<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday Ratings: CBS Dominates With CSI; World Series and Life on Mars Drop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:17:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29448</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29448</guid>
		<description>hey, wat was the final  number of veiwers for greys and CSI? i heard they gained a few?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, wat was the final  number of veiwers for greys and CSI? i heard they gained a few?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viola</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29391</link>
		<dc:creator>Viola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29391</guid>
		<description>Thanks Robert for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Robert for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29390</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29390</guid>
		<description>Viola, DVR viewing that happened the same night the show aired is included, but it takes Nielsen weeks to produce the live+7 DVR data and so we won&#039;t see that data for the premiere episode from 10/9 until this Monday (10/27).  We won&#039;t see it for the episode referenced above until 11/10. 

Unfortunately, our analysis overall is that DVR viewing that occurs after the night the program aired is meaningless in terms of ad revenue, and only valuable for press releases.  Though this is probably not quite as true for shows airing at 10pm, it&#039;s likely still mostly true anyway (because &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/more-evidence-nobody-watches-commercials-on-dvr-playback/6775 &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nobody watches commercials via DVR&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Viola, DVR viewing that happened the same night the show aired is included, but it takes Nielsen weeks to produce the live+7 DVR data and so we won&#8217;t see that data for the premiere episode from 10/9 until this Monday (10/27).  We won&#8217;t see it for the episode referenced above until 11/10. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, our analysis overall is that DVR viewing that occurs after the night the program aired is meaningless in terms of ad revenue, and only valuable for press releases.  Though this is probably not quite as true for shows airing at 10pm, it&#8217;s likely still mostly true anyway (because <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/more-evidence-nobody-watches-commercials-on-dvr-playback/6775 " rel="nofollow">nobody watches commercials via DVR</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viola</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29389</link>
		<dc:creator>Viola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been following Life on Mars and I love it!! I hope they keep it around.  8 million viewers is not chump change.  Do the numbers account for dvr viewings too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following Life on Mars and I love it!! I hope they keep it around.  8 million viewers is not chump change.  Do the numbers account for dvr viewings too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29388</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29388</guid>
		<description>At this rate, Survivor will have more viewers than Grey&#039;s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this rate, Survivor will have more viewers than Grey&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris the TV Sage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29291</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris the TV Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29291</guid>
		<description>Alde is also committing the fallacy of assuming that we all have the same definition of &quot;quality&quot; television. I can think of 7 million former viewers of Pushing Daisies who have a differing opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alde is also committing the fallacy of assuming that we all have the same definition of &#8220;quality&#8221; television. I can think of 7 million former viewers of Pushing Daisies who have a differing opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnthemon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29288</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnthemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29288</guid>
		<description>It seems like everything on NBC is drooping this season. My Name is Earl, the Office, Heroes, Chuck...and there new shows are universally failing with the exception of Knight Rider, but it&#039;s still far from a hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like everything on NBC is drooping this season. My Name is Earl, the Office, Heroes, Chuck&#8230;and there new shows are universally failing with the exception of Knight Rider, but it&#8217;s still far from a hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonlightfan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29274</link>
		<dc:creator>moonlightfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29274</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;ll have you know Bill &#039;ah doh&#039; drink. Catholic school has spoiled me for the real world  &gt;&lt;&#039;

But I get by unmeasurable volumes of bottled H2O. Which is really funny because whenever I go out my friends get free drinks cause I hit up the bartender for drinks, and pass it on to them. But the ironic thing is that I don&#039;t drive, so I can&#039;t be the designated driver, and they say it would be plus to hit two birds with one stone, free drinks and a designated driver in one.   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;ll have you know Bill &#8216;ah doh&#8217; drink. Catholic school has spoiled me for the real world  &gt;&lt;&#8217;</p>
<p>But I get by unmeasurable volumes of bottled H2O. Which is really funny because whenever I go out my friends get free drinks cause I hit up the bartender for drinks, and pass it on to them. But the ironic thing is that I don&#8217;t drive, so I can&#8217;t be the designated driver, and they say it would be plus to hit two birds with one stone, free drinks and a designated driver in one.   <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonlightfan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29272</link>
		<dc:creator>moonlightfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29272</guid>
		<description>I understand that Peterson WANTS to leave the show, but every time he picks up and outs a few episodes they haul in a recognizable actor to tend to the lead. Also, everything is relational, one point connects to another. But it is obvious that they are trying to portend to the Character driven format this year. 

And though awards are seemingly understated when it comes to ratings, it must urk some board members that they have the most viewed tv shows in TV land, yet are black balled when it comes to award season in the drama department.

Also, I know I am going to be labeled a conspiracy theorists when it comes to this generality, but did anyone realize that Jerry Bruckheimer eliminated one black actor from his show, as another black actor was coming on board. Maybe I am the only one breathing too much into this because I am black, but he did this once before with POTC 2 -&gt; 3, he dropped one black actress in favor of the lead which was also black. I noticed this because she was featured in the commercials for the 1st POTC. Once is excusable, but twice becomes suspect. What, 2 blacks can&#039;t share the same screen time at once? 

But I doubt anyone will really take this act seriously, they only sit up and take notice when spike lee addresses these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that Peterson WANTS to leave the show, but every time he picks up and outs a few episodes they haul in a recognizable actor to tend to the lead. Also, everything is relational, one point connects to another. But it is obvious that they are trying to portend to the Character driven format this year. </p>
<p>And though awards are seemingly understated when it comes to ratings, it must urk some board members that they have the most viewed tv shows in TV land, yet are black balled when it comes to award season in the drama department.</p>
<p>Also, I know I am going to be labeled a conspiracy theorists when it comes to this generality, but did anyone realize that Jerry Bruckheimer eliminated one black actor from his show, as another black actor was coming on board. Maybe I am the only one breathing too much into this because I am black, but he did this once before with POTC 2 -&gt; 3, he dropped one black actress in favor of the lead which was also black. I noticed this because she was featured in the commercials for the 1st POTC. Once is excusable, but twice becomes suspect. What, 2 blacks can&#8217;t share the same screen time at once? </p>
<p>But I doubt anyone will really take this act seriously, they only sit up and take notice when spike lee addresses these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cesarrr</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29257</link>
		<dc:creator>cesarrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29257</guid>
		<description>Grey&#039;s Anatomy is so anoying right now. It used to be a really good show, with likeable characters that you can fall in love with (season 1 and 2), BUT NOT ANYMORE
No wonder why its viewership is declining.

with that said, I think that Private Practice would do so much better if they put it after Grey&#039;s at 10pm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy is so anoying right now. It used to be a really good show, with likeable characters that you can fall in love with (season 1 and 2), BUT NOT ANYMORE<br />
No wonder why its viewership is declining.</p>
<p>with that said, I think that Private Practice would do so much better if they put it after Grey&#8217;s at 10pm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29243</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29243</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see CBS dropping the show this year.  As for what happens if CBS doesn&#039;t renew it, I&#039;ll worry about in May :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see CBS dropping the show this year.  As for what happens if CBS doesn&#8217;t renew it, I&#8217;ll worry about in May <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29236</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29236</guid>
		<description>Robert, do you think ABC can pickup &#039;Old Christine&#039; if CBS drop the show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, do you think ABC can pickup &#8216;Old Christine&#8217; if CBS drop the show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29223</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29223</guid>
		<description>Alde, and you spout such an opinion because it&#039;s not *your* money being invested.  If it was, I imagine you&#039;d care a lot more about making money than winning awards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alde, and you spout such an opinion because it&#8217;s not *your* money being invested.  If it was, I imagine you&#8217;d care a lot more about making money than winning awards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alde</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29220</link>
		<dc:creator>Alde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29220</guid>
		<description>You know, it seems to be a matter of fact by now that quality shows tend to obtain less of a viewer numbers. It&#039;s always easier for a casual viewer to tune in and watch some random procedural with intentionally quirky characters than to spend time watching a continual story which, in most cases, tends to transcend one-dimensional perspectives. What I&#039;m trying to say, I suppose, is that I&#039;d take critical acclaim and awards over numbers based on casual viewers with an intelligence below a sledge hammer any day. I&#039;m really grateful at this point that cable networks let their shows to live in peace - that&#039;s maybe one of the biggest factors why they end up having way higher quality opposed to something random that wins &quot;its hour&quot; in broadcast TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it seems to be a matter of fact by now that quality shows tend to obtain less of a viewer numbers. It&#8217;s always easier for a casual viewer to tune in and watch some random procedural with intentionally quirky characters than to spend time watching a continual story which, in most cases, tends to transcend one-dimensional perspectives. What I&#8217;m trying to say, I suppose, is that I&#8217;d take critical acclaim and awards over numbers based on casual viewers with an intelligence below a sledge hammer any day. I&#8217;m really grateful at this point that cable networks let their shows to live in peace &#8211; that&#8217;s maybe one of the biggest factors why they end up having way higher quality opposed to something random that wins &#8220;its hour&#8221; in broadcast TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29217</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29217</guid>
		<description>STFU 


Tut tut. Be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STFU </p>
<p>Tut tut. Be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29212</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29212</guid>
		<description>Peterson is still an executive producer on the show and has stated that he will return whenever the writers want him to make a guest appearance, so he&#039;s not exactly bailing on the show. Besides, after 8 and a half seasons, I can&#039;t blame him for wanting to try something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peterson is still an executive producer on the show and has stated that he will return whenever the writers want him to make a guest appearance, so he&#8217;s not exactly bailing on the show. Besides, after 8 and a half seasons, I can&#8217;t blame him for wanting to try something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29210</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29210</guid>
		<description>Moonlight fan, perhaps you&#039;re drinking too much rum over there in Trinadad.  AWARDS ARE MEANINGLESS.  Unless you&#039;re the fourth place network like NBC, and then awards for 30 Rock (which I do love) are somewhat meaningful. 

Which would you rather be?  Mad Men (and I love this show) with ~1.5 million viewers and a best drama Emmy or Burn Notice (and I confess, I enjoy BN more) with over 4 million viewers?

PD isn&#039;t going *anywhere* but OUT after it&#039;s 13 episodes unless Jesus makes an appearance and says &quot;RESURRECT THIS SHOW&quot; (unlikely).  Otherwise, it&#039;s done like Moonlight.

CBS already *knows* how Christine does in the Monday 9:30 spot (better than Worst Week!). It needs something to ANCHOR its Wednesday comedy block, and so it will try to keep Christine there. I don&#039;t see that changing unless CBS gives up on a Wednesday comedy  block which does not seem likely for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moonlight fan, perhaps you&#8217;re drinking too much rum over there in Trinadad.  AWARDS ARE MEANINGLESS.  Unless you&#8217;re the fourth place network like NBC, and then awards for 30 Rock (which I do love) are somewhat meaningful. </p>
<p>Which would you rather be?  Mad Men (and I love this show) with ~1.5 million viewers and a best drama Emmy or Burn Notice (and I confess, I enjoy BN more) with over 4 million viewers?</p>
<p>PD isn&#8217;t going *anywhere* but OUT after it&#8217;s 13 episodes unless Jesus makes an appearance and says &#8220;RESURRECT THIS SHOW&#8221; (unlikely).  Otherwise, it&#8217;s done like Moonlight.</p>
<p>CBS already *knows* how Christine does in the Monday 9:30 spot (better than Worst Week!). It needs something to ANCHOR its Wednesday comedy block, and so it will try to keep Christine there. I don&#8217;t see that changing unless CBS gives up on a Wednesday comedy  block which does not seem likely for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29209</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29209</guid>
		<description>Ummm...Peterson WANTS to leave. CBS would love to keep him, but he&#039;s been wanting to get back to theater work for a while and decided not to sign a new contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230;Peterson WANTS to leave. CBS would love to keep him, but he&#8217;s been wanting to get back to theater work for a while and decided not to sign a new contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonlightfan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29207</link>
		<dc:creator>moonlightfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29207</guid>
		<description>I think that the lack of nods in the emmy&#039;s &amp; globe dept really smacked CBS silly. They are getting rid of Peterson for the same reason they brought in Rufus Sewell as main lead for eleventh hr, they are trying to rebuild their shows around characters, like USA does. Peterson&#039;s departure takes viewers with him, Fishbourne would bring new ones, especially those looking for quality. 

Not only that but they are doing the right thing and trimming down the cast, letting character acting take center stage. 

I saw LOM last night, I enjoyed it, Harvey Keitel looks like he would be up for an award nod next year, regardless of LOM being on the R/C index. Though this show is getting pounded in the ratings, they should ditch Eli Stone and give LOM a lead in from DWTS. Either Mon Or Tues, LOM looks like it could have been a shoe in to take up with the NYPD audience, though considerably less nitty gritty. 

PD should go after DHH. Brothers and Sisters have been hanging onto their coat tails for far too long. 

FYI, CBS is going to place Garry Unmarried after Two and a Half Men next week, I feel as if Christine deserves that spot a whole lot more. But I think that overall CBS is doing the smart thing by restructuring their procedurals. It should work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the lack of nods in the emmy&#8217;s &amp; globe dept really smacked CBS silly. They are getting rid of Peterson for the same reason they brought in Rufus Sewell as main lead for eleventh hr, they are trying to rebuild their shows around characters, like USA does. Peterson&#8217;s departure takes viewers with him, Fishbourne would bring new ones, especially those looking for quality. </p>
<p>Not only that but they are doing the right thing and trimming down the cast, letting character acting take center stage. </p>
<p>I saw LOM last night, I enjoyed it, Harvey Keitel looks like he would be up for an award nod next year, regardless of LOM being on the R/C index. Though this show is getting pounded in the ratings, they should ditch Eli Stone and give LOM a lead in from DWTS. Either Mon Or Tues, LOM looks like it could have been a shoe in to take up with the NYPD audience, though considerably less nitty gritty. </p>
<p>PD should go after DHH. Brothers and Sisters have been hanging onto their coat tails for far too long. </p>
<p>FYI, CBS is going to place Garry Unmarried after Two and a Half Men next week, I feel as if Christine deserves that spot a whole lot more. But I think that overall CBS is doing the smart thing by restructuring their procedurals. It should work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29189</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29189</guid>
		<description>Holly, I agree down the line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holly, I agree down the line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29187</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29187</guid>
		<description>Robert, I agree that Grey&#039;s 18-34 demo makes it more valuable, but the question centered around the 18-49 demo. If Andrea had argued that CSI&#039;s low 18-34 demo results made it less of a &quot;powerhouse&quot;, I might have agreed, but she didn&#039;t. She appeared to be arguing that CSI&#039;s high viewer numbers made its demo less important/valuable. The breakdown &lt;i&gt;within&lt;/i&gt; the 18-49 demo may hurt its value, but the extra viewers &lt;i&gt;outside&lt;/i&gt; the demos don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I agree that Grey&#8217;s 18-34 demo makes it more valuable, but the question centered around the 18-49 demo. If Andrea had argued that CSI&#8217;s low 18-34 demo results made it less of a &#8220;powerhouse&#8221;, I might have agreed, but she didn&#8217;t. She appeared to be arguing that CSI&#8217;s high viewer numbers made its demo less important/valuable. The breakdown <i>within</i> the 18-49 demo may hurt its value, but the extra viewers <i>outside</i> the demos don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29185</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29185</guid>
		<description>Iggy, Grey&#039;s quality took a sharp dive in season 2. If the viewers didn&#039;t catch on then, I doubt they ever will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iggy, Grey&#8217;s quality took a sharp dive in season 2. If the viewers didn&#8217;t catch on then, I doubt they ever will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29184</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29184</guid>
		<description>ER went through a lot of characters and lasted as a huge show for a long time. I don&#039;t think it will matter much, but it does, of course, depend on the new characters being likable, like you said, Holly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ER went through a lot of characters and lasted as a huge show for a long time. I don&#8217;t think it will matter much, but it does, of course, depend on the new characters being likable, like you said, Holly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iggy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29182</link>
		<dc:creator>Iggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29182</guid>
		<description>Grey&#039;s numbers are still solid because it has a loyal viewership that&#039;s invested in the characters.  However, the show is just horrible now.  Just about everyone I know who watches the show agrees that the quality has seriously declined. I don&#039;t see this show improving, but I think will continue a steady decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grey&#8217;s numbers are still solid because it has a loyal viewership that&#8217;s invested in the characters.  However, the show is just horrible now.  Just about everyone I know who watches the show agrees that the quality has seriously declined. I don&#8217;t see this show improving, but I think will continue a steady decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/24/ratings/6778#comment-29181</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=6778#comment-29181</guid>
		<description>I think CSI could go either way after Peterson&#039;s exit. On one hand, a lot of people are attached to the &lt;i&gt;show&lt;/i&gt; not just one character and the introduction of Laurence Fishburne could help significantly. On the other hand, CSI is loosing 3 characters in just over a year. That means a lot of changes and a different dynamic on the show. I think for the most part viewers will give the show a chance after Peterson leaves, but if the new characters don&#039;t grab people, the numbers could drop dramatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CSI could go either way after Peterson&#8217;s exit. On one hand, a lot of people are attached to the <i>show</i> not just one character and the introduction of Laurence Fishburne could help significantly. On the other hand, CSI is loosing 3 characters in just over a year. That means a lot of changes and a different dynamic on the show. I think for the most part viewers will give the show a chance after Peterson leaves, but if the new characters don&#8217;t grab people, the numbers could drop dramatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
