<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Thur, Apr 24: New CSI and Grey&#8217;s Are Back, and Down Over Last Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:07:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-11300</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-11300</guid>
		<description>Andy - Hope you&#039;re right about the ratings going up tonite for Supernatural.  Tomorrow will tell the tale. :?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; Hope you&#8217;re right about the ratings going up tonite for Supernatural.  Tomorrow will tell the tale. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17066</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17066</guid>
		<description>Andy - Hope you&#039;re right about the ratings going up tonite for Supernatural.  Tomorrow will tell the tale. :?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; Hope you&#39;re right about the ratings going up tonite for Supernatural.  Tomorrow will tell the tale. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-11296</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-11296</guid>
		<description>Oh Supernatural *sigh* I know last weeks episode wasn&#039;t made of gold but still--the ratings are so disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Supernatural *sigh* I know last weeks episode wasn&#8217;t made of gold but still&#8211;the ratings are so disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17065</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17065</guid>
		<description>Oh Supernatural *sigh* I know last weeks episode wasn&#039;t made of gold but still--the ratings are so disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Supernatural *sigh* I know last weeks episode wasn&#39;t made of gold but still&#8211;the ratings are so disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-11082</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-11082</guid>
		<description>I agree with VSgroi.  I liked Ghostfacers (GF).  I understand why people might not like it because of its timing in the shortened season, but it was funny and creepy (think Sammy in the birthday hat!).

Andy, I disagree about Ben Edlund.  I do like Jeremy Carver&#039;s stuff, but Ben Edlund&#039;s previous episodes have been good.  In addition to GF, he wrote Malleus Maleficarum, Bad Day at Black Rock (great physical comedy in this one), Hollywood Babylon, Nightshifter (an AWESOME episode which  introduced Agent Henricksen), and Simon Said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with VSgroi.  I liked Ghostfacers (GF).  I understand why people might not like it because of its timing in the shortened season, but it was funny and creepy (think Sammy in the birthday hat!).</p>
<p>Andy, I disagree about Ben Edlund.  I do like Jeremy Carver&#8217;s stuff, but Ben Edlund&#8217;s previous episodes have been good.  In addition to GF, he wrote Malleus Maleficarum, Bad Day at Black Rock (great physical comedy in this one), Hollywood Babylon, Nightshifter (an AWESOME episode which  introduced Agent Henricksen), and Simon Said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17064</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17064</guid>
		<description>I agree with VSgroi.  I liked Ghostfacers (GF).  I understand why people might not like it because of its timing in the shortened season, but it was funny and creepy (think Sammy in the birthday hat!).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Andy, I disagree about Ben Edlund.  I do like Jeremy Carver&#039;s stuff, but Ben Edlund&#039;s previous episodes have been good.  In addition to GF, he wrote Malleus Maleficarum, Bad Day at Black Rock (great physical comedy in this one), Hollywood Babylon, Nightshifter (an AWESOME episode which  introduced Agent Henricksen), and Simon Said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with VSgroi.  I liked Ghostfacers (GF).  I understand why people might not like it because of its timing in the shortened season, but it was funny and creepy (think Sammy in the birthday hat!).</p>
<p>Andy, I disagree about Ben Edlund.  I do like Jeremy Carver&#39;s stuff, but Ben Edlund&#39;s previous episodes have been good.  In addition to GF, he wrote Malleus Maleficarum, Bad Day at Black Rock (great physical comedy in this one), Hollywood Babylon, Nightshifter (an AWESOME episode which  introduced Agent Henricksen), and Simon Said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VSgroi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10721</link>
		<dc:creator>VSgroi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10721</guid>
		<description>I loved Thursday night&#039;s episode of &quot;Supernatural&quot;.  It was quirky with lots of laugh out loud moments.  Sure the first 10-15 minutes with no Sam or Dean was torture, but after they showed up, things were great.  The ghost was appropriately spooky, icky, and nasty.  As Dean said--visiting Morton House was their Grand Canyon.

Sad to see the lower ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Thursday night&#8217;s episode of &#8220;Supernatural&#8221;.  It was quirky with lots of laugh out loud moments.  Sure the first 10-15 minutes with no Sam or Dean was torture, but after they showed up, things were great.  The ghost was appropriately spooky, icky, and nasty.  As Dean said&#8211;visiting Morton House was their Grand Canyon.</p>
<p>Sad to see the lower ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VSgroi</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17063</link>
		<dc:creator>VSgroi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17063</guid>
		<description>I loved Thursday night&#039;s episode of &quot;Supernatural&quot;.  It was quirky with lots of laugh out loud moments.  Sure the first 10-15 minutes with no Sam or Dean was torture, but after they showed up, things were great.  The ghost was appropriately spooky, icky, and nasty.  As Dean said--visiting Morton House was their Grand Canyon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sad to see the lower ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Thursday night&#39;s episode of &#8220;Supernatural&#8221;.  It was quirky with lots of laugh out loud moments.  Sure the first 10-15 minutes with no Sam or Dean was torture, but after they showed up, things were great.  The ghost was appropriately spooky, icky, and nasty.  As Dean said&#8211;visiting Morton House was their Grand Canyon.</p>
<p>Sad to see the lower ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10683</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10683</guid>
		<description>lol at Tony.

+ 1 to Jack.

Anyway, I agree with Polly. Supernatural last night was disappointing. I think it&#039;s time Ben Edlund (who wrote Ghostfacers, and also created Bela) needs to start writing a LOT less. He&#039;s simply not as talented as writers like Jeremy Carver (who wrote Mystery Spot).

I&#039;m actually somewhat glad that only 2.27 tuned in. It&#039;s a clear indication to the writers that episodes like this aren&#039;t as appreciated as episodes like Mystery Spot, or Dream a Little Dream of Me, etc.

Next week the ratings should go up, Long Distance Caller looks superb. And Edlund didn&#039;t write it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol at Tony.</p>
<p>+ 1 to Jack.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree with Polly. Supernatural last night was disappointing. I think it&#8217;s time Ben Edlund (who wrote Ghostfacers, and also created Bela) needs to start writing a LOT less. He&#8217;s simply not as talented as writers like Jeremy Carver (who wrote Mystery Spot).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually somewhat glad that only 2.27 tuned in. It&#8217;s a clear indication to the writers that episodes like this aren&#8217;t as appreciated as episodes like Mystery Spot, or Dream a Little Dream of Me, etc.</p>
<p>Next week the ratings should go up, Long Distance Caller looks superb. And Edlund didn&#8217;t write it. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17062</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17062</guid>
		<description>lol at Tony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;+ 1 to Jack.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I agree with Polly. Supernatural last night was disappointing. I think it&#039;s time Ben Edlund (who wrote Ghostfacers, and also created Bela) needs to start writing a LOT less. He&#039;s simply not as talented as writers like Jeremy Carver (who wrote Mystery Spot).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m actually somewhat glad that only 2.27 tuned in. It&#039;s a clear indication to the writers that episodes like this aren&#039;t as appreciated as episodes like Mystery Spot, or Dream a Little Dream of Me, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Next week the ratings should go up, Long Distance Caller looks superb. And Edlund didn&#039;t write it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol at Tony.</p>
<p>+ 1 to Jack.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree with Polly. Supernatural last night was disappointing. I think it&#39;s time Ben Edlund (who wrote Ghostfacers, and also created Bela) needs to start writing a LOT less. He&#39;s simply not as talented as writers like Jeremy Carver (who wrote Mystery Spot).</p>
<p>I&#39;m actually somewhat glad that only 2.27 tuned in. It&#39;s a clear indication to the writers that episodes like this aren&#39;t as appreciated as episodes like Mystery Spot, or Dream a Little Dream of Me, etc.</p>
<p>Next week the ratings should go up, Long Distance Caller looks superb. And Edlund didn&#39;t write it. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10671</guid>
		<description>Well, I like 30 Rock and think it&#039;s a good show, so i guess that makes me an idiot.

At least I&#039;m an idiot who knows how to turn off caps lock on my keyboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I like 30 Rock and think it&#8217;s a good show, so i guess that makes me an idiot.</p>
<p>At least I&#8217;m an idiot who knows how to turn off caps lock on my keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 09:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17061</guid>
		<description>Well, I like 30 Rock and think it&#039;s a good show, so i guess that makes me an idiot.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At least I&#039;m an idiot who knows how to turn off caps lock on my keyboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I like 30 Rock and think it&#39;s a good show, so i guess that makes me an idiot.</p>
<p>At least I&#39;m an idiot who knows how to turn off caps lock on my keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10662</guid>
		<description>NBC IS THE BIGGEST IDIOT STATION EVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC IS THE BIGGEST IDIOT STATION EVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17060</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17060</guid>
		<description>NBC IS THE BIGGEST IDIOT STATION EVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC IS THE BIGGEST IDIOT STATION EVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10659</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10659</guid>
		<description>30 ROCK IS THE WORST SHOW EVER.ANYONE WHO THINKS ITS GOOD IS A IDIOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 ROCK IS THE WORST SHOW EVER.ANYONE WHO THINKS ITS GOOD IS A IDIOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17059</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 07:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17059</guid>
		<description>30 ROCK IS THE WORST SHOW EVER.ANYONE WHO THINKS ITS GOOD IS A IDIOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 ROCK IS THE WORST SHOW EVER.ANYONE WHO THINKS ITS GOOD IS A IDIOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kw.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10646</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kw.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10646</guid>
		<description>I was really glad to go on Variety.com and see that LOST&#039;s 18-49 was actually a 5.5.  Which is higher than the last two episodes it had at 9 O&#039;Clock.  As long as it has a good lead in like Grey&#039;s it should do fine at 10.  And I guess it really doesn&#039;t matter what it does during the finale since it will fall out of the Nielsen season and May sweeps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really glad to go on Variety.com and see that LOST&#8217;s 18-49 was actually a 5.5.  Which is higher than the last two episodes it had at 9 O&#8217;Clock.  As long as it has a good lead in like Grey&#8217;s it should do fine at 10.  And I guess it really doesn&#8217;t matter what it does during the finale since it will fall out of the Nielsen season and May sweeps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kw.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17058</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kw.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17058</guid>
		<description>I was really glad to go on &lt;a href=&quot;http://Variety.com&quot;&gt;Variety.com&lt;/a&gt; and see that LOST&#039;s 18-49 was actually a 5.5.  Which is higher than the last two episodes it had at 9 O&#039;Clock.  As long as it has a good lead in like Grey&#039;s it should do fine at 10.  And I guess it really doesn&#039;t matter what it does during the finale since it will fall out of the Nielsen season and May sweeps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really glad to go on <a href="http://Variety.com">Variety.com</a> and see that LOST&#39;s 18-49 was actually a 5.5.  Which is higher than the last two episodes it had at 9 O&#39;Clock.  As long as it has a good lead in like Grey&#39;s it should do fine at 10.  And I guess it really doesn&#39;t matter what it does during the finale since it will fall out of the Nielsen season and May sweeps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10621</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10621</guid>
		<description>Personally, I liked the Supernatural episode last night just fine - I thought it was quirky and fun and a nice little light episode before what I&#039;m sure is going to be three gut-twisting episodes for the rest of this season (jut like Hollywood Babylon last year, if y&#039;all will recall...) - and I&#039;m shocked at these ratings. 

Could the fact that the CW programming was pre-empted in Chicago due to the White Sox game be to blame for part of it? And is there any way to find out if it was pre-empted on other major affiliates? I know that pre-emption can&#039;t be to blame for how badly it performed by itself - that there were other factors, including know doubt confusion over &quot;wtf is this and where are Sam and Dean?&quot; by some viewers and disinterest in others - but still I&#039;d like to know how great an impact pre-emptions had on the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I liked the Supernatural episode last night just fine &#8211; I thought it was quirky and fun and a nice little light episode before what I&#8217;m sure is going to be three gut-twisting episodes for the rest of this season (jut like Hollywood Babylon last year, if y&#8217;all will recall&#8230;) &#8211; and I&#8217;m shocked at these ratings. </p>
<p>Could the fact that the CW programming was pre-empted in Chicago due to the White Sox game be to blame for part of it? And is there any way to find out if it was pre-empted on other major affiliates? I know that pre-emption can&#8217;t be to blame for how badly it performed by itself &#8211; that there were other factors, including know doubt confusion over &#8220;wtf is this and where are Sam and Dean?&#8221; by some viewers and disinterest in others &#8211; but still I&#8217;d like to know how great an impact pre-emptions had on the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachael</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17057</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17057</guid>
		<description>Personally, I liked the Supernatural episode last night just fine - I thought it was quirky and fun and a nice little light episode before what I&#039;m sure is going to be three gut-twisting episodes for the rest of this season (jut like Hollywood Babylon last year, if y&#039;all will recall...) - and I&#039;m shocked at these ratings. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Could the fact that the CW programming was pre-empted in Chicago due to the White Sox game be to blame for part of it? And is there any way to find out if it was pre-empted on other major affiliates? I know that pre-emption can&#039;t be to blame for how badly it performed by itself - that there were other factors, including know doubt confusion over &quot;wtf is this and where are Sam and Dean?&quot; by some viewers and disinterest in others - but still I&#039;d like to know how great an impact pre-emptions had on the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I liked the Supernatural episode last night just fine &#8211; I thought it was quirky and fun and a nice little light episode before what I&#39;m sure is going to be three gut-twisting episodes for the rest of this season (jut like Hollywood Babylon last year, if y&#39;all will recall&#8230;) &#8211; and I&#39;m shocked at these ratings. </p>
<p>Could the fact that the CW programming was pre-empted in Chicago due to the White Sox game be to blame for part of it? And is there any way to find out if it was pre-empted on other major affiliates? I know that pre-emption can&#39;t be to blame for how badly it performed by itself &#8211; that there were other factors, including know doubt confusion over &#8220;wtf is this and where are Sam and Dean?&#8221; by some viewers and disinterest in others &#8211; but still I&#39;d like to know how great an impact pre-emptions had on the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maria</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10616</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10616</guid>
		<description>Supernatural&#039;s ratings were down because it really wasn&#039;t a &quot;Supernatural&quot; episode. It was more like an introduction to another show called Ghostfacers, compliments of Supernatural. If you didn&#039;t know better, just watching the first half hour- was like; they put something else on! where is Supernatural? then finally we see Dean and Sam, for about 15 minutes after the half hour it was Supernatural-like, then we get Ghostfacers again. Then two more minutes of Dean and Sam at the end. So we wait one more week to see an actual episode of Supernatural. Three more eps. is not as good as four but that&#039;s ok. Man what were they thinking, we wanted to watch Supernatural, not Ghostfacers. For new people who saw this episode, please watch next week, this is not a typical example of Supernatural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supernatural&#8217;s ratings were down because it really wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;Supernatural&#8221; episode. It was more like an introduction to another show called Ghostfacers, compliments of Supernatural. If you didn&#8217;t know better, just watching the first half hour- was like; they put something else on! where is Supernatural? then finally we see Dean and Sam, for about 15 minutes after the half hour it was Supernatural-like, then we get Ghostfacers again. Then two more minutes of Dean and Sam at the end. So we wait one more week to see an actual episode of Supernatural. Three more eps. is not as good as four but that&#8217;s ok. Man what were they thinking, we wanted to watch Supernatural, not Ghostfacers. For new people who saw this episode, please watch next week, this is not a typical example of Supernatural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maria</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17056</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17056</guid>
		<description>Supernatural&#039;s ratings were down because it really wasn&#039;t a &quot;Supernatural&quot; episode. It was more like an introduction to another show called Ghostfacers, compliments of Supernatural. If you didn&#039;t know better, just watching the first half hour- was like; they put something else on! where is Supernatural? then finally we see Dean and Sam, for about 15 minutes after the half hour it was Supernatural-like, then we get Ghostfacers again. Then two more minutes of Dean and Sam at the end. So we wait one more week to see an actual episode of Supernatural. Three more eps. is not as good as four but that&#039;s ok. Man what were they thinking, we wanted to watch Supernatural, not Ghostfacers. For new people who saw this episode, please watch next week, this is not a typical example of Supernatural.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supernatural&#39;s ratings were down because it really wasn&#39;t a &#8220;Supernatural&#8221; episode. It was more like an introduction to another show called Ghostfacers, compliments of Supernatural. If you didn&#39;t know better, just watching the first half hour- was like; they put something else on! where is Supernatural? then finally we see Dean and Sam, for about 15 minutes after the half hour it was Supernatural-like, then we get Ghostfacers again. Then two more minutes of Dean and Sam at the end. So we wait one more week to see an actual episode of Supernatural. Three more eps. is not as good as four but that&#39;s ok. Man what were they thinking, we wanted to watch Supernatural, not Ghostfacers. For new people who saw this episode, please watch next week, this is not a typical example of Supernatural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10613</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>Nessa - I understand the spoof idea (and what they were spoofing), I just think that they wasted an opportunity to win over viewers that might have started watching during the strike.  (I also think that as far as spoofs go, this was a bad one.) In case anyone wonders I think Supernatural is great (just not last night and 16% of the viewers seemed to agree. Unfortunately for the CW they need all the viewers they can get and this didn&#039;t help.) 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nessa &#8211; I understand the spoof idea (and what they were spoofing), I just think that they wasted an opportunity to win over viewers that might have started watching during the strike.  (I also think that as far as spoofs go, this was a bad one.) In case anyone wonders I think Supernatural is great (just not last night and 16% of the viewers seemed to agree. Unfortunately for the CW they need all the viewers they can get and this didn&#8217;t help.) </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17055</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-17055</guid>
		<description>Nessa - I understand the spoof idea (and what they were spoofing), I just think that they wasted an opportunity to win over viewers that might have started watching during the strike.  (I also think that as far as spoofs go, this was a bad one.) In case anyone wonders I think Supernatural is great (just not last night and 16% of the viewers seemed to agree. Unfortunately for the CW they need all the viewers they can get and this didn&#039;t help.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for sharing your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nessa &#8211; I understand the spoof idea (and what they were spoofing), I just think that they wasted an opportunity to win over viewers that might have started watching during the strike.  (I also think that as far as spoofs go, this was a bad one.) In case anyone wonders I think Supernatural is great (just not last night and 16% of the viewers seemed to agree. Unfortunately for the CW they need all the viewers they can get and this didn&#39;t help.) </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nessa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10610</link>
		<dc:creator>Nessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/25/nielsen-ratings-thur-apr-24-new-csi-and-greys-are-back-and-down-over-last-year/3508#comment-10610</guid>
		<description>Polly: I understand where you&#039;re coming from, I just don&#039;t think that&#039;s what they were trying to do. They were honestly making it a show that took all those lame stereotypes about reality shows, the Blair Witch Project, Ghost Hunters, and expectations of SN and making it ridiculous in a funny way that people could tell it was a spoof. But I get that people don&#039;t like that type of thing, and you&#039;re either in or your out. Personally, I never cared for the episode Tall Tales in season 2, but after a while, I realized it was pretty good, just an aquired feeling. 


Matt: See, that&#039;s what I think of last night&#039;s show. It was nice to have something fresh and original that they haven&#039;t done before, and when you watch the entire season 3 as a whole, you can also see that it&#039;s a much needed comedic break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polly: I understand where you&#8217;re coming from, I just don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what they were trying to do. They were honestly making it a show that took all those lame stereotypes about reality shows, the Blair Witch Project, Ghost Hunters, and expectations of SN and making it ridiculous in a funny way that people could tell it was a spoof. But I get that people don&#8217;t like that type of thing, and you&#8217;re either in or your out. Personally, I never cared for the episode Tall Tales in season 2, but after a while, I realized it was pretty good, just an aquired feeling. </p>
<p>Matt: See, that&#8217;s what I think of last night&#8217;s show. It was nice to have something fresh and original that they haven&#8217;t done before, and when you watch the entire season 3 as a whole, you can also see that it&#8217;s a much needed comedic break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
