This does not make sense. fascist & racist? that's rather silly. and again makes little sense.
Waterman:give me one example of something that Rachel Maddow did that actually fits the definition of despicable and I'll give you 10 from Billo….oh wait Keith already does that.
and you should drop the personal attacks about Rachel's sexuality. It's not very becoming or mature.

By: Waterman

Waterman — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:21:58 +0000

Hey Bushlies: are you kidding? Rachael Maddow is one of the most dispicable left wing nut jobs out there. Do you really think that some half wit station is going to give her a seat and microphone on T.V.? What would they call her show….. The Dike with da Mike?

By: Waterman

Waterman — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:21:58 +0000

By: Bushlies

Bushlies — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:28:50 +0000

Rachael is a sweetheart and a nice offset to Keith’s hard side, but as much as I want to like him I just can’t. None of us can. I’ve listened to him too long. I know him and people like him at our university. Keith is an Ivy league elitist snob who panders to the masses for social justice, yet lives the bourgeois life style. I can’t stand the hypocrisy! Anyone who admits to liking him is basically saying you are a fascist and a closet racist. At least with war criminals like Bush and Cheney you know where they stand. MSNBC-give us a different voice! Headline Rachael-you’ll get more viewers!

By: Bushlies

Bushlies — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:28:50 +0000

Rachael is a sweetheart and a nice offset to Keith's hard side, but as much as I want to like him I just can't. None of us can. I've listened to him too long. I know him and people like him at our university. Keith is an Ivy league elitist snob who panders to the masses for social justice, yet lives the bourgeois life style. I can't stand the hypocrisy! Anyone who admits to liking him is basically saying you are a fascist and a closet racist. At least with war criminals like Bush and Cheney you know where they stand. MSNBC-give us a different voice! Headline Rachael-you'll get more viewers!

By: Egg-bert

Egg-bert — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:20:48 +0000

I saw tonights Olbermann show and It was horrible. When is that phony gonna criticize Saint Obama and his wife

By: Egg-bert

Egg-bert — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:20:48 +0000

I saw tonights Olbermann show and It was horrible. When is that phony gonna criticize Saint Obama and his wife

By: Waterman

Waterman — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:26:24 +0000

Well, here we are on Wednesday night watching the Keith Slobberman Melt Down Show. Man, if the only thing little Keith has to go on is Cindy McCain plagerizing a recipe, I think the Republicans have it all wrapped up for the upcoming election. Keith is running out of material these days. Keith the slobberman even did a segment on Rush ( I missed it, mommy had to give me a bath ) and of course you WILL notice that Rush won’t even come down the Keith’s level of recognizing what Keith said. The Jokes on you Keith. Oh by the way, did you all notice how the boy toy (Rachael Maddow) was back on tonight? I tell you all this prediction, I think Keith is going to hang himself (commit suicide)real soon in his dressing room and leave a note saying Bill O made him do it.