<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CW to Stop Streaming Gossip Girl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:00:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>Further confirmation that they really only renewed it to save face. I&#039;m of the opinion that CW will be shutting its doors before the fall season starts. Losing Smackdown was all the proof I needed. What network would allow their #1 show to leave, no matter the price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further confirmation that they really only renewed it to save face. I&#8217;m of the opinion that CW will be shutting its doors before the fall season starts. Losing Smackdown was all the proof I needed. What network would allow their #1 show to leave, no matter the price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-18406</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-18406</guid>
		<description>Further confirmation that they really only renewed it to save face. I&#039;m of the opinion that CW will be shutting its doors before the fall season starts. Losing Smackdown was all the proof I needed. What network would allow their #1 show to leave, no matter the price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further confirmation that they really only renewed it to save face. I&#39;m of the opinion that CW will be shutting its doors before the fall season starts. Losing Smackdown was all the proof I needed. What network would allow their #1 show to leave, no matter the price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-9786</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-9786</guid>
		<description>Angie, I second that emotion.

I think we have a pretty good feel on the enthusiasm level for many shows, and we get effectively zero activity ala &quot;OMG, I *love* Gossip Girl!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, I second that emotion.</p>
<p>I think we have a pretty good feel on the enthusiasm level for many shows, and we get effectively zero activity ala &#8220;OMG, I *love* Gossip Girl!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-18405</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-18405</guid>
		<description>Angie, I second that emotion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think we have a pretty good feel on the enthusiasm level for many shows, and we get effectively zero activity ala &quot;OMG, I *love* Gossip Girl!&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, I second that emotion.</p>
<p>I think we have a pretty good feel on the enthusiasm level for many shows, and we get effectively zero activity ala &#8220;OMG, I *love* Gossip Girl!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-9784</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-9784</guid>
		<description>They really can&#039;t accept that nobody wants to watch Gossip Girl, can they?  I love how the article claimed executive are &quot;flummoxed&quot; (didn&#039;t know they knew words that big at the CW) by Gossip Girl&#039;s low ratings since it had such a cyber following, which makes me twitch.

On what basis are they claiming Gossip Girl has such a following?   Because it&#039;s downloaded on iTunes?  Please.  Where are the rest of the raving lunatics that usually accompany a huge online fandom (winning popularity polls, emphatic posting to articles, i.e. Supernatural)?  Nowhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really can&#8217;t accept that nobody wants to watch Gossip Girl, can they?  I love how the article claimed executive are &#8220;flummoxed&#8221; (didn&#8217;t know they knew words that big at the CW) by Gossip Girl&#8217;s low ratings since it had such a cyber following, which makes me twitch.</p>
<p>On what basis are they claiming Gossip Girl has such a following?   Because it&#8217;s downloaded on iTunes?  Please.  Where are the rest of the raving lunatics that usually accompany a huge online fandom (winning popularity polls, emphatic posting to articles, i.e. Supernatural)?  Nowhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-18404</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-to-stop-streaming-gossip-girl/3388#comment-18404</guid>
		<description>They really can&#039;t accept that nobody wants to watch Gossip Girl, can they?  I love how the article claimed executive are &quot;flummoxed&quot; (didn&#039;t know they knew words that big at the CW) by Gossip Girl&#039;s low ratings since it had such a cyber following, which makes me twitch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On what basis are they claiming Gossip Girl has such a following?   Because it&#039;s downloaded on iTunes?  Please.  Where are the rest of the raving lunatics that usually accompany a huge online fandom (winning popularity polls, emphatic posting to articles, i.e. Supernatural)?  Nowhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really can&#39;t accept that nobody wants to watch Gossip Girl, can they?  I love how the article claimed executive are &#8220;flummoxed&#8221; (didn&#39;t know they knew words that big at the CW) by Gossip Girl&#39;s low ratings since it had such a cyber following, which makes me twitch.</p>
<p>On what basis are they claiming Gossip Girl has such a following?   Because it&#39;s downloaded on iTunes?  Please.  Where are the rest of the raving lunatics that usually accompany a huge online fandom (winning popularity polls, emphatic posting to articles, i.e. Supernatural)?  Nowhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
