<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Gossip Girl&#8221; Builds Week-to-Week as The CW Agains Finishes Monday #1 With Young Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:49:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30023</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30023</guid>
		<description>The CW is actually making a little name for themselves, finally. Seems to be a niche-network, but maybe that&#039;s their ticket to survival. The numbers are up, that much is inarguable. It&#039;ll be interesting to watch things play out for them next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW is actually making a little name for themselves, finally. Seems to be a niche-network, but maybe that&#8217;s their ticket to survival. The numbers are up, that much is inarguable. It&#8217;ll be interesting to watch things play out for them next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30007</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30007</guid>
		<description>Ohhhh....got it.  saying they were tied for second among the aggregate 18-34 is a little dicey. with the time adjustments, it was close, but minus Univision (who it doesn&#039;t compare itself too) it is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhh&#8230;.got it.  saying they were tied for second among the aggregate 18-34 is a little dicey. with the time adjustments, it was close, but minus Univision (who it doesn&#8217;t compare itself too) it is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30006</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30006</guid>
		<description>Just now? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just now? <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30005</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30005</guid>
		<description>In the interest of making Julia not look silly, I had briefly posted (Incorrectly) that sans Univision CW did tie for second. When I deleted my post moments later, she had already posted after me.

It is my Alzheimer&#039;s at work here, not hers. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of making Julia not look silly, I had briefly posted (Incorrectly) that sans Univision CW did tie for second. When I deleted my post moments later, she had already posted after me.</p>
<p>It is my Alzheimer&#8217;s at work here, not hers. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30003</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30003</guid>
		<description>Dammit. Now I look silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit. Now I look silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30002</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30002</guid>
		<description>Bill, ABC came in first, FOX came in second, CW tied for third with NBC, at least according to your numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, ABC came in first, FOX came in second, CW tied for third with NBC, at least according to your numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-30000</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-30000</guid>
		<description>Robert, according to the numbers you gave us, GG tied for third. This says they tied for second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, according to the numbers you gave us, GG tied for third. This says they tied for second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-29999</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-29999</guid>
		<description>Angie, you&#039;re right, but it&#039;s possible that Fox&#039;s numbers can be rounded to be tied at 2.2, or that due to the live sporting event they actually look much different at 8pm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, you&#8217;re right, but it&#8217;s possible that Fox&#8217;s numbers can be rounded to be tied at 2.2, or that due to the live sporting event they actually look much different at 8pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-29998</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-29998</guid>
		<description>Angie, they posted both the women 18-34 (3.4/9) and the overall 18-34 (2.2/6).  I&#039;m confused about what you&#039;re confused about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, they posted both the women 18-34 (3.4/9) and the overall 18-34 (2.2/6).  I&#8217;m confused about what you&#8217;re confused about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-29993</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-29993</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  But . . . they&#039; posted the 2.2/6 number - the adult number that you had.  I&#039;m confused . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  But . . . they&#8217; posted the 2.2/6 number &#8211; the adult number that you had.  I&#8217;m confused . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-29949</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-29949</guid>
		<description>Oh my god, Gossip Girl has more audience than SUPERBOWL!
hehehehehe!

xxx
B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god, Gossip Girl has more audience than SUPERBOWL!<br />
hehehehehe!</p>
<p>xxx<br />
B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-29946</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-29946</guid>
		<description>Angie, the numbers in our overnight post are for all adults 18-34. The CW focuses only on women 18-34. Segment your audience enough and you can &quot;win&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie, the numbers in our overnight post are for all adults 18-34. The CW focuses only on women 18-34. Segment your audience enough and you can &#8220;win&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/10/28/gossip-girl-builds-week-to-week-as-the-cw-agains-finishes-monday-1-with-young-women/7005#comment-29943</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7005#comment-29943</guid>
		<description>Umm . . . didn&#039;t gossip girls tie for THIRD in 18-34 adults?  Bueller?  Now the CW is just making stuff up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm . . . didn&#8217;t gossip girls tie for THIRD in 18-34 adults?  Bueller?  Now the CW is just making stuff up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
