Although at a reported $90,000 a second, I think Super Bowl ads are more an exercise in corporate vanity than effective marketing spending, this one was my favorite:
Although, the Thanksgiving Parade Coke spot was also clever.
Posted on 04 February 2008 by Bill Gorman
Although at a reported $90,000 a second, I think Super Bowl ads are more an exercise in corporate vanity than effective marketing spending, this one was my favorite:
Although, the Thanksgiving Parade Coke spot was also clever.
Posted on 27 November 2007 by Bill Gorman
Reuters is reporting that NBC Universal has agreed to use ratings data and other advertising products from TiVo Inc.
Let’s examine the announced portions of the agreement:
Read the full story
Posted on 17 October 2007 by Bill Gorman
In all the news about the new C+3 commercial ratings, it seems like most writers have focused on the “nothing new” theme. The NYTimes TV blog even ran with the title “People Do Watch Commercials“.
Not if they’re watching shows on their DVR they don’t.
The story that everybody seemed to overlook is that we finally have statistical proof that DVR viewers are completely lost to advertisers.
If we look at the numbers, for many shows, effectively no one who watches a show timeshifted watches the commercials.
Let’s use Grey’s Anatomy as an example, for the week of Sept. 24-30:
Read the full story
Posted on 16 October 2007 by Robert Seidman

Advertising Age is reporting on the C+3 commercial viewer ratings for the week of 9/24-9/30 - the first week of the new season where results have been made available. While the overall average drop was only 3% from shows to commercials (a smaller difference than I would have thought), Live+3 show ratings on average were about 16% higher than the C+3 commercial ratings among adults 18-49.
Broadcast Commercial Live+3 Ranking for Sept. 24-Sept. 30:
Read the full story
Posted on 09 October 2007 by Robert Seidman
Business as Usual: Disagreeing with Gorman

I’m jumping over to the dark side and siding with Les Moonves and other TV Network wonks on the effectiveness of ads on the DVR.
Gorman and I are both vastly geeky users when it comes to DVR usage and have reprogrammed a button on our DVR remotes to skip over commercials 30 seconds at a time. This, I believe, is not the case for a vast majority of DVR users who mostly do see the commercials at an accelerated pace via fast-forwarding.
Read the full story
Posted on 08 October 2007 by Bill Gorman


Robert posted on the subject yesterday, but a host of TV journalists have weighed in since then about the “turmoil” the new C+3 ratings is going to cause and I wanted to comment on the upcoming changes as well.
Many concerns have been voiced:
Read the full story
Posted on 07 October 2007 by Robert Seidman
New C+3 commercial ratings to debut with season premiere DVR tallies

The week of October 15th is going to keep the spinmeisters busy. In fact, we’re already seeing some pre-spin, and anti-spin.
“What we saw last week is what we saw last week,” says scheduling maven at Fox Preston Beckman in a story by Variety.. “Nothing is going to change that will radically shift a network’s perceptions of a show.”
Read the full story
Posted on 01 October 2007 by Robert Seidman

Your momma is so old she watches CSI instead of Grey’s Anatomy? I’m trying to learn what advertisers value. Earlier I questioned the difference in pricing for a 30 second spot on Grey’s Anatomy vs. CSI: $419K vs. $248K according to the Fall season Advertising Age survey. I speculated that the price differential probably wasn’t completely based on the 18-49 category because there was only about a 9% difference there, and the premium is significantly higher than 9%.
I went digging around and found this ABC press release issued last Friday which played up that Grey’s had a 43% ratings advantage among adults aged 18-34, where Grey’s had 9.0 rating w/23 share. Among women 18-34 Grey’s pulled a stellar 13.4 rating and a 30 share (of women 18-34 with their TV’s turned on, 30% of them were tuned into Grey’s).
I’m guessing that it’s these metrics that are justifying the premium. As a % of the Grey’s pricing the difference of 171K between the cost for the two shows is about 40%. I can see where advertisers would value the 18-34 segment on a “they’re still young and can hopefully be influenced by us” basis. If that’s the case, from that perspective the premium doesn’t seem that outrageous. Although CSI had 20% more viewers, they were older.
Nielsen’s estimates for this season include a total of about 67m people in the 18-34 category and around 131m in the 18-49 group Each segment is fairly evenly split between males and females. While the 18-49 demo is surely important, it would appear that the 18-34 demo is more important. Sadly, we do not receive weekly information from Nielsen breaking out that demo, but we’ll look for the press releases.