<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings Sun May 4: ABC Wins As Housewives Crush Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:38:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-15091</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-15091</guid>
		<description>It was a few years ago that I last saw the figure for 18-49s. And I didn&#039;t really look at the actual rating too much. Confusion all around  - sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a few years ago that I last saw the figure for 18-49s. And I didn&#39;t really look at the actual rating too much. Confusion all around  &#8211; sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-15090</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-15090</guid>
		<description>Doug is correct more or less though I have a slightly different number and a different explanation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An 18-49 ratings point = 1 % of the Nielsen Universe Estimate for that population (which I have at 131.5 million, so one percent = 1.315 million) . In this case each 1/10th of a point equals roughly 131,500.  FG had roughly 1.2 million more 18-49 viewers than The Simpsons.  I say roughly because Nielsen uses rounding too, so there&#039;s no way to get exactly to viewers from the ratings points but it&#039;s close enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The second number, share, represents the share of people in that demographic with their TVs turned on who were watching that program.  The Simpsons had 9% of all 18-49 year olds who were watching TV at that time.  Family Guy had 10% of all 18-49 year olds who were watching TV when it was on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug is correct more or less though I have a slightly different number and a different explanation.</p>
<p>An 18-49 ratings point = 1 % of the Nielsen Universe Estimate for that population (which I have at 131.5 million, so one percent = 1.315 million) . In this case each 1/10th of a point equals roughly 131,500.  FG had roughly 1.2 million more 18-49 viewers than The Simpsons.  I say roughly because Nielsen uses rounding too, so there&#39;s no way to get exactly to viewers from the ratings points but it&#39;s close enough.</p>
<p>The second number, share, represents the share of people in that demographic with their TVs turned on who were watching that program.  The Simpsons had 9% of all 18-49 year olds who were watching TV at that time.  Family Guy had 10% of all 18-49 year olds who were watching TV when it was on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13669</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13669</guid>
		<description>An adults 18-49 ratings point = 1.34 million viewers. So, with a 3.0 rating, The Simpsons had 4.02 million viewers in the 18-49 bracket. With a 3.0/10, 3.0 represents the total % of 18-49 households in the country watching The Simpsons, while the 10 represents the % of 18-49ers watching tv in that timeslot tuned into the show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Say, for instance, that there are 100 18-49 households in a given sample. A 3.0/10 means that 3 of those households were watching The Simpsons. But since there were only 30 households with their televisions turned on at the time, TS won 10% of the total available audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An adults 18-49 ratings point = 1.34 million viewers. So, with a 3.0 rating, The Simpsons had 4.02 million viewers in the 18-49 bracket. With a 3.0/10, 3.0 represents the total % of 18-49 households in the country watching The Simpsons, while the 10 represents the % of 18-49ers watching tv in that timeslot tuned into the show.</p>
<p>Say, for instance, that there are 100 18-49 households in a given sample. A 3.0/10 means that 3 of those households were watching The Simpsons. But since there were only 30 households with their televisions turned on at the time, TS won 10% of the total available audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13668</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13668</guid>
		<description>Andrea, you are correct.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i923e73779edeb4c5a79c388c66315e6c&quot;&gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_dis...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, you are correct.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3i923e73779edeb4c5a79c388c66315e6c"></a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_dis.." rel="nofollow">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_dis..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13667</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13667</guid>
		<description>I just read that NBC is pulling Psych and Monk from the schedule and replacing them with reruns of The Office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read that NBC is pulling Psych and Monk from the schedule and replacing them with reruns of The Office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13666</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13666</guid>
		<description>Why is ALIENS IN AMERICA still on?  Its awful and the ratings show it. Then again CW is a network thats gone down the tubes so they probably dont care about low ratings. They cancelled Veronica Mars for junk like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is ALIENS IN AMERICA still on?  Its awful and the ratings show it. Then again CW is a network thats gone down the tubes so they probably dont care about low ratings. They cancelled Veronica Mars for junk like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13665</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13665</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does 2.8 in the demo seem really high for Monk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does 2.8 in the demo seem really high for Monk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qazwsx</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13664</link>
		<dc:creator>qazwsx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13664</guid>
		<description>I am so excited for DH and Brothers and Sisters Emmy voters Take notes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so excited for DH and Brothers and Sisters Emmy voters Take notes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13663</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13663</guid>
		<description>Family Guy was hilarious last night. Top 10 episode of all time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Family Guy was hilarious last night. Top 10 episode of all time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty95</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13662</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/05/nielsen-ratings-sun-may-4-abc-wins-as-housewives-crush-field/3617#comment-13662</guid>
		<description>Wow, DH is up again ... maybe last episode will average 17 million viewers :) And I hope that finale get 18-19.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, DH is up again &#8230; maybe last episode will average 17 million viewers <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  And I hope that finale get 18-19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
