<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratings Tuesday, September 2: Viewers Return to 90210</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:56:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-26274</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-26274</guid>
		<description>I loved 90210 in the 90&#039;s. I still watch the Rerun&#039;s. How ever I  think the new 90210 stinks. Shannon aged alot also. You can see it totally in her face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved 90210 in the 90&#8217;s. I still watch the Rerun&#8217;s. How ever I  think the new 90210 stinks. Shannon aged alot also. You can see it totally in her face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dereon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-22537</link>
		<dc:creator>dereon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-22537</guid>
		<description>I think i some what agree with roy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think i some what agree with roy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21717</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21717</guid>
		<description>Final ratings for 90210 went down to 4.65 and the 18-49 demo dropped to 2.6/7 . . . they definitely were not near 5 million!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final ratings for 90210 went down to 4.65 and the 18-49 demo dropped to 2.6/7 . . . they definitely were not near 5 million!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21637</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21637</guid>
		<description>I dunno Roy.  Here in San Francisco they had biplanes flying over advertising the premiere of 90210 -- I&#039;m sure that happened in several other cities at least. On a guess CW spent more promoting 90210&#039;s premiere than GG&#039;s season premiere, but it&#039;s just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno Roy.  Here in San Francisco they had biplanes flying over advertising the premiere of 90210 &#8212; I&#8217;m sure that happened in several other cities at least. On a guess CW spent more promoting 90210&#8217;s premiere than GG&#8217;s season premiere, but it&#8217;s just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21636</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21636</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be able to live happily if it was 90210 being whored constantly instead of that abortion Gossip Girl. They seem to at least be trying to act well instead of playing themselves as characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be able to live happily if it was 90210 being whored constantly instead of that abortion Gossip Girl. They seem to at least be trying to act well instead of playing themselves as characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21610</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21610</guid>
		<description>Nick: I think it&#039;s what they do with shows like Supernatural that facilitate dislike of the network.

In any case, big win for the CW with 90210. They should have just done this last year instead of GG. 

Hopefully these new viewers check out some other shows on the network, especially on Sep 18.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick: I think it&#8217;s what they do with shows like Supernatural that facilitate dislike of the network.</p>
<p>In any case, big win for the CW with 90210. They should have just done this last year instead of GG. </p>
<p>Hopefully these new viewers check out some other shows on the network, especially on Sep 18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21589</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21589</guid>
		<description>why do people hate the cw so much, they have a few good shows, supernatural and reaper come to mind right off the top of my head</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do people hate the cw so much, they have a few good shows, supernatural and reaper come to mind right off the top of my head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21587</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21587</guid>
		<description>I predict their numbers will drop to 4.3mil next week, then hover at 4.0 for awhile, then wind up between 3.5 and 3.8 for the rest of the series.  It&#039;s one thing to lead a dumb horse to water, it&#039;s another to make it stay there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict their numbers will drop to 4.3mil next week, then hover at 4.0 for awhile, then wind up between 3.5 and 3.8 for the rest of the series.  It&#8217;s one thing to lead a dumb horse to water, it&#8217;s another to make it stay there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Lasers! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; E a estréia do novo Barrados no Baile?</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21584</link>
		<dc:creator>With Lasers! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; E a estréia do novo Barrados no Baile?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21584</guid>
		<description>[...] não decepcionou na audiência. Foram 4.9 milhões de pessoas assistindo ao primeiro episódio, número que subiu para 5.1 durante [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] não decepcionou na audiência. Foram 4.9 milhões de pessoas assistindo ao primeiro episódio, número que subiu para 5.1 durante [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21581</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21581</guid>
		<description>LoL...Well...at least your quick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LoL&#8230;Well&#8230;at least your quick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21580</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21580</guid>
		<description>Wow, my bad entirely Rick, I&#039;m surprised that typo existed for so long ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, my bad entirely Rick, I&#8217;m surprised that typo existed for so long <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21579</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21579</guid>
		<description>CW has &quot;FRINGE&quot; to deal with next week - so....well...you know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW has &#8220;FRINGE&#8221; to deal with next week &#8211; so&#8230;.well&#8230;you know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21578</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21578</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused- is it Monday sept 2nd or Tuesday Sept 2nd ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused- is it Monday sept 2nd or Tuesday Sept 2nd ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21570</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21570</guid>
		<description>90210 is basically just the same teenage-drama crap that you can find on The N.

This new spin-off is definitely a far departure from the original series of the 1990&#039;s.

People were curious and checked out the premiere, but I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if they don&#039;t show up for next week&#039;s episode.

Goodbye, and good riddance The CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90210 is basically just the same teenage-drama crap that you can find on The N.</p>
<p>This new spin-off is definitely a far departure from the original series of the 1990&#8217;s.</p>
<p>People were curious and checked out the premiere, but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they don&#8217;t show up for next week&#8217;s episode.</p>
<p>Goodbye, and good riddance The CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TVaholic</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21568</link>
		<dc:creator>TVaholic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21568</guid>
		<description>Yes, WIPEOUT was a repeat last night.

As usual, ABC is screwing with thier viewers, so now we have no idea when the next new epsidoe will be. There have only been 6 originals and a clips show so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, WIPEOUT was a repeat last night.</p>
<p>As usual, ABC is screwing with thier viewers, so now we have no idea when the next new epsidoe will be. There have only been 6 originals and a clips show so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21567</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21567</guid>
		<description>The Cubs game went into extra innings, so here in Chicagoland, 90210 started at about midnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cubs game went into extra innings, so here in Chicagoland, 90210 started at about midnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manda</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21566</link>
		<dc:creator>Manda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21566</guid>
		<description>Wipeout was a repeat of the &quot;Crow-Bar&quot; episode - one of my favorites.

I&#039;ll miss Wanna Bet. Hopefully this won&#039;t be the beginning and end of Ant &amp; Dec&#039;s American career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wipeout was a repeat of the &#8220;Crow-Bar&#8221; episode &#8211; one of my favorites.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll miss Wanna Bet. Hopefully this won&#8217;t be the beginning and end of Ant &amp; Dec&#8217;s American career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21562</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21562</guid>
		<description>Wow, good for CW. I just wonder if 90210 will be able to retain those numbers wee to week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, good for CW. I just wonder if 90210 will be able to retain those numbers wee to week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P Roels</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21561</link>
		<dc:creator>P Roels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21561</guid>
		<description>Was interested in the numbers for 90210 - especially since it was preempted in chicago area by Cubs baseball - it premiered at 10:30 last night on local WGN - all the hype had me curious but not enough to wait until 10:30 to watch it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was interested in the numbers for 90210 &#8211; especially since it was preempted in chicago area by Cubs baseball &#8211; it premiered at 10:30 last night on local WGN &#8211; all the hype had me curious but not enough to wait until 10:30 to watch it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21556</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21556</guid>
		<description>Both Berman and TV Guide had Wipeout as a repeat. If anyone watched it and can tell us otherwise, let us know.

Jack, we may see Shield results in a press release/story today. We will certainly get them with the weekly cable results next Tuesday, since I&#039;m sure it will be in the top 40 list we get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Berman and TV Guide had Wipeout as a repeat. If anyone watched it and can tell us otherwise, let us know.</p>
<p>Jack, we may see Shield results in a press release/story today. We will certainly get them with the weekly cable results next Tuesday, since I&#8217;m sure it will be in the top 40 list we get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21554</guid>
		<description>Wow. The CW won the key demos. Not a surprise since nothing else was on TV. Well, there was The Shield season premiere on FX. Will we ever see numbers for The Shield? Bill? Robert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. The CW won the key demos. Not a surprise since nothing else was on TV. Well, there was The Shield season premiere on FX. Will we ever see numbers for The Shield? Bill? Robert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/03/ratings-monday-september-2-viewers-return-to-90210/4893#comment-21553</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=4893#comment-21553</guid>
		<description>The the numbers would seem to indicate that Wipeout is a repeat, and Berman did designate it so, but the Fast nationals didn&#039;t seem to list it as a repeat.  Good numbers if it was, bad news if it wasn&#039;t!  I don&#039;t know because I was skimming 90210 and watching Magnum Force on AMC in HD (&quot;a man has to know his limitations...&quot;)

I look forward to the CW release as well, but in fairness, it won the 18-49 demo outright (thanks to the convention) and crushed in the 18-34 (and would&#039;ve even without the convention coverage at 10p) so that&#039;s definitely a real win for CW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The the numbers would seem to indicate that Wipeout is a repeat, and Berman did designate it so, but the Fast nationals didn&#8217;t seem to list it as a repeat.  Good numbers if it was, bad news if it wasn&#8217;t!  I don&#8217;t know because I was skimming 90210 and watching Magnum Force on AMC in HD (&#8221;a man has to know his limitations&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
<p>I look forward to the CW release as well, but in fairness, it won the 18-49 demo outright (thanks to the convention) and crushed in the 18-34 (and would&#8217;ve even without the convention coverage at 10p) so that&#8217;s definitely a real win for CW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
