<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lots More Olympic Viewing if You Have High Definition?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/16/lots-more-olympic-viewing-if-you-have-high-definition/4705/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/16/lots-more-olympic-viewing-if-you-have-high-definition/4705</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:56:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/16/lots-more-olympic-viewing-if-you-have-high-definition/4705#comment-14415</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4705#comment-14415</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  It raises some questions for me regarding how Nielsen tracks/measures this, but the relative comparisons are still interesting.  I&#039;d put some of the &quot;mediocrity&quot; on there just being sooooo many hours of coverage, but since you&#039;re only talking about primetime, I probably can&#039;t do that.  The HD bump by event would make a pretty good chart -- I wish we had the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does Nielsen do any additional segmentation? Like by size of TV, source of HD signal (cable, satellite, OTA)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  It raises some questions for me regarding how Nielsen tracks/measures this, but the relative comparisons are still interesting.  I&#39;d put some of the &quot;mediocrity&quot; on there just being sooooo many hours of coverage, but since you&#39;re only talking about primetime, I probably can&#39;t do that.  The HD bump by event would make a pretty good chart &#8212; I wish we had the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Does Nielsen do any additional segmentation? Like by size of TV, source of HD signal (cable, satellite, OTA)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/08/16/lots-more-olympic-viewing-if-you-have-high-definition/4705#comment-14414</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4705#comment-14414</guid>
		<description>Nielsen actually does track HDTV homes. As of a couple days ago the Olympics were averaging a 21.5 in Prime in HD homes, or +25% better than they were then doing in all homes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I posted this fact in Cuban&#039;s blog comments as well. Wonder if he reads the comments?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe it or not, the 25% bump could be called mediocre for a big sports event. The Super Bowl was +40% higher in HD homes. So was the World Series, NFC Playoffs, Masters, etc. (I&#039;m ballparking here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nielsen actually does track HDTV homes. As of a couple days ago the Olympics were averaging a 21.5 in Prime in HD homes, or +25% better than they were then doing in all homes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I posted this fact in Cuban&#39;s blog comments as well. Wonder if he reads the comments?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe it or not, the 25% bump could be called mediocre for a big sports event. The Super Bowl was +40% higher in HD homes. So was the World Series, NFC Playoffs, Masters, etc. (I&#39;m ballparking here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
