<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday Ratings: So You Think You Can Dance Helps Fox Win Again On A Down Night</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899</link>
	<description>Nielsen TV Show Ratings, Data and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chelsea</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103546</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelsea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103546</guid>
		<description>During Charmed&#039;s first and fifth seasons averaged 5 million.  The rest averaged 4.  Charmed was a good show, they were gonna make a spin-off to premeire when The CW launched, but The CW said no to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During Charmed&#8217;s first and fifth seasons averaged 5 million.  The rest averaged 4.  Charmed was a good show, they were gonna make a spin-off to premeire when The CW launched, but The CW said no to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103538</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103538</guid>
		<description>I like The WB better, they should have kept Reba although I did not watch but it had like 3 million viewers on SUNDAY, most CW shows could not even reach that. They should have used that as a lead in for launching shows. I remember before during the WB days Charmed on Sundays averaged 4 million viewers, right? Now Sunday is dead. So sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like The WB better, they should have kept Reba although I did not watch but it had like 3 million viewers on SUNDAY, most CW shows could not even reach that. They should have used that as a lead in for launching shows. I remember before during the WB days Charmed on Sundays averaged 4 million viewers, right? Now Sunday is dead. So sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103534</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103534</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll always be a fan of The CW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll always be a fan of The CW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.G</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103490</link>
		<dc:creator>R.G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103490</guid>
		<description>The CW needs to target males for once, like put the pro sports or bring back Sunday schedule. They need to do that if they want to live a decade. 

Plus most teenage girls are more into watching ABC Family or ABC than the CW, those are facts. Grey&#039;s Anatomy, American Idol, and even Family Guy gets more teenage girls viewing than any CW show combined. This should alarm them somewhat.

I hear lot of NBC late night comedians make fun of the lackluster ratings of NBC, they should include the fact that they are not the CW in one of those jokes next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW needs to target males for once, like put the pro sports or bring back Sunday schedule. They need to do that if they want to live a decade. </p>
<p>Plus most teenage girls are more into watching ABC Family or ABC than the CW, those are facts. Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, American Idol, and even Family Guy gets more teenage girls viewing than any CW show combined. This should alarm them somewhat.</p>
<p>I hear lot of NBC late night comedians make fun of the lackluster ratings of NBC, they should include the fact that they are not the CW in one of those jokes next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103469</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 22:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103469</guid>
		<description>Dawn also cares about Tuesdays with putting 90210 and Melrose Place together like it was in the 90s on FOX. I hope Melrose Place does well even though 90210 doesnt get that great of numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn also cares about Tuesdays with putting 90210 and Melrose Place together like it was in the 90s on FOX. I hope Melrose Place does well even though 90210 doesnt get that great of numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103463</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 21:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103463</guid>
		<description>I think Dawn is starting to care about Thursdays now that the Vampire Diaries will be on, but thats about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Dawn is starting to care about Thursdays now that the Vampire Diaries will be on, but thats about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103448</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103448</guid>
		<description>RM/89, &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/01/the-cw-to-change-name-to-the-m-w/15244&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;We joke that all the CW cares about is Monday-Wednesday&lt;/a&gt;, but they have to care about Thursday too, it&#039;s just that Dawn can&#039;t take credit for last season&#039;s Thursday shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RM/89, <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/04/01/the-cw-to-change-name-to-the-m-w/15244" rel="nofollow">We joke that all the CW cares about is Monday-Wednesday</a>, but they have to care about Thursday too, it&#8217;s just that Dawn can&#8217;t take credit for last season&#8217;s Thursday shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM/89</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103445</link>
		<dc:creator>RM/89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103445</guid>
		<description>&quot;CW is so pathetic. Repeating a reality show? They should just throw some reruns of Buffy or something.&quot;

CW strictly programs shows from (C)BS/paramount and (W)arner bros. Buffy and Angel are from 20thFox, but I think WB struck a deal with 20thFox or something because they air both shows on WB.com.  

Reba was also produced by 20th, which is why it was cancelled (even with outrageously good ratings at 7:30 on a sunday, 13-episode order, and had to pay like $20m for the 31 episodes WB network ordered but was terminated cuz of the cancellation). 

Reaper is produced by ABC studios. Forget Dawson&#039;s Creek (Sony) or anything like that.

Something I don&#039;t get is that if its core focus is on Mon-Wed, then what the hell is a sappy tween vampire show doing on a thursday. Dawn knows it doesn&#039;t work for just any show right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CW is so pathetic. Repeating a reality show? They should just throw some reruns of Buffy or something.&#8221;</p>
<p>CW strictly programs shows from (C)BS/paramount and (W)arner bros. Buffy and Angel are from 20thFox, but I think WB struck a deal with 20thFox or something because they air both shows on WB.com.  </p>
<p>Reba was also produced by 20th, which is why it was cancelled (even with outrageously good ratings at 7:30 on a sunday, 13-episode order, and had to pay like $20m for the 31 episodes WB network ordered but was terminated cuz of the cancellation). </p>
<p>Reaper is produced by ABC studios. Forget Dawson&#8217;s Creek (Sony) or anything like that.</p>
<p>Something I don&#8217;t get is that if its core focus is on Mon-Wed, then what the hell is a sappy tween vampire show doing on a thursday. Dawn knows it doesn&#8217;t work for just any show right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103421</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103421</guid>
		<description>Nothing good on last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing good on last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103418</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103418</guid>
		<description>Ratings-wise ( and ONLY ratings wise,) you have to give Wipeout and Talent credit. I thought two years ago SYTYCD was a good idea as far as reality shows go, but it doesn&#039;t seem to be gaining any ground at all. Saw Talent once for as long as it took to spew out a few curse words and change the channel - oh well, like they say: If you don&#039;t like it, change the channel. ( To what ...?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ratings-wise ( and ONLY ratings wise,) you have to give Wipeout and Talent credit. I thought two years ago SYTYCD was a good idea as far as reality shows go, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to be gaining any ground at all. Saw Talent once for as long as it took to spew out a few curse words and change the channel &#8211; oh well, like they say: If you don&#8217;t like it, change the channel. ( To what &#8230;?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103404</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103404</guid>
		<description>gmyers, it does, those 5 min of Wipeout viewing are in the 9pm Japanese Game show numbers. They get removed in the final numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gmyers, it does, those 5 min of Wipeout viewing are in the 9pm Japanese Game show numbers. They get removed in the final numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmyers</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103388</link>
		<dc:creator>gmyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103388</guid>
		<description>Wipeout did not end until 9:05 last night. Doesn&#039;t that effect things with Japanese Game show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wipeout did not end until 9:05 last night. Doesn&#8217;t that effect things with Japanese Game show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103383</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103383</guid>
		<description>What about Sir Paul on Letterman last night? Any scoop on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Sir Paul on Letterman last night? Any scoop on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The1337</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103381</link>
		<dc:creator>The1337</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103381</guid>
		<description>CW is so pathetic. Repeating a reality show? They should just throw some reruns of Buffy or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CW is so pathetic. Repeating a reality show? They should just throw some reruns of Buffy or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103380</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103380</guid>
		<description>Glad to see Japanese Game show improving.  It&#039;s a real hoot with lots of heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see Japanese Game show improving.  It&#8217;s a real hoot with lots of heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jocor</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103377</link>
		<dc:creator>jocor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103377</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll tell you why the ratings were down.

Because I lost power at my house and missed So You Think You Can Dance.

(Outrage.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you why the ratings were down.</p>
<p>Because I lost power at my house and missed So You Think You Can Dance.</p>
<p>(Outrage.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R.J.</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103375</link>
		<dc:creator>R.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103375</guid>
		<description>The CW network is rely suffering in the ratings this summer. When it was still the WB, it was great in the ratings from what i remembered and never performed as bad as The CW Network is know. I think that networks needs to target more viewers than just teenage girls because that is all who is basically watching that network, Silly teenage girls. At least the WB was like a standard network that actually gave the other networks some competition most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW network is rely suffering in the ratings this summer. When it was still the WB, it was great in the ratings from what i remembered and never performed as bad as The CW Network is know. I think that networks needs to target more viewers than just teenage girls because that is all who is basically watching that network, Silly teenage girls. At least the WB was like a standard network that actually gave the other networks some competition most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103369</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103369</guid>
		<description>rob, indeed you are, indeed you are. Although that was a difference between our two data sources which tend to round differently, it&#039;s fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rob, indeed you are, indeed you are. Although that was a difference between our two data sources which tend to round differently, it&#8217;s fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103368</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103368</guid>
		<description>and the philanthropist got a 1.2? you said 1.1

haha im catching all ur mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the philanthropist got a 1.2? you said 1.1</p>
<p>haha im catching all ur mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103364</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103364</guid>
		<description>rob, thanks for the catch. The error was the 3.6 typo for Wipeout in the table. Now fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rob, thanks for the catch. The error was the 3.6 typo for Wipeout in the table. Now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gorman</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103361</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103361</guid>
		<description>Anon, I did have that info in our Syndicated Ratings post

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/syndicated-ratings-entertainment-tonight-up-21-vs-last-year-as-jackson-boost-for-magazine-shows-continued/22843

And I was conflicted on what to headline, the Oprah fall or the Magazine boost from the Jackson stuff. I went with the Jackson stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, I did have that info in our Syndicated Ratings post</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/syndicated-ratings-entertainment-tonight-up-21-vs-last-year-as-jackson-boost-for-magazine-shows-continued/22843" rel="nofollow">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/14/syndicated-ratings-entertainment-tonight-up-21-vs-last-year-as-jackson-boost-for-magazine-shows-continued/22843</a></p>
<p>And I was conflicted on what to headline, the Oprah fall or the Magazine boost from the Jackson stuff. I went with the Jackson stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103360</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103360</guid>
		<description>you said wipeout is down to a 2.6 but it says wipeout got a 3.6. which is right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you said wipeout is down to a 2.6 but it says wipeout got a 3.6. which is right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/07/16/wednesday-ratings-so-you-think-you-can-dance-wins-again-for-fox-on-a-down-night/22899#comment-103357</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/?p=22899#comment-103357</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you guys find this worthy of posting, but apparently Oprah hit an all-time low in ratings last week

http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/Dayparts_update_51/Ratings_hit_an_all-time_low_for_Oprah.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you guys find this worthy of posting, but apparently Oprah hit an all-time low in ratings last week</p>
<p><a href="http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/Dayparts_update_51/Ratings_hit_an_all-time_low_for_Oprah.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/Dayparts_update_51/Ratings_hit_an_all-time_low_for_Oprah.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
