<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Try Your Hand At Network TV PR!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:07:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Retail_TV_Guy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26842</link>
		<dc:creator>Retail_TV_Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26842</guid>
		<description>Even with 27% of key demos reducing their budget for television shoppnig, Show X looks better than ever now in High Definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with 27% of key demos reducing their budget for television shoppnig, Show X looks better than ever now in High Definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lighthope</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26549</link>
		<dc:creator>Lighthope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26549</guid>
		<description>Show X made television history last night as the most watched television programme ever, pulling in 100 percent of the audience.  This during a time when a strange power blackout knocked off every other station from the airwaves makes the achievement at the more remarkable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show X made television history last night as the most watched television programme ever, pulling in 100 percent of the audience.  This during a time when a strange power blackout knocked off every other station from the airwaves makes the achievement at the more remarkable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26529</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26529</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just spin from the network. They&#039;re just trying to justify exclusively targeting Georges and ignoring the millions of Kevins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just spin from the network. They&#8217;re just trying to justify exclusively targeting Georges and ignoring the millions of Kevins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26524</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26524</guid>
		<description>Yes, but of the Georges that watch Show X, research has shown that they are the highest income bracket of all Georges across the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but of the Georges that watch Show X, research has shown that they are the highest income bracket of all Georges across the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26520</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26520</guid>
		<description>in 2007 a demographic study revealed that Kevins have on average 12% more expandable income than Georges. A victory in the Kevins victory would have been a big victory for show X, but they don&#039;t want to talk about the negative (that they were beaten in Kevins). They want to focus on how they won the less powerful Georges, and rightly so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in 2007 a demographic study revealed that Kevins have on average 12% more expandable income than Georges. A victory in the Kevins victory would have been a big victory for show X, but they don&#8217;t want to talk about the negative (that they were beaten in Kevins). They want to focus on how they won the less powerful Georges, and rightly so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26515</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26515</guid>
		<description>Everyone knows that Kevins have more spending power than Georges, but networks have no respect for Kevins. It&#039;s such a namist demo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows that Kevins have more spending power than Georges, but networks have no respect for Kevins. It&#8217;s such a namist demo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26514</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26514</guid>
		<description>Holly, you can&#039;t discount the George demo. It&#039;s very lucrative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly, you can&#8217;t discount the George demo. It&#8217;s very lucrative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26512</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26512</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know which fall stuck me as the most disastrous: Humpty Dumpty, the value of my 401K or the ratings for the well-written Pushing Daisies as it one again fell to last place in it&#039;s time slot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know which fall stuck me as the most disastrous: Humpty Dumpty, the value of my 401K or the ratings for the well-written Pushing Daisies as it one again fell to last place in it&#8217;s time slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26487</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26487</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a sales business, and sometimes PR spin is grease that keeps the sales wheels turning.  

I think CW was right to reference new airings as competition.  If everybody kicked their seasons off at the same time it would be different, but since the CW had a few weeks of little to no competition (causing people to say, &quot;OF COURSE  they did well they had NO competition&quot;) it&#039;s completely appropriate to point out what happened after that.  Of course, if they are still doing that in another week or two, I&#039;m right there with you.

Your dream of the NBC press release &quot;OMG! We&#039;re TOTALLY FREAKED OUT About How Far Heroes Has Fallen (even though it still won its hour) will remain, as it should, but a dream.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sales business, and sometimes PR spin is grease that keeps the sales wheels turning.  </p>
<p>I think CW was right to reference new airings as competition.  If everybody kicked their seasons off at the same time it would be different, but since the CW had a few weeks of little to no competition (causing people to say, &#8220;OF COURSE  they did well they had NO competition&#8221;) it&#8217;s completely appropriate to point out what happened after that.  Of course, if they are still doing that in another week or two, I&#8217;m right there with you.</p>
<p>Your dream of the NBC press release &#8220;OMG! We&#8217;re TOTALLY FREAKED OUT About How Far Heroes Has Fallen (even though it still won its hour) will remain, as it should, but a dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThundaPC</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26485</link>
		<dc:creator>ThundaPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26485</guid>
		<description>Last week Show X was the highest-rated entertainment program featuring four roommates and a politician on cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Show X was the highest-rated entertainment program featuring four roommates and a politician on cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26470</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26470</guid>
		<description>Despite the increasing lack of brains going into it, show X achieved outstanding numbers against smart competition that deserves higher viewership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the increasing lack of brains going into it, show X achieved outstanding numbers against smart competition that deserves higher viewership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angus</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26456</link>
		<dc:creator>angus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26456</guid>
		<description>In spite of the blackout, Golden Girls finished in the top 3 among most adult demos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of the blackout, Golden Girls finished in the top 3 among most adult demos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26448</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26448</guid>
		<description>My favorites are when a show looses in all the normal measures, so the net has to bring out the smaller demos to say that the show is a success:

&quot;Show X was the most watched show of the hour among African-Americans 18-23 named George.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorites are when a show looses in all the normal measures, so the net has to bring out the smaller demos to say that the show is a success:</p>
<p>&#8220;Show X was the most watched show of the hour among African-Americans 18-23 named George.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/09/try-your-hand-at-network-tv-pr/6017#comment-26444</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6017#comment-26444</guid>
		<description>While the stock market was plunging, Show X was booming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the stock market was plunging, Show X was booming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
