<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dollhouse Had Largest Share of Viewing From DVRs, Did That Save The Show?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:47:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-101491</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-101491</guid>
		<description>Just in case anyone has any doubts about LG&#039;s grasp of reality: I &quot;hate Dollhouse&quot; and &quot;love T:SCC&quot; about as much as LG had access to season finale scripts for the latter.

I made the mistake some time ago of referencing LG&#039;s &quot;T:SCC canceled&quot; hoax (T:SCC was eventually canceled, but it&#039;s fair to say LG&#039;s story was fiction) when I tried to persuade DH fans it was not a good idea to hitch DH&#039;s fortunes to a sinking ship. As a result, nothing I said was taken seriously, even though the central point, that T:SCC was a sinking ship regardless of whether LG was trolling or not, was obviously correct.

I&#039;ve made it clear I don&#039;t trust LG&#039;s posts, and as a result LG insists on treating me as a fan of T:SCC, a show I&#039;ve attacked since the second season started last year.

I normally make it a policy not to respond to LG, but in this case I&#039;ll make an exception if only to ensure nobody else makes the same stupid error I did and in case there&#039;s anyone stupid enough to actually think I really hate DH, a show I&#039;ve been raving about since Ep. 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case anyone has any doubts about LG&#8217;s grasp of reality: I &#8220;hate Dollhouse&#8221; and &#8220;love T:SCC&#8221; about as much as LG had access to season finale scripts for the latter.</p>
<p>I made the mistake some time ago of referencing LG&#8217;s &#8220;T:SCC canceled&#8221; hoax (T:SCC was eventually canceled, but it&#8217;s fair to say LG&#8217;s story was fiction) when I tried to persuade DH fans it was not a good idea to hitch DH&#8217;s fortunes to a sinking ship. As a result, nothing I said was taken seriously, even though the central point, that T:SCC was a sinking ship regardless of whether LG was trolling or not, was obviously correct.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made it clear I don&#8217;t trust LG&#8217;s posts, and as a result LG insists on treating me as a fan of T:SCC, a show I&#8217;ve attacked since the second season started last year.</p>
<p>I normally make it a policy not to respond to LG, but in this case I&#8217;ll make an exception if only to ensure nobody else makes the same stupid error I did and in case there&#8217;s anyone stupid enough to actually think I really hate DH, a show I&#8217;ve been raving about since Ep. 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-101482</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-101482</guid>
		<description>@squiggleslash

The only people that rabidly hate Dollhouse are you and the other 43 active (I&#039;ll be nice here) Terminatorwiki &quot;fans&quot;. 

Dollhouse will be fine.

Apparently the people that mattered thought DH was a better show with more potential and the DH fans obviously communicated a stronger desire to keep their show :)

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@squiggleslash</p>
<p>The only people that rabidly hate Dollhouse are you and the other 43 active (I&#8217;ll be nice here) Terminatorwiki &#8220;fans&#8221;. </p>
<p>Dollhouse will be fine.</p>
<p>Apparently the people that mattered thought DH was a better show with more potential and the DH fans obviously communicated a stronger desire to keep their show <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100778</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100778</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s actually a fun part of this.  it&#039;s rare for a summer date to mean a lot for the fall schedule.  DVD sales are down across the industry.  if dollhouse hits the numbers the fans expect, fox will have no choice but to be impressed.

there is, of course, another scenario.  one of the telling weaknesses of dollhouse is that even the whedonesque.com hard-core whedonites are kind of split on dollhouse.  that&#039;s like the republican presidential candidate struggling to win south carolina.

if dvd sales disappoint, i think we can all agree, it&#039;s over.  but they might not.  it&#039;s good when the people decide, not a few executives in a room.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s actually a fun part of this.  it&#8217;s rare for a summer date to mean a lot for the fall schedule.  DVD sales are down across the industry.  if dollhouse hits the numbers the fans expect, fox will have no choice but to be impressed.</p>
<p>there is, of course, another scenario.  one of the telling weaknesses of dollhouse is that even the whedonesque.com hard-core whedonites are kind of split on dollhouse.  that&#8217;s like the republican presidential candidate struggling to win south carolina.</p>
<p>if dvd sales disappoint, i think we can all agree, it&#8217;s over.  but they might not.  it&#8217;s good when the people decide, not a few executives in a room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greennogo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100757</link>
		<dc:creator>greennogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100757</guid>
		<description>I think DVD sales will be pretty strong in spite of the fact that the price tag is a bit high for less than the full contingent of 22 episodes. A lot of people want to see the now mythic &quot;Epitaph One&quot; episode and the pre network notes original &quot;Echo&quot; 1st episode. (And if &quot;Echo&quot; matches the script that&#039;s out there, it&#039;ll only reinforce the perception that Joss was forced to &#039;dumb it down&#039; over the first five episodes for the network.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think DVD sales will be pretty strong in spite of the fact that the price tag is a bit high for less than the full contingent of 22 episodes. A lot of people want to see the now mythic &#8220;Epitaph One&#8221; episode and the pre network notes original &#8220;Echo&#8221; 1st episode. (And if &#8220;Echo&#8221; matches the script that&#8217;s out there, it&#8217;ll only reinforce the perception that Joss was forced to &#8216;dumb it down&#8217; over the first five episodes for the network.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100756</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100756</guid>
		<description>freeman - The reason I didn&#039;t raise the issue of the poor lead in was because I already had taken it into account. Dollhouse ended the season on a 1.0, while it was being paired with Prison Break and after it had already run into the start of the summer season. I don&#039;t see any synergies between PB and Dollhouse, and even if there are some, the start of the summer season will have wiped out any meager benefits it might have gotten from PB. In the end, I think the vast majority of people watching the last three episodes of Dollhouse watched it by turning on the TV at 9 and/or tuning to Fox at 9.

So from my point of view, it&#039;s highly improbable that ratings will get worse unless the show itself gets worse. But I don&#039;t think 1.0-1.2 is sustainable in the long term for the reasons you point out. It just takes Fox to get a pilot for a show it thinks can make it on a Friday and which doesn&#039;t cost substantially more, and Fox has to consider other things to do with Dollhouse.

The good news (from my point of view) is that there are more options with Dollhouse than there were with T:SCC. T:SCC was so expensive, and DVD sales so poor, that moving it to another network was never an option. Dollhouse may be able to move, if DVD sales are at least reasonable. I&#039;m just not confident they will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freeman &#8211; The reason I didn&#8217;t raise the issue of the poor lead in was because I already had taken it into account. Dollhouse ended the season on a 1.0, while it was being paired with Prison Break and after it had already run into the start of the summer season. I don&#8217;t see any synergies between PB and Dollhouse, and even if there are some, the start of the summer season will have wiped out any meager benefits it might have gotten from PB. In the end, I think the vast majority of people watching the last three episodes of Dollhouse watched it by turning on the TV at 9 and/or tuning to Fox at 9.</p>
<p>So from my point of view, it&#8217;s highly improbable that ratings will get worse unless the show itself gets worse. But I don&#8217;t think 1.0-1.2 is sustainable in the long term for the reasons you point out. It just takes Fox to get a pilot for a show it thinks can make it on a Friday and which doesn&#8217;t cost substantially more, and Fox has to consider other things to do with Dollhouse.</p>
<p>The good news (from my point of view) is that there are more options with Dollhouse than there were with T:SCC. T:SCC was so expensive, and DVD sales so poor, that moving it to another network was never an option. Dollhouse may be able to move, if DVD sales are at least reasonable. I&#8217;m just not confident they will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100743</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100743</guid>
		<description>oh, the other huge factor is fox&#039;s pilots.  the second-season pickup for dollhouse was clearly in part a reflection of fox&#039;s pilot season wiping out.  it&#039;s only a matter of time before someone makes a pilot that fox is willing to make the centerpiece of its new friday night.  

once that happens, the ride is over for dollhouse fans.  kevin reilly might be content to break even with a cheap sci-fi show in the short run, but in the long run, he wants to build a dominant night, and he knows dollhouse will never be part of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, the other huge factor is fox&#8217;s pilots.  the second-season pickup for dollhouse was clearly in part a reflection of fox&#8217;s pilot season wiping out.  it&#8217;s only a matter of time before someone makes a pilot that fox is willing to make the centerpiece of its new friday night.  </p>
<p>once that happens, the ride is over for dollhouse fans.  kevin reilly might be content to break even with a cheap sci-fi show in the short run, but in the long run, he wants to build a dominant night, and he knows dollhouse will never be part of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100738</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100738</guid>
		<description>that&#039;s actually an excellent analysis by squiggleslash.  it looks like we&#039;re getting ready to stop wasting this site&#039;s bandwidth.  he&#039;s a fan and i&#039;m not, but i agree with most of what he said.

the thing i&#039;d say he forgot is what most fans forget: the effect of other shows.  there&#039;s no way that horrible lead-in sitcom hour will deliver the closely-matched audience that sarah connor did for the first nine episodes.  fox ruled sunday night for years with the simpsons/x-files tag team, but animation is different.  animation nerds and sci-fi nerds are two mutations of the same family tree.  friday night has no synergy.  dollhouse&#039;s ratings will inescapably go down.

and, i&#039;m not sure how big this will be, but nbc even scheduled a show at 9, medium, that might actually peel off some of dollhouse&#039;s fringe-y audience, which can&#039;t lose a single person as it stands.  

i think we all agree, the prognosis is not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s actually an excellent analysis by squiggleslash.  it looks like we&#8217;re getting ready to stop wasting this site&#8217;s bandwidth.  he&#8217;s a fan and i&#8217;m not, but i agree with most of what he said.</p>
<p>the thing i&#8217;d say he forgot is what most fans forget: the effect of other shows.  there&#8217;s no way that horrible lead-in sitcom hour will deliver the closely-matched audience that sarah connor did for the first nine episodes.  fox ruled sunday night for years with the simpsons/x-files tag team, but animation is different.  animation nerds and sci-fi nerds are two mutations of the same family tree.  friday night has no synergy.  dollhouse&#8217;s ratings will inescapably go down.</p>
<p>and, i&#8217;m not sure how big this will be, but nbc even scheduled a show at 9, medium, that might actually peel off some of dollhouse&#8217;s fringe-y audience, which can&#8217;t lose a single person as it stands.  </p>
<p>i think we all agree, the prognosis is not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100730</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100730</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone can say for definite what&#039;s going to happen with Dollhouse, but I&#039;d say the logic probably works like this:

1. Most likely

Ratings stay flat, DVD sales low, show canceled most probably after 13 episodes, though possibly allowed to lumber on, T:SCC style, to end on a full season if Fox sees it as better than cheap filler material.

I think ratings will stay flat because I&#039;m finding people actually hate the show. I don&#039;t mean in an American Idol type way, I mean as in I&#039;ve defended it before and been treated as if I just said Hitler is a pretty cool guy. I mean that literally, you have no idea how hysterial people are in their hatred of Dollhouse. The fact it portrays an evil system dispassionately, and the people running it as human beings rather than evil archetypes, really rubs critics up the wrong way. I love the show for those strengths, but alas I think it&#039;s too complex for general audiences to appreciate. Add to that the fact it&#039;s already not attracted a large audience, and the issues others have raised about the &quot;main character&quot; not being identifiable, and you don&#039;t have something that has a large pull.

DVD sales will be low partially for the above, and partially because the DVD set is relatively expensive for relatively little. $32 is the heavily discounted price. It&#039;s not even on my wait order list, and I love the show.

2. Second most likely

Ratings remain low, but DVD sales are good. Fox finishes series 2 (including mid-season pick-up), with S3 onwards moved to FX

I&#039;ve already explained why I think ratings will remain low. There&#039;s more of a chance I&#039;m wrong on DVD sales, largely because the DVD set contains some extras many fans will feel are critical, in much the same way that fans of Firefly felt obliged to buy the DVD set because it had content missing from the network run.

Why finish the series and put S3 on FX? Well, if DVD sales are high, and ratings don&#039;t go lower, then there may well be enough of an audience to justify showing the show on cable especially as the cost is low and the DVD sales will help drive up revenues. Dollhouse would also appear to fit some of FX&#039;s demographic. Why bother canceling it if the show is ultimately profitable? It&#039;s better to find a way to keep making the show, it&#039;s just putting it on Fox with such low ratings makes no sense.

3. Third most likely

Ratings go up, DVD sales are high. Show continues to limp on, with a third season commissioned for the Fox Network.

I think both are improbable but if somehow ratings improve, I can see Fox renewing the series as they don&#039;t have much of a justification for not doing so.

4. Fourth most likely: Ratings plummet. DVD sales low. Show is canceled after seven or eight episodes.

Highly improbable. I think Dollhouse has attracted a base of strong fans, so I don&#039;t see Dollhouse dropping below the 1.0 it ended the first season on. But it&#039;s also possible the second season will stink.


Me, I&#039;m hoping for the second or third most likely scenarios. I just don&#039;t see either as particularly likely. I don&#039;t think ratings will go above a 1.2, and I don&#039;t think DVD sales are going to be particularly good. But I&#039;d be delighted to be proven wrong, as the show&#039;s awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone can say for definite what&#8217;s going to happen with Dollhouse, but I&#8217;d say the logic probably works like this:</p>
<p>1. Most likely</p>
<p>Ratings stay flat, DVD sales low, show canceled most probably after 13 episodes, though possibly allowed to lumber on, T:SCC style, to end on a full season if Fox sees it as better than cheap filler material.</p>
<p>I think ratings will stay flat because I&#8217;m finding people actually hate the show. I don&#8217;t mean in an American Idol type way, I mean as in I&#8217;ve defended it before and been treated as if I just said Hitler is a pretty cool guy. I mean that literally, you have no idea how hysterial people are in their hatred of Dollhouse. The fact it portrays an evil system dispassionately, and the people running it as human beings rather than evil archetypes, really rubs critics up the wrong way. I love the show for those strengths, but alas I think it&#8217;s too complex for general audiences to appreciate. Add to that the fact it&#8217;s already not attracted a large audience, and the issues others have raised about the &#8220;main character&#8221; not being identifiable, and you don&#8217;t have something that has a large pull.</p>
<p>DVD sales will be low partially for the above, and partially because the DVD set is relatively expensive for relatively little. $32 is the heavily discounted price. It&#8217;s not even on my wait order list, and I love the show.</p>
<p>2. Second most likely</p>
<p>Ratings remain low, but DVD sales are good. Fox finishes series 2 (including mid-season pick-up), with S3 onwards moved to FX</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already explained why I think ratings will remain low. There&#8217;s more of a chance I&#8217;m wrong on DVD sales, largely because the DVD set contains some extras many fans will feel are critical, in much the same way that fans of Firefly felt obliged to buy the DVD set because it had content missing from the network run.</p>
<p>Why finish the series and put S3 on FX? Well, if DVD sales are high, and ratings don&#8217;t go lower, then there may well be enough of an audience to justify showing the show on cable especially as the cost is low and the DVD sales will help drive up revenues. Dollhouse would also appear to fit some of FX&#8217;s demographic. Why bother canceling it if the show is ultimately profitable? It&#8217;s better to find a way to keep making the show, it&#8217;s just putting it on Fox with such low ratings makes no sense.</p>
<p>3. Third most likely</p>
<p>Ratings go up, DVD sales are high. Show continues to limp on, with a third season commissioned for the Fox Network.</p>
<p>I think both are improbable but if somehow ratings improve, I can see Fox renewing the series as they don&#8217;t have much of a justification for not doing so.</p>
<p>4. Fourth most likely: Ratings plummet. DVD sales low. Show is canceled after seven or eight episodes.</p>
<p>Highly improbable. I think Dollhouse has attracted a base of strong fans, so I don&#8217;t see Dollhouse dropping below the 1.0 it ended the first season on. But it&#8217;s also possible the second season will stink.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;m hoping for the second or third most likely scenarios. I just don&#8217;t see either as particularly likely. I don&#8217;t think ratings will go above a 1.2, and I don&#8217;t think DVD sales are going to be particularly good. But I&#8217;d be delighted to be proven wrong, as the show&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100724</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100724</guid>
		<description>And what do we Swedenborgians have to do with DOLLHOUSE? (Or comets,
for that matter?) I have no idea what you are trying to say.
  The plot of &quot;Stage Fright&quot; was stolen from Chesterton, but I
saw nothing about &quot;Swedenborgian space&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what do we Swedenborgians have to do with DOLLHOUSE? (Or comets,<br />
for that matter?) I have no idea what you are trying to say.<br />
  The plot of &#8220;Stage Fright&#8221; was stolen from Chesterton, but I<br />
saw nothing about &#8220;Swedenborgian space&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100303</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100303</guid>
		<description>Lanie Grace says:

&quot;Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.&quot;

Why?  You&#039;ve already cognized that it might fall to a 0.5, at which point &quot;Kevin Reilly&#039;s ego&quot; would take the reins in grand Swedenborgian fashion, like the comet Kohoutek.  This is &quot;the same reason DH will at least go all of S2.&quot;  So why now has that 0.5 turned into an expectantly engorged audience?  (Is this the &quot;different&quot; reason DH will &quot;at least go all of S2&quot; to go along with the &quot;same&quot; reason?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lanie Grace says:</p>
<p>&#8220;Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why?  You&#8217;ve already cognized that it might fall to a 0.5, at which point &#8220;Kevin Reilly&#8217;s ego&#8221; would take the reins in grand Swedenborgian fashion, like the comet Kohoutek.  This is &#8220;the same reason DH will at least go all of S2.&#8221;  So why now has that 0.5 turned into an expectantly engorged audience?  (Is this the &#8220;different&#8221; reason DH will &#8220;at least go all of S2&#8243; to go along with the &#8220;same&#8221; reason?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100283</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100283</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t think DVRs are sophisticated enough to measure this yet. but here&#039;s my belief: there isn&#039;t a single person in america who wants to watch the michael strahan sitcom, til death AND dollhouse.  my prediction is, exactly zero people in the united states will watch the entire fox friday night lineup on september 18.  DVRs can&#039;t tell us that yet, can they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think DVRs are sophisticated enough to measure this yet. but here&#8217;s my belief: there isn&#8217;t a single person in america who wants to watch the michael strahan sitcom, til death AND dollhouse.  my prediction is, exactly zero people in the united states will watch the entire fox friday night lineup on september 18.  DVRs can&#8217;t tell us that yet, can they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squiggleslash</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100269</link>
		<dc:creator>squiggleslash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100269</guid>
		<description>High DVR numbers might be seen as evidence that a show is poorly scheduled. The issue, for Fox with Dollhouse, I guess is that they don&#039;t have another slot to show it in that isn&#039;t occupied with a show they believe has higher ratings than they believe Dollhouse is capable of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High DVR numbers might be seen as evidence that a show is poorly scheduled. The issue, for Fox with Dollhouse, I guess is that they don&#8217;t have another slot to show it in that isn&#8217;t occupied with a show they believe has higher ratings than they believe Dollhouse is capable of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greennogo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100248</link>
		<dc:creator>greennogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100248</guid>
		<description>I doubt that DVR and online stats are in a position to save anybody&#039;s show in and of themselves, but it&#039;s hard to argue that even with factoring in the technologically changeful nature of the 18-49 demo&#039;s viewing habits, that there are some definite inconsistencies between the terrestrial broadcast numbers and the new media viewing numbers.  An increase as radical as &quot;Dollhouse&#039;s&quot; is just too disproportionably large to ignore. I think even some advertisers realize this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that DVR and online stats are in a position to save anybody&#8217;s show in and of themselves, but it&#8217;s hard to argue that even with factoring in the technologically changeful nature of the 18-49 demo&#8217;s viewing habits, that there are some definite inconsistencies between the terrestrial broadcast numbers and the new media viewing numbers.  An increase as radical as &#8220;Dollhouse&#8217;s&#8221; is just too disproportionably large to ignore. I think even some advertisers realize this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100232</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100232</guid>
		<description>thanks bill, as long as people stay non-hateful i assume the endless debates are entertaining to anyone who peeks, but i&#039;ve never posted here before, so you never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks bill, as long as people stay non-hateful i assume the endless debates are entertaining to anyone who peeks, but i&#8217;ve never posted here before, so you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100226</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100226</guid>
		<description>freeman, all our comment threads are closed automatically after 14 days, you&#039;ve still got 8 days left!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freeman, all our comment threads are closed automatically after 14 days, you&#8217;ve still got 8 days left!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100223</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100223</guid>
		<description>i keep waiting for the tvbythenumbers people to shut this thread down and make us shut up.

but apparently we&#039;re still doing this.  and actually, there’s actually a fair amount of agreement between everyone still left.

I agree with the whedon fans in that:

fox doesn’t really believe in dollhouse.

i disagree with the whedon fans in that:

the reason fox doesn’t believe in dollhouse is because they shouldn’t.  it’s not a theoretical question any more, it’s been shown to the viewers and they’ve turned up their noses.  

the big over-arcing problem here is that in the 1990s, joss was willing to fully commit his talent to getting the viewers to identify with buffy and sarah michelle gellar and reap the rewards of the viewers’ love for buffy.  but joss’ ego has grown to the point where he now needs his writing to be the star of the show.  it needs to be Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse.  and in the immortal words of rocky the flying squirrel, that trick never works.  joss can get his not-big-enough-for-prime-time internet army to show up for that, but normal viewers only bond with people who are on the screen.

but hey, joss has some big hits under his belt and more money than he can ever spend. if he wants to cut back on the intensity and rigor of his work so he can enjoy it more, well, a lot of writers do that in their 40s, i’m certainly in no position to judge.

it’s only when he tries to use a fragile moment in a young actor’s career as a temporary flotation device to keep his drowning show afloat that he turns into something evil.  but i guess you could argue that it’s joss’ role to try that, and summer’s agent’s job to keep it from working.  so whatever, we’ll see what happens, it won’t be decided here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i keep waiting for the tvbythenumbers people to shut this thread down and make us shut up.</p>
<p>but apparently we&#8217;re still doing this.  and actually, there’s actually a fair amount of agreement between everyone still left.</p>
<p>I agree with the whedon fans in that:</p>
<p>fox doesn’t really believe in dollhouse.</p>
<p>i disagree with the whedon fans in that:</p>
<p>the reason fox doesn’t believe in dollhouse is because they shouldn’t.  it’s not a theoretical question any more, it’s been shown to the viewers and they’ve turned up their noses.  </p>
<p>the big over-arcing problem here is that in the 1990s, joss was willing to fully commit his talent to getting the viewers to identify with buffy and sarah michelle gellar and reap the rewards of the viewers’ love for buffy.  but joss’ ego has grown to the point where he now needs his writing to be the star of the show.  it needs to be Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse.  and in the immortal words of rocky the flying squirrel, that trick never works.  joss can get his not-big-enough-for-prime-time internet army to show up for that, but normal viewers only bond with people who are on the screen.</p>
<p>but hey, joss has some big hits under his belt and more money than he can ever spend. if he wants to cut back on the intensity and rigor of his work so he can enjoy it more, well, a lot of writers do that in their 40s, i’m certainly in no position to judge.</p>
<p>it’s only when he tries to use a fragile moment in a young actor’s career as a temporary flotation device to keep his drowning show afloat that he turns into something evil.  but i guess you could argue that it’s joss’ role to try that, and summer’s agent’s job to keep it from working.  so whatever, we’ll see what happens, it won’t be decided here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100189</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100189</guid>
		<description>@Richard Steven Hack

Thats a Dead On Comment, Summer&#039;s performance will determine her reputation, not if the show fails or succeeds.

@Max452

Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard Steven Hack</p>
<p>Thats a Dead On Comment, Summer&#8217;s performance will determine her reputation, not if the show fails or succeeds.</p>
<p>@Max452</p>
<p>Very true, DH will need an enlarged audience over the current fanbase, I expect that will happen.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max452</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100161</link>
		<dc:creator>max452</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100161</guid>
		<description>@Lanie,

If I remember correctly, the X-Files did so-so on Friday but became big when it was moved to Sundays. More people than the &quot;dedicated fan base&quot; started watching, and it became a hit. Fox even reran old episodes from seasons 1-4 on Sundays, which are some of the shows best. If X-files didn&#039;t do well on season 5 on Sundays it was done. There are interviews with Chris Carter saying they were trying to wrap some threads up in case they didn&#039;t make it to season 6.

If all Dollhouse has is its &quot;dedicated fanbase&quot; and doesn&#039;t attract new viewers, its done. When it comes to Fox, fan bases alone did not save Firefly, TSSC, Dark Angel, Briscoe County Jr, etc, etc, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lanie,</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, the X-Files did so-so on Friday but became big when it was moved to Sundays. More people than the &#8220;dedicated fan base&#8221; started watching, and it became a hit. Fox even reran old episodes from seasons 1-4 on Sundays, which are some of the shows best. If X-files didn&#8217;t do well on season 5 on Sundays it was done. There are interviews with Chris Carter saying they were trying to wrap some threads up in case they didn&#8217;t make it to season 6.</p>
<p>If all Dollhouse has is its &#8220;dedicated fanbase&#8221; and doesn&#8217;t attract new viewers, its done. When it comes to Fox, fan bases alone did not save Firefly, TSSC, Dark Angel, Briscoe County Jr, etc, etc, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100108</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100108</guid>
		<description>Freeman, as for Joss Whedon&#039;s career, it&#039;s like winning coaches with Baseball or Football.  People remember that they won it all in Year X, and they give them a chance well past their prime.  Joe Gibbs, numerous managers and General Managers in baseball come to mind.  Once you have a hit that you&#039;re responsible for, you always get a second chance.

Movies are another matter.  Anyone heard of Renny Harlin lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeman, as for Joss Whedon&#8217;s career, it&#8217;s like winning coaches with Baseball or Football.  People remember that they won it all in Year X, and they give them a chance well past their prime.  Joe Gibbs, numerous managers and General Managers in baseball come to mind.  Once you have a hit that you&#8217;re responsible for, you always get a second chance.</p>
<p>Movies are another matter.  Anyone heard of Renny Harlin lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100087</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100087</guid>
		<description>Freeman: Nothing is going to damage Summer&#039;s rep except a bad performance - which I&#039;ve never seen her give, not recently anyway.

What would be likely to happen is that Summer is brought in to boost the ratings, they don&#039;t boost, they go down, and everybody says what a shame it was that Summer was on another failing show.

Just like they did with TSCC after Firefly. That&#039;s exactly what they said. As long as most people perceive her character as engaging and her performance professional, she&#039;s not going to have a problem with the show failing out from under her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeman: Nothing is going to damage Summer&#8217;s rep except a bad performance &#8211; which I&#8217;ve never seen her give, not recently anyway.</p>
<p>What would be likely to happen is that Summer is brought in to boost the ratings, they don&#8217;t boost, they go down, and everybody says what a shame it was that Summer was on another failing show.</p>
<p>Just like they did with TSCC after Firefly. That&#8217;s exactly what they said. As long as most people perceive her character as engaging and her performance professional, she&#8217;s not going to have a problem with the show failing out from under her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100067</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-100067</guid>
		<description>@The_GodfatherSJP

If Fridays are so bad what was the reason behind the X-Files massive success? Wasn&#039;t the first four seasons of X-Files on Friday at 9pm?

If the answer is X-Files had solid writing, a dedicated fan base and all around good show that overcame the &quot;Friday Death Slot&quot; then why didn&#039;t the robot show make it?

I am betting that Dollhouse will over come the Friday Death Slot and will not need a lead, hence it will be able to stand on its own, again, unlike the robot show and before anyone gets all in a tizzy, if the robot show could stand on it&#039;s own, it would still be there.

But anyway GF,

Thank you for explaining,

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The_GodfatherSJP</p>
<p>If Fridays are so bad what was the reason behind the X-Files massive success? Wasn&#8217;t the first four seasons of X-Files on Friday at 9pm?</p>
<p>If the answer is X-Files had solid writing, a dedicated fan base and all around good show that overcame the &#8220;Friday Death Slot&#8221; then why didn&#8217;t the robot show make it?</p>
<p>I am betting that Dollhouse will over come the Friday Death Slot and will not need a lead, hence it will be able to stand on its own, again, unlike the robot show and before anyone gets all in a tizzy, if the robot show could stand on it&#8217;s own, it would still be there.</p>
<p>But anyway GF,</p>
<p>Thank you for explaining,</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99892</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99892</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, mistake on my part.  Brothers is at 8PM.  Even worse than Sons of Tucson.  A Michael Strahan comedy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, mistake on my part.  Brothers is at 8PM.  Even worse than Sons of Tucson.  A Michael Strahan comedy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_GodfatherSJP</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99889</link>
		<dc:creator>The_GodfatherSJP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99889</guid>
		<description>Okay, my 2 cents over Dollhouse&#039;s renewal is this:

Forget fan demand.  Forget DVR numbers.  Forget ratings, or at least in the traditional sense.

It&#039;s M O N E Y.  Personally, I very much buy Nick C.&#039;s story that Dollhouse could be produced very cheaply, that&#039;s the pitch that sold the show for a second season.  Think about it.  They get an hour&#039;s worth of television for the price of a half hour sitcom, and its a sci-fi drama that they wholly own and produce.  So they see all the money from DVD sales and syndication, and it&#039;s a Whedon project, guaranteed fanbase.  Plus they get all the advertising revenue.  Win win for the network, it&#039;s a guaranteed money maker.  Of course, if the ratings really tank, that&#039;s another story.

Even then, they&#039;re not overly enthusiastic about the show&#039;s chances.  If they were, why keep it on a Friday, where television shows go to die?  Why lead off with a Freshman comedy, Sons of Tucson, followed by a failing sitcom, Til Death, which was only renewed because of Sony&#039;s cheap deal with FOX?  Dollhouse&#039;s ratings tanked badly with a non sci-fi lead in, do they really expect much better with two shows that have very little audience overlap with Sci-Fi viewers?  If they were optimistic about it&#039;s chances, it would have been paired with Past Life or Human Target.  

It&#039;s not.  It got renewed because it was very cheap, FOX will give it another chance to improve, but they&#039;re not expecting much.  Show&#039;s going in to the Fall 2009 season already on life support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, my 2 cents over Dollhouse&#8217;s renewal is this:</p>
<p>Forget fan demand.  Forget DVR numbers.  Forget ratings, or at least in the traditional sense.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s M O N E Y.  Personally, I very much buy Nick C.&#8217;s story that Dollhouse could be produced very cheaply, that&#8217;s the pitch that sold the show for a second season.  Think about it.  They get an hour&#8217;s worth of television for the price of a half hour sitcom, and its a sci-fi drama that they wholly own and produce.  So they see all the money from DVD sales and syndication, and it&#8217;s a Whedon project, guaranteed fanbase.  Plus they get all the advertising revenue.  Win win for the network, it&#8217;s a guaranteed money maker.  Of course, if the ratings really tank, that&#8217;s another story.</p>
<p>Even then, they&#8217;re not overly enthusiastic about the show&#8217;s chances.  If they were, why keep it on a Friday, where television shows go to die?  Why lead off with a Freshman comedy, Sons of Tucson, followed by a failing sitcom, Til Death, which was only renewed because of Sony&#8217;s cheap deal with FOX?  Dollhouse&#8217;s ratings tanked badly with a non sci-fi lead in, do they really expect much better with two shows that have very little audience overlap with Sci-Fi viewers?  If they were optimistic about it&#8217;s chances, it would have been paired with Past Life or Human Target.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not.  It got renewed because it was very cheap, FOX will give it another chance to improve, but they&#8217;re not expecting much.  Show&#8217;s going in to the Fall 2009 season already on life support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karolina</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99875</link>
		<dc:creator>karolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99875</guid>
		<description>I came up with a second Michael Strahan/Dollhouse crossover episode.

Michael&#039;s boss invites him to play golf.  But Michael doesn&#039;t play golf.  So he goes to the Dollhouse and gets imprinted with Tiger Woods&#039; golf-playing abilities.  But the boss hates playing against a great golfer.  Michael learns to be himself.  It&#039;s more of an emotional episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came up with a second Michael Strahan/Dollhouse crossover episode.</p>
<p>Michael&#8217;s boss invites him to play golf.  But Michael doesn&#8217;t play golf.  So he goes to the Dollhouse and gets imprinted with Tiger Woods&#8217; golf-playing abilities.  But the boss hates playing against a great golfer.  Michael learns to be himself.  It&#8217;s more of an emotional episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freeman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99864</link>
		<dc:creator>freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/18/dollhouse-had-largest-share-of-viewing-from-dvrs-did-that-save-the-show/21052#comment-99864</guid>
		<description>of course, if kevin reilly was REALLY committed to dollhouse he might have given it a better time slot or a real budget or a real lead-in.  he might have given it sample screenings on better nights to expose viewers to the show - networks do that with shows they really believe in, you know.

i&#039;m not sure you&#039;ll find a lot of precedent for kevin giving a THIRD season to shows without viewers.  the shows he&#039;s famous for nurturing, 30 rock, the office and the sopranos, outgrew their awkward phases and built decent audiences.  when sarah connor did a second season with dollhouse-like numbers, kevin pulled the plug.

will the second season be 13 or 22?  like boris says, we can just wait to find out.  it&#039;s not up to me.  and it will have more to do with when fox has its new friday night ready than dollhouse itself.

by the way, if you&#039;re such a joss whedon fan you shouldn&#039;t really celebrate these pathetic charity pickups.  the whole time dollhouse is scraping along at the bottom of the ratings it&#039;s quietly eroding joss whedon&#039;s ability to get future movies and tv shows made.  if you recall, in the 1990s he did stuff that was interesting AND successful.  now he hasn&#039;t had a hit in ten years.  at some point they start to notice stuff like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course, if kevin reilly was REALLY committed to dollhouse he might have given it a better time slot or a real budget or a real lead-in.  he might have given it sample screenings on better nights to expose viewers to the show &#8211; networks do that with shows they really believe in, you know.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;ll find a lot of precedent for kevin giving a THIRD season to shows without viewers.  the shows he&#8217;s famous for nurturing, 30 rock, the office and the sopranos, outgrew their awkward phases and built decent audiences.  when sarah connor did a second season with dollhouse-like numbers, kevin pulled the plug.</p>
<p>will the second season be 13 or 22?  like boris says, we can just wait to find out.  it&#8217;s not up to me.  and it will have more to do with when fox has its new friday night ready than dollhouse itself.</p>
<p>by the way, if you&#8217;re such a joss whedon fan you shouldn&#8217;t really celebrate these pathetic charity pickups.  the whole time dollhouse is scraping along at the bottom of the ratings it&#8217;s quietly eroding joss whedon&#8217;s ability to get future movies and tv shows made.  if you recall, in the 1990s he did stuff that was interesting AND successful.  now he hasn&#8217;t had a hit in ten years.  at some point they start to notice stuff like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
