<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early Ratings: Biden-Palin Poised for Higher Ratings Than Obama-McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:24:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25266</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25266</guid>
		<description>Paul, on the weekends we usually get them from Berman.  During the week we&#039;re not usually getting them via the Web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, on the weekends we usually get them from Berman.  During the week we&#8217;re not usually getting them via the Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25261</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25261</guid>
		<description>If someone new was appointed to take over the network from Dawn they will probably maul the schedule and restart with brand new shows, would CW&#039;s audience decline greatly if it went to cable? i don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone new was appointed to take over the network from Dawn they will probably maul the schedule and restart with brand new shows, would CW&#8217;s audience decline greatly if it went to cable? i don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25260</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25260</guid>
		<description>To be honest Dawn is ok, Smallville &amp; Supernatural could be long gone, as the network is now targeting young women and said shows pull in good male numbers. But some of her methods make me cringe, why would the Robin pilot (The Graysons) be targetted at women more than men? Have designer clothes + girly music? LOL
One Tree Hill is still really good, Mondays episode was like a horror film :O:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest Dawn is ok, Smallville &amp; Supernatural could be long gone, as the network is now targeting young women and said shows pull in good male numbers. But some of her methods make me cringe, why would the Robin pilot (The Graysons) be targetted at women more than men? Have designer clothes + girly music? LOL<br />
One Tree Hill is still really good, Mondays episode was like a horror film :O:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25258</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25258</guid>
		<description>That better not mean Dawn is allowed to keep her job...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That better not mean Dawn is allowed to keep her job&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25256</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25256</guid>
		<description>Almost everything on CW this week has shown gains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost everything on CW this week has shown gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25255</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25255</guid>
		<description>What site do you get you fast affiliates from?:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What site do you get you fast affiliates from?:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25254</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25254</guid>
		<description>Ahh. Okay, well thanks for the clarification. *patiently waits for fast nationals*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh. Okay, well thanks for the clarification. *patiently waits for fast nationals*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25253</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25253</guid>
		<description>FYI, in the fast affiliates Smallville had a 2.6/4 and 3.95 million. Supernatural a 2.5/3 and 3.57 million...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, in the fast affiliates Smallville had a 2.6/4 and 3.95 million. Supernatural a 2.5/3 and 3.57 million&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25252</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25252</guid>
		<description>2.6 means 2.6 percent of the households with televisions in the markets measured were watching. The 5 means five percent of the households with their TVs actually turned on were watching.

Note to Bill -- I&#039;ll add the boilerplate explanations when I resume these sometime ~ 10/13!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.6 means 2.6 percent of the households with televisions in the markets measured were watching. The 5 means five percent of the households with their TVs actually turned on were watching.</p>
<p>Note to Bill &#8212; I&#8217;ll add the boilerplate explanations when I resume these sometime ~ 10/13!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25251</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25251</guid>
		<description>Charles i doubt it, a 2.5 in overnights would be about 3.60 - 3.80 i think:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles i doubt it, a 2.5 in overnights would be about 3.60 &#8211; 3.80 i think:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25250</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25250</guid>
		<description>Charles, the &quot;/5&quot; which is the share of metered market households watching TV that were tuned into that show really isn&#039;t a direct indicator of the number of viewers. The rating &quot;2.6/&quot; which is the percentage of all TV households watching the show is proportional to the number of viewers. So it&#039;s a reasonable assumption that an increase from 2.5 to 2.6 is likely to show a similar level of increase in the number of viewers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, the &#8220;/5&#8243; which is the share of metered market households watching TV that were tuned into that show really isn&#8217;t a direct indicator of the number of viewers. The rating &#8220;2.6/&#8221; which is the percentage of all TV households watching the show is proportional to the number of viewers. So it&#8217;s a reasonable assumption that an increase from 2.5 to 2.6 is likely to show a similar level of increase in the number of viewers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lol</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25249</link>
		<dc:creator>lol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25249</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand this numbers...
can anyone explain it to me?
Supernatural has 2.6/5... what means 2.6 and wath means 5?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand this numbers&#8230;<br />
can anyone explain it to me?<br />
Supernatural has 2.6/5&#8230; what means 2.6 and wath means 5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25248</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25248</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bill :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bill <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25247</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25247</guid>
		<description>&gt;P.S. Sorry Cubs fans

TBS feels your pain too! It might be 3 and out for the best ratings matchup in the Division Series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>P.S. Sorry Cubs fans</p>
<p>TBS feels your pain too! It might be 3 and out for the best ratings matchup in the Division Series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25246</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25246</guid>
		<description>Ooh, Smallville could cross 4 million again. Bill, since Supernatural ended with a /5, does that mean it too could be over 4 million?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, Smallville could cross 4 million again. Bill, since Supernatural ended with a /5, does that mean it too could be over 4 million?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25245</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25245</guid>
		<description>Paul,

These were the metered market numbers last week:
CW&#039;s Smallville (#5: 2.8/ 4) and Supernatural (#5: 2.5/ 4)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>These were the metered market numbers last week:<br />
CW&#8217;s Smallville (#5: 2.8/ 4) and Supernatural (#5: 2.5/ 4)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/early-ratings-biden-palin-poised-for-higher-ratings-than-obama-mccain-debate/5604#comment-25244</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5604#comment-25244</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have any idea what smallville had last week in early metered market numbers?

Thanks:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have any idea what smallville had last week in early metered market numbers?</p>
<p>Thanks:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
