<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Nielsen Ratings: CBS Smiles as Repeats Perform at 9pm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:42:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clutz12001</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36654</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz12001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36654</guid>
		<description>Jay is partially incorrect, but partially correct.  Nielsen viewer may tune in to a station, then push all the right buttons on the meter to say he/she is watching &quot;Show X.&quot;  Nielsen viewer may then walk the dog, have dinner, do the laundry, etc...without noting the absence on the meter.  Nielsen viewer may also flip back and forth every five minutes, sufficiently to allow two shows to be &quot;counted&quot; on his or her meter.  In reality, the viewer may not have been all that interested in either show.  

In older technology, Nielsen also makes assumptions when diary data does not match up with metered data.  This is the &quot;zero-cell&quot; phenomenon.  They have somehow sold their customers on the idea that for zero-cells, it&#039;s OK to assume that the Zero-Cell Viewer behaved the same as the majority of viewers, in the same demographic, who correctly matched their meters to their diaries.  People Meters are supposed to eliminate this concern as they eliminate a lot of paper diary work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay is partially incorrect, but partially correct.  Nielsen viewer may tune in to a station, then push all the right buttons on the meter to say he/she is watching &#8220;Show X.&#8221;  Nielsen viewer may then walk the dog, have dinner, do the laundry, etc&#8230;without noting the absence on the meter.  Nielsen viewer may also flip back and forth every five minutes, sufficiently to allow two shows to be &#8220;counted&#8221; on his or her meter.  In reality, the viewer may not have been all that interested in either show.  </p>
<p>In older technology, Nielsen also makes assumptions when diary data does not match up with metered data.  This is the &#8220;zero-cell&#8221; phenomenon.  They have somehow sold their customers on the idea that for zero-cells, it&#8217;s OK to assume that the Zero-Cell Viewer behaved the same as the majority of viewers, in the same demographic, who correctly matched their meters to their diaries.  People Meters are supposed to eliminate this concern as they eliminate a lot of paper diary work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36592</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36592</guid>
		<description>Im glad the 9pm hour on CBS is strong with repeats.  That tells you people were there, but didnt want to watch The Ex-List or Moonlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im glad the 9pm hour on CBS is strong with repeats.  That tells you people were there, but didnt want to watch The Ex-List or Moonlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36579</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36579</guid>
		<description>Jay, you&#039;re incorrect.  The people meters measure all minutes of viewing.  So if you watch 10 minutes, change the channel for 5, come back for 10, change the channel for 5, all the various minutes of viewing are applied to the appropriate programs.  The numbers are the total minutes of viewing for the program, divided by the program&#039;s duration to come up with average viewers at any point in time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, you&#8217;re incorrect.  The people meters measure all minutes of viewing.  So if you watch 10 minutes, change the channel for 5, come back for 10, change the channel for 5, all the various minutes of viewing are applied to the appropriate programs.  The numbers are the total minutes of viewing for the program, divided by the program&#8217;s duration to come up with average viewers at any point in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay turney</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36577</link>
		<dc:creator>jay turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36577</guid>
		<description>Not to be a smartass, but I still notice that people seem to think the Nielsens measure diehard fan response. They measure who watches the first two batteries of ads, primarily ( though not entirely. ) If the TV is on a show for however long it takes to show a requisite number of ads, that show wins the half-hour. Studies show - I know everyone hates that phrase - viewers may watch, say, Ghost Whisperer to get a good look at JLH&#039;s cleavage. Or DH to see how well, soap-style, their plot interest is being advanced. Then they may turn the channel, download porno, walk the dog, whatever. Those viewers mean exactly as much, statistically, as hardcore fans who write letters, blog, etc. Of course the Nielsen diary exists for more detailed reports, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;m incorrect to say how the boxes are designed to work, how they worked since TV had ratings, and how they still work. If I am incorrect, I&#039;d be grateful to know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be a smartass, but I still notice that people seem to think the Nielsens measure diehard fan response. They measure who watches the first two batteries of ads, primarily ( though not entirely. ) If the TV is on a show for however long it takes to show a requisite number of ads, that show wins the half-hour. Studies show &#8211; I know everyone hates that phrase &#8211; viewers may watch, say, Ghost Whisperer to get a good look at JLH&#8217;s cleavage. Or DH to see how well, soap-style, their plot interest is being advanced. Then they may turn the channel, download porno, walk the dog, whatever. Those viewers mean exactly as much, statistically, as hardcore fans who write letters, blog, etc. Of course the Nielsen diary exists for more detailed reports, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m incorrect to say how the boxes are designed to work, how they worked since TV had ratings, and how they still work. If I am incorrect, I&#8217;d be grateful to know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonlightfan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36572</link>
		<dc:creator>moonlightfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36572</guid>
		<description>OOps, LJ not LP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOps, LJ not LP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonlightfan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36571</link>
		<dc:creator>moonlightfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36571</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m interested to see what happens to LP, I have never seen anyone bluff their way out of getting cancelled, but I would like to see Brooke Shields make it happen. After all, this is the womoan that took down Tom Cruise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m interested to see what happens to LP, I have never seen anyone bluff their way out of getting cancelled, but I would like to see Brooke Shields make it happen. After all, this is the womoan that took down Tom Cruise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyS</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36542</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36542</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that info Corey. Looks like they&#039;re going to turn Prison Break round very quickly, but it worries me no end. I mean after Monday&#039;s episode there shouldn&#039;t be enough wiggle room for 5 more episodes; in fact, in truth I&#039;d have liked tomorrow&#039;s to be the last one.

I think that that very point will be the deathnell for the show.

If Michael and co. do get the 6th card and Scylla then there has to be some unnecessary twist to maintain the story for 5 more hours. The only thing I can think of is that they don&#039;t get it, and this means further problems. It&#039;ll look like a stalling tactic and they could potenitally lose more of their audience.

Of course we&#039;ll have to wait and see, but still, I think the show is about to make another big drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that info Corey. Looks like they&#8217;re going to turn Prison Break round very quickly, but it worries me no end. I mean after Monday&#8217;s episode there shouldn&#8217;t be enough wiggle room for 5 more episodes; in fact, in truth I&#8217;d have liked tomorrow&#8217;s to be the last one.</p>
<p>I think that that very point will be the deathnell for the show.</p>
<p>If Michael and co. do get the 6th card and Scylla then there has to be some unnecessary twist to maintain the story for 5 more hours. The only thing I can think of is that they don&#8217;t get it, and this means further problems. It&#8217;ll look like a stalling tactic and they could potenitally lose more of their audience.</p>
<p>Of course we&#8217;ll have to wait and see, but still, I think the show is about to make another big drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36536</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36536</guid>
		<description>Fans respond to Ghost Whisperers was negative? I&#039;m surprised this show even has fans considering it&#039;s a disgrace to human intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fans respond to Ghost Whisperers was negative? I&#8217;m surprised this show even has fans considering it&#8217;s a disgrace to human intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36520</guid>
		<description>NBC should just change their letters to SAD. And no, SAD is NOT an acronym.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC should just change their letters to SAD. And no, SAD is NOT an acronym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz12001</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36514</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz12001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36514</guid>
		<description>&quot;All those fans of show X allegedly boycotting CBS?  It looks like some of them aren’t...&quot;  I don&#039;t think ratings can definitively prove or disprove that statement.  Fans very well could be boycotting but to no avail. 

I have learned one factor regarding a boycott of any network:  If Show X is canceled because of low Nielsen ratings, and Show X&#039;s viewers boycott the network, then the network will not notice because not many boycotters were Nielsen households.  If more viewers of Show X were Nielsen families, then Show X would have had high ratings to begin with, and may not have been canceled.

Even assuming that Nielsen ratings are accurate, low-rated shows don&#039;t have enough fans to make a boycott matter. For the boycott to matter, viewers of Show X must by default be viewers of other CBS shows in the first place - what if the only show they watched on CBS was Show X anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All those fans of show X allegedly boycotting CBS?  It looks like some of them aren’t&#8230;&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think ratings can definitively prove or disprove that statement.  Fans very well could be boycotting but to no avail. </p>
<p>I have learned one factor regarding a boycott of any network:  If Show X is canceled because of low Nielsen ratings, and Show X&#8217;s viewers boycott the network, then the network will not notice because not many boycotters were Nielsen households.  If more viewers of Show X were Nielsen families, then Show X would have had high ratings to begin with, and may not have been canceled.</p>
<p>Even assuming that Nielsen ratings are accurate, low-rated shows don&#8217;t have enough fans to make a boycott matter. For the boycott to matter, viewers of Show X must by default be viewers of other CBS shows in the first place &#8211; what if the only show they watched on CBS was Show X anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel P</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36513</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36513</guid>
		<description>Aww, only 3 more eps for the year? Well hey, I&#039;ll be happy come next year knowing that I have an extra week to look forward to. :D 

 I&#039;m confused though. Prison Break 2 hour finale? Why have a finale midseason?... I thought it was going to continue in March and then finish the series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aww, only 3 more eps for the year? Well hey, I&#8217;ll be happy come next year knowing that I have an extra week to look forward to. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p> I&#8217;m confused though. Prison Break 2 hour finale? Why have a finale midseason?&#8230; I thought it was going to continue in March and then finish the series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36509</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36509</guid>
		<description>Lol good one that NBC&#039;s fridays makes FOX&#039;s fridays seem good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol good one that NBC&#8217;s fridays makes FOX&#8217;s fridays seem good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36506</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36506</guid>
		<description>Quick programming note: T:SCC will air it&#039;s fall finale on December 8th instead of December 15th. So, only 3 new episodes before the holidays instead of the previously annouched 4.   http://www.fox.com/blogs/terminator/  

One of the writers was kind enough to address the situation.

&quot;The situation is still in flux, but the decision to air a big two hour Prison Break finale forced us to stop at 12 episodes instead of 13 and move one of the first 13 into the back part of the season. So instead of ending our run at 12 and depriving people of the episode that was designed as a finale to the first chunk of the season (Earthlings), we&#039;re opting to move the mostly standalone &quot;Alpine&quot; into the back part of the season-- probably between episode 13, &quot;The Good Wound,&quot; and 14, &quot;Desert Cantos.&quot; This is actually a place that works pretty darn well for &quot;Alpine Fields,&quot; actually. So while you&#039;ll have to wait until after the holidays to see it, it won&#039;t be too long of a wait&quot;

http://tsccsociety.proboards52.com/index.cgi?board=spoilers&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1083&amp;page=2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick programming note: T:SCC will air it&#8217;s fall finale on December 8th instead of December 15th. So, only 3 new episodes before the holidays instead of the previously annouched 4.   <a href="http://www.fox.com/blogs/terminator/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fox.com/blogs/terminator/</a>  </p>
<p>One of the writers was kind enough to address the situation.</p>
<p>&#8220;The situation is still in flux, but the decision to air a big two hour Prison Break finale forced us to stop at 12 episodes instead of 13 and move one of the first 13 into the back part of the season. So instead of ending our run at 12 and depriving people of the episode that was designed as a finale to the first chunk of the season (Earthlings), we&#8217;re opting to move the mostly standalone &#8220;Alpine&#8221; into the back part of the season&#8211; probably between episode 13, &#8220;The Good Wound,&#8221; and 14, &#8220;Desert Cantos.&#8221; This is actually a place that works pretty darn well for &#8220;Alpine Fields,&#8221; actually. So while you&#8217;ll have to wait until after the holidays to see it, it won&#8217;t be too long of a wait&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://tsccsociety.proboards52.com/index.cgi?board=spoilers&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1083&amp;page=2" rel="nofollow">http://tsccsociety.proboards52.com/index.cgi?board=spoilers&amp;action=display&amp;thread=1083&amp;page=2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36504</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36504</guid>
		<description>Well it looks like Lipstick Jungle is probably toast now for sure (unfortunately ... this and Dirty Sexy Money are two shows I was hoping could be saved).

And on a slightly different subject, albeit one mentioned here in a roundabout way.  Ya&#039;ll were talking about Kathy Cox who won the million on &quot;Smarter than a 5th Grader&quot;, well check this out ... http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/stories/2008/11/22/kathy_cox_bankruptcy.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_newstab.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it looks like Lipstick Jungle is probably toast now for sure (unfortunately &#8230; this and Dirty Sexy Money are two shows I was hoping could be saved).</p>
<p>And on a slightly different subject, albeit one mentioned here in a roundabout way.  Ya&#8217;ll were talking about Kathy Cox who won the million on &#8220;Smarter than a 5th Grader&#8221;, well check this out &#8230; <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/stories/2008/11/22/kathy_cox_bankruptcy.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_newstab." rel="nofollow">http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/stories/2008/11/22/kathy_cox_bankruptcy.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_newstab.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris the TV Sage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36501</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris the TV Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36501</guid>
		<description>Anyone that still wants to watch Deal has probably discovered how much better the daily half-hour syndie version is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone that still wants to watch Deal has probably discovered how much better the daily half-hour syndie version is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36497</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36497</guid>
		<description>Deal or No Deal looks like it&#039;s geting old because it&#039;s starting to get lower numbers than before. Are you smarter than a 5th greader is even beating it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deal or No Deal looks like it&#8217;s geting old because it&#8217;s starting to get lower numbers than before. Are you smarter than a 5th greader is even beating it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36495</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36495</guid>
		<description>Andrea, it&#039;s true that CBS skews old, but this season they&#039;ve improved their relative standing among the 18-49 demo noticeably from a close third to an effective tie for first.

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/19/cbs-abc-fox-continue-with-season-to-date-honors/8415
vs.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/20/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-924-1118/1839

Sure, you could say that it&#039;s all due to the competition&#039;s more significant declines, but in a shrinking market (broadcast prime-time) it&#039;s all about taking share away from the other guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, it&#8217;s true that CBS skews old, but this season they&#8217;ve improved their relative standing among the 18-49 demo noticeably from a close third to an effective tie for first.</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/19/cbs-abc-fox-continue-with-season-to-date-honors/8415" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/19/cbs-abc-fox-continue-with-season-to-date-honors/8415</a><br />
vs.<br />
<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/20/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-924-1118/1839" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/20/season-to-date-broadcast-net-ratings-924-1118/1839</a></p>
<p>Sure, you could say that it&#8217;s all due to the competition&#8217;s more significant declines, but in a shrinking market (broadcast prime-time) it&#8217;s all about taking share away from the other guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36489</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36489</guid>
		<description>Alex,

I think CBS does well with the geriatric crew no matter what night a procedural in airing.

The TV demo is not in on the weekends, so the other networks suffer as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>
<p>I think CBS does well with the geriatric crew no matter what night a procedural in airing.</p>
<p>The TV demo is not in on the weekends, so the other networks suffer as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cesarrr</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36487</link>
		<dc:creator>cesarrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36487</guid>
		<description>im so happy for ghost whisperer. I love Jennifer Love Hewitt and David Conrad. 
that show is in its 4th season and its bigger than ever! (or at least bigger than last season)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im so happy for ghost whisperer. I love Jennifer Love Hewitt and David Conrad.<br />
that show is in its 4th season and its bigger than ever! (or at least bigger than last season)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36486</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36486</guid>
		<description>So are people watching CBS on Friday’s because the line-up (repeats and all) is great or because the alternatives are horrible? I mean, if Ghost Whisperer were up against some kind of competition at 8 would it still be pulling the numbers it is? Same goes for the entire CBS line-up on Friday’s surely anything could draw comparatively brilliant numbers up against the sinking ships of everyone else’s Friday Night line-up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are people watching CBS on Friday’s because the line-up (repeats and all) is great or because the alternatives are horrible? I mean, if Ghost Whisperer were up against some kind of competition at 8 would it still be pulling the numbers it is? Same goes for the entire CBS line-up on Friday’s surely anything could draw comparatively brilliant numbers up against the sinking ships of everyone else’s Friday Night line-up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36485</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36485</guid>
		<description>sean, agreed, but i just took the numbers from Berman and didn&#039;t see the data report as we do mon-fri.  if the show data is correct the avg is 5.9 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sean, agreed, but i just took the numbers from Berman and didn&#8217;t see the data report as we do mon-fri.  if the show data is correct the avg is 5.9 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris the TV Sage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36484</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris the TV Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36484</guid>
		<description>My bad, Alex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad, Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris the TV Sage</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36482</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris the TV Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36482</guid>
		<description>Kyle: There was one winner on 5th Grader in September - and Ken Jennings would&#039;ve been the second, as he knew the million-dollar answer after having already stopped at 500K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle: There was one winner on 5th Grader in September &#8211; and Ken Jennings would&#8217;ve been the second, as he knew the million-dollar answer after having already stopped at 500K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36481</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36481</guid>
		<description>foxs averages at the top seem low</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>foxs averages at the top seem low</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex S.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/11/22/friday-nielsen-ratings-cbs-smiles-as-repeats-perform-at-9pm/8608#comment-36480</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=8608#comment-36480</guid>
		<description>&quot;still have no idea how nobody has ever won the million on 5th grader.&quot;

Somebody did win the million dollar prize on Smarter than a 5th grader.

It was a few weeks back in I believe this season&#039;s opener.

Her name was Kathy Cox and she is reportedly donating all her winnings to the public school in Georgia.

http://gameshows.about.com/od/photogalleries/ig/5th-Grader-Season-3/Kathy-Cox-large.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;still have no idea how nobody has ever won the million on 5th grader.&#8221;</p>
<p>Somebody did win the million dollar prize on Smarter than a 5th grader.</p>
<p>It was a few weeks back in I believe this season&#8217;s opener.</p>
<p>Her name was Kathy Cox and she is reportedly donating all her winnings to the public school in Georgia.</p>
<p><a href="http://gameshows.about.com/od/photogalleries/ig/5th-Grader-Season-3/Kathy-Cox-large.htm" rel="nofollow">http://gameshows.about.com/od/photogalleries/ig/5th-Grader-Season-3/Kathy-Cox-large.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
