<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NETWORKS OF NBC DRAW MORE THAN 18 MILLION VIEWERS ON ELECTION NIGHT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/05/networks-of-nbc-draw-more-than-18-million-viewers-on-election-night/7682/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/05/networks-of-nbc-draw-more-than-18-million-viewers-on-election-night/7682</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:24:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/05/networks-of-nbc-draw-more-than-18-million-viewers-on-election-night/7682#comment-32617</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7682#comment-32617</guid>
		<description>Those are pretty impressive numbers for MSNBC when you consider that programming providers moved the network from their base packages to the premium packages when MSNBC began providing some liberal programming and it started catching on with viewers.  Just imagine their viewership if they were placed back down in the base package like they used to be instead of being banished to the &quot;wilderness&quot; of the premium channels.  Their ratings would be off the charts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are pretty impressive numbers for MSNBC when you consider that programming providers moved the network from their base packages to the premium packages when MSNBC began providing some liberal programming and it started catching on with viewers.  Just imagine their viewership if they were placed back down in the base package like they used to be instead of being banished to the &#8220;wilderness&#8221; of the premium channels.  Their ratings would be off the charts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/05/networks-of-nbc-draw-more-than-18-million-viewers-on-election-night/7682#comment-32381</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7682#comment-32381</guid>
		<description>I agree with Cool that it&#039;s absurd.  On the broadcast side, NBC got bested by ABC.  On the cable side, MSNBC was beat bo CNN and Fox News.  What the hell does &quot;networks of NBC&quot; even mean to advertisers?  I&#039;m so tired of &quot;PR Departments&quot; putting a moronic spin on something so meaningless.  I suppose with little to be upbeat about, NBC has no choice but to tout such a meaningless &quot;victory&quot;.  Anyone in the industry with half a brain knows that NBC is in the toilet, so I doubt such PR is going to do anything but inflate the egos of the incompetent executives who are part of &quot;the networks of NBC&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Cool that it&#8217;s absurd.  On the broadcast side, NBC got bested by ABC.  On the cable side, MSNBC was beat bo CNN and Fox News.  What the hell does &#8220;networks of NBC&#8221; even mean to advertisers?  I&#8217;m so tired of &#8220;PR Departments&#8221; putting a moronic spin on something so meaningless.  I suppose with little to be upbeat about, NBC has no choice but to tout such a meaningless &#8220;victory&#8221;.  Anyone in the industry with half a brain knows that NBC is in the toilet, so I doubt such PR is going to do anything but inflate the egos of the incompetent executives who are part of &#8220;the networks of NBC&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/05/networks-of-nbc-draw-more-than-18-million-viewers-on-election-night/7682#comment-32285</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7682#comment-32285</guid>
		<description>Cool, it&#039;s not absurd, it&#039;s PR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, it&#8217;s not absurd, it&#8217;s PR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/05/networks-of-nbc-draw-more-than-18-million-viewers-on-election-night/7682#comment-32279</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7682#comment-32279</guid>
		<description>This is absurd.. it&#039;s like ABC adds ESPN numbers every Monday so they can say: DISNEY NETWORKS DRAW MORE THAN 30 million viewers (DWTS + MNF)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absurd.. it&#8217;s like ABC adds ESPN numbers every Monday so they can say: DISNEY NETWORKS DRAW MORE THAN 30 million viewers (DWTS + MNF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
