<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The End Has Finally Come For ABC&#8217;s According To Jim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:03:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarabelleBlue</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-47138</link>
		<dc:creator>MarabelleBlue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-47138</guid>
		<description>Messed up DSM and Pushing Daisies...where are people sense of imagination and humor that no one would want to watch these shows? I thought television was supposed to take you away from real life. Whatever....I&#039;m not even watching The Bachelor, this Bachelor stinks, no character and I&#039;m tired of hearing women whaa whaa about some guy they barely even know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Messed up DSM and Pushing Daisies&#8230;where are people sense of imagination and humor that no one would want to watch these shows? I thought television was supposed to take you away from real life. Whatever&#8230;.I&#8217;m not even watching The Bachelor, this Bachelor stinks, no character and I&#8217;m tired of hearing women whaa whaa about some guy they barely even know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cattydog</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-44087</link>
		<dc:creator>Cattydog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-44087</guid>
		<description>At the risk of being slammed by some of the above individuals, I have to say I liked Eli Stone as well.  At least it DID have a script and some decent actors.  Was also unhappy when Boston Legal was canceled.  Shame on ABC.  Most of what&#039;s on television now is pure drivel.  Oh yes, and &quot;speech&quot; is spelled speech, not speach (sorry)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of being slammed by some of the above individuals, I have to say I liked Eli Stone as well.  At least it DID have a script and some decent actors.  Was also unhappy when Boston Legal was canceled.  Shame on ABC.  Most of what&#8217;s on television now is pure drivel.  Oh yes, and &#8220;speech&#8221; is spelled speech, not speach (sorry)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noctis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43970</link>
		<dc:creator>Noctis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43970</guid>
		<description>Renny... They skipped it because they had to air the speach by BUSH.. if there wasnt a speach, they would have aired it and calm down, no other Scripted show at 8.00 on ABC does better then Ugly Betty, so its a shoe-in for next season.. (well.. at least thats what i think..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renny&#8230; They skipped it because they had to air the speach by BUSH.. if there wasnt a speach, they would have aired it and calm down, no other Scripted show at 8.00 on ABC does better then Ugly Betty, so its a shoe-in for next season.. (well.. at least thats what i think..)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noctis</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43969</link>
		<dc:creator>Noctis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43969</guid>
		<description>Lynxie let me explain thing out for you.

Eli had LOST as a leadin for its premiere and a few episodes too. When lost went into repeats, it got 7 million.. then 6 million... then 5 million... ABC then tried to revive it by giving it a special airing after DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, it got 9.25 million... Its season finale a few days later got 6.45 million viewers. BUT ABC STILL RENEWED IT..

THIS SEASON.. It had DANCING WITH THE STARS as a lead-in it got 8-7 million viewers. after DWTS ended its run.. it got 4 million.. then its newest episode got a 3.81 million viewers.
3.81 VIEWERS AFTER GETTING LOST, DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES AND DANCING WITH THE STARS AS ITS LEADINS..

GOSSIP GIRL WOULD DO BETTER...

ITS DEAD... GET OVER IT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynxie let me explain thing out for you.</p>
<p>Eli had LOST as a leadin for its premiere and a few episodes too. When lost went into repeats, it got 7 million.. then 6 million&#8230; then 5 million&#8230; ABC then tried to revive it by giving it a special airing after DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES, it got 9.25 million&#8230; Its season finale a few days later got 6.45 million viewers. BUT ABC STILL RENEWED IT..</p>
<p>THIS SEASON.. It had DANCING WITH THE STARS as a lead-in it got 8-7 million viewers. after DWTS ended its run.. it got 4 million.. then its newest episode got a 3.81 million viewers.<br />
3.81 VIEWERS AFTER GETTING LOST, DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES AND DANCING WITH THE STARS AS ITS LEADINS..</p>
<p>GOSSIP GIRL WOULD DO BETTER&#8230;</p>
<p>ITS DEAD&#8230; GET OVER IT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renny</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43968</link>
		<dc:creator>Renny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43968</guid>
		<description>We need Betty please watch it ABC is definetly trying to kill the show i mean they keep skipping dates i mean it had the longest season break and this thursday they skipped it again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need Betty please watch it ABC is definetly trying to kill the show i mean they keep skipping dates i mean it had the longest season break and this thursday they skipped it again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43649</link>
		<dc:creator>GRD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43649</guid>
		<description>I notice ABC.com has taken down their &quot;Dirty Sexy Money&quot; page and message boards. I wonder if they&#039;re going to burn off the last few episodes they shot over the summer, or just scrap &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice ABC.com has taken down their &#8220;Dirty Sexy Money&#8221; page and message boards. I wonder if they&#8217;re going to burn off the last few episodes they shot over the summer, or just scrap &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43585</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43585</guid>
		<description>No, simply that the show was done and you need to let it go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, simply that the show was done and you need to let it go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43581</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43581</guid>
		<description>Gee Bill, do you tell everyone that disagrees with you to &quot;move on&quot; or is that code for scram?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Bill, do you tell everyone that disagrees with you to &#8220;move on&#8221; or is that code for scram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43443</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43443</guid>
		<description>Lynxie, Eli Stone&#039;s done. Move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynxie, Eli Stone&#8217;s done. Move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GRD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43442</link>
		<dc:creator>GRD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43442</guid>
		<description>Basically, all that article says is that the co-creator is &quot;holding on to hope.&quot; With nothing to back it up, I&#039;m afraid it&#039;s not very convincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, all that article says is that the co-creator is &#8220;holding on to hope.&#8221; With nothing to back it up, I&#8217;m afraid it&#8217;s not very convincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43441</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43441</guid>
		<description>Not so fast on the *cancellation* of Eli Stone!

http://www.newsarama.com/tv/010913-Guggenheim-Stone.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so fast on the *cancellation* of Eli Stone!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsarama.com/tv/010913-Guggenheim-Stone.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsarama.com/tv/010913-Guggenheim-Stone.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43327</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43327</guid>
		<description>I am surprised that TVGuide would make that mistake.

Here is a better, but still not perfect mid-season grid from B&amp;C:

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/CA6619215.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised that TVGuide would make that mistake.</p>
<p>Here is a better, but still not perfect mid-season grid from B&#038;C:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/CA6619215.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.broadcastingcable.com/CA6619215.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43326</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43326</guid>
		<description>TVGuide is wrong. Eli Stone was canceled (well, ABC chose not to order any more episodes, but it&#039;s the same thing) back in November. There has been no announcement to change that, and given its ratings, someone connected to the show would have to have some really good blackmail for it to get a renewal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TVGuide is wrong. Eli Stone was canceled (well, ABC chose not to order any more episodes, but it&#8217;s the same thing) back in November. There has been no announcement to change that, and given its ratings, someone connected to the show would have to have some really good blackmail for it to get a renewal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43324</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43324</guid>
		<description>TV Guide is showing Eli Stone scheduled in the 10 p.m. time slot on Tuesdays. 
http://www.tvguide.com/special/winter-preview/winter-schedule.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TV Guide is showing Eli Stone scheduled in the 10 p.m. time slot on Tuesdays.<br />
<a href="http://www.tvguide.com/special/winter-preview/winter-schedule.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvguide.com/special/winter-preview/winter-schedule.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Vincent</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43112</guid>
		<description>The  three shows we would all schedule the time to eat and watch every week are cancelled. Boston Legal... we just hollered and howled... fun stuff.  Pushing Daisies was incredible to watch it was so different.  family in France are just now watching the first season... they love it.  Eli Stone had us going. enjoyed the tension and all the characters.  The musical interludes were super... So what&#039;s left? The ones remaining I can take or leave em.   Pretty tough to cut off so many good shows.... I guess we&#039;ll up our subscription to Netflcks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  three shows we would all schedule the time to eat and watch every week are cancelled. Boston Legal&#8230; we just hollered and howled&#8230; fun stuff.  Pushing Daisies was incredible to watch it was so different.  family in France are just now watching the first season&#8230; they love it.  Eli Stone had us going. enjoyed the tension and all the characters.  The musical interludes were super&#8230; So what&#8217;s left? The ones remaining I can take or leave em.   Pretty tough to cut off so many good shows&#8230;. I guess we&#8217;ll up our subscription to Netflcks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43092</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43092</guid>
		<description>abc without Dancing with the Stars dissapear.

abc only exists on thursdays and sundays nights. In my opinion DWTS should be moved to wednesdays and thursdays to revamp the ratings of LOSt and Grey&#039;s anatomy. this shows are the only that could retain a good audience from dancing. any other show in monday or tuesday will fail like we saw in the past seasons.

Spring

Monday
8 PM Dancing with the Stars (Encore)
9 PM Ugly Betty
10 PM The Bachelor

Tuesday
8 PM Samantha Who?
8:30 PM Scrubs
9 PM American Inventor Season 2
10 PM Life on Mars

Wednesday
8 PM Dancing with the Stars: Dance show
10 PM Lost

Thursday
8 PM Dancing With the Stars: Results show
9 PM Grey&#039;s Anatomy
10 PM Private Practice

Friday
8 PM Homeland Security USA (?)
8:30 PM
9 PM (?)
10 PM Primetime or 20/20 (?)

Sunday
8 PM EM: HE
9 PM Desperate Housewives
10 PM Brothers &amp; Sisters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abc without Dancing with the Stars dissapear.</p>
<p>abc only exists on thursdays and sundays nights. In my opinion DWTS should be moved to wednesdays and thursdays to revamp the ratings of LOSt and Grey&#8217;s anatomy. this shows are the only that could retain a good audience from dancing. any other show in monday or tuesday will fail like we saw in the past seasons.</p>
<p>Spring</p>
<p>Monday<br />
8 PM Dancing with the Stars (Encore)<br />
9 PM Ugly Betty<br />
10 PM The Bachelor</p>
<p>Tuesday<br />
8 PM Samantha Who?<br />
8:30 PM Scrubs<br />
9 PM American Inventor Season 2<br />
10 PM Life on Mars</p>
<p>Wednesday<br />
8 PM Dancing with the Stars: Dance show<br />
10 PM Lost</p>
<p>Thursday<br />
8 PM Dancing With the Stars: Results show<br />
9 PM Grey&#8217;s Anatomy<br />
10 PM Private Practice</p>
<p>Friday<br />
8 PM Homeland Security USA (?)<br />
8:30 PM<br />
9 PM (?)<br />
10 PM Primetime or 20/20 (?)</p>
<p>Sunday<br />
8 PM EM: HE<br />
9 PM Desperate Housewives<br />
10 PM Brothers &amp; Sisters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43091</guid>
		<description>BIG DADDY, NBC Universal owns SciFi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIG DADDY, NBC Universal owns SciFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIG DADDY</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43089</link>
		<dc:creator>BIG DADDY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43089</guid>
		<description>Who owns the Sci-Fi channel?  Is lost in syndication or is ABC the parent of Sci-FI?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who owns the Sci-Fi channel?  Is lost in syndication or is ABC the parent of Sci-FI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43037</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43037</guid>
		<description>If ABC decides to bring back SW? for a third season, the possibility of syndication will almost certainly bring it back for a fourth.  Right now, it looks like ABC will bring it back next year, unless something unexpected happens before this year is finished.  If some of the comedies ABC brings in at midseason work out, that might give SW? a good compatible show to pair it with instead of DWTS.

I just can&#039;t see ABC canceling UB, or PP, especially now that PP will have the crossovers with GA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ABC decides to bring back SW? for a third season, the possibility of syndication will almost certainly bring it back for a fourth.  Right now, it looks like ABC will bring it back next year, unless something unexpected happens before this year is finished.  If some of the comedies ABC brings in at midseason work out, that might give SW? a good compatible show to pair it with instead of DWTS.</p>
<p>I just can&#8217;t see ABC canceling UB, or PP, especially now that PP will have the crossovers with GA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43030</guid>
		<description>Ugly Betty isn&#039;t going anywhere; if ABC was worried about it, they would have shuffled it around with all their midseason moves. I wouldn&#039;t put any money on it returning in 2010 though. Same deal with Samantha Who.

Life on Mars is far more up in the air than Bill thinks; you don&#039;t get your back order cut if you&#039;re a slam dunk for renewal. (And The Unusuals takes over the time slot come April.) If the numbers don&#039;t stabilize near where they are quickly after Lost, it&#039;s done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly Betty isn&#8217;t going anywhere; if ABC was worried about it, they would have shuffled it around with all their midseason moves. I wouldn&#8217;t put any money on it returning in 2010 though. Same deal with Samantha Who.</p>
<p>Life on Mars is far more up in the air than Bill thinks; you don&#8217;t get your back order cut if you&#8217;re a slam dunk for renewal. (And The Unusuals takes over the time slot come April.) If the numbers don&#8217;t stabilize near where they are quickly after Lost, it&#8217;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43014</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43014</guid>
		<description>I think that Samantha Who and Ugly Betty are FAR from shoo ins for next season.  Life on Mars is unlikely to return unless is performs well after Lost.  This is where the simple analysis of the raw numbers falls down.

Samantha Who and Life on Mars have performed modestly because of their lead-ins and certainly not well enough given their respective lead-ins.  LoM will be gone if it doesn&#039;t work behind Lost.  SW fits well with ABC&#039;s brand but again I think they will pick Scrubs over SW any day (especially if they can squeeze another season out somehow despite Zach Braff&#039;s departure).

Ugly Betty has shown a very negative trend over the last two seasons going (and indeed in general) the trend has gone from very large success to now very very modest numbers that only good in relative terms (see Eli Stone, Pushing Daisies and DSM).  If Castle, Cupid and The Unusuals all burst out and given PP relative solid performance after GG I think that ABC will think long and hard about renewing UB.  The thing that may ultimately save it is that it is a much cheaper production now that it is based in NY.  Especially given that the three new shows are probably all 9/10pm shows rather than 8pm shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Samantha Who and Ugly Betty are FAR from shoo ins for next season.  Life on Mars is unlikely to return unless is performs well after Lost.  This is where the simple analysis of the raw numbers falls down.</p>
<p>Samantha Who and Life on Mars have performed modestly because of their lead-ins and certainly not well enough given their respective lead-ins.  LoM will be gone if it doesn&#8217;t work behind Lost.  SW fits well with ABC&#8217;s brand but again I think they will pick Scrubs over SW any day (especially if they can squeeze another season out somehow despite Zach Braff&#8217;s departure).</p>
<p>Ugly Betty has shown a very negative trend over the last two seasons going (and indeed in general) the trend has gone from very large success to now very very modest numbers that only good in relative terms (see Eli Stone, Pushing Daisies and DSM).  If Castle, Cupid and The Unusuals all burst out and given PP relative solid performance after GG I think that ABC will think long and hard about renewing UB.  The thing that may ultimately save it is that it is a much cheaper production now that it is based in NY.  Especially given that the three new shows are probably all 9/10pm shows rather than 8pm shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43011</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43011</guid>
		<description>Cool,

Eli Stone was NOT given a fair chance AT ALL! For one the ludicrous time slot and I could go on and on. It&#039;s obvious you aren&#039;t a fan of the show so...enjoy the zzzzzzzzz reality shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool,</p>
<p>Eli Stone was NOT given a fair chance AT ALL! For one the ludicrous time slot and I could go on and on. It&#8217;s obvious you aren&#8217;t a fan of the show so&#8230;enjoy the zzzzzzzzz reality shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynxie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43008</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43008</guid>
		<description>Has ABC OFFICIALLY cancelled Eli Stone, like in...sets torn down, actors released from contracts, etc? Any word on when, if, NEVER, ABC will air the unaired episodes? I suppose I should be happy ABC is failing as well, but I can&#039;t drink that poison. Homeland Security USA?????????????????????????? The network seals it&#039;s fate with another horrible snoozer. Good to know our TSA agents are intercepting deep fried bats from Cambodia! Why wasn&#039;t Eli given a chance in the 8 p.m. time slot???? Whatevah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has ABC OFFICIALLY cancelled Eli Stone, like in&#8230;sets torn down, actors released from contracts, etc? Any word on when, if, NEVER, ABC will air the unaired episodes? I suppose I should be happy ABC is failing as well, but I can&#8217;t drink that poison. Homeland Security USA?????????????????????????? The network seals it&#8217;s fate with another horrible snoozer. Good to know our TSA agents are intercepting deep fried bats from Cambodia! Why wasn&#8217;t Eli given a chance in the 8 p.m. time slot???? Whatevah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cool</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43009</link>
		<dc:creator>cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43009</guid>
		<description>Well, ABC is not exactly failling but to please the fans, they bring back 3 bubble shows (Eli, PD and DSM) and they all failed badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, ABC is not exactly failling but to please the fans, they bring back 3 bubble shows (Eli, PD and DSM) and they all failed badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joie</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/01/10/the-end-has-finally-come-foraccording-to-jim/10588#comment-43002</link>
		<dc:creator>Joie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=10588#comment-43002</guid>
		<description>ATJ should&#039;ve died a long time ago. The show is just terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATJ should&#8217;ve died a long time ago. The show is just terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
