<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DVR Viewership Up 64% In Broadcast Primetime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:46:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What Do The World&#8217;s Most Influential Companies Have In Common? &#171; Participatory Marketing</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-44677</link>
		<dc:creator>What Do The World&#8217;s Most Influential Companies Have In Common? &#171; Participatory Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-44677</guid>
		<description>[...] DVRs used in 20% (up from 9%) of all households and make up 7.5% of all prime time viewers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DVRs used in 20% (up from 9%) of all households and make up 7.5% of all prime time viewers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14903</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14903</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah Regulus, THAT&#039;S what is driving DVR growth...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish Disqus had a &quot;whack job&quot; filter.  Of course, I wouldn&#039;t get to comment as much if that was the case, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah Regulus, THAT&#39;S what is driving DVR growth&#8230;</p>
<p>I wish Disqus had a &#8220;whack job&#8221; filter.  Of course, I wouldn&#39;t get to comment as much if that was the case, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14904</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14904</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah Regulus, THAT&#039;S what is driving DVR growth...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish Disqus had a &quot;whack job&quot; filter.  Of course, I wouldn&#039;t get to comment as much if that was the case, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah Regulus, THAT&#39;S what is driving DVR growth&#8230;</p>
<p>I wish Disqus had a &#8220;whack job&#8221; filter.  Of course, I wouldn&#39;t get to comment as much if that was the case, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulus</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14901</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14901</guid>
		<description>People are now using DVRs to PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN from the Quasi-Pornographic Prescription Drug Ads that Pharmacutical Companies are putting out. These ads, for products dealing with Sex and &quot;Bodily Functions&quot; are aired frequently AT TIMES WHEN CHILDREN ARE WATCHING! I&#039;ve seen them aired on Weekend Afternoon Sports Events such as NASCAR, PGA Golf and the Kentucky Derby, as well as during JEOPARDY! and WHEEL OF FORTUNE on weeknights. (Last year I even saw a VIAGARA Ad air during a Childrens Program!) The Pharmacutical Companies do not care who is watching these ads, and I do not blame Parents who have resorted to DVRs to shield their Kids from this filth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are now using DVRs to PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN from the Quasi-Pornographic Prescription Drug Ads that Pharmacutical Companies are putting out. These ads, for products dealing with Sex and &#8220;Bodily Functions&#8221; are aired frequently AT TIMES WHEN CHILDREN ARE WATCHING! I&#39;ve seen them aired on Weekend Afternoon Sports Events such as NASCAR, PGA Golf and the Kentucky Derby, as well as during JEOPARDY! and WHEEL OF FORTUNE on weeknights. (Last year I even saw a VIAGARA Ad air during a Childrens Program!) The Pharmacutical Companies do not care who is watching these ads, and I do not blame Parents who have resorted to DVRs to shield their Kids from this filth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulus</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14902</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14902</guid>
		<description>People are now using DVRs to PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN from the Quasi-Pornographic Prescription Drug Ads that Pharmacutical Companies are putting out. These ads, for products dealing with Sex and &quot;Bodily Functions&quot; are aired frequently AT TIMES WHEN CHILDREN ARE WATCHING! I&#039;ve seen them aired on Weekend Afternoon Sports Events such as NASCAR, PGA Golf and the Kentucky Derby, as well as during JEOPARDY! and WHEEL OF FORTUNE on weeknights. (Last year I even saw a VIAGARA Ad air during a Childrens Program!) The Pharmacutical Companies do not care who is watching these ads, and I do not blame Parents who have resorted to DVRs to shield their Kids from this filth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are now using DVRs to PROTECT THEIR CHILDREN from the Quasi-Pornographic Prescription Drug Ads that Pharmacutical Companies are putting out. These ads, for products dealing with Sex and &#8220;Bodily Functions&#8221; are aired frequently AT TIMES WHEN CHILDREN ARE WATCHING! I&#39;ve seen them aired on Weekend Afternoon Sports Events such as NASCAR, PGA Golf and the Kentucky Derby, as well as during JEOPARDY! and WHEEL OF FORTUNE on weeknights. (Last year I even saw a VIAGARA Ad air during a Childrens Program!) The Pharmacutical Companies do not care who is watching these ads, and I do not blame Parents who have resorted to DVRs to shield their Kids from this filth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14899</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14899</guid>
		<description>DVR is not as important as live viewers.  One of these days advertisers will look solely at who&#039;s watching commercials, than avg viewers totals.  Networks need to start creating incentives to get folks to watch their shows live.  American Idol has an advantage because it is live, and so do sports.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My idea for networks is live blogs with the cast immediately after the live viewing.  Show with rabid fan bases would eat it up. I think moonlight, gossip girl, lost, office would all see their live ratings improve a little.  It may not be a lot but this is how networks need to be thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DVR is not as important as live viewers.  One of these days advertisers will look solely at who&#39;s watching commercials, than avg viewers totals.  Networks need to start creating incentives to get folks to watch their shows live.  American Idol has an advantage because it is live, and so do sports.</p>
<p>My idea for networks is live blogs with the cast immediately after the live viewing.  Show with rabid fan bases would eat it up. I think moonlight, gossip girl, lost, office would all see their live ratings improve a little.  It may not be a lot but this is how networks need to be thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14900</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14900</guid>
		<description>DVR is not as important as live viewers.  One of these days advertisers will look solely at who&#039;s watching commercials, than avg viewers totals.  Networks need to start creating incentives to get folks to watch their shows live.  American Idol has an advantage because it is live, and so do sports.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My idea for networks is live blogs with the cast immediately after the live viewing.  Show with rabid fan bases would eat it up. I think moonlight, gossip girl, lost, office would all see their live ratings improve a little.  It may not be a lot but this is how networks need to be thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DVR is not as important as live viewers.  One of these days advertisers will look solely at who&#39;s watching commercials, than avg viewers totals.  Networks need to start creating incentives to get folks to watch their shows live.  American Idol has an advantage because it is live, and so do sports.</p>
<p>My idea for networks is live blogs with the cast immediately after the live viewing.  Show with rabid fan bases would eat it up. I think moonlight, gossip girl, lost, office would all see their live ratings improve a little.  It may not be a lot but this is how networks need to be thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob R</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14898</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comment-14898</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for publicizing this.   When I read how viewers are not returning to their favorite network shows, and network executives are puzzled, and series are recording season lows and series lows, Iand certain &quot;haters&quot; are gleefully reporting that &quot;Desperate Housewives&quot; isn&#039;t popular any more (just as an example), I want to scream at the authors of those articles to make sure they are comparing apples to apples.   You really should be comparing Live + 7 ratings for Spring 2008 to Live + 7 ratings for Spring 2007 to really determine whether, and by how much, a show&#039;s total audience has declined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for publicizing this.   When I read how viewers are not returning to their favorite network shows, and network executives are puzzled, and series are recording season lows and series lows, Iand certain &#8220;haters&#8221; are gleefully reporting that &#8220;Desperate Housewives&#8221; isn&#39;t popular any more (just as an example), I want to scream at the authors of those articles to make sure they are comparing apples to apples.   You really should be comparing Live + 7 ratings for Spring 2008 to Live + 7 ratings for Spring 2007 to really determine whether, and by how much, a show&#39;s total audience has declined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
