<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Sat Apr 19: FOX Wins, CW Does Something Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:24:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-10063</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-10063</guid>
		<description>Well... Give Ms. Ostroff a jingle and show her both sides of this arguement.

We&#039;ll split the consulting fee. (LFMAO)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Give Ms. Ostroff a jingle and show her both sides of this arguement.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll split the consulting fee. (LFMAO)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-15722</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-15722</guid>
		<description>Well... Give Ms. Ostroff a jingle and show her both sides of this arguement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;ll split the consulting fee. (LFMAO)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; Give Ms. Ostroff a jingle and show her both sides of this arguement.</p>
<p>We&#39;ll split the consulting fee. (LFMAO)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-10058</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-10058</guid>
		<description>I disagree. CW can&#039;t score big ratings when people are actually home and watching TV.  Short of something Smackdown-esque or MMA related, the CW would do worse on Saturdays than it does on all the other days -- which isn&#039;t good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. CW can&#8217;t score big ratings when people are actually home and watching TV.  Short of something Smackdown-esque or MMA related, the CW would do worse on Saturdays than it does on all the other days &#8212; which isn&#8217;t good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-15721</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-15721</guid>
		<description>I disagree. CW can&#039;t score big ratings when people are actually home and watching TV.  Short of something Smackdown-esque or MMA related, the CW would do worse on Saturdays than it does on all the other days -- which isn&#039;t good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. CW can&#39;t score big ratings when people are actually home and watching TV.  Short of something Smackdown-esque or MMA related, the CW would do worse on Saturdays than it does on all the other days &#8212; which isn&#39;t good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-10056</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-10056</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that if the CW took some of their best network programs and stacked &#039;em on Saturday&#039;s they migh be able to score some big ratings against the drivel that is Saturday night.

Loyal fans of their favorite shows would make Sats their night and people with no other real choices just might tune in.

There are a couple of CW shows that I might watch, but they&#039;re in against one or more of my regular shows.

Can&#039;t even remember what I watch on Saturdays if i&#039;m home... I guess whatever looks good on cable.

The L&amp;O trilogy last night was the third time in 6 weeks for some of the episodes... didn&#039;t even bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that if the CW took some of their best network programs and stacked &#8216;em on Saturday&#8217;s they migh be able to score some big ratings against the drivel that is Saturday night.</p>
<p>Loyal fans of their favorite shows would make Sats their night and people with no other real choices just might tune in.</p>
<p>There are a couple of CW shows that I might watch, but they&#8217;re in against one or more of my regular shows.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t even remember what I watch on Saturdays if i&#8217;m home&#8230; I guess whatever looks good on cable.</p>
<p>The L&amp;O trilogy last night was the third time in 6 weeks for some of the episodes&#8230; didn&#8217;t even bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon V</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-15720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/20/nielsen-ratings-sat-apr-19-fox-wins-cw-does-something-right/3419#comment-15720</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that if the CW took some of their best network programs and stacked &#039;em on Saturday&#039;s they migh be able to score some big ratings against the drivel that is Saturday night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Loyal fans of their favorite shows would make Sats their night and people with no other real choices just might tune in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are a couple of CW shows that I might watch, but they&#039;re in against one or more of my regular shows.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Can&#039;t even remember what I watch on Saturdays if i&#039;m home... I guess whatever looks good on cable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The L&amp;O trilogy last night was the third time in 6 weeks for some of the episodes... didn&#039;t even bother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that if the CW took some of their best network programs and stacked &#39;em on Saturday&#39;s they migh be able to score some big ratings against the drivel that is Saturday night.</p>
<p>Loyal fans of their favorite shows would make Sats their night and people with no other real choices just might tune in.</p>
<p>There are a couple of CW shows that I might watch, but they&#39;re in against one or more of my regular shows.</p>
<p>Can&#39;t even remember what I watch on Saturdays if i&#39;m home&#8230; I guess whatever looks good on cable.</p>
<p>The L&amp;O trilogy last night was the third time in 6 weeks for some of the episodes&#8230; didn&#39;t even bother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
