<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did CBS Execs Just Wince?  Kansas City Goes for 2 Point Conversion instead of Overtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:43:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843#comment-33212</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7843#comment-33212</guid>
		<description>Bill, I&#039;m sure CBS was happy overall with how the games played out, but  you&#039;re insane if you think it wouldn&#039;t have prefered overtime and even more NFL.  I&#039;m sure there were a couple of CBS sports honchos shouting: &quot;KICK THE EXTRA POINT!&quot;  But that was Herm &quot;We play to WIN the game&quot; Edwards and even though they have not won often, I enjoyed seeing him play for the win rather than the tie.

Vader, Fox gives Buck/Aikman the game it thinks will be the most watched game and that winds up being the Cowboys often, even if it&#039;s not necessarily the &quot;best game&quot;. The Cowboys get better ratings than the NY Giants (though that may change in the second half given the standings).  I could be wrong but I think it has more to do with most-watched game than Aikman&#039;s past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, I&#8217;m sure CBS was happy overall with how the games played out, but  you&#8217;re insane if you think it wouldn&#8217;t have prefered overtime and even more NFL.  I&#8217;m sure there were a couple of CBS sports honchos shouting: &#8220;KICK THE EXTRA POINT!&#8221;  But that was Herm &#8220;We play to WIN the game&#8221; Edwards and even though they have not won often, I enjoyed seeing him play for the win rather than the tie.</p>
<p>Vader, Fox gives Buck/Aikman the game it thinks will be the most watched game and that winds up being the Cowboys often, even if it&#8217;s not necessarily the &#8220;best game&#8221;. The Cowboys get better ratings than the NY Giants (though that may change in the second half given the standings).  I could be wrong but I think it has more to do with most-watched game than Aikman&#8217;s past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vader</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843#comment-33210</link>
		<dc:creator>Vader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7843#comment-33210</guid>
		<description>This might be one of the two games Aikman does that doesn&#039;t feature the Dallas Cowboys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be one of the two games Aikman does that doesn&#8217;t feature the Dallas Cowboys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843#comment-33207</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7843#comment-33207</guid>
		<description>I think CBS should be happy to have had a 2 close and watchable to the end late games (the last involving a team as dreadful as the Chiefs spill a bit over 7pm). Had you offered them that possibility at the beginning of the day, they&#039;d have jumped at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CBS should be happy to have had a 2 close and watchable to the end late games (the last involving a team as dreadful as the Chiefs spill a bit over 7pm). Had you offered them that possibility at the beginning of the day, they&#8217;d have jumped at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843#comment-33190</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7843#comment-33190</guid>
		<description>oh definitely 52 is in his range and he was just a smidge to the right. But nailing 60 yarders in practice isn&#039;t the same as nailing a 52 yarder in the heat of battle.  Plus at the time Buck brought it up, it was in the 60+ range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh definitely 52 is in his range and he was just a smidge to the right. But nailing 60 yarders in practice isn&#8217;t the same as nailing a 52 yarder in the heat of battle.  Plus at the time Buck brought it up, it was in the 60+ range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick C</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/09/did-cbs-execs-just-wince-kansas-city-goes-for-2-point-conversion-instead-of-overtime/7843#comment-33189</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=7843#comment-33189</guid>
		<description>He may have missed the FG, but they were in the kicker&#039;s range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may have missed the FG, but they were in the kicker&#8217;s range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
