<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nickelodeon’s ICARLY is Basic Cable’s Number-One Kids’ Show With Total Viewers for Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:43:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805#comment-104166</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22805#comment-104166</guid>
		<description>I have to admit ICarly doesn&#039;t always make my laugh the same way Hannah Montana does but for some reason I&#039;m more attached to the IC characters. Could care less about the other Disney or Nick shows however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit ICarly doesn&#8217;t always make my laugh the same way Hannah Montana does but for some reason I&#8217;m more attached to the IC characters. Could care less about the other Disney or Nick shows however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805#comment-103678</link>
		<dc:creator>sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22805#comment-103678</guid>
		<description>heyy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heyy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delsy</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805#comment-103329</link>
		<dc:creator>Delsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22805#comment-103329</guid>
		<description>i like iCarly but the quailty of the show. Is NOT the same as some on disney there are better Nick shows. Ratings are not always the best thing to have. Thats the reason why Hannah Monatna is worth a Billione dollers and iCarly is barly worth 6million dollors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like iCarly but the quailty of the show. Is NOT the same as some on disney there are better Nick shows. Ratings are not always the best thing to have. Thats the reason why Hannah Monatna is worth a Billione dollers and iCarly is barly worth 6million dollors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disney gal</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805#comment-103218</link>
		<dc:creator>disney gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22805#comment-103218</guid>
		<description>i think there is other shows on tv for kids and teens that are better than stupid icarly!!!!!!

that show is horriable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think there is other shows on tv for kids and teens that are better than stupid icarly!!!!!!</p>
<p>that show is horriable!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTH DISNEY?</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805#comment-103156</link>
		<dc:creator>WTH DISNEY?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22805#comment-103156</guid>
		<description>The only reason iCarly is #1 for the half of 2009 is because Disney made a bold and dumb decision by not airing episodes of The Suite Life on Deck which as I recalled beat ALL of these shows in the ratings and was #1 for September 2008 to May 2009. Disney then decided not to air new episodes of the series and let their news makers, Sonny with a Chance and JONAS become their top new priority. I hope that Disney has learned it&#039;s lesson. SLOD was the only reason Disney was on top, without the channel doesn&#039;t have strong stable ratings. Just because the stars of On Deck do not make and do not receive as much media attention and promotion as the stars of JONAS, Sonny and Wizards means NOTHING! The SLOD cast is sensation and Disney still doesn&#039;t have a clue.. that is exactly why they barely promote SLOD. SCREW DISNEY! Based on SLOD&#039;s ratings for the past months, it is a mega smash hit! AIR MORE EPISODES OF SLOD AND STOP PROMOTING THE LOWEST RATED SHOWS ON TV!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason iCarly is #1 for the half of 2009 is because Disney made a bold and dumb decision by not airing episodes of The Suite Life on Deck which as I recalled beat ALL of these shows in the ratings and was #1 for September 2008 to May 2009. Disney then decided not to air new episodes of the series and let their news makers, Sonny with a Chance and JONAS become their top new priority. I hope that Disney has learned it&#8217;s lesson. SLOD was the only reason Disney was on top, without the channel doesn&#8217;t have strong stable ratings. Just because the stars of On Deck do not make and do not receive as much media attention and promotion as the stars of JONAS, Sonny and Wizards means NOTHING! The SLOD cast is sensation and Disney still doesn&#8217;t have a clue.. that is exactly why they barely promote SLOD. SCREW DISNEY! Based on SLOD&#8217;s ratings for the past months, it is a mega smash hit! AIR MORE EPISODES OF SLOD AND STOP PROMOTING THE LOWEST RATED SHOWS ON TV!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/nickelodeon%e2%80%99s-icarly-is-basic-cable%e2%80%99s-number-one-kids%e2%80%99-show-with-total-viewers-for-week/22805#comment-102965</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22805#comment-102965</guid>
		<description>Top True Jackson VP episode, 2.779 million, Sat 8:30p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top True Jackson VP episode, 2.779 million, Sat 8:30p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
