<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DVRs Boost TV Viewership Over Live Viewing, But Not Over Last Season</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:56:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27162</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27162</guid>
		<description>Mom always did try to pit us against each other and then sit back and watch the fireworks.  Shame on you, mom!

haha, as for me, it&#039;s probably the clean east bay air.  Real fall, complete with deciduous trees!  It&#039;s thrown my system completely out of whack.  Or I&#039;m just PMSing over Chuck&#039;s numbers ;)

I completely understand Bill&#039;s general annoyance with the spin doctors, but believe if someone sets out with the specific agenda of debunking the spin, it becomes a slippery slope in some cases (this one being an example) as far as objectivity and useful analysis go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom always did try to pit us against each other and then sit back and watch the fireworks.  Shame on you, mom!</p>
<p>haha, as for me, it&#8217;s probably the clean east bay air.  Real fall, complete with deciduous trees!  It&#8217;s thrown my system completely out of whack.  Or I&#8217;m just PMSing over Chuck&#8217;s numbers <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I completely understand Bill&#8217;s general annoyance with the spin doctors, but believe if someone sets out with the specific agenda of debunking the spin, it becomes a slippery slope in some cases (this one being an example) as far as objectivity and useful analysis go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill and Robert's Mom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27161</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill and Robert's Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27161</guid>
		<description>Well, can you blame me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, can you blame me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27159</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27159</guid>
		<description>Mom always loved Robert best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom always loved Robert best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27157</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27157</guid>
		<description>LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27155</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27155</guid>
		<description>Trouble in paradise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trouble in paradise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27154</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27154</guid>
		<description>yes, and the fact is, the analysis is absolutely meaningless for at least FOUR out of FIVE of the networks (I didn&#039;t do any due dilgence with NBC).  You get so caught up with how the Hollywood machine spins things I think it hurts your objectivity.  Objectively, the season *isn&#039;t* off to a bad start for ABC, Fox or the CW, and if you factor in year over year differences involving CSI, not for CBS either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, and the fact is, the analysis is absolutely meaningless for at least FOUR out of FIVE of the networks (I didn&#8217;t do any due dilgence with NBC).  You get so caught up with how the Hollywood machine spins things I think it hurts your objectivity.  Objectively, the season *isn&#8217;t* off to a bad start for ABC, Fox or the CW, and if you factor in year over year differences involving CSI, not for CBS either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27153</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27153</guid>
		<description>If you read the media on the Live+7 numbers, you&#039;d think it was all a boon for broadcasting.

Fact is, Live+7 viewing for the 5 English networks is down vs last season, by more than Live+SD. Are there differences between the networks, sure. That&#039;s what the bars are demonstrating. Folks can see that for themselves. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you read the media on the Live+7 numbers, you&#8217;d think it was all a boon for broadcasting.</p>
<p>Fact is, Live+7 viewing for the 5 English networks is down vs last season, by more than Live+SD. Are there differences between the networks, sure. That&#8217;s what the bars are demonstrating. Folks can see that for themselves. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27145</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27145</guid>
		<description>...and they may be meaningless to CBS as well!  Last year they had a new CSI on that week and this year they did not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and they may be meaningless to CBS as well!  Last year they had a new CSI on that week and this year they did not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/14/dvrs-boost-tv-viewership-over-live-viewing-but-not-over-last-season/6182#comment-27142</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6182#comment-27142</guid>
		<description>Your commentary seems off base to me.  Sadly for *CBS and NBC* the season is off to a bad start (based on that one week).  But that&#039;s not true for ABC, CW or Fox.  60% of the big five are off to a better start than last year.  It&#039;s the huge losses with CBS and NBC that drag the overall averages down.  For now those averages are meaningless except to NBC and CBS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your commentary seems off base to me.  Sadly for *CBS and NBC* the season is off to a bad start (based on that one week).  But that&#8217;s not true for ABC, CW or Fox.  60% of the big five are off to a better start than last year.  It&#8217;s the huge losses with CBS and NBC that drag the overall averages down.  For now those averages are meaningless except to NBC and CBS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
