<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen Ratings May 20, 2008: Kristi Wins, Will David Cook Win Too?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:52:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vader0309</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-14797</link>
		<dc:creator>vader0309</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-14797</guid>
		<description>Some people will continue to watch a show, to see what is on. Ratings catch that don&#039;t they? and even in that Shark Dropped Six million viewers meaning they couldn&#039;t hold the NCIS Viewers. Now again read the post from  **ATTENTION CBS MODERATORS** on the board that I wrote to you. that is all I ask. and in all actuality. When it comes to viewership. Networks want shows that will hold viewers from one show to the next. I am not mathematically challenged. The 2 hour lead in, gave a better shot for more viewers. if it was a crap show in between I don&#039;t think Shark would have had 10 million viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people will continue to watch a show, to see what is on. Ratings catch that don&#39;t they? and even in that Shark Dropped Six million viewers meaning they couldn&#39;t hold the NCIS Viewers. Now again read the post from  **ATTENTION CBS MODERATORS** on the board that I wrote to you. that is all I ask. and in all actuality. When it comes to viewership. Networks want shows that will hold viewers from one show to the next. I am not mathematically challenged. The 2 hour lead in, gave a better shot for more viewers. if it was a crap show in between I don&#39;t think Shark would have had 10 million viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-13754</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 11:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-13754</guid>
		<description>Why would NCIS being 2 hours long increase viewer numbers?  Whether a program is 30 minutes or 2 hours makes no difference.  Its not like there were 8 million viewers for hour 1 and 8 million for hour 2 and they added them up.  Some people here like Vader are mathematically challenged.  Except in regards to the amount of revenue it generates because you can stuff more commercials into 2 hours than you can 30 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would NCIS being 2 hours long increase viewer numbers?  Whether a program is 30 minutes or 2 hours makes no difference.  Its not like there were 8 million viewers for hour 1 and 8 million for hour 2 and they added them up.  Some people here like Vader are mathematically challenged.  Except in regards to the amount of revenue it generates because you can stuff more commercials into 2 hours than you can 30 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vader0309</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-13753</link>
		<dc:creator>vader0309</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-13753</guid>
		<description>Not to go against you or anything but NCIS was 2 hours long, and maybe that was the reason for higher numbers. Is it a fact, No. however I would to have liked and see if that would have happened for Jericho. Guess Who, I did post to you in one of the recent posts on the Jericho Message board. Check it out and get back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to go against you or anything but NCIS was 2 hours long, and maybe that was the reason for higher numbers. Is it a fact, No. however I would to have liked and see if that would have happened for Jericho. Guess Who, I did post to you in one of the recent posts on the Jericho Message board. Check it out and get back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-13752</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-13752</guid>
		<description>Im suprised they killed off SHARK with 10.5 million viewers -   CBS wanted 10-11 million viewers to show up for Jericho Season 2 in order to get a season 3 in the same DEATH slot.   CBS is brutal !!! LOL !  Maybe the fans will start sending Sharks Teeth to CBS to protest?  LOL x 1000!!!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I cant believe the crybaby on HELLS KITCHEN didnt get the boot.  Maybe next week. Isnt he the one sweating into the food in the previews?   Eww !! Makes me never want to eat out again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im suprised they killed off SHARK with 10.5 million viewers &#8211;   CBS wanted 10-11 million viewers to show up for Jericho Season 2 in order to get a season 3 in the same DEATH slot.   CBS is brutal !!! LOL !  Maybe the fans will start sending Sharks Teeth to CBS to protest?  LOL x 1000!!!</p>
<p>I cant believe the crybaby on HELLS KITCHEN didnt get the boot.  Maybe next week. Isnt he the one sweating into the food in the previews?   Eww !! Makes me never want to eat out again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-13751</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-13751</guid>
		<description>Chris, with CW launching new episodes a few weeks earlier than other networks (Sept 1, I believe), it will be interesting to see what kind of fall they have.  I think they need to get shows like GG, One Tree Hill and Supernatural averaging over 3 million viewers after a month or two of new episodes or jobs and/or the network itself will be on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, with CW launching new episodes a few weeks earlier than other networks (Sept 1, I believe), it will be interesting to see what kind of fall they have.  I think they need to get shows like GG, One Tree Hill and Supernatural averaging over 3 million viewers after a month or two of new episodes or jobs and/or the network itself will be on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elyk988</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-13750</link>
		<dc:creator>Elyk988</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-13750</guid>
		<description>Shark had a good run.  Too bad for James Woods.&lt;br&gt;Was this the last night of new episodes, or is it tomorrow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shark had a good run.  Too bad for James Woods.<br />Was this the last night of new episodes, or is it tomorrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/21/nielsen-ratings-may-20-2008-kristi-wins-will-david-cook-win-too/3857#comment-13749</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=3857#comment-13749</guid>
		<description>Reaper was great, The CW did a smart thing in renewing but why do we have to wait for mid season??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reaper was great, The CW did a smart thing in renewing but why do we have to wait for mid season??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
