<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtuality canceled?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:33:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JimmyRotten</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-102028</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyRotten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-102028</guid>
		<description>POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT

I have to agree with the detractors. I thought the idea was interesting but the acting was bad. I only recognized the chick that was in Carnival/T3 and she was much better in both of thiose. It&#039;s like the cast knew &quot;This is never gonna get picked up&quot; so why bother. I think the ending suggested a Matrix like fake reality as well. FYI, did anyone think that after Terminator-TSC and Dollhouse that Fox is a little gun shy for SciFi shows? This may have worked better as a mini-series. I just don&#039;t see how the story could stretch over several seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POSSIBLE SPOILER ALERT</p>
<p>I have to agree with the detractors. I thought the idea was interesting but the acting was bad. I only recognized the chick that was in Carnival/T3 and she was much better in both of thiose. It&#8217;s like the cast knew &#8220;This is never gonna get picked up&#8221; so why bother. I think the ending suggested a Matrix like fake reality as well. FYI, did anyone think that after Terminator-TSC and Dollhouse that Fox is a little gun shy for SciFi shows? This may have worked better as a mini-series. I just don&#8217;t see how the story could stretch over several seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101580</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101580</guid>
		<description>What is this? I&#039;m agreeing with Robert&#039;s analysis? How can this be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this? I&#8217;m agreeing with Robert&#8217;s analysis? How can this be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101571</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101571</guid>
		<description>When Dollhouse gets yanked (in 4 episodes), I doubt they&#039;ll throw an expensive sci-fi series there as a replacement.  At least the acting was decent on Virtuality, unlike Dollhouse&#039;s lead making me cringe.

Stargate Universe will provide me with a similar themed sci-fi series.  So it&#039;s not a major loss to me, and it also means I have no reason to bother with Fox outside of Fringe.  There is a bit of concern that the new series will become Stargate Voyager 90210.

Anyway...  I was under the impression that more episodes of Virtuality were already produced, but weren&#039;t airing outside of the two hour pilot.  I guess I was wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Dollhouse gets yanked (in 4 episodes), I doubt they&#8217;ll throw an expensive sci-fi series there as a replacement.  At least the acting was decent on Virtuality, unlike Dollhouse&#8217;s lead making me cringe.</p>
<p>Stargate Universe will provide me with a similar themed sci-fi series.  So it&#8217;s not a major loss to me, and it also means I have no reason to bother with Fox outside of Fringe.  There is a bit of concern that the new series will become Stargate Voyager 90210.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;  I was under the impression that more episodes of Virtuality were already produced, but weren&#8217;t airing outside of the two hour pilot.  I guess I was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101562</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101562</guid>
		<description>The networks should consider when they do something like this that they put up a notice saying, &quot;This is a pilot we didn&#039;t pick up, so enjoy it because you&#039;ll never see it again.&quot;

In fact, maybe somebody should start a channel called &quot;The Pilot Channel&quot; just showing all the pilots that were never picked up. There must be thousands - you could run the channel for five years just on previous unsold pilots, thus allowing new pilots to stack up so you could keep going afterward.

I was disappointed after watching the Global Frequency pilot that it wasn&#039;t picked up, but in reality if they actually tried doing the GF stories as they were in the comic, the FCC would have banned the show anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The networks should consider when they do something like this that they put up a notice saying, &#8220;This is a pilot we didn&#8217;t pick up, so enjoy it because you&#8217;ll never see it again.&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact, maybe somebody should start a channel called &#8220;The Pilot Channel&#8221; just showing all the pilots that were never picked up. There must be thousands &#8211; you could run the channel for five years just on previous unsold pilots, thus allowing new pilots to stack up so you could keep going afterward.</p>
<p>I was disappointed after watching the Global Frequency pilot that it wasn&#8217;t picked up, but in reality if they actually tried doing the GF stories as they were in the comic, the FCC would have banned the show anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz P.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101552</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101552</guid>
		<description>I usually catch all of Fox&#039;s shows whether it be be on TV or on my computer. I must say that Fox did a horrible job of advertising for this specific series, and in my opinion had a lot of potential. As far as Dollhouse is concerned--oh please, it not better than Virtuality and had me hoping they would cancel it after the first episode.

As far as people saying we should be &quot;thankful&quot; for them running Virtuality--I think not. It&#039;s not about the fact that they actually put it up there, it&#039;s simply the annoyance that people feel when they spend a bunch of time watching the damn show and then it not even being continued.

This always seems to happen with a ton of shows on Fox... I mean seriously...Glee? Dollhouse? Who are they advertising to anyways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually catch all of Fox&#8217;s shows whether it be be on TV or on my computer. I must say that Fox did a horrible job of advertising for this specific series, and in my opinion had a lot of potential. As far as Dollhouse is concerned&#8211;oh please, it not better than Virtuality and had me hoping they would cancel it after the first episode.</p>
<p>As far as people saying we should be &#8220;thankful&#8221; for them running Virtuality&#8211;I think not. It&#8217;s not about the fact that they actually put it up there, it&#8217;s simply the annoyance that people feel when they spend a bunch of time watching the damn show and then it not even being continued.</p>
<p>This always seems to happen with a ton of shows on Fox&#8230; I mean seriously&#8230;Glee? Dollhouse? Who are they advertising to anyways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101373</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101373</guid>
		<description>This show was excellent and I&#039;m very sad that nothing will probably ever come of it.  But how can Fox be surprised by the numbers?  There was zero advertising for this show as far as I can tell.  I&#039;m a HUGE Sci-fi fan and I only found out about this show a few days before it was on by chance.  I think it was the same problem with Kings.  Great shows but people out there just have no idea what they are about and why they should tune in.  Your average TV viewer doesn&#039;t actively pursue new shows I think... this stuff needs to be put in front of their eyes somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show was excellent and I&#8217;m very sad that nothing will probably ever come of it.  But how can Fox be surprised by the numbers?  There was zero advertising for this show as far as I can tell.  I&#8217;m a HUGE Sci-fi fan and I only found out about this show a few days before it was on by chance.  I think it was the same problem with Kings.  Great shows but people out there just have no idea what they are about and why they should tune in.  Your average TV viewer doesn&#8217;t actively pursue new shows I think&#8230; this stuff needs to be put in front of their eyes somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101244</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101244</guid>
		<description>&quot;Soon you’ll have Dollhouse responsible for JFK too.&quot;

Nononono, the only thing Dollhouse killed is Joss Whedons credibility as a writer.

OMG, see what I did there? :D

Kidding. Kinda. ;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Soon you’ll have Dollhouse responsible for JFK too.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nononono, the only thing Dollhouse killed is Joss Whedons credibility as a writer.</p>
<p>OMG, see what I did there? <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kidding. Kinda. ;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101242</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101242</guid>
		<description>Btw, lets not forget &quot;dense&quot; has more than one meaning ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, lets not forget &#8220;dense&#8221; has more than one meaning <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredo</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101241</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101241</guid>
		<description>They should have kept this and sent Dollhouse to the Outhouse. Virtuality had promise, Dollhouse was unwatchable after 2 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have kept this and sent Dollhouse to the Outhouse. Virtuality had promise, Dollhouse was unwatchable after 2 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101238</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101238</guid>
		<description>Joss Whedon on the grassy knoll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joss Whedon on the grassy knoll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101237</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101237</guid>
		<description>lol @ Dollhouse killed Firefly.  Soon you&#039;ll have Dollhouse responsible for JFK too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol @ Dollhouse killed Firefly.  Soon you&#8217;ll have Dollhouse responsible for JFK too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101233</guid>
		<description>&quot;I still dont understand what all this Dollhouse hostility is about?&quot;

Dollhouse killed TSCC. And Virtuality. And Firefly. 

But, Dollhouse will get axed after 13 episodes, if not sooner come fall. Then there will be 4 failed FOX sci fi shows. BTW I liked TSCC and Virtuality and Firefly. Dollhouse I found mind-numbingly bad. Just all around horrible. But, hey, some people enjoy it so wtf do I know? And this is not hostility toward DH. It&#039;s just an opinion from a TV watcher. Some shows i enjoy, some I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I still dont understand what all this Dollhouse hostility is about?&#8221;</p>
<p>Dollhouse killed TSCC. And Virtuality. And Firefly. </p>
<p>But, Dollhouse will get axed after 13 episodes, if not sooner come fall. Then there will be 4 failed FOX sci fi shows. BTW I liked TSCC and Virtuality and Firefly. Dollhouse I found mind-numbingly bad. Just all around horrible. But, hey, some people enjoy it so wtf do I know? And this is not hostility toward DH. It&#8217;s just an opinion from a TV watcher. Some shows i enjoy, some I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101223</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101223</guid>
		<description>I still dont understand what all this Dollhouse hostility is about?

@Chad,

Not only will Virtuality not bring in the 18-34 males, it misses in all catagories. FOX doesn&#039;t need SciFi at all if you want to get right down to it. 

Science Fiction alone will not keep a network on the air, hence, the renaming of SciFi to SyFy and the shifting from a pure Science Fiction channel by SCiFi over the past couple of years to a broader audience.

In today&#039;s high tech world, SciFi isn&#039;t &quot;All that WOW&quot; like it was even 10, 15 or 20 years ago.

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still dont understand what all this Dollhouse hostility is about?</p>
<p>@Chad,</p>
<p>Not only will Virtuality not bring in the 18-34 males, it misses in all catagories. FOX doesn&#8217;t need SciFi at all if you want to get right down to it. </p>
<p>Science Fiction alone will not keep a network on the air, hence, the renaming of SciFi to SyFy and the shifting from a pure Science Fiction channel by SCiFi over the past couple of years to a broader audience.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s high tech world, SciFi isn&#8217;t &#8220;All that WOW&#8221; like it was even 10, 15 or 20 years ago.</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101221</guid>
		<description>From a completely quality-wise viewpoint... Vituality &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Dollhouse. I&#039;m glad FOX aired the pilot. It was great. Yes, I am sad there will be no more episodes, but whatever... win some, lose some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a completely quality-wise viewpoint&#8230; Vituality &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Dollhouse. I&#8217;m glad FOX aired the pilot. It was great. Yes, I am sad there will be no more episodes, but whatever&#8230; win some, lose some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101218</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101218</guid>
		<description>Andrea, don&#039;t feed the troll.  Lanie G thinks the entire web revolves around her and her barely coherent posts.

And yeah, I can see why Fox won&#039;t pick it up.  It&#039;s not mainstream enough, it won&#039;t bring in the 18-34 males.  Fox needs more Dushku cleavage, now that&#039;s quality sci-fi.  Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrea, don&#8217;t feed the troll.  Lanie G thinks the entire web revolves around her and her barely coherent posts.</p>
<p>And yeah, I can see why Fox won&#8217;t pick it up.  It&#8217;s not mainstream enough, it won&#8217;t bring in the 18-34 males.  Fox needs more Dushku cleavage, now that&#8217;s quality sci-fi.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101200</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101200</guid>
		<description>Relevant for criticizing the content I mean, networks clearly use them to slaughter stuff ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relevant for criticizing the content I mean, networks clearly use them to slaughter stuff <img src='http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101199</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101199</guid>
		<description>@wy 
Ratings for a first episode is not relevant - people had no idea what it was and so can&#039;t make an informed choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wy<br />
Ratings for a first episode is not relevant &#8211; people had no idea what it was and so can&#8217;t make an informed choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101140</link>
		<dc:creator>Wy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101140</guid>
		<description>The movie lost me right at the beginning with its pointless 8-minute virtual reality sequences.  Yeah, yeah, I know, VR is a part of it, but all it said to me was that the real plot wasn&#039;t good enough, and rightly so it wasn&#039;t, so let&#039;s go jack it up first with all the VR nonsense, which only succeeds in making things more needlessly confusing.  It would&#039;ve made more sense to have had a decent plot start off the episode that gradually and naturally led into the VR stuff as a tool of sorts, but to start off with 8 mminutes of VR, how does that establish anything anyone would find worth watching in the show?  Not to mention that any pilot is already in trouble when the camerawork gets all fuzzy and wonky, and not to mention again that not a single cast member was likeable or memorable on any level whatsoever with not a spark of humanity in any of them.  Was Who was who again?  Do I care?  No.  A 1,000th airing of the original Star Trek pilot of 43 years ago would still have been far more satisfying to sit through.  And the ridiculously disastrous ratings Virtuality got was well deserved but, unfortunately, those kind of invisible ratings didn&#039;t seem to deter FOX from renewing the equally horrifically awful Dollhouse.  What&#039;s with FOX lately and their seeming penchant for airing mind-numbingly bad shows that make NBC&#039;s vile efforts look like classics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie lost me right at the beginning with its pointless 8-minute virtual reality sequences.  Yeah, yeah, I know, VR is a part of it, but all it said to me was that the real plot wasn&#8217;t good enough, and rightly so it wasn&#8217;t, so let&#8217;s go jack it up first with all the VR nonsense, which only succeeds in making things more needlessly confusing.  It would&#8217;ve made more sense to have had a decent plot start off the episode that gradually and naturally led into the VR stuff as a tool of sorts, but to start off with 8 mminutes of VR, how does that establish anything anyone would find worth watching in the show?  Not to mention that any pilot is already in trouble when the camerawork gets all fuzzy and wonky, and not to mention again that not a single cast member was likeable or memorable on any level whatsoever with not a spark of humanity in any of them.  Was Who was who again?  Do I care?  No.  A 1,000th airing of the original Star Trek pilot of 43 years ago would still have been far more satisfying to sit through.  And the ridiculously disastrous ratings Virtuality got was well deserved but, unfortunately, those kind of invisible ratings didn&#8217;t seem to deter FOX from renewing the equally horrifically awful Dollhouse.  What&#8217;s with FOX lately and their seeming penchant for airing mind-numbingly bad shows that make NBC&#8217;s vile efforts look like classics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grapeshot</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101080</link>
		<dc:creator>grapeshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101080</guid>
		<description>I thought Virtuality was too long by half, and worse yet, had an unappealing cast. Or, to put it a better way, a cast with no chemisty.  Thus no one seemed very convincing in their role.  I wouldn&#039;t say that the story was too dense, but rather it was half-baked, with scenes that dragged out too long with too much talking.  (It&#039;s about MOVING PICTURES, folks, not talking heads!)  

I liked the premise of the virtual-reality-game-gone-haywire, as well as the go/no-go plot device, but found the reality show idea to be lame.  I don&#039;t watch reality shows ever, so why would I want to watch a show depicting a reality show?  I think the story would have plenty of tension if it had been told in a more straight-forward fashion, sort of like the Alien movies, only with the boogie man in the virtual reality game instead of a monster.  The faux tension introduced by the lame reality show plot device was not only annoying but unnecessary.

But the chief sin of this show was to be utterly humorless and to take itself too seriously.  There wasn&#039;t a single flash of redeeming wit throughout the entire two hours.  I like science fiction, but even so I won&#039;t tolerate stupid or bad drama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Virtuality was too long by half, and worse yet, had an unappealing cast. Or, to put it a better way, a cast with no chemisty.  Thus no one seemed very convincing in their role.  I wouldn&#8217;t say that the story was too dense, but rather it was half-baked, with scenes that dragged out too long with too much talking.  (It&#8217;s about MOVING PICTURES, folks, not talking heads!)  </p>
<p>I liked the premise of the virtual-reality-game-gone-haywire, as well as the go/no-go plot device, but found the reality show idea to be lame.  I don&#8217;t watch reality shows ever, so why would I want to watch a show depicting a reality show?  I think the story would have plenty of tension if it had been told in a more straight-forward fashion, sort of like the Alien movies, only with the boogie man in the virtual reality game instead of a monster.  The faux tension introduced by the lame reality show plot device was not only annoying but unnecessary.</p>
<p>But the chief sin of this show was to be utterly humorless and to take itself too seriously.  There wasn&#8217;t a single flash of redeeming wit throughout the entire two hours.  I like science fiction, but even so I won&#8217;t tolerate stupid or bad drama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kermonk</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101078</link>
		<dc:creator>Kermonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101078</guid>
		<description>Hey you! What&#039;s with the aggression? Are you a failed holodeck experiment?

Besides, Vrituality was pre-canceled - we knew that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you! What&#8217;s with the aggression? Are you a failed holodeck experiment?</p>
<p>Besides, Vrituality was pre-canceled &#8211; we knew that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Steven Hack</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101059</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Steven Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101059</guid>
		<description>Hey, Lanie, that sounds like a fun premise! Anything that brings Summer back to the tube, I&#039;ll go for. Well, almost anything...if she stars in a remake of Cheers, I&#039;ll commit suicide.

Wonder if she&#039;d like playing a vampire on True Blood...She&#039;d do vampire good, I think. 

Wouldn&#039;t mind seeing her on Burn Notice getting into fights with Fiona...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Lanie, that sounds like a fun premise! Anything that brings Summer back to the tube, I&#8217;ll go for. Well, almost anything&#8230;if she stars in a remake of Cheers, I&#8217;ll commit suicide.</p>
<p>Wonder if she&#8217;d like playing a vampire on True Blood&#8230;She&#8217;d do vampire good, I think. </p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing her on Burn Notice getting into fights with Fiona&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101058</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101058</guid>
		<description>I think FOX never intended to air it, but when suddenly their books looked bad, they had to air it to recover some cost. Thus, it was suddenly fast-tracked and the CG people and marketing people had to scramble to get it ready within 3 weeks. Reason why Fox didn&#039;t promote it is simple, they wish to spend anymore money on it. Why all the buzz?  Because the Fox marketing people actually liked the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think FOX never intended to air it, but when suddenly their books looked bad, they had to air it to recover some cost. Thus, it was suddenly fast-tracked and the CG people and marketing people had to scramble to get it ready within 3 weeks. Reason why Fox didn&#8217;t promote it is simple, they wish to spend anymore money on it. Why all the buzz?  Because the Fox marketing people actually liked the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanie Grace</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101056</link>
		<dc:creator>Lanie Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101056</guid>
		<description>@Andrea,

There wasn&#039;t anything wrong with my reading comprehension, you are simply junping at any opportunity to express your fanatical anger over your little robot show getting cancelled due to lack of interest in it. The Robot Show is dead and gone, never coming back in any form. There is and never will be a S3, get over it.

Virtuality was bad, definitly not one of RDM&#039;s better creations. Robert was dead on about the virtuality head gear, infact I thought I saw a &quot;Caprica&quot; logo on the one in the opening sequence LOL

Richard Steven Hack also has a valid point about the show getting claustrophobic by being confined in a ship for ten years and it does seem like a ST:TNG and DS9 holodeck ripoff. However; RSH mentions the &quot;Q&quot;, perhaps this could happen.....

Q could introduce the crew to a lethal human like killing machine much in the way he did with exposing Picard et al to the &quot;Borg&quot;. With a simple wave of his hand to punish humanity a sphere forms melting everything in it&#039;s path.

 As it subsides we see a crouched, naked Summer Glau rise and the only way for the crew to live is to run endlessly through adventure after adventure, jumping from one holodeck sequence to the next being chased all across the holodeck universe by Jameron! I know you are all over that!

But then again, FOX is too stupid to know a good show when they see one ha?

~Lanie~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrea,</p>
<p>There wasn&#8217;t anything wrong with my reading comprehension, you are simply junping at any opportunity to express your fanatical anger over your little robot show getting cancelled due to lack of interest in it. The Robot Show is dead and gone, never coming back in any form. There is and never will be a S3, get over it.</p>
<p>Virtuality was bad, definitly not one of RDM&#8217;s better creations. Robert was dead on about the virtuality head gear, infact I thought I saw a &#8220;Caprica&#8221; logo on the one in the opening sequence LOL</p>
<p>Richard Steven Hack also has a valid point about the show getting claustrophobic by being confined in a ship for ten years and it does seem like a ST:TNG and DS9 holodeck ripoff. However; RSH mentions the &#8220;Q&#8221;, perhaps this could happen&#8230;..</p>
<p>Q could introduce the crew to a lethal human like killing machine much in the way he did with exposing Picard et al to the &#8220;Borg&#8221;. With a simple wave of his hand to punish humanity a sphere forms melting everything in it&#8217;s path.</p>
<p> As it subsides we see a crouched, naked Summer Glau rise and the only way for the crew to live is to run endlessly through adventure after adventure, jumping from one holodeck sequence to the next being chased all across the holodeck universe by Jameron! I know you are all over that!</p>
<p>But then again, FOX is too stupid to know a good show when they see one ha?</p>
<p>~Lanie~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101049</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101049</guid>
		<description>Lanie, &quot;God I love the haters, ok, here for the mentally deficient that need my comments written in crayon.&quot;

--And that still wouldn&#039;t deter that you need some reading comprehension, plus a better attitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lanie, &#8220;God I love the haters, ok, here for the mentally deficient that need my comments written in crayon.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;And that still wouldn&#8217;t deter that you need some reading comprehension, plus a better attitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Seidman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/06/29/virtuality-canceled/21583#comment-101045</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=21583#comment-101045</guid>
		<description>LOL.

I was going to go with &quot;bitchy little girls&quot; out of homage to Burn Notice (&quot;you know spies are a bunch of bitchy little girls&quot;) but I didn&#039;t want to disparage the little girls.

And for the record, official scoring is still less than one hand!  A couple of those instances were not attributed to me (one was a Gossip Girl Episode name and one was a direct quote of a line of dialogue from LOST).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.</p>
<p>I was going to go with &#8220;bitchy little girls&#8221; out of homage to Burn Notice (&#8221;you know spies are a bunch of bitchy little girls&#8221;) but I didn&#8217;t want to disparage the little girls.</p>
<p>And for the record, official scoring is still less than one hand!  A couple of those instances were not attributed to me (one was a Gossip Girl Episode name and one was a direct quote of a line of dialogue from LOST).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
