<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Ratings: Cowboys &amp; Emmy Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:56:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23655</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23655</guid>
		<description>I usually cut awards shows some slack because after all they really ARE for the nominees and the winners, but could they have made it more boring?  Josh Groban&#039;s musical montage was the highlight of the night.

I would rather have the Emmys run a bit over and BE entertaining.  Did I miss something?  Were there any good clips from the nominated shows?  Were there any clips of any shows?  The &quot;tributes&quot; to 60 Years of Television were badly executed.

The show was just pathetic.  Don Rickles was funny though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually cut awards shows some slack because after all they really ARE for the nominees and the winners, but could they have made it more boring?  Josh Groban&#8217;s musical montage was the highlight of the night.</p>
<p>I would rather have the Emmys run a bit over and BE entertaining.  Did I miss something?  Were there any good clips from the nominated shows?  Were there any clips of any shows?  The &#8220;tributes&#8221; to 60 Years of Television were badly executed.</p>
<p>The show was just pathetic.  Don Rickles was funny though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gusar</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23654</link>
		<dc:creator>Gusar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23654</guid>
		<description>Outlander, you&#039;re going to love Chuck. It&#039;s quirky and it&#039;s fun. With lots of humor and a hot chick kicking ass. It really sucks that it&#039;s at the same time as TSCC.

As for Knight Rider... I actually liked the Pilot earlier this year. But from the series itself, I&#039;ve seen a small promo and well... yuck. In the words of Cromartie though, &quot;We&#039;ll see...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlander, you&#8217;re going to love Chuck. It&#8217;s quirky and it&#8217;s fun. With lots of humor and a hot chick kicking ass. It really sucks that it&#8217;s at the same time as TSCC.</p>
<p>As for Knight Rider&#8230; I actually liked the Pilot earlier this year. But from the series itself, I&#8217;ve seen a small promo and well&#8230; yuck. In the words of Cromartie though, &#8220;We&#8217;ll see&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23644</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23644</guid>
		<description>Outlander, from the reviews I&#039;ve read, Knight Rider is going to suck.  In fact it looks so bad I don&#039;t even want to waste the time downloading the free premiere off iTunes.  It&#039;s even in HD, and I still don&#039;t care.

That said, better numbers for Terminator can&#039;t come soon enough.  I&#039;m hoping it&#039;ll fare okay against tonight&#039;s Heroes re-cap hour.  Next week against Chuck is going to be tough.  Fox seems to be ramping up some advertising though, from some boards I&#039;ve been reading people were saying it was advertised once for every two/three Fringe ads yesterday.  I think that&#039;s more than they advertised the season premiere.  Plus some other good news, there was a nice article in the New York Times about the show last week, and Summer is going to be in GQ magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlander, from the reviews I&#8217;ve read, Knight Rider is going to suck.  In fact it looks so bad I don&#8217;t even want to waste the time downloading the free premiere off iTunes.  It&#8217;s even in HD, and I still don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>That said, better numbers for Terminator can&#8217;t come soon enough.  I&#8217;m hoping it&#8217;ll fare okay against tonight&#8217;s Heroes re-cap hour.  Next week against Chuck is going to be tough.  Fox seems to be ramping up some advertising though, from some boards I&#8217;ve been reading people were saying it was advertised once for every two/three Fringe ads yesterday.  I think that&#8217;s more than they advertised the season premiere.  Plus some other good news, there was a nice article in the New York Times about the show last week, and Summer is going to be in GQ magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23636</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23636</guid>
		<description>I love Amanda Tapping and hope Sanctuary is a big success.  But didn&#039;t Sanctuary start out as a super-low budget web-based program?  Then didn&#039;t it get overhauled to be a TV show?  I&#039;ll watch it, but I&#039;m reminded of Painkiller Jane and Flash Gordon...and that scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Amanda Tapping and hope Sanctuary is a big success.  But didn&#8217;t Sanctuary start out as a super-low budget web-based program?  Then didn&#8217;t it get overhauled to be a TV show?  I&#8217;ll watch it, but I&#8217;m reminded of Painkiller Jane and Flash Gordon&#8230;and that scares me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23632</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23632</guid>
		<description>3G of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3G of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23631</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23631</guid>
		<description>Julia, my guess is your work doesn&#039;t flush its DNS cache regularly.  That&#039;s the only thing I can think of.  The web allows me to ping the site virtually from around the world, and everywhere I look it&#039;s now pointing to the right information.  But I believe that despite this certain locations and ISPs are still pointing to the old DNS because of cahce settings.  Hopefully that will all take care of itself on its own in short order, but sorry.

P.S. the new site design is much more iPhone friendly, but hopefully you have a new 3G iPhone.  I stll have my 1.0 version and it&#039;s not very fast when accessing via the Edge network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, my guess is your work doesn&#8217;t flush its DNS cache regularly.  That&#8217;s the only thing I can think of.  The web allows me to ping the site virtually from around the world, and everywhere I look it&#8217;s now pointing to the right information.  But I believe that despite this certain locations and ISPs are still pointing to the old DNS because of cahce settings.  Hopefully that will all take care of itself on its own in short order, but sorry.</p>
<p>P.S. the new site design is much more iPhone friendly, but hopefully you have a new 3G iPhone.  I stll have my 1.0 version and it&#8217;s not very fast when accessing via the Edge network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23630</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23630</guid>
		<description>Who called it?

Also, I still can&#039;t access the site at all from work. Thank you iPhone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who called it?</p>
<p>Also, I still can&#8217;t access the site at all from work. Thank you iPhone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan B.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23627</guid>
		<description>The early numbers for the Emmys last year from Berman were at 10.6/16, so...that&#039;s not good at all. Football, on the other hand, is about 25% above what it was estimated at last year, so over 19 million is possible.

But is anyone shocked, at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The early numbers for the Emmys last year from Berman were at 10.6/16, so&#8230;that&#8217;s not good at all. Football, on the other hand, is about 25% above what it was estimated at last year, so over 19 million is possible.</p>
<p>But is anyone shocked, at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23626</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23626</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Intersect&quot; itself is complete science fiction(unless you&#039;re a conspiracy theorist who believes such tech exists and the government has such technology but hides it from us!). But I agree, it&#039;s not a science fiction show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Intersect&#8221; itself is complete science fiction(unless you&#8217;re a conspiracy theorist who believes such tech exists and the government has such technology but hides it from us!). But I agree, it&#8217;s not a science fiction show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23625</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23625</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t even say there&#039;s any SciFi-ish element to Chuck at all. The only reason one might say there is is due to the whole government conspiracy thing that is so prevalent in SciFi shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t even say there&#8217;s any SciFi-ish element to Chuck at all. The only reason one might say there is is due to the whole government conspiracy thing that is so prevalent in SciFi shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23624</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23624</guid>
		<description>Outlander, though there is a very small SciFi-ish element to Chuck, it&#039;s definitely not a SciFi show, but action/comedy. The show it reminds me most of is Burn Notice, though targeted just a little bit younger.  It&#039;s a fun show though.

Not anxious to see what Sanctuary is all about on SciFi? the promos for during Stargate Atlantis didn&#039;t really inspire me much, but....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlander, though there is a very small SciFi-ish element to Chuck, it&#8217;s definitely not a SciFi show, but action/comedy. The show it reminds me most of is Burn Notice, though targeted just a little bit younger.  It&#8217;s a fun show though.</p>
<p>Not anxious to see what Sanctuary is all about on SciFi? the promos for during Stargate Atlantis didn&#8217;t really inspire me much, but&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23623</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23623</guid>
		<description>Frank,

You&#039;re killing me here.  My precious Terminator is probably going to get bounced when its 13 eppy run ends in November.  Stargate Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica both have been canceled.  So this leaves me with Knight Rider, Fringe, and freaking Dollhouse for my scifi fixes.  (I don&#039;t do Lost, and will begrudgingly get into Chuck once TSCC is formally canceled).  If you&#039;re telling me that the Knight Rider show is just as atrocious as its two-hour miniseries event last year, you&#039;re basically saying I&#039;m banished to watching ... reality shows. 

Say it ain&#039;t so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re killing me here.  My precious Terminator is probably going to get bounced when its 13 eppy run ends in November.  Stargate Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica both have been canceled.  So this leaves me with Knight Rider, Fringe, and freaking Dollhouse for my scifi fixes.  (I don&#8217;t do Lost, and will begrudgingly get into Chuck once TSCC is formally canceled).  If you&#8217;re telling me that the Knight Rider show is just as atrocious as its two-hour miniseries event last year, you&#8217;re basically saying I&#8217;m banished to watching &#8230; reality shows. </p>
<p>Say it ain&#8217;t so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23621</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23621</guid>
		<description>Julia, 1990, with an 8.2/14.  Last year was close, 8.4/14, but a household ratings point meant more households last year than it did in 1990 but for now 1990 is the low in both rating and viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, 1990, with an 8.2/14.  Last year was close, 8.4/14, but a household ratings point meant more households last year than it did in 1990 but for now 1990 is the low in both rating and viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23620</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23620</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m finally convinced I should check out Mad Men, so it may gain at least a few more viewers after last night. Now if only any non-30 Rock watchers would do the same...

Do you have the data on what the household rating was for the lowest rated Emmys? I know these numbers will probably change, but it would still be interesting to compare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m finally convinced I should check out Mad Men, so it may gain at least a few more viewers after last night. Now if only any non-30 Rock watchers would do the same&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you have the data on what the household rating was for the lowest rated Emmys? I know these numbers will probably change, but it would still be interesting to compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23619</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23619</guid>
		<description>Awesome, thanks.  I&#039;ll use &quot;&quot; from now on.

This is the link, in case it&#039;s not registering.  It&#039;s a funny read, for those interested.

http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/09/emmys-mad-men.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome, thanks.  I&#8217;ll use &#8220;&#8221; from now on.</p>
<p>This is the link, in case it&#8217;s not registering.  It&#8217;s a funny read, for those interested.</p>
<p><a href="http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/09/emmys-mad-men.html" rel="nofollow">http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/09/emmys-mad-men.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23618</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23618</guid>
		<description>Frank, just post the URL and I&#039;ll edit your original comment.  sorry about that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, just post the URL and I&#8217;ll edit your original comment.  sorry about that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23617</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23617</guid>
		<description>huh...odd...  The link code worked, but the block quote code was stripped out of my comment.  That line was supposed to be a quote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh&#8230;odd&#8230;  The link code worked, but the block quote code was stripped out of my comment.  That line was supposed to be a quote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23615</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23615</guid>
		<description>Robert:

We&#039;re with you all the way.

Award shows stink, but we do like to know who won.

The Emmy show last night was just dreadful, from start to finish.

RR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert:</p>
<p>We&#8217;re with you all the way.</p>
<p>Award shows stink, but we do like to know who won.</p>
<p>The Emmy show last night was just dreadful, from start to finish.</p>
<p>RR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/22/early-ratings-cowboys-emmy-awards/5244#comment-23614</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5244#comment-23614</guid>
		<description>Funniest &lt;a href=&quot;http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/09/emmys-mad-men.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;breakdown&lt;/a&gt; of the Emmy awards so far:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Truly, it was one of the worst moments of television I’ve ever witnessed, and keep in mind that I just watched the first episode of NBC’s new version of &quot;Knight Rider.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funniest <a href="http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2008/09/emmys-mad-men.html" rel="nofollow">breakdown</a> of the Emmy awards so far:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Truly, it was one of the worst moments of television I’ve ever witnessed, and keep in mind that I just watched the first episode of NBC’s new version of &#8220;Knight Rider.&#8221;</i></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
