Categorized | '

NBA Finals: Nielsen Nation Says, “Where Have You Gone Michael Jordan? Our Nation Doesn’t Turn Its Lonely Eyes to Kobe and KG”

Posted on 08 June 2008 by Robert Seidman

Michael Jordan was a hit with casual NBA Fans and TV Viewers

With apologies to Simon & Garfunkel.

Last Thursday night’s NBA finals generated 13.38 million viewers according to Nielsen.  This is much better than last year (when game one drew 9.21 million, so Kobe and KG at least aren’t quite as lonely as Lebron James and Tim Duncan) but a far cry from the Michael Jordan era when the NBA finals he participated in routinely averaged over 25 million viewers, almost twice as many as watched on Thursday night.

While I think it’s a lock I’m going to lose the lunch bet to Bill Gorman should the series between the Los Angeles Lakers and Boston Celtics extend to six games (Bill bet the finals would average over 15 million viewers, I took the under), it’s still a far cry from the glory days.   So we’ll let you weigh in too, not just for tonight’s game, but for the whole series.  How many people do you think this year’s finals will average. So far, it’s averaging 13.38 million.     Please note: you can ignore the preliminary numbers we’ll receive for the primetime portion of the game (9p-11p) because they’re awful for live events.  Last Thursday’s game was off by over 3 million viewers in the preliminary results.

How Many Average Viewers for This Year's NBA Finals?

  • 13 Million to 15 million (30%, 200 Votes)
  • 15 million to 17 million (29%, 194 Votes)
  • 11 million to 13 million (18%, 120 Votes)
  • Under 10 Million (14%, 95 Votes)
  • Over 17 Million (9%, 66 Votes)

Total Voters: 675

Loading ... Loading ...
Share:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • email

6 Responses to “NBA Finals: Nielsen Nation Says, “Where Have You Gone Michael Jordan? Our Nation Doesn’t Turn Its Lonely Eyes to Kobe and KG””

  1. glsilver497 says:

    309 votes and no comment?come on people.i take 15–17million.it will get a better rating today.

  2. gsilver, I guess people like voting in polls better than commenting! I think your pick is probably right though, at least if the series goes more than 5 games and it is the “wisdom of the crowds” pick!

  3. Josh Catone says:

    Actually, we probably did have Yahoo! Sports… but… still. ;)

  4. Catone,

    There was Yahoo Sports *and* if you can believe it, TiVo (though only about 12 of us) in 1998! I respectfully disagree somewhat about star power. Tiger Woods *still* makes a huge difference in ratings for Golf in 2008. The drop off in ratings if TW isn't in the tournament (or even in the running the final day) is immense.

    Fragmentation is an issue in the aggregate, but if it mattered that much the February 2008 Super Bowl wouldn't have had record TV viewers.

  5. Josh Catone says:

    Certainly a solid point — I know I won't be as interested in the US Open this year if Tiger's not in the hunt on Sunday. ;)

    That said, I'm not sure if you can compare the Super Bowl (a one-off event) so well with the NBA Finals (dragged out over 2 weeks).

  6. Agree that the Super Bowl isn't a direct (or “fair”) comparison. But I have trouble attributing 100% better ratings 10 years ago for the NBA finals completely to fragmentation. Stars definitely draw in the more casual viewer. Of course I haven't seen last night's ratings yet and if Lakers can win 2 or 3 games in LA, the gap between 1998 will surely narrow at least a bit.


Renew of Cancel Index


Play Fan Excuse Bingo!