<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Nielsen Ratings: Pushing Daisies Six Feet Under</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:26:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gw</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-27382</link>
		<dc:creator>gw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-27382</guid>
		<description>We are not a Nielsen household, nor are any of the households of our friends or family across the country. I wish our household and those of our friends &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt;, because we have watched every episode of Pushing Daisies and love it. We&#039;d like to write the show&#039;s sponsors and encourage them to keep putting their advertising dollars toward this refreshing, original and excellent show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not a Nielsen household, nor are any of the households of our friends or family across the country. I wish our household and those of our friends <i>were</i>, because we have watched every episode of Pushing Daisies and love it. We&#8217;d like to write the show&#8217;s sponsors and encourage them to keep putting their advertising dollars toward this refreshing, original and excellent show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25197</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25197</guid>
		<description>Steve, Biggest Loser until Oct 29 when a new show starts, &quot;Mama&#039;s Boys&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, Biggest Loser until Oct 29 when a new show starts, &#8220;Mama&#8217;s Boys&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25196</guid>
		<description>Criminal Minds gets such huge ratings with no lead in and no promo. 17 million for the premier is impressive. Almost in DH &amp; GA territory. I think next week PP will drop and CM will go up again. CSI NY gets the benefit of an amazing lead in from CM and not much competition. I wonder how it would do without it??? CM has actually become a great show which I am now hooked on. I now understand its growing popularity. What will replace America&#039;s Got Talent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Criminal Minds gets such huge ratings with no lead in and no promo. 17 million for the premier is impressive. Almost in DH &amp; GA territory. I think next week PP will drop and CM will go up again. CSI NY gets the benefit of an amazing lead in from CM and not much competition. I wonder how it would do without it??? CM has actually become a great show which I am now hooked on. I now understand its growing popularity. What will replace America&#8217;s Got Talent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25187</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25187</guid>
		<description>@Joe
Although i don&#039;t like PD i know how it feels to have a show that pulls in bad numbers ie TSCC, PB &amp; CHUCK.

When a new show starts in the fall i usually wait until midseason to see if i think it will be renewed, if it looks like it will i watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe<br />
Although i don&#8217;t like PD i know how it feels to have a show that pulls in bad numbers ie TSCC, PB &amp; CHUCK.</p>
<p>When a new show starts in the fall i usually wait until midseason to see if i think it will be renewed, if it looks like it will i watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25134</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25134</guid>
		<description>Julia -- with the only marketplace that matters; the television networks who sell the advertising and the advertisers who buy it, so far the answer to your question is a resounding &quot;no&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia &#8212; with the only marketplace that matters; the television networks who sell the advertising and the advertisers who buy it, so far the answer to your question is a resounding &#8220;no&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia26</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25132</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25132</guid>
		<description>Dont you think in this day and age with where we are with technology... that we can gauge ratings better and more accurate than with Nielsen Boxes??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont you think in this day and age with where we are with technology&#8230; that we can gauge ratings better and more accurate than with Nielsen Boxes??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25121</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25121</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies is a good show but it&#039;s one of those shows that you either &quot;GET IT&quot; or you don&#039;t I happen to enjoy it but I can see why some people would be turned off I mean it is different to me it looks like a show made by Tim Burton it really has his flavor to it and I know lots of people do not like his movies while others do but yeah I hope it doesn&#039;t get canceled but if it does I guess i can somewhat understand why as most people just don&#039;t get it BUT I have to ask these people with nielsen boxes.....What are you thinking? How can that awful writing on Knight Rider draw a better rating than Pushing Daisies I mean come on is it those cute lil graphics on the screen when KITT transforms??

I also agree with most on here that FOX should move TSCC to wednesday following Bones I think it will actually draw better numbers in that time slot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies is a good show but it&#8217;s one of those shows that you either &#8220;GET IT&#8221; or you don&#8217;t I happen to enjoy it but I can see why some people would be turned off I mean it is different to me it looks like a show made by Tim Burton it really has his flavor to it and I know lots of people do not like his movies while others do but yeah I hope it doesn&#8217;t get canceled but if it does I guess i can somewhat understand why as most people just don&#8217;t get it BUT I have to ask these people with nielsen boxes&#8230;..What are you thinking? How can that awful writing on Knight Rider draw a better rating than Pushing Daisies I mean come on is it those cute lil graphics on the screen when KITT transforms??</p>
<p>I also agree with most on here that FOX should move TSCC to wednesday following Bones I think it will actually draw better numbers in that time slot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25119</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25119</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies is awful, it&#039;s something you would expect from Disney Channel. I mean it seems more aimed at kids so why not put it on ABC family or a kids channel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies is awful, it&#8217;s something you would expect from Disney Channel. I mean it seems more aimed at kids so why not put it on ABC family or a kids channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25118</link>
		<dc:creator>Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25118</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies if a vapid repetitive piece of fluff. It&#039;s all pretty colors and no substance. Fine, but not for the 1 hour format. Try listening to an episode without watching, it&#039;s pretty atrocious. Good to see that the people called the king has no clothes. To bad it&#039;s hurting the rest of the night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies if a vapid repetitive piece of fluff. It&#8217;s all pretty colors and no substance. Fine, but not for the 1 hour format. Try listening to an episode without watching, it&#8217;s pretty atrocious. Good to see that the people called the king has no clothes. To bad it&#8217;s hurting the rest of the night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25117</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25117</guid>
		<description>Dirty Sexy Money was amazing ABC needs to give that show a chance in a different timeslot. Private Practice is a terrible lead in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirty Sexy Money was amazing ABC needs to give that show a chance in a different timeslot. Private Practice is a terrible lead in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25116</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25116</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that PP was scheduled to run long, so DSMs numbers will probably drop in the finals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that PP was scheduled to run long, so DSMs numbers will probably drop in the finals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25115</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25115</guid>
		<description>I suppose DSM is on par with its last aired episode(s)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose DSM is on par with its last aired episode(s)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia26</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25114</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25114</guid>
		<description>The DSM and PP numbers arent good? They sound good to me LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DSM and PP numbers arent good? They sound good to me LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25113</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25113</guid>
		<description>Thank you. Even my Pushing Daisies hating friend overestimated it. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you. Even my Pushing Daisies hating friend overestimated it. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25112</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25112</guid>
		<description>According to Zap2it-

CBS averaged a 7.9 rating/13 share for the night, easily beating second-place NBC&#039;s 5.4/9. ABC took third with a 4.8/8. FOX, 4.4/7, came in fourth, and The CW drew a 2.0/3.

The adults 18-49 title also went to CBS, which drew a 3.3 rating in the key advertising demographic. ABC managed to grab second with a 2.6, followed closely by NBC, 2.5, and FOX, 2.4. The CW came in at 1.4.

FOX&#039;s &quot;Bones&quot; led the 8 p.m. hour with a 6.1/10. CBS&#039; &quot;New Adventures of Old Christine&quot; and &quot;Gary Unmarried&quot; finished second in households, but NBC&#039;s &quot;Knight Rider&quot; (4.6/7), which grew a tiny bit from its premiere, had more total viewers. The premiere of &quot;Pushing Daisies&quot; scored only a 4.1/7, well below its average from last season. &quot;America&#039;s Next Top Model&quot; earned a 2.7/4 for The CW.

CBS took the lead at 9 p.m. with &quot;Criminal Minds,&quot; 9.3/14. The finale of &quot;America&#039;s Got Talent&quot; delivered a 7.7/12 for NBC. ABC moved up to third with &quot;Private Practice,&quot; 5.5/8. A pair of &quot;&#039;Til Death&quot; episodes averaged 2.7/4 for FOX, keeping it ahead of The CW&#039;s &quot;90210&quot; encore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Zap2it-</p>
<p>CBS averaged a 7.9 rating/13 share for the night, easily beating second-place NBC&#8217;s 5.4/9. ABC took third with a 4.8/8. FOX, 4.4/7, came in fourth, and The CW drew a 2.0/3.</p>
<p>The adults 18-49 title also went to CBS, which drew a 3.3 rating in the key advertising demographic. ABC managed to grab second with a 2.6, followed closely by NBC, 2.5, and FOX, 2.4. The CW came in at 1.4.</p>
<p>FOX&#8217;s &#8220;Bones&#8221; led the 8 p.m. hour with a 6.1/10. CBS&#8217; &#8220;New Adventures of Old Christine&#8221; and &#8220;Gary Unmarried&#8221; finished second in households, but NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Knight Rider&#8221; (4.6/7), which grew a tiny bit from its premiere, had more total viewers. The premiere of &#8220;Pushing Daisies&#8221; scored only a 4.1/7, well below its average from last season. &#8220;America&#8217;s Next Top Model&#8221; earned a 2.7/4 for The CW.</p>
<p>CBS took the lead at 9 p.m. with &#8220;Criminal Minds,&#8221; 9.3/14. The finale of &#8220;America&#8217;s Got Talent&#8221; delivered a 7.7/12 for NBC. ABC moved up to third with &#8220;Private Practice,&#8221; 5.5/8. A pair of &#8220;&#8216;Til Death&#8221; episodes averaged 2.7/4 for FOX, keeping it ahead of The CW&#8217;s &#8220;90210&#8243; encore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25111</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25111</guid>
		<description>Julia, PD=6.32 million 2.0/6 w/18-49, Private Practice= 8.048 w/ a 3.3/10 (a bit of saving grace) and DSM = 7.15 w/2.5/7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, PD=6.32 million 2.0/6 w/18-49, Private Practice= 8.048 w/ a 3.3/10 (a bit of saving grace) and DSM = 7.15 w/2.5/7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25110</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25110</guid>
		<description>:D Though I don&#039;t seem to have 3G up here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  Though I don&#8217;t seem to have 3G up here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25109</guid>
		<description>Gutted, I thought last nights Pushing Daisies was so good. Plus it has one of the best emsemble casts on TV. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gutted, I thought last nights Pushing Daisies was so good. Plus it has one of the best emsemble casts on TV. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25108</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25108</guid>
		<description>nope. you&#039;ll have to view it on your iPhone ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope. you&#8217;ll have to view it on your iPhone <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25107</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25107</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m hoping for a total viewers update before I have to leave for the airport. Got anything yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m hoping for a total viewers update before I have to leave for the airport. Got anything yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foo Man Chu</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25106</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo Man Chu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25106</guid>
		<description>Pushing Daisies wasnt promoted all that much - I forgot it was on and caugh it 15 minutes in while channel surfing and doing some home improvement projects around the house.  I suspect it will likely get the axe by mid season. Too bad, its a truly different show like nothing else on the air. Then again that probably part of the problem - its too different.  Having it off the air so long with no re-runs didnt help either.  These days most viewers want clones of talent shows, crime shows or reality shows - just look at the weekly top 20.

Hopefully FRINGE will hold the 9-10 million viewer mark that one is one of the few show, other than LOST, that I really look forward to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing Daisies wasnt promoted all that much &#8211; I forgot it was on and caugh it 15 minutes in while channel surfing and doing some home improvement projects around the house.  I suspect it will likely get the axe by mid season. Too bad, its a truly different show like nothing else on the air. Then again that probably part of the problem &#8211; its too different.  Having it off the air so long with no re-runs didnt help either.  These days most viewers want clones of talent shows, crime shows or reality shows &#8211; just look at the weekly top 20.</p>
<p>Hopefully FRINGE will hold the 9-10 million viewer mark that one is one of the few show, other than LOST, that I really look forward to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25104</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25104</guid>
		<description>^^
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/03/nielsen-major-league-baseball-playoffs-tv-ratings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^<br />
<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/03/nielsen-major-league-baseball-playoffs-tv-ratings" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/10/03/nielsen-major-league-baseball-playoffs-tv-ratings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25103</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25103</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if Bill updated this chart w/2007 data, but the &quot;red&quot; line in it represents the average viewers for the LDS round. it combines *all* games/series for the LDS round, and is not an average of the individual games or series -- there are four series in that round</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if Bill updated this chart w/2007 data, but the &#8220;red&#8221; line in it represents the average viewers for the LDS round. it combines *all* games/series for the LDS round, and is not an average of the individual games or series &#8212; there are four series in that round</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia26</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25102</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25102</guid>
		<description>Thanks Robert! Interesting stuff... I am a Yankees fan so its now officially football season in my house. No MLB play-off watching for us! Thank God Big Blue is off to a good start!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Robert! Interesting stuff&#8230; I am a Yankees fan so its now officially football season in my house. No MLB play-off watching for us! Thank God Big Blue is off to a good start!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirtysexyj</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/02/early-nielsen-ratings-pushing-daisies-six-feet-under/5534#comment-25101</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirtysexyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5534#comment-25101</guid>
		<description>wow

stunned by the numbers a little.

I really enjoyed DSM, and hopefully viewership will grow. The bright side?

DSM outperformed PD and Lipstick Jungle, and managed to hold the majority of PP lead in. 


DSM is great , tune in nxt week !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow</p>
<p>stunned by the numbers a little.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed DSM, and hopefully viewership will grow. The bright side?</p>
<p>DSM outperformed PD and Lipstick Jungle, and managed to hold the majority of PP lead in. </p>
<p>DSM is great , tune in nxt week !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
