<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overnight Ratings for Monday Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/overnight-ratings-for-monday-update/4661/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/overnight-ratings-for-monday-update/4661</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:03:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/overnight-ratings-for-monday-update/4661#comment-14919</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4661#comment-14919</guid>
		<description>Full numbers now up @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/nielsen-ratings-monday-august-11-olympics-viewing-down-but-still-dominant/4662&quot;&gt;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/nielsen-ra...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TSCC, not so good, but no surprises really.  TVa, I&#039;m with you, I figured ~7 million and near a 2.0.  The results for 2.5 are extremely impressive to me. There&#039;s loyal, core audiences and then there are loyal core audiences! But much of it&#039;s 18-49 audience is over 34 because for that half hour 2.5 men lost to Fuego en la Sangre in the 18-34 demo (2.2/6 for Fuego vs. 1.4/4 for 2.5 -- a pretty healthy beatdown).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full numbers now up @ <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/nielsen-ratings-monday-august-11-olympics-viewing-down-but-still-dominant/4662"></a><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/nielsen-ra.." rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/nielsen-ra..</a>.</p>
<p>TSCC, not so good, but no surprises really.  TVa, I&#39;m with you, I figured ~7 million and near a 2.0.  The results for 2.5 are extremely impressive to me. There&#39;s loyal, core audiences and then there are loyal core audiences! But much of it&#39;s 18-49 audience is over 34 because for that half hour 2.5 men lost to Fuego en la Sangre in the 18-34 demo (2.2/6 for Fuego vs. 1.4/4 for 2.5 &#8212; a pretty healthy beatdown).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TVaholic</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/overnight-ratings-for-monday-update/4661#comment-14918</link>
		<dc:creator>TVaholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4661#comment-14918</guid>
		<description>I am very surprised at Two and A Half Men&#039;s ratings. I had the under all the way. I thought if it could get 6 million, it would have done well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very surprised at Two and A Half Men&#39;s ratings. I had the under all the way. I thought if it could get 6 million, it would have done well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/12/overnight-ratings-for-monday-update/4661#comment-12962</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4661#comment-12962</guid>
		<description>How did TERMINATOR do, night two???&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want this show to get amazing numbers!&lt;br&gt;So Stoked for Season 2!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did TERMINATOR do, night two???</p>
<p>I want this show to get amazing numbers!<br />So Stoked for Season 2!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
