<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Ratings &#8211; NCIS and The Mentalist impressive in reruns, House takes demos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:24:39 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-44002</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-44002</guid>
		<description>But Bones is one of the only shows that maintains such high rates, it&#039;s already in its 4th season so. Ratings are getting better every season. That means something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Bones is one of the only shows that maintains such high rates, it&#8217;s already in its 4th season so. Ratings are getting better every season. That means something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-40061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-40061</guid>
		<description>idizzle, House reruns from season 4 haven&#039;t been doing that well. The last one after Bones barely made 5 million so putting in a Fringe re-run is better for Fox than a House re-run unless it&#039;s from one of the first three seasons.  The dropping of the old team and the lack of quality in the show in seasons 4 and 5 is catching up to it. 

My mother doesn&#039;t watch NCIS but my teenage daughter does and loves it. She used to watch House but now she&#039;s not even interested in watching when it&#039;s not on opposite NCIS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>idizzle, House reruns from season 4 haven&#8217;t been doing that well. The last one after Bones barely made 5 million so putting in a Fringe re-run is better for Fox than a House re-run unless it&#8217;s from one of the first three seasons.  The dropping of the old team and the lack of quality in the show in seasons 4 and 5 is catching up to it. </p>
<p>My mother doesn&#8217;t watch NCIS but my teenage daughter does and loves it. She used to watch House but now she&#8217;s not even interested in watching when it&#8217;s not on opposite NCIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39956</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39956</guid>
		<description>Coming in late here, but @ Clutz and Robert about House - I totally agree. It isn&#039;t just that the dynamic has changed with the new cast, the direction of the show has changed.

I&#039;m all for character development over time - in fact I love it more than cases sometimes - but the House/Cuddy thing is anvil-meet-head effect. Beating us over the head with it is just going to turn me off. Subtlety was my favorited flavor of UST, and though I am smack in the middle of that women 18-35 bracket, I expect a lot more out of top shows like House. 

I expected a lot more Of Bones too, which is why I haven&#039;t been watching this year. 

But just because women may want more relationship dynamic in a show, doesn&#039;t mean &quot;most&quot; of us want it at the cost of the show-dynamic, feel and plot. I&#039;m a smart girl, you don&#039;t have to beat me over the head with two character&#039;s unresovled issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming in late here, but @ Clutz and Robert about House &#8211; I totally agree. It isn&#8217;t just that the dynamic has changed with the new cast, the direction of the show has changed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for character development over time &#8211; in fact I love it more than cases sometimes &#8211; but the House/Cuddy thing is anvil-meet-head effect. Beating us over the head with it is just going to turn me off. Subtlety was my favorited flavor of UST, and though I am smack in the middle of that women 18-35 bracket, I expect a lot more out of top shows like House. </p>
<p>I expected a lot more Of Bones too, which is why I haven&#8217;t been watching this year. </p>
<p>But just because women may want more relationship dynamic in a show, doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;most&#8221; of us want it at the cost of the show-dynamic, feel and plot. I&#8217;m a smart girl, you don&#8217;t have to beat me over the head with two character&#8217;s unresovled issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39819</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39819</guid>
		<description>Would watch Simon Baker even if he was just sleeping. Brilliant actor!!! I only watch The Mentalist because of him. Improve on the scripts guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would watch Simon Baker even if he was just sleeping. Brilliant actor!!! I only watch The Mentalist because of him. Improve on the scripts guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz Seegert</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39780</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz Seegert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39780</guid>
		<description>NCIS is finally getting the ratings it deserves, two elements are missing from the show.  The head slap and Gibbs saying Ya Think.  This is far and away the best show on TV now, I wish Micheal Weatherly had gotten a Emmy nomination for his role, and the show deserves one to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NCIS is finally getting the ratings it deserves, two elements are missing from the show.  The head slap and Gibbs saying Ya Think.  This is far and away the best show on TV now, I wish Micheal Weatherly had gotten a Emmy nomination for his role, and the show deserves one to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moonves Says "TV Model Ain't Broken": MediaBytes with Shelly Palmer December 11, 2008 &#124; MediaBytes with Shelly Palmer</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39765</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonves Says "TV Model Ain't Broken": MediaBytes with Shelly Palmer December 11, 2008 &#124; MediaBytes with Shelly Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39765</guid>
		<description>[...] The Mentalist took in 18.8 million viewers to take number one on Tuesday. The show has been so popular that a rerun garnered an equally impressive 14 million viewers. CBS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Mentalist took in 18.8 million viewers to take number one on Tuesday. The show has been so popular that a rerun garnered an equally impressive 14 million viewers. CBS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39728</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39728</guid>
		<description>House to Monday&#039;s, Seems like it will be the death of either CBS or Fox.  Im gonna continue watching CBS.  Fox has never done anything for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House to Monday&#8217;s, Seems like it will be the death of either CBS or Fox.  Im gonna continue watching CBS.  Fox has never done anything for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heradite</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39711</link>
		<dc:creator>Heradite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39711</guid>
		<description>Fringe will be returning in January with a new lead-in (American Idol).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fringe will be returning in January with a new lead-in (American Idol).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz12001</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39710</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz12001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39710</guid>
		<description>Bill, I agree with the &quot;different dynamic&quot; vibe coming through on House.  I&#039;m not liking it at all. Wilson&#039;s relationships are part of his character - he was always the sentimental one.  Other previous relationship angles amongst coworkers were more impulse-driven.  As for House and Cuddy, it was purely &quot;I&#039;m a jerk who will sexually harass you&quot; angle played for humor.  Now we&#039;ve got the sappy &quot;feelings&quot; crap going on ;) 

OK, OK, back to ratings talk.  NCIS pulled huge viewers for a repeat, but (as usual) yikes on their 18-34 numbers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, I agree with the &#8220;different dynamic&#8221; vibe coming through on House.  I&#8217;m not liking it at all. Wilson&#8217;s relationships are part of his character &#8211; he was always the sentimental one.  Other previous relationship angles amongst coworkers were more impulse-driven.  As for House and Cuddy, it was purely &#8220;I&#8217;m a jerk who will sexually harass you&#8221; angle played for humor.  Now we&#8217;ve got the sappy &#8220;feelings&#8221; crap going on <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>OK, OK, back to ratings talk.  NCIS pulled huge viewers for a repeat, but (as usual) yikes on their 18-34 numbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39700</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39700</guid>
		<description>Ben, DVD viewing is not counted  In these overnight reports above, I actually agree with you about Household Ratings and total viewers, and since we report viewers we do not actually bother including the household ratings/share.

Since we don&#039;t get overnight viewer numbers for the demos, but do get rating/share information for age demos we report them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, DVD viewing is not counted  In these overnight reports above, I actually agree with you about Household Ratings and total viewers, and since we report viewers we do not actually bother including the household ratings/share.</p>
<p>Since we don&#8217;t get overnight viewer numbers for the demos, but do get rating/share information for age demos we report them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39699</guid>
		<description>So i&#039;m taking it that DVDs don&#039;t count as part of the tv share? I&#039;m also wondering why household ratings are reported. Wouldn&#039;t just total viewers be sufficient (as well as demo ratings)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So i&#8217;m taking it that DVDs don&#8217;t count as part of the tv share? I&#8217;m also wondering why household ratings are reported. Wouldn&#8217;t just total viewers be sufficient (as well as demo ratings)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39696</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39696</guid>
		<description>I need to get around to completely overhauling Numbers 101.  A holiday project...

Frank, that does explain &quot;ratings&quot; somewhat, but I&#039;m not sure it explains share.  When you see 2.5/6 for the 18-49 rating share for CBS it means 2.5% of the overall 18-49 population (of about 132 million people) were tuned in on average.  The 6 share means that of all 18-49 year olds who were watching TV (broadcast or cable) 6% watched on average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to get around to completely overhauling Numbers 101.  A holiday project&#8230;</p>
<p>Frank, that does explain &#8220;ratings&#8221; somewhat, but I&#8217;m not sure it explains share.  When you see 2.5/6 for the 18-49 rating share for CBS it means 2.5% of the overall 18-49 population (of about 132 million people) were tuned in on average.  The 6 share means that of all 18-49 year olds who were watching TV (broadcast or cable) 6% watched on average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39693</guid>
		<description>Frank, &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/demystifying-the-s&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Numbers 101&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/demystifying-the-s" rel="nofollow">Numbers 101</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39691</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39691</guid>
		<description>hey do u guys have page for noobs, i dont know what rating/share means or how to read it :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey do u guys have page for noobs, i dont know what rating/share means or how to read it <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39683</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39683</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right, I was confusing the TAMI 6 minute measuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right, I was confusing the TAMI 6 minute measuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39681</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39681</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not necessarily not plausible! it may be more likely there are a few million people who actually like the show, but that&#039;s too scary for many people to even consider!

it&#039;s possible 5 million tuned in for a mere minute before realizing it was ATJ.  I think there are no minimums to be counted into the average audience numbers we report.  There is a 6 minute minimum only to be counted in the Total Audience measurement (numbers we rarely see outside of press releases and NBC TAMi).

the averages are just total minutes/duration.  If you watch less than 6 minutes, it should still get into the averages.  If it doesn&#039;t, that would be a pretty serious flaw in Nielsen measurement. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not necessarily not plausible! it may be more likely there are a few million people who actually like the show, but that&#8217;s too scary for many people to even consider!</p>
<p>it&#8217;s possible 5 million tuned in for a mere minute before realizing it was ATJ.  I think there are no minimums to be counted into the average audience numbers we report.  There is a 6 minute minimum only to be counted in the Total Audience measurement (numbers we rarely see outside of press releases and NBC TAMi).</p>
<p>the averages are just total minutes/duration.  If you watch less than 6 minutes, it should still get into the averages.  If it doesn&#8217;t, that would be a pretty serious flaw in Nielsen measurement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39680</guid>
		<description>Other Matt, here&#039;s an alternate explanation:

The original 5.05 million viewers from 9-9:30 are all asleep by 9:30, contributing their viewing to the second half hour.

The increase of 290,000 average viewers from 9:30-10 consist of 1.45 million people who tune in for the minimum time to be counted into the average (which I believe is 6 minutes) realize it&#039;s ATJ and tune out in horror. Voila, 290,000 more average viewers.

Not necessarily a plausible explanation, but more fun! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other Matt, here&#8217;s an alternate explanation:</p>
<p>The original 5.05 million viewers from 9-9:30 are all asleep by 9:30, contributing their viewing to the second half hour.</p>
<p>The increase of 290,000 average viewers from 9:30-10 consist of 1.45 million people who tune in for the minimum time to be counted into the average (which I believe is 6 minutes) realize it&#8217;s ATJ and tune out in horror. Voila, 290,000 more average viewers.</p>
<p>Not necessarily a plausible explanation, but more fun! <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Matt</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39677</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39677</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just shocked that According to Jim did better in the second half hour.  That means a few million Americans watched one episode and thought &quot;gee, that was great.  I&#039;m gonna watch some more.&quot;

I&#039;m also surprised that Biggest Looser was such a young show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just shocked that According to Jim did better in the second half hour.  That means a few million Americans watched one episode and thought &#8220;gee, that was great.  I&#8217;m gonna watch some more.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also surprised that Biggest Looser was such a young show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz12001</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39650</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz12001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39650</guid>
		<description>Bill, I guess I am one of those oddball 18-49 women who don&#039;t care for relationship angles in otherwise thoughtful shows.  

IMHO, the smart, capable women (like Cuddy and Thirteen in House) are suddenly written into states where their brains are replaced by hormones, thoughts replaced by feelings.  I find it boring and a twinge misogynistic.

So far, Fringe has avoided going the &quot;feelings&quot; route with Olivia Dunham, save for her need to sort out the mysteries of John Scott.  Anna Torv was a bit pained and frozen at first, but now it seems to be working.  Joshua Jackson and Anna Torv have a good bro-sis vibe going now.  I REALLY hope the writers don&#039;t ruin that vibe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, I guess I am one of those oddball 18-49 women who don&#8217;t care for relationship angles in otherwise thoughtful shows.  </p>
<p>IMHO, the smart, capable women (like Cuddy and Thirteen in House) are suddenly written into states where their brains are replaced by hormones, thoughts replaced by feelings.  I find it boring and a twinge misogynistic.</p>
<p>So far, Fringe has avoided going the &#8220;feelings&#8221; route with Olivia Dunham, save for her need to sort out the mysteries of John Scott.  Anna Torv was a bit pained and frozen at first, but now it seems to be working.  Joshua Jackson and Anna Torv have a good bro-sis vibe going now.  I REALLY hope the writers don&#8217;t ruin that vibe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39649</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39649</guid>
		<description>Law &amp; Order, Law &amp; Order: SVU, Law &amp; Order: CI are ALL TV shows.  Mythbusters is a TV show.  Battlestar Galactica is a TV show.  Burn Notice is a TV show as is In Plain Sight! and of course Pardon the Interruption is a TV Show. While you may not actually &quot;watch&quot; PTI, my sense is that you watch the other shows, so I will not chime in with &quot;you don&#039;t watch any&quot;.

Ok, so you don&#039;t watch Heroes (smart, smart man), or TSCC, which honestly despite its fanbase here, I don&#039;t know that I could recommend, or Life (which I think you&#039;d like) or Chuck which is an incredibly fun show.  But there are so many hours in the day -- especially when sooner or later, you will give in and some of your TV viewing time will be SpongeBob!  You will be assimilated in ways I will likely never be!

As for House, I&#039;m not sure the relationship angles are vastly different.  I think the new crop of Doctors changed the dynamic more.  House/Cuddy has been more overtones than undertones this year, but if I read the last scene last night correctly, that&#039;s done.  On the other hand, if they change things to the point where House is both nesting AND paternal, I will agree with you that it&#039;s a deliberate attempt at changing the show to change the demographic base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law &#038; Order, Law &#038; Order: SVU, Law &#038; Order: CI are ALL TV shows.  Mythbusters is a TV show.  Battlestar Galactica is a TV show.  Burn Notice is a TV show as is In Plain Sight! and of course Pardon the Interruption is a TV Show. While you may not actually &#8220;watch&#8221; PTI, my sense is that you watch the other shows, so I will not chime in with &#8220;you don&#8217;t watch any&#8221;.</p>
<p>Ok, so you don&#8217;t watch Heroes (smart, smart man), or TSCC, which honestly despite its fanbase here, I don&#8217;t know that I could recommend, or Life (which I think you&#8217;d like) or Chuck which is an incredibly fun show.  But there are so many hours in the day &#8212; especially when sooner or later, you will give in and some of your TV viewing time will be SpongeBob!  You will be assimilated in ways I will likely never be!</p>
<p>As for House, I&#8217;m not sure the relationship angles are vastly different.  I think the new crop of Doctors changed the dynamic more.  House/Cuddy has been more overtones than undertones this year, but if I read the last scene last night correctly, that&#8217;s done.  On the other hand, if they change things to the point where House is both nesting AND paternal, I will agree with you that it&#8217;s a deliberate attempt at changing the show to change the demographic base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39647</link>
		<dc:creator>GRD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39647</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s all that much of a change. Last season we had Chase and Cameron making out in the janitor&#039;s closet, and Wilson with Amber, and Foreman with more than one woman, if I remember correctly. And House has been leering at Cuddy practically since the first episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s all that much of a change. Last season we had Chase and Cameron making out in the janitor&#8217;s closet, and Wilson with Amber, and Foreman with more than one woman, if I remember correctly. And House has been leering at Cuddy practically since the first episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39642</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39642</guid>
		<description>I almost never comment about the contents of TV shows (Robert will probably chime in it&#039;s because I don&#039;t watch any), but not only do I not like the &quot;relationship&quot; angles occurring in House, they seem so significant as to be an obvious move to change the dynamic of the show.

Could it be an attempt to capture more female viewers? House did better last night among women 18-49 (6.2 rating), than men (4.85 rating), but we don&#039;t know if that&#039;s noticeably changed from earlier seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost never comment about the contents of TV shows (Robert will probably chime in it&#8217;s because I don&#8217;t watch any), but not only do I not like the &#8220;relationship&#8221; angles occurring in House, they seem so significant as to be an obvious move to change the dynamic of the show.</p>
<p>Could it be an attempt to capture more female viewers? House did better last night among women 18-49 (6.2 rating), than men (4.85 rating), but we don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s noticeably changed from earlier seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39640</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39640</guid>
		<description>R.G., go ask your mother. Whose mother doesn&#039;t love Mark Harmon. Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R.G., go ask your mother. Whose mother doesn&#8217;t love Mark Harmon. Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39639</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39639</guid>
		<description>According to Jim and Fringe are going down!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Jim and Fringe are going down!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clutz12001</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/12/10/tuesday-ratings-ncis-and-the-mentalist-impressive-in-reruns-house-takes-demos/9446#comment-39637</link>
		<dc:creator>clutz12001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=9446#comment-39637</guid>
		<description>@Mel, &quot;The bloom is off the rose for House, though. I haven’t been impressed with the last couple of episodes. Least of all, last night’s Christmas ep.&quot;

House is getting to relationship-y IMHO.  It&#039;s not nearly as bad as Grey&#039;s Anatomy, but slowly it&#039;s moving that direction!  The final kiss of last night&#039;s episode was another leap away from the biting sarcasm and nihilism that makes House such a fun show.  Too many feelings, not enough grumpy House, not enough Wilson, and not arguing over medical cases!!!  Wilson at least had one fun sarcastic moment though, with the green wrapping paper ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mel, &#8220;The bloom is off the rose for House, though. I haven’t been impressed with the last couple of episodes. Least of all, last night’s Christmas ep.&#8221;</p>
<p>House is getting to relationship-y IMHO.  It&#8217;s not nearly as bad as Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, but slowly it&#8217;s moving that direction!  The final kiss of last night&#8217;s episode was another leap away from the biting sarcasm and nihilism that makes House such a fun show.  Too many feelings, not enough grumpy House, not enough Wilson, and not arguing over medical cases!!!  Wilson at least had one fun sarcastic moment though, with the green wrapping paper <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
