HBO Wants on iTunes, But it Wants Flexible Pricing - TV Ratings, Nielsen Ratings, Television Show Ratings | TVbytheNumbers.com

Categorized | '

Note to HBO: Legacy Thinking is OK For You, But…

Posted on 12 May 2008 by Robert Seidman

HBOI don’t want to tell HBO to stop using legacy thinking.  I would advise it that traditional television industry legacy thinking is bad for it, but HBO’s legacy is this: The Sopranos and Sex in the City.   Throw in some Big Love, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Entourage, and Flight of the Conchords if you must, but none of them are the draws that Sopranos and Sex were.

HBO is trying to go old school legacy. It wants on Apple’s iTunes, but it wants flexible pricing.  That’s not the kind of legacy thinking HBO should be using.

HBO needs to get over that because it’s dumb thinking.  We’re moving towards people not wanting to pay for content at all, in any situation, and they’d like to have the flexibility to get on iTunes and charge more.

Here’s why the iTunes pricing is OK as it is at $1.99:

If HBO airs two shows a week that you like, and you download both of them 4 times a month each, that’s already $16.  You’re better off just subscribing to HBO.  And if they can’t produce two shows a week you like and you’re not in it for the movies?  That’s HBO’s problem (and that is in fact, HBO’s main problem!).

I understand wanting to embrace new tech AND still having the illusion of control, but they’d be better off offering people like me who are already PAYING FOR HBO a $2 month surcharge to have free downloads of the shows I already paid for so that I can stick Entourage on the iPhone easily.  I wouldn’t pay $5 a month extra for that, but I might pay $2/mo, though I think it someday will just be bundled into the subscription price because it will need to  be in order to be competitive.  HBO is obviously not embracing that future reality yet. 

Better still, HBO should focus on making sure it has two shows a week that millions want to watch. That is HBO’s legacy.  Unfortunately, it’s not HBO’s present reality, but merely a thing of the past.

Silicon Alley Insider’s take is that if it’s true that Apple really caved on pricing, the next round of negotiations with the studios could get a little hectic for Apple.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz

5 Comments For This Post

  1. dave says:

    nobody should be paying any amount of money for any television content when its so readily available for free. (albeit illegally)

  2. Julia says:

    Well, it appears HBO got what it wanted. They are now up on iTunes, and one hour series are $2.99 an episode. Half hour are $1.99.

  3. Robert Seidman says:

    While I don't think it would be a wildly used distribution method for HBO — I encourage one and all to try out The Wire!

  4. Julia says:

    You know, thinking about it, I can understand HBO's argument. While I think they would be better off with keeping prices low, their hour long episodes are really 60 minutes, as opposed to the 42 minutes you get with other networks. So you are paying more, but you are getting more.

    But what I would like to do is pay HBO and/or Showtime a monthly fee to watch streams on their sites. I would be happy to pay whatever the monthly fee is for it through a cable network. Or an ala carte method would be really nice. You can get access to one show's streams, which are available within 24 hours of airing, for $5/month. Two shows for $7, etc. For those of us who don't want to get HBO on our TVs, I think it would be a great solution.

  5. Robert Seidman says:

    Julia many of the episodes really are an hour, and considering the DVD pricing it's easy to understand why HBO wanted to do this. But what I don't like about this deal is that the episodes will ONLY be released to iTunes ONCE they are available on DVD. You will *not* be able to download HBO shows the day/week/etc after they aired — at least not from iTunes :-)