<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: O&#8217;Reilly vs. Olbermann Through Thursday, October 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:33:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-32759</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-32759</guid>
		<description>Oh, and by the way, please people.  We&#039;re not stupid.  Do not come on here and bash Olberman and then defend Fox and claim you&#039;re a Democrat.  Yes, it&#039;s very clever Repubs.  You get to say, &quot;see, even Dems agree with us&quot;.  

The problem?  We&#039;re smarter than you.  We see through your crap.  SOOOO SORRY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and by the way, please people.  We&#8217;re not stupid.  Do not come on here and bash Olberman and then defend Fox and claim you&#8217;re a Democrat.  Yes, it&#8217;s very clever Repubs.  You get to say, &#8220;see, even Dems agree with us&#8221;.  </p>
<p>The problem?  We&#8217;re smarter than you.  We see through your crap.  SOOOO SORRY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-32757</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-32757</guid>
		<description>Wow there MGpatsfan, the problem with people of your ilk is you think asking basic and pressing questions about this Nations policies are &quot;gotcha&quot; questions.  You flat out lie or are intellectually dishonest by babbling about how &quot;the Bush Doctrine&quot; means this or that all the while knowing how completely full of it you are.  

She didn&#039;t get any damn &quot;gotcha&quot; questions, she made a fool out of herself and McCain&#039;s own AIDES have supported this.  You people want to blame the media for all your shortcomings. 




Oh...oh...final thing. 

Is Africa a Country or a CONTINENT!!  You know, like you learn in 2nd grade?  

Gee, that mush have been a &quot;gotcha&quot; question from the McCain aides, right?

Or who is in Nafta?  &quot;IN what regard Charlie&quot;!!!!


bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

I mean, look at Cattlemans ignorant rant back there.  Just laughable.  I mean the use of analogies...priceless.  Problem is, he&#039;s like the uptight Military Father in American beautiful.  He can babble on and on about how worked up everyone else is, but I fear any moment now he&#039;s going to try and hit on his male neighbor, only to be rejected and respond with a shooting spree.  



Anyway, you wacko right wingers make me laugh.  You also make me a little upset at how you can perpetuate this prevailing ignorance in this country, but that&#039;s not your fault.  Maybe your kids will be smarter than you. 

I mean, only the GOP could HONESTLY pass off the argument that the educated in this country(who vote Democratic overwhelmingly) are the idiots and the high school drops outs, or even the big bad grads are the smarts ones.  How those teaching at our fine institutions of higher learning are the idiots and those who work as roofers are the truly intelligent ones. 

It&#039;s a comical argument. 



But alas, liberalism will ALWAYS win out.  A nation or it&#039;s people NEVER to backward.  Is this country more liberal than it was 200 years ago? 100 years ago?75? 50? 25? 15? 10?  What&#039;s going to happen in another 5...10?

Oh, it&#039;ll be priceless.  You ignorant, fear mongeriong, hateful people of the Christian Right hiding behind your book of fairy tales and try and hang on as long as you can, but your fingers are being pried off of this country&#039;s controls.  


SO SORRY!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow there MGpatsfan, the problem with people of your ilk is you think asking basic and pressing questions about this Nations policies are &#8220;gotcha&#8221; questions.  You flat out lie or are intellectually dishonest by babbling about how &#8220;the Bush Doctrine&#8221; means this or that all the while knowing how completely full of it you are.  </p>
<p>She didn&#8217;t get any damn &#8220;gotcha&#8221; questions, she made a fool out of herself and McCain&#8217;s own AIDES have supported this.  You people want to blame the media for all your shortcomings. </p>
<p>Oh&#8230;oh&#8230;final thing. </p>
<p>Is Africa a Country or a CONTINENT!!  You know, like you learn in 2nd grade?  </p>
<p>Gee, that mush have been a &#8220;gotcha&#8221; question from the McCain aides, right?</p>
<p>Or who is in Nafta?  &#8220;IN what regard Charlie&#8221;!!!!</p>
<p>bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha</p>
<p>I mean, look at Cattlemans ignorant rant back there.  Just laughable.  I mean the use of analogies&#8230;priceless.  Problem is, he&#8217;s like the uptight Military Father in American beautiful.  He can babble on and on about how worked up everyone else is, but I fear any moment now he&#8217;s going to try and hit on his male neighbor, only to be rejected and respond with a shooting spree.  </p>
<p>Anyway, you wacko right wingers make me laugh.  You also make me a little upset at how you can perpetuate this prevailing ignorance in this country, but that&#8217;s not your fault.  Maybe your kids will be smarter than you. </p>
<p>I mean, only the GOP could HONESTLY pass off the argument that the educated in this country(who vote Democratic overwhelmingly) are the idiots and the high school drops outs, or even the big bad grads are the smarts ones.  How those teaching at our fine institutions of higher learning are the idiots and those who work as roofers are the truly intelligent ones. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a comical argument. </p>
<p>But alas, liberalism will ALWAYS win out.  A nation or it&#8217;s people NEVER to backward.  Is this country more liberal than it was 200 years ago? 100 years ago?75? 50? 25? 15? 10?  What&#8217;s going to happen in another 5&#8230;10?</p>
<p>Oh, it&#8217;ll be priceless.  You ignorant, fear mongeriong, hateful people of the Christian Right hiding behind your book of fairy tales and try and hang on as long as you can, but your fingers are being pried off of this country&#8217;s controls.  </p>
<p>SO SORRY!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-30091</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-30091</guid>
		<description>Astonishing!

It escapes me how anyone can conclude that the hate is coming from Olbermann. He is anti-hate. He is certainly bias but he checks his facts and he is damn entertaining. Cab anyone really say that Hannity is entertaining? Can anyone say he is not mean spirited and hateful?

Fox is the only network with conservatives? Come on People! How about Pat Buchanan and Joe Scarborough. In addition, MSNBC is NOT a news operation... it&#039;s the commentary arm of NBC news which is absolutely fair and balanced. This is the mistake that all blindly biased conservatives make. FOX presents itself as NEWS... that is a joke. It is the ONLY news operation with an obvious... no wait... it’s not just obvious, it&#039;s obnoxious... bias. No other major news operation is bias from a corporate philosophy... some individuals may be bias but the corporate philosophy is not to favor one side or another... ONCE AGAIN PEOPLE... and try to listen this time... MSNBC is NOT a news operation... it&#039;s 100% political commentary and they do get plenty of conservatives on there. However, if you want to compare, the comparison is to NBC News (notice the word news) to FOX News... NOT MSNBC to FOX News.

Are you people really that dense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astonishing!</p>
<p>It escapes me how anyone can conclude that the hate is coming from Olbermann. He is anti-hate. He is certainly bias but he checks his facts and he is damn entertaining. Cab anyone really say that Hannity is entertaining? Can anyone say he is not mean spirited and hateful?</p>
<p>Fox is the only network with conservatives? Come on People! How about Pat Buchanan and Joe Scarborough. In addition, MSNBC is NOT a news operation&#8230; it&#8217;s the commentary arm of NBC news which is absolutely fair and balanced. This is the mistake that all blindly biased conservatives make. FOX presents itself as NEWS&#8230; that is a joke. It is the ONLY news operation with an obvious&#8230; no wait&#8230; it’s not just obvious, it&#8217;s obnoxious&#8230; bias. No other major news operation is bias from a corporate philosophy&#8230; some individuals may be bias but the corporate philosophy is not to favor one side or another&#8230; ONCE AGAIN PEOPLE&#8230; and try to listen this time&#8230; MSNBC is NOT a news operation&#8230; it&#8217;s 100% political commentary and they do get plenty of conservatives on there. However, if you want to compare, the comparison is to NBC News (notice the word news) to FOX News&#8230; NOT MSNBC to FOX News.</p>
<p>Are you people really that dense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joba c</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-28500</link>
		<dc:creator>joba c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-28500</guid>
		<description>I had to turn msnbc off. Olberman is hateful, spiteful and lacking intelligence. He&#039;s too hateful for this Democrat. 
Can anyone tell me if rachel maddow is olbermans twin BROTHER?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to turn msnbc off. Olberman is hateful, spiteful and lacking intelligence. He&#8217;s too hateful for this Democrat.<br />
Can anyone tell me if rachel maddow is olbermans twin BROTHER?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-27393</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-27393</guid>
		<description>Thank You WHATliberalmedia and logic. I appreciate the kind comments. I even appreciate the other comments that are not so kind.

 All of us can get frustrated with opposing view points that we see as misguided but the worst frustration occurs when some talking head is dispensing little more then a baseless series of non sense knowing that it is going to work on the citizen who derives their news primarily from that source or is mindlessly seeking a single view, the facts be damned. Let&#039;s face it, there is plenty of overly bias, talking points based flem that comes spewing out of the mouths of pundits left and right.

 I obtain information and commentary from a variety of sources including the television news operations, print, radio and the internet. It becomes very clear after you expose yourself to all views (assuming an open mind) which are useless dribble and what actually makes sense or can at least be considered in a reasonable decision making process.

 Consider this: When you tune into the news are you rooting for something or do you want to get some facts you can use to make a sound decision? I fear that too few would answer the ladder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You WHATliberalmedia and logic. I appreciate the kind comments. I even appreciate the other comments that are not so kind.</p>
<p> All of us can get frustrated with opposing view points that we see as misguided but the worst frustration occurs when some talking head is dispensing little more then a baseless series of non sense knowing that it is going to work on the citizen who derives their news primarily from that source or is mindlessly seeking a single view, the facts be damned. Let&#8217;s face it, there is plenty of overly bias, talking points based flem that comes spewing out of the mouths of pundits left and right.</p>
<p> I obtain information and commentary from a variety of sources including the television news operations, print, radio and the internet. It becomes very clear after you expose yourself to all views (assuming an open mind) which are useless dribble and what actually makes sense or can at least be considered in a reasonable decision making process.</p>
<p> Consider this: When you tune into the news are you rooting for something or do you want to get some facts you can use to make a sound decision? I fear that too few would answer the ladder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quepqasa</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-27381</link>
		<dc:creator>quepqasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-27381</guid>
		<description>Fox News and MSNBC is to objective journalism as WWF or WWE wrestling is to real olympic style wrestling.  People eat the fake stuff up for some reason.  It&#039;s all for ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News and MSNBC is to objective journalism as WWF or WWE wrestling is to real olympic style wrestling.  People eat the fake stuff up for some reason.  It&#8217;s all for ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckiechan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-26877</link>
		<dc:creator>chuckiechan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-26877</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why people keep whining about Fox News. It is what it is, and it&#039;s winning the rating war. People like myself appreciate the fact that unlike the other stations, they have guests from opposite ideas and parties of EQUAL RANK, not some college debater vs the RNC chairman!

As far as bias? Oberman and his new sidekick, Rachel Maddow - easy on the eyes, but twists logic to the point where all truth is gone. What a bunch of low lifes. I swear they are competing with Colbert!

I am not a political junkie. I want news programs that do their job - call our leaders to account - not campaign for them. Fox was won their audience from the competitors, so why blame Fox? Blame the competition for sticking to the old liberal newspaper model and getting beat buy a more modern format!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why people keep whining about Fox News. It is what it is, and it&#8217;s winning the rating war. People like myself appreciate the fact that unlike the other stations, they have guests from opposite ideas and parties of EQUAL RANK, not some college debater vs the RNC chairman!</p>
<p>As far as bias? Oberman and his new sidekick, Rachel Maddow &#8211; easy on the eyes, but twists logic to the point where all truth is gone. What a bunch of low lifes. I swear they are competing with Colbert!</p>
<p>I am not a political junkie. I want news programs that do their job &#8211; call our leaders to account &#8211; not campaign for them. Fox was won their audience from the competitors, so why blame Fox? Blame the competition for sticking to the old liberal newspaper model and getting beat buy a more modern format!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citygirl</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-26510</link>
		<dc:creator>Citygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-26510</guid>
		<description>Unbelievable that supposed &#039;thinking&#039; people can be as biased as some of you are. Just look at the numbers - please. Obviously, whether you agree or not, the majority of people prefer Fox - the NEWEST network by the way --- because it is the very first time in Media that both sides are shown.  Watchdogs of the media have looked at their programming - you can look it up anywhere.  There are fair in time for every political view - including Independents, Dems and Reps ---

The difference that sets them apart :  they are not afraid to &#039;buck&#039; their own peers and report actual news, rather than filter thru personal preference.  
You show me where Olberman has both sides on his program --- just show me.
He was fired because he was an &#039;anchor&#039; reporting the news?? Well at least they called that one right.  And Chris Mathews?  
You don&#039;t see anyone on Fox reporting the news like these two -- Those with opinions say who they are and it&#039;s not news anchor.
And maybe you haven&#039;t noticed that their opinion shows are balanced also.  If you don&#039;t think Alan Combs is very liberal, then think again --
How about Greta?  How about Geraldo Rivera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unbelievable that supposed &#8216;thinking&#8217; people can be as biased as some of you are. Just look at the numbers &#8211; please. Obviously, whether you agree or not, the majority of people prefer Fox &#8211; the NEWEST network by the way &#8212; because it is the very first time in Media that both sides are shown.  Watchdogs of the media have looked at their programming &#8211; you can look it up anywhere.  There are fair in time for every political view &#8211; including Independents, Dems and Reps &#8212;</p>
<p>The difference that sets them apart :  they are not afraid to &#8216;buck&#8217; their own peers and report actual news, rather than filter thru personal preference.<br />
You show me where Olberman has both sides on his program &#8212; just show me.<br />
He was fired because he was an &#8216;anchor&#8217; reporting the news?? Well at least they called that one right.  And Chris Mathews?<br />
You don&#8217;t see anyone on Fox reporting the news like these two &#8212; Those with opinions say who they are and it&#8217;s not news anchor.<br />
And maybe you haven&#8217;t noticed that their opinion shows are balanced also.  If you don&#8217;t think Alan Combs is very liberal, then think again &#8211;<br />
How about Greta?  How about Geraldo Rivera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logic</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-26497</link>
		<dc:creator>logic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-26497</guid>
		<description>JC, 

You make the most sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JC, </p>
<p>You make the most sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHATliberalmedia?</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-26110</link>
		<dc:creator>WHATliberalmedia?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-26110</guid>
		<description>Very good point, JC. Olbermann always does his fact checking... he is left leaning, but makes sure not to make a jack@$$ out of himself with false accusations that aren&#039;t backed up... unlike some people *cough* O&#039;Reilly *cough*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point, JC. Olbermann always does his fact checking&#8230; he is left leaning, but makes sure not to make a jack@$$ out of himself with false accusations that aren&#8217;t backed up&#8230; unlike some people *cough* O&#8217;Reilly *cough*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25880</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25880</guid>
		<description>I see a lot of strong opinions being expressed but I see just as much lack of understanding.

Does anyone really think that Countdown with Keith Olbermann is a news cast? If you compare Countdown to Special report with Brit Hume you are comparing apples to oranges. There is an important distinction to draw here. FOX News does not have a separate true news operation like NBC does. If you want to make true comparisons you need to compare FOX News programs with the likes of Tom Brokaw and Brian Williams. Does anyone honestly think that &quot;Meet the Press&quot; is bias?

We lost a journalism giant recently and he worked for NBC. His name was Tim Russert. Does anyone recall how much praise was heaped on this man from both the left and the right? Tim was the example of fairness and he was equally tough on all his guests. He attracted the likes of Andrea Mitchell and David Gregory to the NBC news organization and to call them bias is to have an agenda against NBC itself.

Show like Countdown and Hannity are obviously commentary and both are presented from their perspective view points. I happen to watch both and I know what I am getting. But I will say this, it is like night and day to compare those two and the comparison is fair since neither program is a news cast but rather a commentary. Olbermann is down right entertaining. Does anyone recall him as a sportscaster? The man has wit and he has his facts straight. It&#039;s very true that his program presents a left leaning agenda but he does it thoughtfully by examining the evidence and presenting only truth... you certainly get his spin but it is the truth. Hannity on the other hand is woefully predictable. I roll my eyes every time he opens his mouth because I know what is about to come out &quot;Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright on and on&quot; Take a listen to Olbermann and you will not see the same sleep inducing repetition. He and his staff do their homework and present an entertaining program while laying down their spin on recent events. Hannity is a mindless automaton with no regard for the facts if they do not suit his agenda.

In addition, I hear this whine all the time that the media is bias. There is certainly bias in media and that bias is sometimes right and sometimes left. I do happen to think that more then 50% of the news media holds a more liberal bias although it is rather difficult to say how much more or just how liberal. I would say that most true journalists do a reasonable job being fair regardless of their personal bias. However, if it is true I don’t hear the obvious question being asked... why? Is it some vast uncoordinated conspiracy against the right? Of course not! The fact is that when thoughtful people draw conclusions they more often end up landing to the left of the political spectrum. It is no coincidence that &quot;Liberals&quot; are far more educated on average. The &quot;Liberal&quot; agenda is largely based on the common good whereas the conservative agenda is based in self interest. More often then not the best objective conclusions tend to be liberal and therefore may result it what appears to be a liberal bias. In fact it is a bias toward sound reasoning.

All I hear about the media whining. Stop and ask yourself why, there is a reason, a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a lot of strong opinions being expressed but I see just as much lack of understanding.</p>
<p>Does anyone really think that Countdown with Keith Olbermann is a news cast? If you compare Countdown to Special report with Brit Hume you are comparing apples to oranges. There is an important distinction to draw here. FOX News does not have a separate true news operation like NBC does. If you want to make true comparisons you need to compare FOX News programs with the likes of Tom Brokaw and Brian Williams. Does anyone honestly think that &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221; is bias?</p>
<p>We lost a journalism giant recently and he worked for NBC. His name was Tim Russert. Does anyone recall how much praise was heaped on this man from both the left and the right? Tim was the example of fairness and he was equally tough on all his guests. He attracted the likes of Andrea Mitchell and David Gregory to the NBC news organization and to call them bias is to have an agenda against NBC itself.</p>
<p>Show like Countdown and Hannity are obviously commentary and both are presented from their perspective view points. I happen to watch both and I know what I am getting. But I will say this, it is like night and day to compare those two and the comparison is fair since neither program is a news cast but rather a commentary. Olbermann is down right entertaining. Does anyone recall him as a sportscaster? The man has wit and he has his facts straight. It&#8217;s very true that his program presents a left leaning agenda but he does it thoughtfully by examining the evidence and presenting only truth&#8230; you certainly get his spin but it is the truth. Hannity on the other hand is woefully predictable. I roll my eyes every time he opens his mouth because I know what is about to come out &#8220;Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright on and on&#8221; Take a listen to Olbermann and you will not see the same sleep inducing repetition. He and his staff do their homework and present an entertaining program while laying down their spin on recent events. Hannity is a mindless automaton with no regard for the facts if they do not suit his agenda.</p>
<p>In addition, I hear this whine all the time that the media is bias. There is certainly bias in media and that bias is sometimes right and sometimes left. I do happen to think that more then 50% of the news media holds a more liberal bias although it is rather difficult to say how much more or just how liberal. I would say that most true journalists do a reasonable job being fair regardless of their personal bias. However, if it is true I don’t hear the obvious question being asked&#8230; why? Is it some vast uncoordinated conspiracy against the right? Of course not! The fact is that when thoughtful people draw conclusions they more often end up landing to the left of the political spectrum. It is no coincidence that &#8220;Liberals&#8221; are far more educated on average. The &#8220;Liberal&#8221; agenda is largely based on the common good whereas the conservative agenda is based in self interest. More often then not the best objective conclusions tend to be liberal and therefore may result it what appears to be a liberal bias. In fact it is a bias toward sound reasoning.</p>
<p>All I hear about the media whining. Stop and ask yourself why, there is a reason, a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Findley</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25849</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Findley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25849</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very simple reason why the irish madman beats Olbermann in the ratings.
  
You can get Olbermanns political viewpoint on ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN. Olbermann is just one of many.
  
To hear something other than a liberal viewpoint you are forced to watch Fox.
  
The only problem with a liberal, or conservative viewpoint is when it&#039;s not called such. Hannity or Rush have no problems admitting where they sit on the political landscape. For some reason liberals don&#039;t like to admit they are liberals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very simple reason why the irish madman beats Olbermann in the ratings.<br />
  <br />
You can get Olbermanns political viewpoint on ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN. Olbermann is just one of many.<br />
  <br />
To hear something other than a liberal viewpoint you are forced to watch Fox.<br />
  <br />
The only problem with a liberal, or conservative viewpoint is when it&#8217;s not called such. Hannity or Rush have no problems admitting where they sit on the political landscape. For some reason liberals don&#8217;t like to admit they are liberals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cattleman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25807</link>
		<dc:creator>cattleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25807</guid>
		<description>pink bear with people like you out there who are willing to say stuff that radically ignorant, it is no mystery how Joseph Goebbels obtained the power that he did. Would you really truly like it if B. Hussein Obama outlawed Fox. Would that make you happy you nutcake. How then would you like it if McCain outlawed MSNBC? Would you like that, or do you only like dictorial rule when it favors outlawing or killing the people you don&#039;t like? What a nut!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pink bear with people like you out there who are willing to say stuff that radically ignorant, it is no mystery how Joseph Goebbels obtained the power that he did. Would you really truly like it if B. Hussein Obama outlawed Fox. Would that make you happy you nutcake. How then would you like it if McCain outlawed MSNBC? Would you like that, or do you only like dictorial rule when it favors outlawing or killing the people you don&#8217;t like? What a nut!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cattleman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25765</link>
		<dc:creator>cattleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25765</guid>
		<description>C-man I think you are half-way right. 

You can count on Olbermann to &quot;crow&quot; as you put it. 

It is in his nature to do that. He is the type of person that rubs it in other people faces when he wins.

He would not have the dignity to just let people notice. But if McCain does lose on Nov. 4th, O&#039;Reilly will not whine.

You obvioulsy do not ever watch O&#039;Reilly, or you would realize that he does not whine. He may kick the door down and machine gun down who he thinks is a villan, but I have in 6 years of watching him never seen him whine.

Olbermann whines, and Matthews really whines. Matthews has a period once a month, he makes Olbermann look like Randolp Scott.

Both of them whine with enough self-righteous pomposity to make it irritating 
---even to thier employers. Why don&#039;t you go back and read the news stories from when Olbermann got canned. It was numerous higher ups from many places on high that had had their gut full of Olbermanns whining that culminated on the RNC night over his &quot;seperating&quot; himself from his own network over the terrorist video that hurt him little feelings.

What will happen is that Olbermann (if McCain loses) will have a group of haters and gloaters such as yourself slowly get bored with him shoveling out endless kudoos to Barack. With no one to hate or mock you will get bored and his numbers will go down even worse.

On the other hand, look for O&#039;Reilly&#039;s numbers to go up as he will be like a voice in the wilderness.

If you do not believe this then go back and look at Rush Limbough&#039;s numbers during the Clinton years that many said would cause Rush to evaporate. Just the opposite happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-man I think you are half-way right. </p>
<p>You can count on Olbermann to &#8220;crow&#8221; as you put it. </p>
<p>It is in his nature to do that. He is the type of person that rubs it in other people faces when he wins.</p>
<p>He would not have the dignity to just let people notice. But if McCain does lose on Nov. 4th, O&#8217;Reilly will not whine.</p>
<p>You obvioulsy do not ever watch O&#8217;Reilly, or you would realize that he does not whine. He may kick the door down and machine gun down who he thinks is a villan, but I have in 6 years of watching him never seen him whine.</p>
<p>Olbermann whines, and Matthews really whines. Matthews has a period once a month, he makes Olbermann look like Randolp Scott.</p>
<p>Both of them whine with enough self-righteous pomposity to make it irritating<br />
&#8212;even to thier employers. Why don&#8217;t you go back and read the news stories from when Olbermann got canned. It was numerous higher ups from many places on high that had had their gut full of Olbermanns whining that culminated on the RNC night over his &#8220;seperating&#8221; himself from his own network over the terrorist video that hurt him little feelings.</p>
<p>What will happen is that Olbermann (if McCain loses) will have a group of haters and gloaters such as yourself slowly get bored with him shoveling out endless kudoos to Barack. With no one to hate or mock you will get bored and his numbers will go down even worse.</p>
<p>On the other hand, look for O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s numbers to go up as he will be like a voice in the wilderness.</p>
<p>If you do not believe this then go back and look at Rush Limbough&#8217;s numbers during the Clinton years that many said would cause Rush to evaporate. Just the opposite happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25761</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25761</guid>
		<description>Well, Manofsteel, even if the GOP were to take over Congress in 2010, if Obama is pres, he has veto power, rather than if McCain were in power and able to rubber stamp anything a GOP Congress would push through.

But as for Obama outlawing FNC, that is something that needs to come from the people, not the government. And at this rate, the people are never going to stop watching FNC. And if the government tried to ban it, that would be the biggest possible offense of the first amendment. The FCC is horrible enough as it is, we don&#039;t need to give them even more power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Manofsteel, even if the GOP were to take over Congress in 2010, if Obama is pres, he has veto power, rather than if McCain were in power and able to rubber stamp anything a GOP Congress would push through.</p>
<p>But as for Obama outlawing FNC, that is something that needs to come from the people, not the government. And at this rate, the people are never going to stop watching FNC. And if the government tried to ban it, that would be the biggest possible offense of the first amendment. The FCC is horrible enough as it is, we don&#8217;t need to give them even more power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manofsteel</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25758</link>
		<dc:creator>Manofsteel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25758</guid>
		<description>Does it really matter if Obama is elected.  The GOP will take over congress in two years and we will be back to hell again.

Let&#039;s vote for a democratic control in two years also or we&#039;re doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it really matter if Obama is elected.  The GOP will take over congress in two years and we will be back to hell again.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s vote for a democratic control in two years also or we&#8217;re doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Bear</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25752</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25752</guid>
		<description>I hope Obama outlaws Fox News when he&#039;s elected.

That will show who is in charge of the media.

We need a takeover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Obama outlaws Fox News when he&#8217;s elected.</p>
<p>That will show who is in charge of the media.</p>
<p>We need a takeover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Man</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25631</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25631</guid>
		<description>That was sure alot to say about one dude ... the thing is that none of that will matter after the GOPers go down the drain on Nov 4 .. then he will get to hear Keith O crow and hear O&#039;Reilly whine and throw temper tandrums for the next 4 yrs ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was sure alot to say about one dude &#8230; the thing is that none of that will matter after the GOPers go down the drain on Nov 4 .. then he will get to hear Keith O crow and hear O&#8217;Reilly whine and throw temper tandrums for the next 4 yrs &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Rey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25630</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Rey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25630</guid>
		<description>You are all wrong wrong wrong AGAIN.

Fox News has hot babes and that&#039;s why I watch it.  Who wants to watch Keith O. and his lack of humor.

I love hot blondes (brunettes too) that are smart and wear sexy clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all wrong wrong wrong AGAIN.</p>
<p>Fox News has hot babes and that&#8217;s why I watch it.  Who wants to watch Keith O. and his lack of humor.</p>
<p>I love hot blondes (brunettes too) that are smart and wear sexy clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blazermaniac</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25505</link>
		<dc:creator>Blazermaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25505</guid>
		<description>Tom, you are the idiot! Olbermann is just one of many Obama Cheerleaders. He did enough to get booted from MSNBC&#039;s main anchor coverage, along with Matthews. They still have their own shows, so NBC didn&#039;t quite eliminate them. And the only poll that matters is on November 4th. If McCain loses that poll, then that&#039;s it. As for losing all of these polls, keep in mind that most of those polls have liberals all over them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, you are the idiot! Olbermann is just one of many Obama Cheerleaders. He did enough to get booted from MSNBC&#8217;s main anchor coverage, along with Matthews. They still have their own shows, so NBC didn&#8217;t quite eliminate them. And the only poll that matters is on November 4th. If McCain loses that poll, then that&#8217;s it. As for losing all of these polls, keep in mind that most of those polls have liberals all over them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cattleman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25488</link>
		<dc:creator>cattleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25488</guid>
		<description>I think that one of my friends said it best a while back. He commented that a long time ago he used to like Olberman somewhat. But whenever someone, like himself, who just wants the news Fair and Balanced and not the Jim Jones type of kool-aide drinker stuff that Olberman gets from Daily Kos and spews out as news it is just not possible to endure him anymore.
 

After the debate the other night, I flipped it from Fox over to MSNBC and Olberman was all but cross examining a distraught looking Maddow. He kept asking her forceful slanted hate filled ---totaly over the top questions---will someone please tranquilize that man--- and he was practically foaming at the mouth to get Maddow to say that Biden won...she just kept saying &quot;I don&#039;t know...&quot;

It was one of those rare moments when I think even Maddow wanted to say....&quot;Why don&#039;t you let me have an independent thought you gas bag!&quot;

She squinted at him as if he were an embarrassment.

Olberman is a vindictive man who makes himself try to look smarter and better than other people by mocking them and ridiculing them. He is an insecure bully who has obtained power. He is the character Andy Griffith played in the movie, &quot;A Face In The Crowd.&quot;

But the difference with Olberman is that he is not funny. He is like the guy in high school who calls girls pizza face and can&#039;t contain himself at the thought of how brilliant that was...He does not care that if they are struggling with acne...in Olbermann&#039;s world crushing other people is fine as long as it gets him attention.

He is an insulting buffon who thinks he is witty and hilarious. One of those loud weirdly bespectacled whackos at conventions who tells jokes that are not funny but laughs harder and louder at them than anyone else. I remember John Chancellor and men like that. They were newsmen back when NBC commanded respect. Keith Olbermann has all but peed on John Chancellor and David Brinkley&#039;s graves.

GE&#039;s stock is a dissaster and that company is in free fall.
People like Olberman are freakshows who whore in a lot of interest, but over time the damge to NBC will last far beyond the days of Keith Olbermann.

MSNBC is a loser network. Even Lou Dobbs bet Chris &quot;tingle up my leg&quot; Matthews last week.

Olberman can&#039;t come anywhere close to beating O&#039;Reiley...but hey what all you rabid FOX haters could do is just change your strategy. Instead of getting all worked up and frying your nervous systems over how horribly O&#039;Reilly pulverizes Olbermann...instead why don&#039;t you thump your chest over how badly Olbermann stomps Nancy Grace...that way at least you can feel like he is a real winner and not have to curse about Fox and do all that hyperventalating...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one of my friends said it best a while back. He commented that a long time ago he used to like Olberman somewhat. But whenever someone, like himself, who just wants the news Fair and Balanced and not the Jim Jones type of kool-aide drinker stuff that Olberman gets from Daily Kos and spews out as news it is just not possible to endure him anymore.</p>
<p>After the debate the other night, I flipped it from Fox over to MSNBC and Olberman was all but cross examining a distraught looking Maddow. He kept asking her forceful slanted hate filled &#8212;totaly over the top questions&#8212;will someone please tranquilize that man&#8212; and he was practically foaming at the mouth to get Maddow to say that Biden won&#8230;she just kept saying &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It was one of those rare moments when I think even Maddow wanted to say&#8230;.&#8221;Why don&#8217;t you let me have an independent thought you gas bag!&#8221;</p>
<p>She squinted at him as if he were an embarrassment.</p>
<p>Olberman is a vindictive man who makes himself try to look smarter and better than other people by mocking them and ridiculing them. He is an insecure bully who has obtained power. He is the character Andy Griffith played in the movie, &#8220;A Face In The Crowd.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the difference with Olberman is that he is not funny. He is like the guy in high school who calls girls pizza face and can&#8217;t contain himself at the thought of how brilliant that was&#8230;He does not care that if they are struggling with acne&#8230;in Olbermann&#8217;s world crushing other people is fine as long as it gets him attention.</p>
<p>He is an insulting buffon who thinks he is witty and hilarious. One of those loud weirdly bespectacled whackos at conventions who tells jokes that are not funny but laughs harder and louder at them than anyone else. I remember John Chancellor and men like that. They were newsmen back when NBC commanded respect. Keith Olbermann has all but peed on John Chancellor and David Brinkley&#8217;s graves.</p>
<p>GE&#8217;s stock is a dissaster and that company is in free fall.<br />
People like Olberman are freakshows who whore in a lot of interest, but over time the damge to NBC will last far beyond the days of Keith Olbermann.</p>
<p>MSNBC is a loser network. Even Lou Dobbs bet Chris &#8220;tingle up my leg&#8221; Matthews last week.</p>
<p>Olberman can&#8217;t come anywhere close to beating O&#8217;Reiley&#8230;but hey what all you rabid FOX haters could do is just change your strategy. Instead of getting all worked up and frying your nervous systems over how horribly O&#8217;Reilly pulverizes Olbermann&#8230;instead why don&#8217;t you thump your chest over how badly Olbermann stomps Nancy Grace&#8230;that way at least you can feel like he is a real winner and not have to curse about Fox and do all that hyperventalating&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Man</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25484</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25484</guid>
		<description>Just a matter of time JohnM ... it&#039;s coming and most of America knows it&#039;s coming .. even McBlame knows it coming .. he doesn&#039;t have even one battleground state in his pocket ... no more GOPs after Nov 4 .. Joe Six-Pack just ain&#039;t buying all their lies ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a matter of time JohnM &#8230; it&#8217;s coming and most of America knows it&#8217;s coming .. even McBlame knows it coming .. he doesn&#8217;t have even one battleground state in his pocket &#8230; no more GOPs after Nov 4 .. Joe Six-Pack just ain&#8217;t buying all their lies &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnM</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25482</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25482</guid>
		<description>C-Man

The only &quot;poll&quot; that matters is what happens on election day.  If McCain loses there, then you can talk all you want about what Americans want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-Man</p>
<p>The only &#8220;poll&#8221; that matters is what happens on election day.  If McCain loses there, then you can talk all you want about what Americans want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Man</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25451</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25451</guid>
		<description>Right wingers - whine all you want about MSNBC ... just look at the scoreboard (polls) ... Americans are tired of all the GOP BS .. when was the last time McBlame won a National Poll? ... they have lost another 3 polls today and that makes about 17 straight national polls they have lost(realclearpolitics.com) ... they are probably gonna have to resort to mud slinging now because the hype and the misquoting and the lack of actual content just ain&#039;t working so well ... we will now see what lowlifes they really are ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right wingers &#8211; whine all you want about MSNBC &#8230; just look at the scoreboard (polls) &#8230; Americans are tired of all the GOP BS .. when was the last time McBlame won a National Poll? &#8230; they have lost another 3 polls today and that makes about 17 straight national polls they have lost(realclearpolitics.com) &#8230; they are probably gonna have to resort to mud slinging now because the hype and the misquoting and the lack of actual content just ain&#8217;t working so well &#8230; we will now see what lowlifes they really are &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slapshot</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/03/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-october-2/5672#comment-25437</link>
		<dc:creator>slapshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=5672#comment-25437</guid>
		<description>MSNBC is a sad excuse for a news operation.  I cant watch them anymore they are obviously all on the Obama payroll except for Buchanan and Scarborough.  People are pissed at Fox and call them heavily biased to the right.  They could be perceived that way, but they are the only channel that lets you know anything negative on Obama.  The best show on cable news Special report with Brit Hume.  They call it both ways.  Olbermann that guy is full of hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC is a sad excuse for a news operation.  I cant watch them anymore they are obviously all on the Obama payroll except for Buchanan and Scarborough.  People are pissed at Fox and call them heavily biased to the right.  They could be perceived that way, but they are the only channel that lets you know anything negative on Obama.  The best show on cable news Special report with Brit Hume.  They call it both ways.  Olbermann that guy is full of hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
