<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Connor: Close to Being Terminated?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:37:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: diurnal618</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-26866</link>
		<dc:creator>diurnal618</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-26866</guid>
		<description>This is the only show I watch! honestly.  I have to DVR it because I am in class.  Please don&#039;t cancel this show.  PLEASE!  Move it to 9 or Tuesday night.  Come on FOX!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the only show I watch! honestly.  I have to DVR it because I am in class.  Please don&#8217;t cancel this show.  PLEASE!  Move it to 9 or Tuesday night.  Come on FOX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdarrow</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-26263</link>
		<dc:creator>mdarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-26263</guid>
		<description>TSCC is one of the few shows my wife and I make the time for to watch. Time travel and its associated permutations are irresistable to us.  Never mind the contradictions, it&#039;s just a TV show!  We like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSCC is one of the few shows my wife and I make the time for to watch. Time travel and its associated permutations are irresistable to us.  Never mind the contradictions, it&#8217;s just a TV show!  We like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-25182</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-25182</guid>
		<description>They should  put TSCC in the Til&#039;Death time slot on wednesdays. As Jackson seemed to be hinting at</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should  put TSCC in the Til&#8217;Death time slot on wednesdays. As Jackson seemed to be hinting at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Doc</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-25178</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-25178</guid>
		<description>I DVR it every week. One of the few shows my wife and I will watch -- along with Chuck, of course. Figures the two have to compete. Would love it if FOX moved TSCC to another night.

TSCC, then 24 -- that would be sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I DVR it every week. One of the few shows my wife and I will watch &#8212; along with Chuck, of course. Figures the two have to compete. Would love it if FOX moved TSCC to another night.</p>
<p>TSCC, then 24 &#8212; that would be sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-25019</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-25019</guid>
		<description>The fact is that T:SCC is a show that contains alot of depth and creativity far more then alot of shows right now and with it&#039;s current timeslot( not to mention that mondays are a complete mess!)it can&#039;t reach the viewers it needs to stay afloat people are getting jerked around way to much that night, not to mention the HUGE! lack of promos and sponsorship(wich i think is another contributer to the declining rates)i do hope that fox execs see the light and change the timeslot another thing how is the WB handling this anyways does anyone know?, i wonder if fox does make the idiotic decision to cancel the show will the WB fetch it to another network?.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is that T:SCC is a show that contains alot of depth and creativity far more then alot of shows right now and with it&#8217;s current timeslot( not to mention that mondays are a complete mess!)it can&#8217;t reach the viewers it needs to stay afloat people are getting jerked around way to much that night, not to mention the HUGE! lack of promos and sponsorship(wich i think is another contributer to the declining rates)i do hope that fox execs see the light and change the timeslot another thing how is the WB handling this anyways does anyone know?, i wonder if fox does make the idiotic decision to cancel the show will the WB fetch it to another network?.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel P</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24997</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24997</guid>
		<description>&quot;As TSCC proved last year though, the show can survive without a good lead-in, but what it does need is a good day and timeslot, not a spot where it’s viewers are being pulled between all their favorite shows. FOX has set it’s Monday night line-up up for failure, and if they don’t understand why, then I really have no faith in the network to handle scripted dramas.&quot;

This is exactly right. The thing that is really killing TSCC is the timeslot. I think simply switching it with Prison Break would really benefit it a lot. But of course switching it to another day could prove to be even better. Imagine if Fox switched it with Fringe? I&#039;m sure TSSC would get a LOT of viewers following House. As for Fringe on Monday at 8? Competing against the shows that Terminator is right now, I think Fringe&#039;s ratings would definitely drop. 

Fox needs to treat the show right. Unfortunately, they don&#039;t seem to be too in to it and of course viewership will be down because of that. If a network doesn&#039;t have faith in its show, how will the viewers? It really saddens me that this show could be getting canned because of this. In the opinion of myself, and many others, it is truly a fantastic and creative show and deserves to shine. But being in the current unfitting timeslot it&#039;s in, that can&#039;t really be expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As TSCC proved last year though, the show can survive without a good lead-in, but what it does need is a good day and timeslot, not a spot where it’s viewers are being pulled between all their favorite shows. FOX has set it’s Monday night line-up up for failure, and if they don’t understand why, then I really have no faith in the network to handle scripted dramas.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is exactly right. The thing that is really killing TSCC is the timeslot. I think simply switching it with Prison Break would really benefit it a lot. But of course switching it to another day could prove to be even better. Imagine if Fox switched it with Fringe? I&#8217;m sure TSSC would get a LOT of viewers following House. As for Fringe on Monday at 8? Competing against the shows that Terminator is right now, I think Fringe&#8217;s ratings would definitely drop. </p>
<p>Fox needs to treat the show right. Unfortunately, they don&#8217;t seem to be too in to it and of course viewership will be down because of that. If a network doesn&#8217;t have faith in its show, how will the viewers? It really saddens me that this show could be getting canned because of this. In the opinion of myself, and many others, it is truly a fantastic and creative show and deserves to shine. But being in the current unfitting timeslot it&#8217;s in, that can&#8217;t really be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24996</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24996</guid>
		<description>Just read the &quot;Terminator is Dominating&quot; article.  What a strange statement to make about the demos.  The rest of the article talks about the cast, and does not even mention the ratings again.  Talk about not supporting his initial claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the &#8220;Terminator is Dominating&#8221; article.  What a strange statement to make about the demos.  The rest of the article talks about the cast, and does not even mention the ratings again.  Talk about not supporting his initial claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike G.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24995</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24995</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that TSCC is an SF show, so you have to expect the abstract and the contradictions.  The obvious conclusion is that they aren&#039;t going to stop judgment day...there would be no T4.

I doubt that Fox is going to move the show...even though it really couldn&#039;t do any worse on a different night...or could it??  It would make sense to do that kind of thing, but let&#039;s not give a major network credit for doing things that make sense.  I still think the night is much too competitive, but, so do a lot of other people, too

They probably will let it run out its 13 episodes...if they are all in the can.  

As far as TSCC hurting PB&#039;s ratings, PB doesn&#039;t need any help.  It&#039;s an aging show; ratings drop over time.  Not sure why Fox NEEDS PB.  It NEEDS AI; that is its biggest draw.  That is probably the show to put on Monday nights.  Could you imagine DWTS and AI going head to head???  Not going to happen, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that TSCC is an SF show, so you have to expect the abstract and the contradictions.  The obvious conclusion is that they aren&#8217;t going to stop judgment day&#8230;there would be no T4.</p>
<p>I doubt that Fox is going to move the show&#8230;even though it really couldn&#8217;t do any worse on a different night&#8230;or could it??  It would make sense to do that kind of thing, but let&#8217;s not give a major network credit for doing things that make sense.  I still think the night is much too competitive, but, so do a lot of other people, too</p>
<p>They probably will let it run out its 13 episodes&#8230;if they are all in the can.  </p>
<p>As far as TSCC hurting PB&#8217;s ratings, PB doesn&#8217;t need any help.  It&#8217;s an aging show; ratings drop over time.  Not sure why Fox NEEDS PB.  It NEEDS AI; that is its biggest draw.  That is probably the show to put on Monday nights.  Could you imagine DWTS and AI going head to head???  Not going to happen, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdfds</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24956</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24956</guid>
		<description>^ In that case, you would probably not find it easy to get into &quot;Doctor Who&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ In that case, you would probably not find it easy to get into &#8220;Doctor Who&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lighthope</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24951</link>
		<dc:creator>Lighthope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24951</guid>
		<description>TSCC is a difficult show to get into.  It tried to be so dark and brooding that it forgot that it also had to be entertaining.  The second season opener attempted to correct for that but ended up being mindless.

Possibly subconsciously, it also doesn&#039;t help that the show doesn&#039;t even try to explain itself.  If they succeed in stopping the terminators, then there are no terminators to stop, thus John Connor will never be born thus no one will be around to stop the terminators.  But if the terminators kill John, then there will be no one to come back and father John, so there will be no one to stop.  Argh!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TSCC is a difficult show to get into.  It tried to be so dark and brooding that it forgot that it also had to be entertaining.  The second season opener attempted to correct for that but ended up being mindless.</p>
<p>Possibly subconsciously, it also doesn&#8217;t help that the show doesn&#8217;t even try to explain itself.  If they succeed in stopping the terminators, then there are no terminators to stop, thus John Connor will never be born thus no one will be around to stop the terminators.  But if the terminators kill John, then there will be no one to come back and father John, so there will be no one to stop.  Argh!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdfsdf</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24914</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfsdf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24914</guid>
		<description>@Bob &quot;If it’s so terrific then why people chose MNF?&quot;

Because no average American is going to choose a scripted TV show - no matter how good it is - over a LIVE Football game. I don&#039;t think you can DVR MNF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob &#8220;If it’s so terrific then why people chose MNF?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because no average American is going to choose a scripted TV show &#8211; no matter how good it is &#8211; over a LIVE Football game. I don&#8217;t think you can DVR MNF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24912</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24912</guid>
		<description>Entertainment...

That&#039;s not true. Net execs *do* still expect 10 mill + viewers. In fact, just 10 mill is considered average. Just look at &quot;Bones&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entertainment&#8230;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not true. Net execs *do* still expect 10 mill + viewers. In fact, just 10 mill is considered average. Just look at &#8220;Bones&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24911</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24911</guid>
		<description>Bill, the sad thing about that story was that the writer, Frank Barron, was a former editor with The Hollywood Reporter. I guffawed when I read the story earlier. He must have pulled a Nielsen&#039;s report from last winter by accident :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, the sad thing about that story was that the writer, Frank Barron, was a former editor with The Hollywood Reporter. I guffawed when I read the story earlier. He must have pulled a Nielsen&#8217;s report from last winter by accident :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: entertainmenttodayandbeyond</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24909</link>
		<dc:creator>entertainmenttodayandbeyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24909</guid>
		<description>Let me say one more thing. The days were a network expects every show to pull in 10 million viewers or more are over. There is just way to much competition for that to be a reality. With TNT, A&amp;E and FX among other now heavily into the first run programming game, there&#039;s just not enough viewers to go around. The landscape has chanced dramatically and that&#039;s here to stay! Six or Seven milion viewers is nothing to sneeze at anymore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me say one more thing. The days were a network expects every show to pull in 10 million viewers or more are over. There is just way to much competition for that to be a reality. With TNT, A&amp;E and FX among other now heavily into the first run programming game, there&#8217;s just not enough viewers to go around. The landscape has chanced dramatically and that&#8217;s here to stay! Six or Seven milion viewers is nothing to sneeze at anymore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24908</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24908</guid>
		<description>Joseph, ditto Robert. That seemed like a typical entertainment &quot;fan&quot; story that included some very wrong ratings information. Fan sites should stick to entertainment. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, ditto Robert. That seemed like a typical entertainment &#8220;fan&#8221; story that included some very wrong ratings information. Fan sites should stick to entertainment. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24906</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24906</guid>
		<description>Joseph, sadly that story is just flat-out wrong.  Now that there is a full slate of competition, not only is TSCC *not* dominating among 18-49 year olds, it&#039;s getting crushed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, sadly that story is just flat-out wrong.  Now that there is a full slate of competition, not only is TSCC *not* dominating among 18-49 year olds, it&#8217;s getting crushed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24904</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24904</guid>
		<description>Maybe not all is lost. Not all the press sees doom and gloom.

http://www.entertainmenttoday.net/content/view/705/29/

Terminator is Dominating
Stars of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Listen to Fans for Season Two on Fox
Season two of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, has made the folks at Fox TV very happy, dominating the adults 18-49 key demos.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not all is lost. Not all the press sees doom and gloom.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.entertainmenttoday.net/content/view/705/29/" rel="nofollow">http://www.entertainmenttoday.net/content/view/705/29/</a></p>
<p>Terminator is Dominating<br />
Stars of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Listen to Fans for Season Two on Fox<br />
Season two of Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, has made the folks at Fox TV very happy, dominating the adults 18-49 key demos.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r phelan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24903</link>
		<dc:creator>r phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24903</guid>
		<description>The show is boring. I can&#039;t keep waiting for something to happen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The show is boring. I can&#8217;t keep waiting for something to happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24902</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24902</guid>
		<description>@Bob    &quot;Many more&quot;?  You shoot down my personal opinion with your own that speaks for the masses?  Gimmme a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob    &#8220;Many more&#8221;?  You shoot down my personal opinion with your own that speaks for the masses?  Gimmme a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24901</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24901</guid>
		<description>Andrea, compare the average 18-49yr demo numbers in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/18/the-tv-show-cancellation-index/3811&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cancellation index&lt;/a&gt;.  TSCC had about two million more in the demo than New Amsterdam.  In fact that&#039;s what saved TSCC I think.  And that&#039;s what will kill it now, if moving to a new night and no net increase happens.

Robert, TSCC might not get a huge increase with a new night, but I think it would receive enough of a bump in the demo to raise some eyebrows.  TSCC really doesn&#039;t even need new viewers, just the old ones back.  That said, who knows if that can save it, but FOX needs to be seen trying.  In fact I think most fans would be happy with just letting the show reach some kind of conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, compare the average 18-49yr demo numbers in the <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/18/the-tv-show-cancellation-index/3811" rel="nofollow">cancellation index</a>.  TSCC had about two million more in the demo than New Amsterdam.  In fact that&#8217;s what saved TSCC I think.  And that&#8217;s what will kill it now, if moving to a new night and no net increase happens.</p>
<p>Robert, TSCC might not get a huge increase with a new night, but I think it would receive enough of a bump in the demo to raise some eyebrows.  TSCC really doesn&#8217;t even need new viewers, just the old ones back.  That said, who knows if that can save it, but FOX needs to be seen trying.  In fact I think most fans would be happy with just letting the show reach some kind of conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24895</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24895</guid>
		<description>It would be stupid of FOX to pull the show now. Let it run it&#039;s course, like K-Ville, which had truly awful numbers. What else is FOX going to put its place? House reruns from last year? What&#039;s done is done.

Kevin Reilly is off to a fantastic start at the network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be stupid of FOX to pull the show now. Let it run it&#8217;s course, like K-Ville, which had truly awful numbers. What else is FOX going to put its place? House reruns from last year? What&#8217;s done is done.</p>
<p>Kevin Reilly is off to a fantastic start at the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24893</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24893</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Foo Man Chu pretty much down the line.  I think the only thing that remains to be seen at this point is whether cancelled = &quot;we won&#039;t air more than 13 episodes&quot;  or = &quot;We&#039;re pulling it from the schedule immediately.&quot;  I think the former more likely than the latter, but it&#039;s pure speculation.

Moving the show may help, but it seems unlikely it would help enough to get the back nine. Serial shows have difficulty adding new users mid-stream. I wouldn&#039;t expect a significant enough bump by moving it to Wednesdays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Foo Man Chu pretty much down the line.  I think the only thing that remains to be seen at this point is whether cancelled = &#8220;we won&#8217;t air more than 13 episodes&#8221;  or = &#8220;We&#8217;re pulling it from the schedule immediately.&#8221;  I think the former more likely than the latter, but it&#8217;s pure speculation.</p>
<p>Moving the show may help, but it seems unlikely it would help enough to get the back nine. Serial shows have difficulty adding new users mid-stream. I wouldn&#8217;t expect a significant enough bump by moving it to Wednesdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24891</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24891</guid>
		<description>FrankJ:

No one was turned off from NA. Either you were into this type of fantasy show or you weren&#039;t. Last spring, NA was in TSCC&#039;s current timeslot, pulling in better numbers and always at the top of the DVR count. Plus, the final was the highest rated stream on FOX.com for a month. NA always had buzz that TSCC strangely lacked and it grew in buzz over the summer. It could have done what the X-Files did after season 1, become a steady &quot;Bones&quot;-like show for FOX. I think, like TSCC, it&#039;s too genre-oriented to be a true hit.

Oh well. I don&#039;t want to hijack the thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FrankJ:</p>
<p>No one was turned off from NA. Either you were into this type of fantasy show or you weren&#8217;t. Last spring, NA was in TSCC&#8217;s current timeslot, pulling in better numbers and always at the top of the DVR count. Plus, the final was the highest rated stream on FOX.com for a month. NA always had buzz that TSCC strangely lacked and it grew in buzz over the summer. It could have done what the X-Files did after season 1, become a steady &#8220;Bones&#8221;-like show for FOX. I think, like TSCC, it&#8217;s too genre-oriented to be a true hit.</p>
<p>Oh well. I don&#8217;t want to hijack the thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foo Man Chu</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24890</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo Man Chu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24890</guid>
		<description>Arguing about Nielsen is meaningless.  Every show thats being cancelled people say Nielsen is flawed.  What they dont think about is that Nielsen could be over estimating the viewer levels of TSCC as well as under estimating it.  In the end its the best system out there and the one advertisers use to determine how much to pay for a show.

DVRs dont mean nearly as much as live viewings since there are fewer ads and most people fast forward thru ads or zap them entirely.  If TSCC was a bubble show (like it was last season), DVR viewing might make a difference, but with Season 2&#039;s viewer levels falling off a cliff - its lights out for TSCC. TSCC cant be cheap to make either. Thats the same formula (declining viewers, high cost) that doomed CBS&#039;s Jericho when it was on the bubble and brought back for a 2nd shot. 

And when the network says things like &quot;“Audiences just aren’t responding to the show,” a Fox source tells SyFy Portal. “Our biggest surprise are the 18-to-49s [a key advertising demographic], those numbers are in the toilet.”, you know its already been cancelled - just not officially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguing about Nielsen is meaningless.  Every show thats being cancelled people say Nielsen is flawed.  What they dont think about is that Nielsen could be over estimating the viewer levels of TSCC as well as under estimating it.  In the end its the best system out there and the one advertisers use to determine how much to pay for a show.</p>
<p>DVRs dont mean nearly as much as live viewings since there are fewer ads and most people fast forward thru ads or zap them entirely.  If TSCC was a bubble show (like it was last season), DVR viewing might make a difference, but with Season 2&#8217;s viewer levels falling off a cliff &#8211; its lights out for TSCC. TSCC cant be cheap to make either. Thats the same formula (declining viewers, high cost) that doomed CBS&#8217;s Jericho when it was on the bubble and brought back for a 2nd shot. </p>
<p>And when the network says things like &#8220;“Audiences just aren’t responding to the show,” a Fox source tells SyFy Portal. “Our biggest surprise are the 18-to-49s [a key advertising demographic], those numbers are in the toilet.”, you know its already been cancelled &#8211; just not officially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrankJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/09/30/sarah-connor-close-to-being-terminated/5398#comment-24889</link>
		<dc:creator>FrankJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5398#comment-24889</guid>
		<description>Andrea, I think what turned some people off to New Amsterdam is it seemed like a retread of Highlander.

Bob, pairing the premiere with a play-off game was the extent of FOX&#039;s &quot;help&quot;.  After that they stuck it behind Prison Break and game shows.  TSCC gained viewers on Prison Break, and it&#039;s fans do not watch reality shows.  The only good thing was the competition was light during the strike, and that helped the show to cultivate it&#039;s audience on it&#039;s own.  But even then the show had no creative help, as all the staff was on strike, FOX just had to air the episodes as they were.  And even under that cloud the show still found it&#039;s audience eventually.

Now FOX moved it earlier in the night, when people are less interested in serious shows, and has it competing against top rated shows on every network.  It&#039;s going to take a hit.  You see FOX putting House or Fringe in that spot?  I don&#039;t think so, they won&#039;t risk the slaughter.  But yet they&#039;re going to blame TSCC for Prison Break&#039;s own problems?  That&#039;s pretty underhanded.  Less people watch Prison Break these days because it&#039;s just winding down.  The show has run out of gas, but hey if they can give it 22 episodes to end it then more power to them.  But the fact remains that all of FOX&#039;s shows are down in the ratings.  Yet nobody talks about how House is down 3 million viewers, or that Fringe is back to where it started in the ratings.  I think the only show FOX has that&#039;s doing okay is Bones, and I even read somewhere that FOX isn&#039;t happy with the 18-49 demo they have either.

And people don&#039;t necessarily choose MNF over other shows, they just choose to watch it live.  Same with DWTS.

Robert, I agree that with bad numbers like this obviously FOX has to do something, cancel or move it, but I think the thing that&#039;s getting a lot of fans upset is the idea that to &quot;save Prison Break&quot; they may just pull the show right now instead of trying to save both shows or at least let the 13 episodes run out to an ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, I think what turned some people off to New Amsterdam is it seemed like a retread of Highlander.</p>
<p>Bob, pairing the premiere with a play-off game was the extent of FOX&#8217;s &#8220;help&#8221;.  After that they stuck it behind Prison Break and game shows.  TSCC gained viewers on Prison Break, and it&#8217;s fans do not watch reality shows.  The only good thing was the competition was light during the strike, and that helped the show to cultivate it&#8217;s audience on it&#8217;s own.  But even then the show had no creative help, as all the staff was on strike, FOX just had to air the episodes as they were.  And even under that cloud the show still found it&#8217;s audience eventually.</p>
<p>Now FOX moved it earlier in the night, when people are less interested in serious shows, and has it competing against top rated shows on every network.  It&#8217;s going to take a hit.  You see FOX putting House or Fringe in that spot?  I don&#8217;t think so, they won&#8217;t risk the slaughter.  But yet they&#8217;re going to blame TSCC for Prison Break&#8217;s own problems?  That&#8217;s pretty underhanded.  Less people watch Prison Break these days because it&#8217;s just winding down.  The show has run out of gas, but hey if they can give it 22 episodes to end it then more power to them.  But the fact remains that all of FOX&#8217;s shows are down in the ratings.  Yet nobody talks about how House is down 3 million viewers, or that Fringe is back to where it started in the ratings.  I think the only show FOX has that&#8217;s doing okay is Bones, and I even read somewhere that FOX isn&#8217;t happy with the 18-49 demo they have either.</p>
<p>And people don&#8217;t necessarily choose MNF over other shows, they just choose to watch it live.  Same with DWTS.</p>
<p>Robert, I agree that with bad numbers like this obviously FOX has to do something, cancel or move it, but I think the thing that&#8217;s getting a lot of fans upset is the idea that to &#8220;save Prison Break&#8221; they may just pull the show right now instead of trying to save both shows or at least let the 13 episodes run out to an ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
