<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Ratings: FOX wins, Lost rebounds a tiny bit The Unusuals still doomed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:43:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: YO</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-74437</link>
		<dc:creator>YO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-74437</guid>
		<description>Fox knows that Bones has a pretty loyal audience, and to prove it the numbers and the followers, Im a big fan of this show... Can be better if the schedule stays in a day... but...well..  FOX is lucky to have this show TRUE, we deserve more respect.. whatever.. great for Bones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox knows that Bones has a pretty loyal audience, and to prove it the numbers and the followers, Im a big fan of this show&#8230; Can be better if the schedule stays in a day&#8230; but&#8230;well..  FOX is lucky to have this show TRUE, we deserve more respect.. whatever.. great for Bones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bones Fanatic</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-74241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bones Fanatic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-74241</guid>
		<description>In my perfect world Fox would air new episodes of Bones 7 days a week! (A person can dream, can&#039;t they?) Love the show! Fox needs to pick a night and time and stick with it! Imagine the ratings Bones could pull if it aired consistently on the same night and time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my perfect world Fox would air new episodes of Bones 7 days a week! (A person can dream, can&#8217;t they?) Love the show! Fox needs to pick a night and time and stick with it! Imagine the ratings Bones could pull if it aired consistently on the same night and time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73756</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73756</guid>
		<description>CSI new York isnt new this week coming up they have Criminal Minds a re run at 9pm and than a new one at 10pm and they wonder why people dvr cause they move everything around 


if i didnt check my dvr I would have never know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSI new York isnt new this week coming up they have Criminal Minds a re run at 9pm and than a new one at 10pm and they wonder why people dvr cause they move everything around </p>
<p>if i didnt check my dvr I would have never know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gleebo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73677</link>
		<dc:creator>Gleebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73677</guid>
		<description>The only new show on ABC I have even remotely liked this midseason has been Better off Ted.  The first episode was weak but it has been better with each successive episode.

I was excited about both Castle and the Unusuals and lasted 2 episodes of Castle and only about 3/4th of the first episode of the Unusuals.  I thought my love for Nathan Fillion and Amber Tamblyn would have me supporting both of these shows but they just didn&#039;t do it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only new show on ABC I have even remotely liked this midseason has been Better off Ted.  The first episode was weak but it has been better with each successive episode.</p>
<p>I was excited about both Castle and the Unusuals and lasted 2 episodes of Castle and only about 3/4th of the first episode of the Unusuals.  I thought my love for Nathan Fillion and Amber Tamblyn would have me supporting both of these shows but they just didn&#8217;t do it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Murphy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73410</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73410</guid>
		<description>&quot;And Patrick I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking me when you ask ‘why advocate that for NBC when ABC in in similar trouble’. I get the impression that you think I’m advocating a Castle renewal and lets be completely clear on this now - I’m not. What I am saying is that ABC is in a different position to NBC right now. Without Leno then I’d have no real issues with NBC renewing Chuck and I don’t think we’d even be discussing them not renewing it. &quot;

I&#039;m not saying necessarily you want Castle specifically.  Although making the (theoretical) supposition while saying to drop the better-performing Chuck is quite confusing.  BOTH networks are in big trouble.  It&#039;s obvious on NBC&#039;s part because they&#039;re handing over 5 hours of primetime programming to Jay Leno.  (partly to keep him off ABC, too, but still...)  It&#039;s obvious on ABC&#039;s part since it hasn&#039;t had a rookie show not be in trouble since even before the strike started.  Private Practice is the only rookie or sophomore show not in trouble, and that&#039;s only because of the Grey&#039;s lead-in.  Hell, DWTS + Grey&#039;s = Leno&#039;s 5 hours, so they&#039;re in the same boat.  The only real difference is that NBC keeps shooting itself in the foot with its decision-making.  Every network gets failed pilots all the time; ABC is just on a really bad streak.  That, or they have people making these decisions with no sense of taste, I don&#039;t know.  

Anyway, both of them need a combination of veteran shows with consistent numbers and rookie shows that will stick around.  Like Julia said, ABC is in a better position to do so with the litany of pilots in its pipeline.  NBC doesn&#039;t have that luxury.  NBC actually has a comedy pilot about a Stripes-esque group of underachievers at a community college.  I wish I was making that up.

NBC is the one that needs to keep more of their current shows because there&#039;s not much coming in for them.  ABC really isn&#039;t in a good position to trash their schedule and reset, either, but they&#039;re in a better position than NBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And Patrick I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking me when you ask ‘why advocate that for NBC when ABC in in similar trouble’. I get the impression that you think I’m advocating a Castle renewal and lets be completely clear on this now &#8211; I’m not. What I am saying is that ABC is in a different position to NBC right now. Without Leno then I’d have no real issues with NBC renewing Chuck and I don’t think we’d even be discussing them not renewing it. &#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying necessarily you want Castle specifically.  Although making the (theoretical) supposition while saying to drop the better-performing Chuck is quite confusing.  BOTH networks are in big trouble.  It&#8217;s obvious on NBC&#8217;s part because they&#8217;re handing over 5 hours of primetime programming to Jay Leno.  (partly to keep him off ABC, too, but still&#8230;)  It&#8217;s obvious on ABC&#8217;s part since it hasn&#8217;t had a rookie show not be in trouble since even before the strike started.  Private Practice is the only rookie or sophomore show not in trouble, and that&#8217;s only because of the Grey&#8217;s lead-in.  Hell, DWTS + Grey&#8217;s = Leno&#8217;s 5 hours, so they&#8217;re in the same boat.  The only real difference is that NBC keeps shooting itself in the foot with its decision-making.  Every network gets failed pilots all the time; ABC is just on a really bad streak.  That, or they have people making these decisions with no sense of taste, I don&#8217;t know.  </p>
<p>Anyway, both of them need a combination of veteran shows with consistent numbers and rookie shows that will stick around.  Like Julia said, ABC is in a better position to do so with the litany of pilots in its pipeline.  NBC doesn&#8217;t have that luxury.  NBC actually has a comedy pilot about a Stripes-esque group of underachievers at a community college.  I wish I was making that up.</p>
<p>NBC is the one that needs to keep more of their current shows because there&#8217;s not much coming in for them.  ABC really isn&#8217;t in a good position to trash their schedule and reset, either, but they&#8217;re in a better position than NBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73376</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73376</guid>
		<description>I guess 23 million is the new 30 million! (=smash hit). Especially when nothing else even gets over 20 million. Idol is still in their own league</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess 23 million is the new 30 million! (=smash hit). Especially when nothing else even gets over 20 million. Idol is still in their own league</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idizzle</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73371</link>
		<dc:creator>idizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73371</guid>
		<description>&quot;lost’s 18-49 numbers are fantastic. considering its against idol.. even house only got 4.5 this week and it was “only” against DWTS, which isnt as big as idol.&quot;

Oh, but haven&#039;t you heard, the Monday 8pm hour is the most competitive hour of the week. ;)

&quot;The Unusuals?…….whatever! Better Off Ted?……sounds stoopid! Lost?! Totally Awesome!&quot;

That&#039;s about as subjective as it gets. In retrospect Lost seems to have worked, but it&#039;s a pretty average title, whereas I like The Unusuals and would wager a guess that the title is the last reason the show is tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;lost’s 18-49 numbers are fantastic. considering its against idol.. even house only got 4.5 this week and it was “only” against DWTS, which isnt as big as idol.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, but haven&#8217;t you heard, the Monday 8pm hour is the most competitive hour of the week. <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;The Unusuals?…….whatever! Better Off Ted?……sounds stoopid! Lost?! Totally Awesome!&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s about as subjective as it gets. In retrospect Lost seems to have worked, but it&#8217;s a pretty average title, whereas I like The Unusuals and would wager a guess that the title is the last reason the show is tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AprilFox</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73365</link>
		<dc:creator>AprilFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73365</guid>
		<description>My family loves The Unusuals, it&#039;s a terrific cast. Amber Tamblyn is phenomenal, I really wish people would give it a chance. I like it better than Life on Mars, I think that show would have done better had it just stayed in 1973 instead of all the hocus pocus schmazzle. LOST is exhausting, too much back and forth stuff like HEROES and people get confused and irritated by it. That&#039;s why they aren&#039;t succeeding and losing viewership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My family loves The Unusuals, it&#8217;s a terrific cast. Amber Tamblyn is phenomenal, I really wish people would give it a chance. I like it better than Life on Mars, I think that show would have done better had it just stayed in 1973 instead of all the hocus pocus schmazzle. LOST is exhausting, too much back and forth stuff like HEROES and people get confused and irritated by it. That&#8217;s why they aren&#8217;t succeeding and losing viewership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesus_stick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73326</link>
		<dc:creator>jesus_stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73326</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lost should move its timeslot to 8pm, American Idol is killing the show. Can’t Believe how The Unusuals is flopping!&quot;

even though its definitely shrinking lost&#039;s audience, it still wins the night as the #1 scripted show.

also, if it was to be moved, i say move it to 10pm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lost should move its timeslot to 8pm, American Idol is killing the show. Can’t Believe how The Unusuals is flopping!&#8221;</p>
<p>even though its definitely shrinking lost&#8217;s audience, it still wins the night as the #1 scripted show.</p>
<p>also, if it was to be moved, i say move it to 10pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesus_stick</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73325</link>
		<dc:creator>jesus_stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73325</guid>
		<description>lost&#039;s 18-49 numbers are fantastic. considering its against idol.. even house only got 4.5 this week and it was &quot;only&quot; against DWTS, which isnt as big as idol. Fringe, even with idol lead in only got a 4.0. 

and last night&#039;s epi was great. 

Bones is also a pleasent surprise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lost&#8217;s 18-49 numbers are fantastic. considering its against idol.. even house only got 4.5 this week and it was &#8220;only&#8221; against DWTS, which isnt as big as idol. Fringe, even with idol lead in only got a 4.0. </p>
<p>and last night&#8217;s epi was great. </p>
<p>Bones is also a pleasent surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73292</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73292</guid>
		<description>I wish someone could come up with something good. A title says a lot. The Unusuals?.......whatever! Better Off Ted?......sounds stoopid! Lost?! Totally Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish someone could come up with something good. A title says a lot. The Unusuals?&#8230;&#8230;.whatever! Better Off Ted?&#8230;&#8230;sounds stoopid! Lost?! Totally Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABCFanaticSpeaksToday</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73278</link>
		<dc:creator>ABCFanaticSpeaksToday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73278</guid>
		<description>Lost should move its timeslot to 8pm, American Idol is killing the show. Can&#039;t Believe how The Unusuals is flopping!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost should move its timeslot to 8pm, American Idol is killing the show. Can&#8217;t Believe how The Unusuals is flopping!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73253</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73253</guid>
		<description>Alex, while ABC doesn&#039;t have Leno coming in to take up time, and they have a LOT of holes, they have one thing that NBC (to its detriment in my opinion) doesn&#039;t have: LOTS of pilots. They have more pilots than any other network. 12 dramas and 14 comedies. Even if only half of these work, that&#039;s still 9.5 hours of new programming that they have, not including any reality they may throw in. As it stands, if they dump everything from midseason, including Samantha Who? (which I don&#039;t see them doing), they need six and a half hours for the fall. If Castle were doing moderately interesting numbers, I think they&#039;d pick it up for 13 episodes in a heartbeat. But it&#039;s not, and ABC is in a position where they don&#039;t need to worry about not bringing anything back at all. 

I&#039;m not even quite sure what or why you are arguing since you say you don&#039;t think ABC actually has a chance of bringing back Castle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, while ABC doesn&#8217;t have Leno coming in to take up time, and they have a LOT of holes, they have one thing that NBC (to its detriment in my opinion) doesn&#8217;t have: LOTS of pilots. They have more pilots than any other network. 12 dramas and 14 comedies. Even if only half of these work, that&#8217;s still 9.5 hours of new programming that they have, not including any reality they may throw in. As it stands, if they dump everything from midseason, including Samantha Who? (which I don&#8217;t see them doing), they need six and a half hours for the fall. If Castle were doing moderately interesting numbers, I think they&#8217;d pick it up for 13 episodes in a heartbeat. But it&#8217;s not, and ABC is in a position where they don&#8217;t need to worry about not bringing anything back at all. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even quite sure what or why you are arguing since you say you don&#8217;t think ABC actually has a chance of bringing back Castle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73230</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73230</guid>
		<description>As much I as I would like Castle to get renewed, I don&#039;t see it happening unless the numbers improve significantly (unlikely) or someone with the show has really good blackmail against someone at ABC (and it has to be spectacular since it&#039;s so hard to scandalize people anymore)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much I as I would like Castle to get renewed, I don&#8217;t see it happening unless the numbers improve significantly (unlikely) or someone with the show has really good blackmail against someone at ABC (and it has to be spectacular since it&#8217;s so hard to scandalize people anymore)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73228</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73228</guid>
		<description>Actually i&#039;d proberly say if any show ABC will stick with Better Off Ted at least it does a 1.90 without having to have a big lead-in. Castle may be kept, depends on pilots and whether ABC decides to increase DWTS time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually i&#8217;d proberly say if any show ABC will stick with Better Off Ted at least it does a 1.90 without having to have a big lead-in. Castle may be kept, depends on pilots and whether ABC decides to increase DWTS time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73223</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73223</guid>
		<description>Wonder if Castle is to become the new Chuck? 141 Comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if Castle is to become the new Chuck? 141 Comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chucksmom</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73222</link>
		<dc:creator>chucksmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73222</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand at all why Castle &amp; The Unusuals are dong well on ABC.  Both are good shows &amp; better then some other scripted shows on other networks.  Both shows were adverstised really well.   Does anyone have a theory?  Both shows are pretty good, right? It is the other shows are Cable bringing the ratings down?

I like JT idea of moving Castle to 8pm on Wedensdays next Fall.

Oh-Well....still crossing my fingers for Chuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand at all why Castle &amp; The Unusuals are dong well on ABC.  Both are good shows &amp; better then some other scripted shows on other networks.  Both shows were adverstised really well.   Does anyone have a theory?  Both shows are pretty good, right? It is the other shows are Cable bringing the ratings down?</p>
<p>I like JT idea of moving Castle to 8pm on Wedensdays next Fall.</p>
<p>Oh-Well&#8230;.still crossing my fingers for Chuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fin</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73219</link>
		<dc:creator>Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73219</guid>
		<description>I kinda agree with Alex seeing as no new shows work for ABC I think they need to nurture shows like Castle: its a prodecural (spelling right?) so I think ABC could try and build an new audience seeing as its current one has gone. Plus Pushing Daisies went from a 4.3 to a 2.4 and it was still renewed (in a better TV Season, albeit it had no lead-in). Whether ABC likes it or not new shows are not working with shrinking broadcast veiwing(plus their new shows go all down hill), so they need to stick to shows that may build (like Castle). Aren&#039;t networks are more likely to loose more from new shows (with low advertising costs and high risk of failure with most new shows failing) than renewing a weaker show. Granted though Castle still has to bounce back; though The Unusuals could do better seeing as its LOST lead-in is crap but thats a different matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda agree with Alex seeing as no new shows work for ABC I think they need to nurture shows like Castle: its a prodecural (spelling right?) so I think ABC could try and build an new audience seeing as its current one has gone. Plus Pushing Daisies went from a 4.3 to a 2.4 and it was still renewed (in a better TV Season, albeit it had no lead-in). Whether ABC likes it or not new shows are not working with shrinking broadcast veiwing(plus their new shows go all down hill), so they need to stick to shows that may build (like Castle). Aren&#8217;t networks are more likely to loose more from new shows (with low advertising costs and high risk of failure with most new shows failing) than renewing a weaker show. Granted though Castle still has to bounce back; though The Unusuals could do better seeing as its LOST lead-in is crap but thats a different matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riff Rafferty</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73214</link>
		<dc:creator>Riff Rafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73214</guid>
		<description>The strike comments don&#039;t wash, sorry. ABC only put on 2 new shows in the fall. Because of the strike. (They&#039;ve both since been cancelled.) The bulk of the midseason pilots were produced and picked up well outside of pilot season. Delayed as a result of the strike. With the exceptions of &quot;In the Motherhood&quot; (an abortion of an amusing web series) and &quot;Surviving Suburbia&quot; (no explanation needed), their midseason freshmen aren&#039;t completely worthless. They might not be great shows outside of &quot;Ted,&quot; but they&#039;re not worthless. Believe me, ABC has put on completely worthless shows in the past. Before the strike. Heck, they even renewed a few of them for second seasons. &quot;What About Brian&quot; and &quot;October Road&quot; come to mind. Nobody can sit here with a straight face and tell me &quot;Castle&quot; and &quot;Cupid&quot; are creatively worse than those shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strike comments don&#8217;t wash, sorry. ABC only put on 2 new shows in the fall. Because of the strike. (They&#8217;ve both since been cancelled.) The bulk of the midseason pilots were produced and picked up well outside of pilot season. Delayed as a result of the strike. With the exceptions of &#8220;In the Motherhood&#8221; (an abortion of an amusing web series) and &#8220;Surviving Suburbia&#8221; (no explanation needed), their midseason freshmen aren&#8217;t completely worthless. They might not be great shows outside of &#8220;Ted,&#8221; but they&#8217;re not worthless. Believe me, ABC has put on completely worthless shows in the past. Before the strike. Heck, they even renewed a few of them for second seasons. &#8220;What About Brian&#8221; and &#8220;October Road&#8221; come to mind. Nobody can sit here with a straight face and tell me &#8220;Castle&#8221; and &#8220;Cupid&#8221; are creatively worse than those shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73207</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73207</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My point is I find it easier to see a scenario for a Castle renewal than a Chuck renewal because one’s on ABC and the other is on NBC.&lt;/i&gt;

Your basis is that you feel like NBC has SO many losses it must cut them all, and that ABC doesn&#039;t have as many bad shows so it doesn&#039;t have to cut all of them.   But nonetheless, because you LIKE the show, you concoct an absurd hypothetical (for a show that pulled a 1.9 rating in the final numbers! ONE POINT NINE.  HELLO!?  ).  

So you would, hypothetically find keeping a show that generates a 1.9, on ABC easier than keeping a show that pulled a 2.3 the same night, albeit in different time slots.

sorry, still completely absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My point is I find it easier to see a scenario for a Castle renewal than a Chuck renewal because one’s on ABC and the other is on NBC.</i></p>
<p>Your basis is that you feel like NBC has SO many losses it must cut them all, and that ABC doesn&#8217;t have as many bad shows so it doesn&#8217;t have to cut all of them.   But nonetheless, because you LIKE the show, you concoct an absurd hypothetical (for a show that pulled a 1.9 rating in the final numbers! ONE POINT NINE.  HELLO!?  ).  </p>
<p>So you would, hypothetically find keeping a show that generates a 1.9, on ABC easier than keeping a show that pulled a 2.3 the same night, albeit in different time slots.</p>
<p>sorry, still completely absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CD</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73206</link>
		<dc:creator>CD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73206</guid>
		<description>I think CSI NY definitely suffered from the rerun confusion. It was originally supposed to be a rerun so they didn&#039;t run a promo last week, then they changed it to a new episode. But a lot of the tv websites and dvr menus still said it was a repeat. And if you didn&#039;t watch the rerun of CM, well then you might not have known that CSI NY was new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think CSI NY definitely suffered from the rerun confusion. It was originally supposed to be a rerun so they didn&#8217;t run a promo last week, then they changed it to a new episode. But a lot of the tv websites and dvr menus still said it was a repeat. And if you didn&#8217;t watch the rerun of CM, well then you might not have known that CSI NY was new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73203</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73203</guid>
		<description>Robert there&#039;s no argument I&#039;m not making a case for a Castle renewal which you for some reason think I am.

My point is I find it easier to see a scenario for a Castle renewal than a Chuck renewal because one&#039;s on ABC and the other is on NBC. I don&#039;t however expect Castle to come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert there&#8217;s no argument I&#8217;m not making a case for a Castle renewal which you for some reason think I am.</p>
<p>My point is I find it easier to see a scenario for a Castle renewal than a Chuck renewal because one&#8217;s on ABC and the other is on NBC. I don&#8217;t however expect Castle to come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73198</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73198</guid>
		<description>And for the record let me say again that I&#039;m not advocating a Castle renewal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for the record let me say again that I&#8217;m not advocating a Castle renewal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73197</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73197</guid>
		<description>Alex, it&#039;s absurd. Your denial of the absurdity only makes me think it more absurd.  You can write 500 paragraphs.  Your argument is still absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, it&#8217;s absurd. Your denial of the absurdity only makes me think it more absurd.  You can write 500 paragraphs.  Your argument is still absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73196</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/16/wednesday-ratings-fox-wins-lost-rebounds-a-tiny-bit-the-unusuals-still-doomed/16834#comment-73196</guid>
		<description>Robert firstly NBC and ABC are in different positions - Leno is very much the difference maker for NBC and puts them in a position where they can ditch everything that&#039;s not working and move forward with only their strongest shows. Without Leno at 10 there&#039;s no way we&#039;re discussing Chuck being axed or Medium or Law &amp; Order. With Leno at 10 NBC has the chance to completely change and refresh their line-up. For better or worse ABC don&#039;t have that. 

I think its incredibly unlikely to say the least that there&#039;s any serious consideration to bringing Castle back as things stand. However I find the various hypothetical scenarios surrounding a Castle renewal easier to consider because its on ABC and unlike NBC they&#039;re going to have to plug holes in the schedule next year. Their slate of locks going forward next year isn&#039;t much improved on NBC&#039;s and at least one of their locks is entirely dependent on its lead-in at this stage and worse still their show launching ratio is arguably worse than NBC&#039;s right now. 

As it stands I think ABC will ditch all of their new shows (with the exception being that Surviving Suburbia might survive if it manages to hold steady next week) however I think something like Castle or even The Unusuals has to do a lot less to make itself renewal worthy than Chuck does. If by some miracle either of Castle or The Unusuals rebounds to a 2.1 or 2.2 before the end of their respective runs then I think ABC does consider bringing it back - purely because they&#039;ll likely need something and want a &#039;new&#039; show to carry forward to a second season. To me its much more conceivable that Castle or The Unusuals can rebound three tenths than Chuck rebounding basically an entire point (although after this weeks number it is slightly less than that), which is where I think it would need to be to lock in renewal. For met at least.

Basically right now its much easier for me to entertain the hypothetical for ABC than it is for NBC because their situations are different and the threshold for what a show should need going forward is different. I&#039;ll also point out that I brought up Castle as the ABC show of choice in response to someone else questioning ABC needing to bring something back next year. 

And Patrick I&#039;m not entirely sure what you&#039;re asking me when you ask &#039;why advocate that for NBC when ABC in in similar trouble&#039;. I get the impression that you think I&#039;m advocating a Castle renewal and lets be completely clear on this now - I&#039;m not. What I am saying is that ABC is in a different position to NBC right now. Without Leno then I&#039;d have no real issues with NBC renewing Chuck and I don&#039;t think we&#039;d even be discussing them not renewing it. 

I&#039;d love to see ABC ditch everything on their line-up that isn&#039;t working but realistically I don&#039;t think we can expect to see that happen because without a Leno like deal to explain it advertisers would have an unholy freak out if you axe everything but Dancing/The Bachelor, Greys, Private Practice (as long as it stays behind Greys) and Desperate Housewives. Like I said above if by some miracle Castle or The Unusuals rebounds slightly then ABC probably take another look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert firstly NBC and ABC are in different positions &#8211; Leno is very much the difference maker for NBC and puts them in a position where they can ditch everything that&#8217;s not working and move forward with only their strongest shows. Without Leno at 10 there&#8217;s no way we&#8217;re discussing Chuck being axed or Medium or Law &amp; Order. With Leno at 10 NBC has the chance to completely change and refresh their line-up. For better or worse ABC don&#8217;t have that. </p>
<p>I think its incredibly unlikely to say the least that there&#8217;s any serious consideration to bringing Castle back as things stand. However I find the various hypothetical scenarios surrounding a Castle renewal easier to consider because its on ABC and unlike NBC they&#8217;re going to have to plug holes in the schedule next year. Their slate of locks going forward next year isn&#8217;t much improved on NBC&#8217;s and at least one of their locks is entirely dependent on its lead-in at this stage and worse still their show launching ratio is arguably worse than NBC&#8217;s right now. </p>
<p>As it stands I think ABC will ditch all of their new shows (with the exception being that Surviving Suburbia might survive if it manages to hold steady next week) however I think something like Castle or even The Unusuals has to do a lot less to make itself renewal worthy than Chuck does. If by some miracle either of Castle or The Unusuals rebounds to a 2.1 or 2.2 before the end of their respective runs then I think ABC does consider bringing it back &#8211; purely because they&#8217;ll likely need something and want a &#8216;new&#8217; show to carry forward to a second season. To me its much more conceivable that Castle or The Unusuals can rebound three tenths than Chuck rebounding basically an entire point (although after this weeks number it is slightly less than that), which is where I think it would need to be to lock in renewal. For met at least.</p>
<p>Basically right now its much easier for me to entertain the hypothetical for ABC than it is for NBC because their situations are different and the threshold for what a show should need going forward is different. I&#8217;ll also point out that I brought up Castle as the ABC show of choice in response to someone else questioning ABC needing to bring something back next year. </p>
<p>And Patrick I&#8217;m not entirely sure what you&#8217;re asking me when you ask &#8216;why advocate that for NBC when ABC in in similar trouble&#8217;. I get the impression that you think I&#8217;m advocating a Castle renewal and lets be completely clear on this now &#8211; I&#8217;m not. What I am saying is that ABC is in a different position to NBC right now. Without Leno then I&#8217;d have no real issues with NBC renewing Chuck and I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;d even be discussing them not renewing it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see ABC ditch everything on their line-up that isn&#8217;t working but realistically I don&#8217;t think we can expect to see that happen because without a Leno like deal to explain it advertisers would have an unholy freak out if you axe everything but Dancing/The Bachelor, Greys, Private Practice (as long as it stays behind Greys) and Desperate Housewives. Like I said above if by some miracle Castle or The Unusuals rebounds slightly then ABC probably take another look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
