<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings for May 1: Where Are The TV Viewers Going?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:43:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11540</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. 

1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#8217;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#8217;d program, where it&#8217;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#8217;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16273</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16273</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#39;s Feb 28 episode was the #1 DVR&#39;d program, where it&#39;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#39;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC 2/28/08 TOTAL DVR+7 14,998, an increase over same day of 11,020 by 3,978 (percentage increase: 36.1%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11539</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11539</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. 

1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998 
11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#8217;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#8217;d program, where it&#8217;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#8217;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998<br />
11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16272</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16272</guid>
		<description>From this website----as an example.  Lost&#039;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#039;d program, where it&#039;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &quot;Lost&quot;, the DVR adjustment is not &quot;overrated.&quot;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &quot;Lost&quot; is one of those shows, so you really can&#039;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998 &lt;br&gt;11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this website&#8212;-as an example.  Lost&#39;s Feb 27 episode was the #1 DVR&#39;d program, where it&#39;s same day overnight audience of 12.8 million increased to 15.0 million (rounded)when DVR + 7 day viewers were included.   So for some shows, like &#8220;Lost&#8221;, the DVR adjustment is not &#8220;overrated.&#8221;  In fact, it is frankly impossible to appreciate the total audeince for a show so many PREFER to put on DVR so they can watch it more closely.  &#8220;Lost&#8221; is one of those shows, so you really can&#39;t evaluate it solely based on the overnights. </p>
<p>1 LOST ABC TOTAL DVR+7 14,998 <br />11,020 3,978 36.1% 12,893 47.1%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11521</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11521</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know, I&#039;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, I&#8217;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16271</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16271</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I know, I&#039;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I know, I&#39;m just saying it was nice seeing it that high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11488</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11488</guid>
		<description>Zach a couple of week&#039;s ago was the ideal situation -- it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#039;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#039;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach a couple of week&#8217;s ago was the ideal situation &#8212; it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#8217;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#8217;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16270</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16270</guid>
		<description>Zach a couple of week&#039;s ago was the ideal situation -- it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#039;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#039;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach a couple of week&#39;s ago was the ideal situation &#8212; it was up against repeats on ABC and CBS.  The last 2 weeks both Grey&#39;s and CSI were back and new.  I&#39;m sure the Office will pick many of the dropped viewers back up via DVR viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11485</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11485</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10... :(  Oh well... still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now... they would never cancel it ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Oh well&#8230; still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now&#8230; they would never cancel it ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach10</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16269</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16269</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10... :(  Oh well... still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now... they would never cancel it ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s sad to see The Office back down in the 7 Millions, when a couple of weeks ago it almost broke 10&#8230; <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Oh well&#8230; still the highest rated Comedy show on NBC right now&#8230; they would never cancel it ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11455</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11455</guid>
		<description>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. 

I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. </p>
<p>I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16268</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16268</guid>
		<description>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if I completely agree this has been the weakest season.  I think we had a weak start but I think once the Christmas episode hit the show really hit their stride and turned out awesome episode after awesome episode. </p>
<p>I think the huge breaks, the lack of promotion, and the cult style of the show is what has dropped the ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11448</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11448</guid>
		<description>I liked Supernatural last night.

The numbers are surprising. If they don&#039;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#039;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#039;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#039;Supernatural&#039;.

I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#039;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#039;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Supernatural last night.</p>
<p>The numbers are surprising. If they don&#8217;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#8217;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#8217;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#8216;Supernatural&#8217;.</p>
<p>I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#8217;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#8217;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16267</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16267</guid>
		<description>I liked Supernatural last night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The numbers are surprising. If they don&#039;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#039;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#039;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#039;Supernatural&#039;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#039;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#039;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Supernatural last night.</p>
<p>The numbers are surprising. If they don&#39;t bump up to 3 mil for the final 2 I&#39;m going to assume that we lost viewers due to: the long ass hiatus and the quality of season 3 in general, since it&#39;s been the weakest season of the 3. Lack of actual scares this season, which is what made Supernatural &#39;Supernatural&#39;.</p>
<p>I really wish more people knew about the show. Everyone&#39;s missing out, and the more viewers we get, there&#39;s a higher probability of a bigger budget, which is obviously a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11445</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11445</guid>
		<description>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TONY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16266</link>
		<dc:creator>TONY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16266</guid>
		<description>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 rocks sucks whens it going to go to the dumps where it belongs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11433</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11433</guid>
		<description>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#039;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#039;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#039;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.

I think Lost&#039;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#039;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#039;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#039;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#039;s space to fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#8217;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#8217;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#8217;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.</p>
<p>I think Lost&#8217;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#8217;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#8217;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#8217;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#8217;s space to fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16265</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16265</guid>
		<description>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#039;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#039;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#039;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think Lost&#039;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#039;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#039;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#039;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#039;s space to fill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the media backlash occurred last year, Lost lost quite a few viewers. It&#39;s trending similar to last season now, which makes it a winner considering how much other series are down over last year. If you want to compare to two years ago, take a look at the numbers for most of the top series (CSI, GA, DH, AI, etc). All have lost significant amounts of viewers. Lost only had one streak where it consistently drew more than 20 million, and that was the first half of season 2 fresh off its emmy win. It&#39;s typical ratings during seasons 1-3.5 were between 16 and 18 million. So it&#39;s lost about a third of that audience, but so have most other top rated series.</p>
<p>I think Lost&#39;s decline is also attributable to ABC&#39;s constant tinkering with the schedule. What other network would move around a big hit series like ABC has with Lost? Any other network would treat it like a treasure and build a night around it, but on ABC, it just doesn&#39;t seem to fit the relationship drama mold, so they really don&#39;t know what to do with it. Now they just seem to shove it on the schedule where there&#39;s space to fill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11430</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11430</guid>
		<description>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.

I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.</p>
<p>I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16264</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16264</guid>
		<description>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smallville picked up viewers the second half, because it was a great episode. It was like watching a movie event.</p>
<p>I work in the video industry, and I have alot of customers that do not watch tv shows when they are on anymore. They like watching all the episodes back-to-back on dvd without commericals. LOST is definitely one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11426</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11426</guid>
		<description>Cookson... i like your attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookson&#8230; i like your attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16263</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16263</guid>
		<description>Cookson... i like your attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookson&#8230; i like your attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookson</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11425</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11425</guid>
		<description>With LOST, obviously it&#039;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &quot;even&quot;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#039;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.

Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group....which LOST is always high on.

Every thing&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With LOST, obviously it&#8217;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &#8220;even&#8221;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#8217;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.</p>
<p>Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group&#8230;.which LOST is always high on.</p>
<p>Every thing&#8217;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cookson</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16262</link>
		<dc:creator>Cookson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-16262</guid>
		<description>With LOST, obviously it&#039;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &quot;even&quot;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#039;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group....which LOST is always high on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Every thing&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With LOST, obviously it&#39;s disappointing to see the numbers lower, but this entire season has been screwed up. So basically, everything is &#8220;even&#8221;, meaning almost every show has lost viewers. Nobody should be scared about LOST anyway. It&#39;s guaranteed to have another 2 seasons, with 17 episodes each.</p>
<p>Plus I mean, the MAIN ratings for nielsen is the 18-49 age group&#8230;.which LOST is always high on.</p>
<p>Every thing&#39;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11421</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597#comment-11421</guid>
		<description>Oh Supernatural you make me sad with these numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Supernatural you make me sad with these numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
