<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TVbytheNumbers</title>
	<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for TV Show Ratings Info and More</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 06:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Renew, Cancel and Series Pickup Recap</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/weekend-renew-cancel-and-series-pickup-recap/3719</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/weekend-renew-cancel-and-series-pickup-recap/3719#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/weekend-renew-cancel-and-series-pickup-recap/3719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Ahead of the upfront presentations this week there were several announcements over the weekend regarding shows being renewed or cancelled and new series pickups. My link list had so many stories on it this weekend that nothing lasted long, so here&#8217;s a brief recap:
Adds/Renews:

90210 (CW)
Stylista(CW)
How To Teach Filthy Rich Girls (Maybe)(CW)
Reaper (CW)
Boston Legal (ABC)
Life on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/logod.jpg" alt="logod.jpg" /></p>
<p>Ahead of the upfront presentations this week there were several announcements over the weekend regarding shows being renewed or cancelled and new series pickups. My link list had so many stories on it this weekend that nothing lasted long, so here&#8217;s a brief recap:</p>
<p><strong>Adds/Renews</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/05/cw_sets_new_banks_project_for.php"><em>90210</em></a> (CW)</li>
<li><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cw-adds-more-tyra-and-filthy-rich-girls/3716"><em>Stylista</em></a>(CW)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/05/cw_sets_new_banks_project_for.php"><em>How To Teach Filthy Rich Girls</em></a> (Maybe)(CW)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/detail/index.jsp?uuid=3e2da30e-4fd7-4cd8-ac33-0370465623b7&amp;sid=rss_kristin&amp;utm_source=eonline&amp;utm_medium=rssfeeds&amp;utm_campaign=rss_kristin"><em>Reaper</em></a><em> </em>(CW)</li>
<li><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/boston-legal-picked-up-for-season-5/3713"><em>Boston Legal</em></a> (ABC)</li>
<li><em><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117985482.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562" target="_blank">Life on Mars</a> </em>(ABC)</li>
<li><em><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117985482.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562" target="_blank">Opportunity Knocks</a> </em>(ABC)</li>
<li><a href="http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-News-Blog/Todays-News/Fall-Tv-Preview/800039322"><em>‘Til Death</em></a> (FOX)</li>
<li><a href="http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-News-Blog/Todays-News/Fall-Tv-Preview/800039322"><em>The Inn</em></a><em> </em>(FOX)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Drops/Cancels</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-News-Blog/Todays-News/Fall-Tv-Preview/800039322"><em>Back to You</em></a> (FOX)</li>
<li><a href="http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/Ausiello-Scoop-Fox/800039290"><em>New Amsterdam</em></a> (FOX)</li>
<li><a href="http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/Cw-Cancels-Aliens/800039306"><em>Aliens in America</em></a> (CW)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Other</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cbs-eyes-back-to-you/3715">CBS considering picking up <em>Back to You</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/weekend-renew-cancel-and-series-pickup-recap/3719/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upfront Predictions from Advertising Age</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/upfront-predictions-from-advertising-age/3718</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/upfront-predictions-from-advertising-age/3718#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/upfront-predictions-from-advertising-age/3718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Advertising Age is going way, way out on a limb (sarcasm) by predicting that this year&#8217;s upfront won&#8217;t be up over last years.  It cites the credit crisis and looming economic depression among the culprits.
It&#8217;s worth taking a look at, especially the PDF chart of &#8220;How It&#8217;ll All Shake Out&#8221;. It predicts only FOX will be up, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://adage.com/images/random/0508/Upfront%20shakeout.pdf"><img align="left" width="180" src="http://adage.com/images/random/0508/1-Upfront-shakeout.jpg" alt="AdAge Upfront Predictions" height="415" style="margin: 10px; width: 180px; height: 415px" title="AdAge Upfront Predictions" /></a></p>
<p>Advertising Age is going way, way out on a limb (sarcasm) by predicting <a target="_blank" href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=126986#">that this year&#8217;s upfront won&#8217;t be up</a> over last years.  It cites the credit crisis and looming economic depression among the culprits.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth taking a look at, especially the PDF chart of &#8220;How It&#8217;ll All Shake Out&#8221;. It predicts only FOX will be up, but only slightly versus last years estimate of $1.9 billion.  It predicts ABC will be flat, and that CBS and NBC will be slightly down.  The prediction for the CW was a bit more dire: just &#8220;down&#8221;.</p>
<p>Based on the AdAge estimates CBS was the big winner last year with $2.45 billion followed by ABC with $2.4 billion.  With ABC live plus same day ratings off 16% versus last year and a &#8220;flat&#8221; prediction either scale carries a premium or they figure they&#8217;ll push the live plus seven day ratings.</p>
<p>The biggest surprise to me was that last year FOX only marginally beat NBC in the upfronts by AdAge&#8217;s estimate: $1.9 billion to $1.8 billion.  And amazingly they have the C-Dub pulling in $1.8 billion last year which was down from the $1.9 billion in 2006. </p>
<p>That it&#8217;s even remotely possible under any circumstance that FOX only pulled in $100 million more via the upfronts last year just goes to show that I completely lack any understanding of how television advertising actually works.</p>
<p>I wonder how much of the CW upfront money ultimately went to staffing the phones for the barrage calls saying, &#8220;We want our money back!&#8221;  <strong><em>Update</em></strong>:  Commenter &#8220;Statlc&#8221; offers up a probable explanation below: the PDF chart on the left is incorrect.  He cites the article which states clearly: <em>The CW&#8217;s total is expected to decline 15% to $560 million.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/upfront-predictions-from-advertising-age/3718/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW Adds More Tyra and Filthy Rich Girls</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cw-adds-more-tyra-and-filthy-rich-girls/3716</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cw-adds-more-tyra-and-filthy-rich-girls/3716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cw-adds-more-tyra-and-filthy-rich-girls/3716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CW is reportedly adding on to America&#8217;s Next Top Model with yet another show from its star and exec producer Tyra Banks.  Word on the street is the network has decided to pick up &#8220;Stylista&#8221;, another weekly reality competition it will likely pair with Next Top Model in its lineup.  Stylista is described [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/tyra_banks.jpg" alt="Tyra Banks" style="margin: 10px; float: left" />CW is reportedly adding on to America&#8217;s Next Top Model with yet another show from its star and exec producer Tyra Banks.  Word on the street is the network has decided to pick up &#8220;Stylista&#8221;, another weekly reality competition it will likely pair with Next Top Model in its lineup.  Stylista is described as the reality TV version of The Devil Wears Prada.</p>
<p>Contestants will serve as assistants to Elle mag fashion news director and a different assitant will be eliminated each week.</p>
<p><em>Stylista </em>was original ordered as an 8 episode run for the spring and summer but apparently the CW liked it so much they&#8217;re saving it for the fall.</p>
<p>The C-dub is also reportedly considering moving forward with the soon (maybe) to be retitled &#8220;How to Teach Filthy Rich Girls&#8221; in addition to the 90210 remake.</p>
<p>TV Week reports there is some chatter about airing some summer-themed Gossip Girl episodes in July and August, but so far mum is the word from CW execs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cw-adds-more-tyra-and-filthy-rich-girls/3716/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS Eyes &#8220;Back to You&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cbs-eyes-back-to-you/3715</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cbs-eyes-back-to-you/3715#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cbs-eyes-back-to-you/3715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently it was reported that FOX was picking up ‘Til Death but taking a pass on Back to You (FOX also decided to pass on New Amsterdam).  Now TV Week is reporting that CBS is taking a look at picking up Back to You.
From a ratings perspective, Back to You did not perform much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently it was reported that FOX was picking up <em><strong>‘Til Death</strong></em> but <a href="http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-News-Blog/Todays-News/Fox-Fall-Death/800039322" target="_blank">taking a pass on <em><strong>Back to You</strong></em> </a>(FOX also decided to pass on <strong><em>New Amsterdam</em></strong>).  Now TV Week is reporting <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/05/studio_trying_to_save_back_to.php" target="_blank">that CBS is taking a look at picking up <em>Back to You</em>.</a></p>
<p>From a ratings perspective, <em>Back to You </em>did not perform much better than <em>‘Til Death</em>.  It had more viewers and households, but on an 18-49 basis both shows were tied for 104th  through the week of May 4th.  Back to You was #107 in overall household rating compared to 122 for <em>‘Til Death</em> (ironically, tied with <em><strong>Jericho</strong></em>, but alas, Jericho was 137th in the 18-49 demo).</p>
<p>But production costs for <em>Back to You</em> may be much higher, especially given its two stars, Kelsey Grammer (of <em>Cheers</em>/<em>Frasier</em> fame) and Patricia Heaton (<em><s>King of Queens</s></em> <em>Everybody Loves Raymond)</em>.   CBS has been rumored to be considering a second night of comedies, and if they stuck back to you on Monday nights following <strong><em>Two and a Half Men</em></strong> it would no doubt perform considerably better than it did on FOX.</p>
<p>TV Week reports that CBS boss Leslie Moonves has received five episodes of <em>Back to You </em>to screen, and to be honest, I&#8217;m a little surprised to find that&#8217;s falling on Moonves as opposed to CBS Entertainment president, Nina Tassler.  I imagine Ms. Tassler is less surprised than I am.</p>
<p>Update 9:25pm PDT: Here&#8217;s a Variety story from tonight that discusses <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117985481.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562" target="_blank">CBS is considering adding another comedy block</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/cbs-eyes-back-to-you/3715/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Legal Picked Up for Season 5</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/boston-legal-picked-up-for-season-5/3713</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/boston-legal-picked-up-for-season-5/3713#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/boston-legal-picked-up-for-season-5/3713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variety is reporting that ABC is indeed picking up David E. Kelley&#8217;s Boston Legal for a fifth season.  Apparently it was all tied-up in a deal with another show Life on Mars, which ABC wants to greenlight, but Kelley owns the rights to the show.  It appears Boston Legal came into the negotiations, and as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117985459.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2562"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/denny.jpg" alt="William Shatner as Denny Crane on ABC’s Boston Legal" style="float: left; margin: 8px" />Variety is reporting </a>that ABC is indeed picking up David E. Kelley&#8217;s <em><strong>Boston Legal</strong></em> for a fifth season.  Apparently it was all tied-up in a deal with another show <strong><em>Life on Mars,</em></strong> which ABC wants to greenlight, but Kelley owns the rights to the show.  It appears <em>Boston Legal </em>came into the negotiations, and as a result BL fans are getting another season of Denny Crane.</p>
<p>What exactly the deal will be with <em>Life on Mars</em> remains unclear, but if the Variety story is correct it appears Kelley will be leaving that show and October Road executive producers Josh Appelbaum, Andre Nemec and Scott Rosenberg are in line to take over as show runners.  Expect all the details to pour in througout the week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/boston-legal-picked-up-for-season-5/3713/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Ratings May 10, 2008: More Love NASCAR Than Lebron</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/nielsen-ratings-may-10-2008-more-love-nascar-than-lebron/3712</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/nielsen-ratings-may-10-2008-more-love-nascar-than-lebron/3712#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Overnight TV Show Ratings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/nielsen-ratings-may-10-2008-more-love-nascar-than-lebron/3712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

	
	
		Scoreboard for Sat. May 10, 2008
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
		Total Viewers (million)
		7.67
		5.80
		4.53
		4.05
	
	
		Rating/Share: Adults 18-49
		2.6/8
		1.3/5
		1.6/6
		1.0/3
	

 Happy Mother&#8217;s Day to all you moms!  About the only good news I can give you as far as this overnight recap goes is thank goodness there will be some better TV on tonight!
NASCAR did outshine the NBA.  But then again, a rerun of CSI: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<table class="wptable rowstyle-alt" id="wptable-1269" >
	<thead>
	<tr>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:220px" align="left">Scoreboard for Sat. May 10, 2008</th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/fox.gif" alt="FOX" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cbs.gif" alt="CBS" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/abc.gif" alt="ABC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/nbc.gif" alt="NBC" /></th>
	</tr>
	</thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Total Viewers (million)</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">7.67</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">5.80</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">4.53</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">4.05</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Rating/Share: Adults 18-49</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.6/8</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">1.3/5</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">1.6/6</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">1.0/3</td>
	</tr>
</table><p>
 Happy Mother&#8217;s Day to all you moms!  About the only good news I can give you as far as this overnight recap goes is thank goodness there will be some better TV on tonight!</p>
<p>NASCAR did outshine the NBA.  But then again, a rerun of <strong><em>CSI: Miami</em></strong> may well have for all I know.  I didn&#8217;t see the hourly data for the Boston Celtics vs. the Cleveland Cavaliers game, but for the night it averaged 4.54 million and a 1.6/6  (rating/share) in the 18-49 demographic vs. 7.67m and a 2.6/9 for NASCAR.  That&#8217;s kind of a beatdown.</p>
<p>Lebron James and Kevin Garnett?  Nobody seems to care.  Lebron is no Michael Jordon when it comes to Nielsen ratings and lately, not on the court either.  Though Cleveland won easily, Lebron again didn&#8217;t have a great night.  But I&#8217;m not here to pick on Lebron, hopefully he&#8217;s worth his Nike contract because he&#8217;s selling a lot of shoes.  He&#8217;s not bringing eyeballs to the television though and it appears that Kobe Bryant is the bigger TV star in the NBA.  </p>
<p>Caveats: yes, I know the game was a blowout early - I stopped watching after the first quarter myself.  But I don&#8217;t want to hear any whining about how NASCAR is only on once a week and we&#8217;d need to add up all the NBA games collectively to make any kind of comparison.  No we don&#8217;t.  More people watched NASCAR and significantly more in the 18-49 demo.  <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/18/sunday-night-football-ratings/1822">Sunday Night Football </a>usually aired after FOURTEEN OTHER GAMES HAD BEEN PLAYED and still could pull in 11 million for its worst matchup and almost 22 for its best non playoff matchup.</p>
<p>At this point it&#8217;s fairly easy to declare NASCAR the better TV sport if a &#8220;who cares&#8221; no big deal race early in the season draws more viewers than an NBA playoff game.  It could be that aside from the NBA finals, nobody cares.  While I found the second half of the NBA regular season to be very exciting, so far the playoffs have been mostly kind of dull.  Suns vs. Spurs had some exciting games, and Chris Paul of the Hornets has been amazing, but otherwise mostly blah.</p>
<p>For now, Lebron is definitely no MJ.  In fact, he&#8217;s not even close to Tiger Woods from a Nielsen ratings perspective.  Speaking of Tiger, he was in the stands for the Detroit Pistons vs. Orlando Magic game in Orlando that aired earlier in the day to watch his Magic rally, take the lead and then still wind up losing by one at the end.  That game was at least exciting, but the problem for the NBA is that most people couldn&#8217;t name one player on either team, let alone one player on both.  And OK, so more people watched Celtics vs. Cavs than <em><strong>Friday Night Smackdown! </strong></em> But Smackdown is taped.  More people watched <em><strong>WWE RAW</strong></em> than Celtics/Cavs.  While last week, <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/top-sports-shows-april-28-may-4-kentucky-derby/3699">a game featuring Kobe on ABC did beat out WWE RAW, it didn&#8217;t beat NASCAR</a>. </p>
<p>Sorry for the sports rant, but there just wasn&#8217;t much to say about the night.  See for yourself: <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/nielsen-ratings-may-10-2008-more-love-nascar-than-lebron/3712#more-3712" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/11/nielsen-ratings-may-10-2008-more-love-nascar-than-lebron/3712/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CW: What Will It Do With Fridays After Smackdown?</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/the-cw-what-will-it-do-with-fridays-after-smackdown/3711</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/the-cw-what-will-it-do-with-fridays-after-smackdown/3711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/the-cw-what-will-it-do-with-fridays-after-smackdown/3711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s overnight report for Friday night I pondered what will happen in the fall for CW Friday nights as they let Friday Night Smackdown! get away to MyNetTV.  Will the CW take its worst performing shows and stick them in the vast Friday night wasteland? Or will it stick the worst performers on Thursday, when there is more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/cw.gif" alt="cw.gif" style="float: left; margin: 8px" />In today&#8217;s <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-9-cbs-wins-moonlight-still-on-the-bubble/3709">overnight report for Friday night </a>I pondered what will happen in the fall for CW Friday nights as they let <strong><em>Friday Night Smackdown!</em></strong> get away to MyNetTV.  Will the CW take its worst performing shows and stick them in the vast Friday night wasteland? Or will it stick the worst performers on Thursday, when there is more competition and try to actually eke out some sort of Friday night success?  Especially with CW <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cw-gives-up-on-sunday-night/3690">abandoning programming on Sunday nights </a>and only programming primetime Mon-Fri, it becomes easier to concentrate the worst performing shows on one night.</p>
<p>I believe <strong>the more likely scenario is sticking the worst performers in the Friday night wasteland</strong>.  Why?  Well, even though Friday night has less competition, I think no matter what happens the perception is that advertising pays better on Thursdays even when the shows are regularly drawing under three million. </p>
<p>Weekend movies are generally released on Fridays and the studios want to get ahead of the game by promoting them right before the weekend starts.  The movie studios don&#8217;t want you home on Friday nights watching your favorite programs on TV or on DVR. They want you at the movie theaters!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a conspiracy theorist, but if I was I would wonder if the movie studios aren&#8217;t subsidizing the TV networks (especially when they&#8217;re both owned by the same company) so that they deliberately won&#8217;t program high quality programming for Friday or Saturday nights.  I think such a theory is a stretch, but when you consider the programming that&#8217;s actually <strong><em>on</em></strong> Friday and Saturday nights exactly just  how much of a stretch is hard to figure.  But either way we&#8217;ll find out the C-dub&#8217;s plans next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/the-cw-what-will-it-do-with-fridays-after-smackdown/3711/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gossip Girl&#8217;s Blake Lively, Live on the Streets</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/gossip-girls-blake-lively-live-on-the-streets/3710</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/gossip-girls-blake-lively-live-on-the-streets/3710#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/gossip-girls-blake-lively-live-on-the-streets/3710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran across this video because of Social Networking aggregator FriendFeed.  It&#8217;s not all Robert Scoble, Louis Gray and Jason Calacanis (granted, most of you have never heard of these people!) , but via someone I don&#8217;t know named Alejandro I saw a link to this video, Gossip Girl&#8217;s Blake Lively, live and on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran across this video because of Social Networking aggregator <a target="_blank" href="http://www.friendfeed.com">FriendFeed</a>.  It&#8217;s not all Robert Scoble, Louis Gray and Jason Calacanis (granted, most of you have never heard of these people!) , but via someone I don&#8217;t know named Alejandro I saw a link to this video, <strong><em>Gossip Girl&#8217;s</em></strong> Blake Lively, live and on the streets. </p>
<p>Though you can never go wrong with dogs and babies - not if you&#8217;re running for President anyway, I&#8217;m not sure what it means in terms of Nielsen ratings, (OK, actually I am sure - it means absolutely nothing) but I noted the gaggle of young girls who asked nicely for her autograph along with all the people taking cell phone pictures of her at the end as she was leaving. </p>
<p align="center"><embed wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sx_GDYLQqn4&amp;hl=en"></embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/gossip-girls-blake-lively-live-on-the-streets/3710/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Ratings Friday May 9: CBS Wins, Moonlight Still on the Bubble</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-9-cbs-wins-moonlight-still-on-the-bubble/3709</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-9-cbs-wins-moonlight-still-on-the-bubble/3709#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Overnight TV Show Ratings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-9-cbs-wins-moonlight-still-on-the-bubble/3709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

	
	
		Scoreboard for Fri. May 9, 2008
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
		Total Viewers (million)
		8.52
		6.42
		5.38
		4.12
		3.39
	
	
		Rating/Share: Adults 18-49
		2.0/7
		1.7/6
		1.4/5
		1.3/5
		1.1/4
	

CBS won another May sweeps Friday night, but you know when the CW is consistently beating FOX on a Friday night, that it&#8217;s a night the networks hardly care about.  It will be very, very interesting to see how the CW programs Friday nights in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<table class="wptable rowstyle-alt" id="wptable-1267" >
	<thead>
	<tr>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:220px" align="left">Scoreboard for Fri. May 9, 2008</th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cbs.gif" alt="CBS" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/abc.gif" alt="ABC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/nbc.gif" alt="NBC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cw.gif" alt="CW" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" ><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/fox.gif" alt="FOX" /></th>
	</tr>
	</thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Total Viewers (million)</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">8.52</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">6.42</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">5.38</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">4.12</td>
		<td style="width:30px" >3.39</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Rating/Share: Adults 18-49</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.0/7</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">1.7/6</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">1.4/5</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">1.3/5</td>
		<td style="width:30px" >1.1/4</td>
	</tr>
</table><p>
CBS won another May sweeps Friday night, but you know when the CW is consistently beating FOX on a Friday night, that it&#8217;s a night the networks hardly care about.  It will be very, very interesting to see how the CW programs Friday nights in the fall when it will no long have <strong><em>Friday Night Smackdown!</em></strong>.  Now that the CW will be programming neither Saturday nor Sunday nights starting in the fall, coupled with the absence of Smackdown they have some difficult choices to make. </p>
<p>Will the CW stick all their worst performing programming on the vast Friday night wasteland, or will they stick those shows on Thursday against very difficult competition and move shows like Supernatural to Friday - a night with fewer viewers, but also less competition?  We&#8217;ll find out next week.</p>
<p>The big difference between last night and the <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/03/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-2-2008-cbs-and-moonlight-are-consistent/3602">prior Friday</a> was that ABC ran with a clips show this week TV&#8217;s <strong><em>All-Time Funniest</em></strong> and although it was by no means stellar with 6.5 million and a 1.6/6, they got a lot better performance out of it than <strong><em>Duel</em></strong>.  Also, <strong><em>20/20</em></strong> fared a lot better at 10pm than it did last week.</p>
<p>CBS obviously lost a few viewers I&#8217;d speculate they went to the clips show on ABC and stuck with <strong><em>20/20</em></strong>, but it&#8217;s but speculation.  Either way all CBS shows were down over last week.  And although <strong><em>Moonlight</em></strong> lost a little more than two hundred thousand viewers (the least of any CBS show week over week) with 7.68 million, it&#8217;s 1.9/6 performance is concerning for a show on the bubble. <strong><em>Ghost Whisperer</em></strong> was down about half a million viewers with 8.74m, and <strong><em>Numb3rs</em></strong> was down over a million viewers with 9.13m.</p>
<p>Although <em>Moonlight</em> still won its time slot, even in the demo.  I think had this been last year, CBS would <strong><u>definitely</u></strong> cancel <em>Moonlight</em>, just as it did <strong><em>Close to Home</em></strong> last year.  Weighing at least slightly in <em>Moonlight&#8217;s</em> favor is that this <strong><u>isn&#8217;t</u></strong> last year. The landscape has changed a little bit as seemingly most networks have completely thrown in the towel (can you say repeats of Most Outrageous Moments, even in May Sweeps!?) as far as Friday nights.  If the margins on <em>Moonlight</em> are right (AKA it doesn&#8217;t cost much to make), it could be a keeper in the current Friday night landscape. </p>
<p>We won&#8217;t  have to wait long to find out, you&#8217;ll know by the finale next Friday whether it&#8217;s the season finale or the series finale.  </p>
<p>See Friday night&#8217;s details: <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-9-cbs-wins-moonlight-still-on-the-bubble/3709#more-3709" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/nielsen-ratings-friday-may-9-cbs-wins-moonlight-still-on-the-bubble/3709/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moonlight Results</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/moonlight-results/3708</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/moonlight-results/3708#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 17:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/moonlight-results/3708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t seen last night&#8217;s viewer numbers yet, but Zap2it is reporting that Moonlight pulled a 5.0/9 (rating/share) which is very consistent with the last couple of weeks.
I&#8217;ll post the viewer numbers later in the normal overnight post, assuming I ever see them.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen last night&#8217;s viewer numbers yet, but <a target="_blank" href="http://www.zap2it.com/tv/ratings/zap-ratings-050908,0,7245680.story">Zap2it is reporting </a>that Moonlight pulled a 5.0/9 (rating/share) which is <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/11/18/moonlight-ratings-2007-2008/1820">very consistent </a>with the last couple of weeks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post the viewer numbers later in the normal overnight post, assuming I ever see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/moonlight-results/3708/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Look Back At The Top TV Shows of 1977</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1977/3697</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1977/3697#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 08:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Year's Top TV Shows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1977/3697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1977: ABC broadcasts the ratings record breaking miniseries Roots. Bill Murray joins the cast of Saturday Night Live.
Notable TV premieres of the year: Eight is Enough (ABC), Three&#8217;s Company (ABC), CHiPs (NBC), Lou Grant (CBS), The Love Boat (ABC). Notable TV finales of the year: Sanford and Son, Mary Tyler Moore, McCloud, McMillian and Wife, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/happy-days.jpg" alt="happy-days.jpg" style="margin: 8px; float: left" height="117" width="165" /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_in_television"><strong>1977</strong>:</a> ABC broadcasts the ratings record breaking miniseries <em><strong>Roots</strong></em>. Bill Murray joins the cast of <em><strong>Saturday Night Live</strong></em>.</p>
<p>Notable TV premieres of the year: <strong><span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"></span></strong><span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"></span><strong><span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span">Eight is Enough</span></strong> (ABC), <em><strong>Three&#8217;s Company</strong></em> (ABC), <em><strong>CHiPs</strong></em> (NBC), <em><strong>Lou Grant </strong></em>(CBS), <strong><em>The Love Boat</em><span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"> </span></strong><span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span">(ABC)</span>. Notable TV finales of the year: <em><strong>Sanford and Son, Mary Tyler Moore, McCloud, McMillian and Wife, Space:1999 </strong></em>and<em><strong> Emergency!</strong><strong>.</strong></em></p>
<p>And these were the top 20 shows of 1976-77: <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1977/3697#more-3697" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/10/we-look-back-at-the-top-tv-shows-of-1977/3697/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC&#8217;s Jeff Zucker Speaks</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nbcs-jeff-zucker-speaks/3707</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nbcs-jeff-zucker-speaks/3707#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nbcs-jeff-zucker-speaks/3707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TV Week published  a longish interview with NBC chief Jeff Zucker today.  Kudos to TV Week for not lobbing Zucker complete softballs.  I found the  whole interview interesting from his use of the word ‘panoply&#8216; to saying NBC only looks at 18-49 performance to saying they don&#8217;t focus on ratings and it&#8217;s not because there&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/zuck.jpg" alt="Jeff Zucker" style="float: left; margin: 10px" />TV Week <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/05/upfront_qa_zucker_on_going_fir.php">published  a longish interview with NBC chief Jeff Zucker</a> today.  Kudos to TV Week for not lobbing Zucker complete softballs.  I found the  whole interview interesting from his use of the word ‘<a target="_blank" href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/panoply">panoply</a>&#8216; to saying NBC only looks at 18-49 performance to saying they don&#8217;t focus on ratings and it&#8217;s not because there&#8217;s no outsized hit but because the difference between being 1st and 4th is incredibly minimal. </p>
<p>While we can wonder if the difference is all that minimal when you actually <strong><em>have</em></strong> an outsized hit (ask FOX, even with a waning Idol), but Zucker is probably correct for most timeslots.  Then again it&#8217;s pretty clear that NBC generates less TV advertising revenue from its broadcast network during primetime than CBS, FOX or ABC. But Zucker&#8217;s comments about managing margins by putting on shows that are less expensive to make a lot of sense.   Based on NBC&#8217;s 2008-2009 schedule it certainly does not appear NBC is motivated towards finding any out-sized hits.</p>
<p>I recommend clicking the link above and reading the full interview, but here&#8217;s a snippet on selling the Super Bowl ads at a 10% premium vs. last year:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>TVWeek: </strong>A 10% starting price increase to $3 million for a Super Bowl spot? How was that decided? And how much do you think the last-minute spots will go for?<br />
<strong>Mr. Zucker: </strong>I&#8217;m not going to suggest-I don&#8217;t know what the last spots will go for. Look, it is clear the Super Bowl is the preeminent program in all forms of popular culture, and the advertising prices are set according to what the market will bear. It&#8217;s clear that there&#8217;s nothing anywhere in the same league with the Super Bowl, and that&#8217;s how the rates get set.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The 10% increase isn&#8217;t very surprising (arbitrary perhaps, but not surprising) but it comes on the heels of the most-watched Super Bowl <em><strong>ever</strong></em>!  A feat that will be particularly hard to pull off in consecutive years, unless against all odds, one of the participants is again 18-0 going into the final game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nbcs-jeff-zucker-speaks/3707/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Reilly vs. Olbermann Through Thursday, May 8</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-may-8/3693</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-may-8/3693#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[OReillyvsOlbermann]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-may-8/3693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 Long Term Trend of O&#8217;Reilly vs. Olbermann TV Ratings:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/050808oreillyolbermannweek.thumbnail.gif" alt="050808oreillyolbermannweek.gif" /></p>
<p align="left"><strong> Long Term Trend of O&#8217;Reilly vs. Olbermann TV Ratings:</strong></p>
<p> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-may-8/3693#more-3693" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/oreilly-vs-olbermann-through-thursday-may-8/3693/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cable News Ratings for Thursday, May 8</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-may-8/3704</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-may-8/3704#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-may-8/3704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for May 8, 2008
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 970,000 viewers
CNN – 627,000 viewers
MSNBC – 383,000 viewers
CNBC – 234,000 viewers
HLN – 247,000 viewers
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for May 8, 2008</strong></p>
<p>P2+ Total Day<br />
FNC – 970,000 viewers<br />
CNN – 627,000 viewers<br />
MSNBC – 383,000 viewers<br />
CNBC – 234,000 viewers<br />
HLN – 247,000 viewers<br />
 <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-may-8/3704#more-3704" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-may-8/3704/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW News: Reaper Renewed</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cw-news-reaper-renewed/3701</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cw-news-reaper-renewed/3701#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cw-news-reaper-renewed/3701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And they say only &#8220;bad news&#8221; is distributed on Fridays.  Not so for fans of Reaper!  E&#8217;s Kristin Dos Santos is reporting that CW has definitely renewed Reaper.
To quote Kristin: Say it with me now: halle-freaking-lujah! (Thank you, Beelzebub!)
Kristin further reports that CW will be picking up the 90210 remake (duh!) and that Aliens in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="151" src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/reaper.jpg" alt="reaper.jpg" height="283" style="float: left; margin: 10px" />And they say only &#8220;bad news&#8221; is distributed on Fridays.  Not so for fans of <strong><em>Reaper</em></strong>!  E&#8217;s Kristin Dos Santos is reporting that CW has definitely renewed <em>Reaper</em>.</p>
<p>To quote Kristin: <em><a href="http://www.eonline.com/gossip/kristin/detail/index.jsp?uuid=3e2da30e-4fd7-4cd8-ac33-0370465623b7&amp;sid=rss_kristin&amp;utm_source=eonline&amp;utm_medium=rssfeeds&amp;utm_campaign=rss_kristin">Say it with me now: halle-freaking-lujah! (Thank you, Beelzebub!)</a></em></p>
<p>Kristin further reports that CW will be picking up the <strong><em>90210</em></strong> remake (duh!) and that Aliens in America is definitely cancelled.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d been holding off on catching up on this season of <em>Reaper</em> until finding out whether it had been renewed and am now looking forward to catching up!</p>
<p>Kristin further reports there will be one additional pickup, either <strong><em>How to Teach Filthy Rich Girls</em></strong> (which she indicates is getting a title change) or <em><strong>Austin: Golden Hour</strong></em>.  Title change or no, my money is on the filthy rich girls. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/cw-news-reaper-renewed/3701/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Sports Shows: Kentucky Derby Leads Field</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/top-sports-shows-april-28-may-4-kentucky-derby/3699</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/top-sports-shows-april-28-may-4-kentucky-derby/3699#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Top Sports]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/top-sports-shows-april-28-may-4-kentucky-derby/3699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky Derby, NASCAR Richmond Lead Slate of NBA Playoff Games 
The 134th running of the Kentucky Derby lead the field of sports shows for the week of April 28- May 4, 2008 with a viewership of 14.2 million.
The always strong NASCAR Sprint Cup Series from Richmond was #3 with a viewership of 7.3 million.
They both [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><em><strong>Kentucky Derby, NASCAR Richmond Lead Slate of NBA Playoff Games </strong></em></p>
<p align="left"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/kentuckyderby.gif" alt="kentuckyderby.gif" style="margin: 8px; float: left" />The 134th running of the <em><strong>Kentucky Derby</strong></em> lead the field of sports shows for the week of April 28- May 4, 2008 with a viewership of 14.2 million.</p>
<p align="left">The always strong <em><strong>NASCAR Sprint Cup</strong></em> Series from Richmond was #3 with a viewership of 7.3 million.</p>
<p align="left">They both lead a field of eight <em><strong>NBA Playoff </strong></em>games topped by the Sunday LA Lakers / Utah Jazz match-up. Luckily for the NBA ratings, the Lakers are cruising and don&#8217;t seem to have much competition, because their big ratings draw in the east, the Boston Celtics, struggled to beat the Atlanta Hawks in 7 games.</p>
<p align="left"><em><strong>Top Sports Shows for the Week of April 28 - May 4, 2008: </strong></em></p>
<p align="left">
<p> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/top-sports-shows-april-28-may-4-kentucky-derby/3699#more-3699" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/top-sports-shows-april-28-may-4-kentucky-derby/3699/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Ratings May 8, 2008: Trouble in Shonda-land?</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nielsen-ratings-may-8-2008-trouble-in-shonda-land/3695</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nielsen-ratings-may-8-2008-trouble-in-shonda-land/3695#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Overnight TV Show Ratings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nielsen-ratings-may-8-2008-trouble-in-shonda-land/3695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

	
	
		Scoreboard for Thurs. May 8, 2008
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
		Total Viewers (million)
		15.03
		11.62
		6.98
		6.58
		3.25
	
	
		Rating/Share: Adults 18-49
		4.3/12
		4.4/12
		2.0/5
		2.8/8
		1.3/4
	

 As is typical for primetime Thursdays,  it&#8217;s mixed leadership between the Tiffanys and the Mouse with CBS having the most viewers and ABC winning the 18-49 demographic, though only barely due to the &#8220;there&#8217;s no Lindsay Lohan yet&#8221; 18-49 performance of Ugly Betty.  ABC is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<table class="wptable rowstyle-alt" id="wptable-1265" >
	<thead>
	<tr>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:220px" align="left">Scoreboard for Thurs. May 8, 2008</th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cbs.gif" alt="CBS" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/abc.gif" alt="ABC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/fox.gif" alt="FOX" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/nbc.gif" alt="NBC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" ><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cw.gif" alt="CW" /></th>
	</tr>
	</thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Total Viewers (million)</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">15.03</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">11.62</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">6.98</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">6.58</td>
		<td style="width:30px" >3.25</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Rating/Share: Adults 18-49</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">4.3/12</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">4.4/12</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.0/5</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.8/8</td>
		<td style="width:30px" >1.3/4</td>
	</tr>
</table><p>
 As is typical for primetime Thursdays,  it&#8217;s mixed leadership between the Tiffanys and the Mouse with CBS having the most viewers and ABC winning the 18-49 demographic, though only barely due to the &#8220;there&#8217;s no Lindsay Lohan yet&#8221; 18-49 performance of <strong><em>Ugly Betty</em></strong>.  ABC is dominant in the 9pm and 10pm hour in the demo with <strong><em>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</em></strong> (which outperformed <strong><em>CSI</em></strong> in the demo by 20%) and <strong><em>LOST</em></strong>.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed last night&#8217;s <em>LOST</em>.  Some of the magic for me is in the casting.  Michael Emerson is wonderful as a creepy Benjamin Linus and relatively new addition Kevin Durand is great as an evil mercenary.  Line of the night from Ben: &#8220;Destiny is a fickle bitch.&#8221;  <em>LOST</em> had 11.28m and a 4.9/13 in the demo.  I also watched <strong><em>Supernatural</em></strong>, and it was the best episode I remember seeing in a while and enjoyed it, but it only drew 2.53m and a 1.0/3 in the demo.  Relax people, it&#8217;s already been renewed (c&#8217;mon, it&#8217;s the CW!).</p>
<p><strong><em>My Name is Earl</em></strong>,  the NBC network finale of <strong><em>Scrubs</em></strong> (soon to be appearing on an ABC network near you) and <strong><em>The Office</em></strong> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/02/nielsen-ratings-for-may-1-where-are-the-tv-viewers-going/3597">all fared just a bit worse than they did in last week&#8217;s overnight report</a>.  The season finale of <strong><em>30 Rock</em></strong>, however picked up a smidge in total viewers, though it&#8217;s 18-49 numbers were off by half a ratings point from last week.</p>
<p>While <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679">DVR viewing is certainly having an impact</a>, the dramatic drop off can&#8217;t be completely ascribed to DVRs.  <em>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</em> had 15.6m viewers last night.  But at least half of the DVR viewers are already baked into the numbers.  So even if Grey&#8217;s pulls 4 million live plus seven day DVR viewers they&#8217;ll only gain back a couple million viewers at most which would put it at 17.6m.  Last year&#8217;s overnight number for the comparable Thursday was 19.58 million, so it&#8217;ll still be down 20 percent-ish over last year even after DVR is factored in, unless there was record-setting DVR viewing for it &#8212; which we won&#8217;t know for a couple of weeks. </p>
<p>Grey&#8217;s also was down in the 18-49, from a 7.8/21 to a 6.1/16.  They will make up a lot of ground here via the remaining couple million or so DVR viewers who&#8217;ll almost all be in the 18-49 demographic.</p>
<p><em>CSI</em> pulled 17.82 million and a 4.9/13, or the same demo numbers as <em>LOST</em>, which had about six million less viewers than <em>CSI</em>.  I still haven&#8217;t watched last night&#8217;s episode that was penned by the <strong><em>Two and a Half</em></strong> Men crew, but it&#8217;s on the DVR and I will definitely check it out.</p>
<p>CBS&#8217;s <strong><em>Survivor: Micronesia</em></strong> was down just a touch from last week with 11.98m viewers and a 4.0/12 in the 18-49 demographic.  It easily won the 8pm hour.   Last night&#8217;s <strong><em>Without a Trace</em></strong> was up almost 3 million total viewers versus last week with 14.6 million, but <em>LOST</em> still easily beat its 3.3/9 in the demo.</p>
<p>Last night&#8217;s details: <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nielsen-ratings-may-8-2008-trouble-in-shonda-land/3695#more-3695" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/nielsen-ratings-may-8-2008-trouble-in-shonda-land/3695/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daytime Nielsen TV Ratings April 28 - May 2, 2008</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/daytime-nielsen-tv-ratings-april-28-may-2-2008/3692</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/daytime-nielsen-tv-ratings-april-28-may-2-2008/3692#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daytime]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/daytime-nielsen-tv-ratings-april-28-may-2-2008/3692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daytime Nielsen TV ratings/viewers, plus Top 5 Daytime Program Ratings:


	
	
		Daytime Nielsen Ratings
		
		
		
	
	
	
		Total Viewers  (Millions)
		3.73
		2.86
		2.7
	
	
		Rating/Viewers: Women 18-49
		1.3/835,000
		1.3/856,000
		1.3/868,000
	


Top 5 Daytime Programs Women 18-49:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Daytime Nielsen TV ratings/viewers, plus Top 5 Daytime Program Ratings:</strong></p>
<p><strong></p>
<table class="wptable rowstyle-alt" id="wptable-1264" >
	<thead>
	<tr>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:220px" align="left">Daytime Nielsen Ratings</th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:75px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cbs.gif" alt="CBS" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:75px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/abc.gif" alt="ABC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:75px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/nbc.gif" alt="NBC" /></th>
	</tr>
	</thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Total Viewers  (Millions)</td>
		<td style="width:75px" align="center">3.73</td>
		<td style="width:75px" align="center">2.86</td>
		<td style="width:75px" align="center">2.7</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Rating/Viewers: Women 18-49</td>
		<td style="width:75px" align="center">1.3/835,000</td>
		<td style="width:75px" align="center">1.3/856,000</td>
		<td style="width:75px" align="center">1.3/868,000</td>
	</tr>
</table><p>
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Top 5 Daytime Programs Women 18-49:</strong></p>
<p> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/daytime-nielsen-tv-ratings-april-28-may-2-2008/3692#more-3692" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/09/daytime-nielsen-tv-ratings-april-28-may-2-2008/3692/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW Gives Up On Sunday Night</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cw-gives-up-on-sunday-night/3690</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cw-gives-up-on-sunday-night/3690#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cw-gives-up-on-sunday-night/3690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variety is reporting that the CW is giving up on programming Sunday night:
The CW is close to sealing a deal with an as-yet unnamed media buyer to take over the night. Under the deal, the CW would sell the 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. block to an advertising conglom, which would turn around and develop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/cw.gif" alt="cw.gif" style="margin: 8px; float: left" />Variety is reporting that the <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117985376.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2565">CW is giving up on programming Sunday night</a>:</p>
<p><em>The CW is close to sealing a deal with an as-yet unnamed media buyer to take over the night. Under the deal, the CW would sell the 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. block to an advertising conglom, which would turn around and develop programming and sell ad time.</em> [&#8230;]  <em>Decision to sell the Sunday primetime block is an acknowledgement that the night has been a tough one for the CW - and before that, the WB, which also struggled to gain ratings traction there. </em></p>
<p>Looks to me like the CW is just cutting its losses. The CW already doesn&#8217;t program Saturdays, and after losing <em><strong>Friday Night Smackdown</strong></em>, can Fridays be far behind? At what point to they simply become a reseller of broadcast bandwidth?</p>
<p>Even by their extremely low threshold for success (Gossip Girl!) they have done badly on Sundays. Looking at a season to date adults 18-49 ranking of their Sunday shows this season finds that <strong><em>every single one</em></strong> <em><strong>of their Sunday shows</strong></em> did worse than the regular airings of <em><strong>every single one</strong><strong> of their other shows</strong></em>. Either they put all their worst shows on Sunday night on purpose, or they just got very, very unlucky. What do you think?</p>
<p>UPDATE: <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/05/cw_sells_sunday_night_to_outsi.php">More details from TVWeek</a>.</p>
<p><em><strong>Season to Date Adults 18-49 Viewing, Through May 4, 2008 </strong></em> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cw-gives-up-on-sunday-night/3690#more-3690" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cw-gives-up-on-sunday-night/3690/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, May 7</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-may-7/3687</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-may-7/3687#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-may-7/3687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for May 7, 2008
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,010,000 viewers
CNN – 638,000 viewers
MSNBC – 440,000 viewers
CNBC – 209,000 viewers
HLN – 261,000 viewers
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for May 7, 2008</strong></p>
<p>P2+ Total Day<br />
FNC – 1,010,000 viewers<br />
CNN – 638,000 viewers<br />
MSNBC – 440,000 viewers<br />
CNBC – 209,000 viewers<br />
HLN – 261,000 viewers<br />
 <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-may-7/3687#more-3687" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/cable-news-ratings-for-wednesday-may-7/3687/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post-Strike Show Status</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/show-by-show-strike-status/2032</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/show-by-show-strike-status/2032#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[WGA Strike]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2007/12/05/show-by-show-strike-status/2032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our table  will now track the Post-Strike status of your favorite broadcast TV shows, including &#8220;renewed or cancelled&#8221; status.
If you have better / more recent info than we are showing, please post a comment and we will update.
Show by Show Status: 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our table  will now track the Post-Strike status of your favorite broadcast TV shows, including &#8220;renewed or cancelled&#8221; status.</p>
<p>If you have better / more recent info than we are showing, please post a comment and we will update.</p>
<p><strong>Show by Show Status: </strong> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/show-by-show-strike-status/2032#more-2032" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/show-by-show-strike-status/2032/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadcast Morning News Ratings, April 28 - May 2</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/broadcast-morning-news-ratings-april-28-may-2/3685</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/broadcast-morning-news-ratings-april-28-may-2/3685#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Morning News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/broadcast-morning-news-ratings-april-28-may-2/3685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweeps Stunts Boost NBC Most, ABC &#38; CBS Less



Full Data for NBC&#8217;s Today Show, ABC&#8217;s Good Morning America and CBS&#8217; Early Show Ratings: 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><em><strong>Sweeps Stunts Boost NBC Most, ABC &amp; CBS Less<br />
</strong></em>
</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/042808morning-news.thumbnail.gif" alt="042808morning-news.gif" /></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Full Data for NBC&#8217;s Today Show, ABC&#8217;s Good Morning America and CBS&#8217; Early Show Ratings: </strong></p>
<p> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/broadcast-morning-news-ratings-april-28-may-2/3685#more-3685" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/broadcast-morning-news-ratings-april-28-may-2/3685/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVR Viewership Up 64% In Broadcast Primetime</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gorman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[New Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wayne Friedman at MediaWatch, has some quotes from Sinclair Broadcast Group&#8217;s CEO David Smith saying that DVR usage has had little impact on his stations. Now I don&#8217;t know the Sinclair business at all, so I&#8217;m not able to say whether Smith is correct, posturing, or ignoring reality.
What I do know is how much people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/dvr.jpg" alt="dvr.jpg" style="margin: 8px; float: left" />Wayne Friedman at MediaWatch, has some <a href="http://blogs.mediapost.com/tv_watch/?p=942">quotes from Sinclair Broadcast Group&#8217;s CEO David Smith</a> saying that DVR usage has had little impact on his stations. Now I don&#8217;t know the Sinclair business at all, so I&#8217;m not able to say whether Smith is correct, posturing, or ignoring reality.</p>
<p>What I do know is how much people are using their DVRs. And while DVR viewing is a small portion of prime-time broadcast TV viewing today, it&#8217;s <em><strong>growing</strong></em> <strong><em>very</em></strong> <em><strong>rapidly, up 64% vs. last season at this point</strong></em>.</p>
<p>In the 2006-7 primetime season through April 22, 2007, DVR viewers made up 4.3% of all primetime broadcast show viewers for the top 6 broadcast networks. The share was higher for the youth age demographics: Adults 18-49, 6.3%, Adults 18-34, 6.3%, and Adults 25-54, 6.0%.</p>
<p>By the 2007-8 season (through April 20, 2007), DVR viewers made up 7.5% of all primetime broadcast show viewers, <em><strong>an increase of 64%</strong></em>. For adults 18-49 DVR viewers were 10.6%, an increase of 53%. For adults 18-34 DVR viewers were 11.7%, an increase of 41%. For adults 25-54 DVR viewers were 10.2%, an increase of 59%.</p>
<p>DVRs are now in over 20% of US TV homes this season (up from about 9% last season), and that share will continue to increase. But while I have no data, I&#8217;d also expect the use of DVRs within households to increase. I&#8217;d guess that people use their DVRs more the longer they have them up to a point, and since the number of DVR households is growing so rapidly many people have only recently obtained one.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that DVRs are used much less to watch the most popular cable and syndicated shows than they are used on primetime broadcast shows, but if you&#8217;re in the TV business it&#8217;s not a matter of <em>if</em> your business will be affected by the DVR just <em>when</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Season to Date 2007-8 Broadcast Primetime DVR Viewership Data , Top 6 Networks</strong> <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679#more-3679" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/dvr-viewership-up-64-in-broadcast-primetime/3679/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Univision: It&#8217;s a Big Deal When It Comes to Ratings</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/univision-its-a-big-deal-when-it-comes-to-ratings/3681</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/univision-its-a-big-deal-when-it-comes-to-ratings/3681#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 19:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/univision-its-a-big-deal-when-it-comes-to-ratings/3681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sometimes I wish I&#8217;d paid more attention in Spanish class in high school.  Sure, I&#8217;m fine ordering beers or finding a bathroom.  I can ask if Susana is home and whether she&#8217;s in the kitchen easily enough, and if you tell me, &#8220;no, she&#8217;s in the living room,&#8221; I&#8217;ll likely comprehend it.  Thirty years after the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/univisionlogo.jpg" alt="Univision" /></p>
<p>Sometimes I wish I&#8217;d paid more attention in Spanish class in high school.  Sure, I&#8217;m fine ordering beers or finding a bathroom.  I can ask if Susana is home and whether she&#8217;s in the kitchen easily enough, and if you tell me, &#8220;no, she&#8217;s in the living room,&#8221; I&#8217;ll likely comprehend it.  Thirty years after the fact I still never forgot &#8220;Ay caramba, cuando arreglan mi cuarto, no encuentro nada!&#8221; (Oh darn! Whenever they clean my room I can&#8217;t find anything!).  Despite this, I can&#8217;t watch <strong><em>Fuego en la Sangre</em></strong> (Burning for Revenge) and understand it.  I wish that I could.</p>
<p>Univision doesn&#8217;t get much love with the traditional US media, and it&#8217;s understandable as most of the content written about ratings is produced for people who speak English.  Nielsen doesn&#8217;t even release overnight data for Univision via Marc Berman.   Again, I understand it, but the lack of inclusion is just another piece of the overall ratings puzzle that gets missed. </p>
<p>Univision really is a pretty big deal.  Last night for example, in the 8pm hour it was tied for second among 18-49 year olds, and numero uno among 18-34 year olds.  Number one.  Sadly, I expect because of the way advertising works that although the 18-34 is normally considered a highly cherished demographic, it may be considered less so among Spanish language shows because of issues of average income. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like bringing it up, but to ignore it would be folly.  Still, number one in a demo is number one.   And it&#8217;s not like the average income among those 18-34 year olds watching <strong><em>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</em></strong> (which <strong><em>Al Diablo con los Guapos</em></strong> BEAT in the 18-34 demo) is in the upper echelon either. <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/univision-its-a-big-deal-when-it-comes-to-ratings/3681#more-3681" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/univision-its-a-big-deal-when-it-comes-to-ratings/3681/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nielsen Ratings May 7, 2008: Worst May Sweeps EVER!</title>
		<link>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/nielsen-ratings-may-7-2008-worst-may-sweeps-ever/3678</link>
		<comments>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/nielsen-ratings-may-7-2008-worst-may-sweeps-ever/3678#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Seidman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/nielsen-ratings-may-7-2008-worst-may-sweeps-ever/3678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

	
	
		Scoreboard for Weds. May 7, 2008
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
		Total Viewers (million)
		14.43
		11.01
		7.74
		6.51
		3.05
	
	
		Rating/Share: Adults 18-49
		5.0/14
		2.7/7
		2.2/6
		2.1/6
		1.5/4
	

Let there be no doubt: worst May Sweeps EVER.    How bad?  Two words: Wife Swap.   ABC&#8217;s Wife Swap won the 18-49 demographic for the 8pm hour with a 2.5/8 (rating/share).  If Carl Sagan were still alive he&#8217;d be asking, &#8220;How can it be so?&#8221;
American Idol was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<table class="wptable rowstyle-alt" id="wptable-1261" >
	<thead>
	<tr>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:220px" align="left">Scoreboard for Weds. May 7, 2008</th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/fox.gif" alt="FOX" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cbs.gif" alt="CBS" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/nbc.gif" alt="NBC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" align="center"><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/abc.gif" alt="ABC" /></th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:30px" ><img src="http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/cw.gif" alt="CW" /></th>
	</tr>
	</thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Total Viewers (million)</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">14.43</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">11.01</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">7.74</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">6.51</td>
		<td style="width:30px" >3.05</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:220px" align="left">Rating/Share: Adults 18-49</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">5.0/14</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.7/7</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.2/6</td>
		<td style="width:30px" align="center">2.1/6</td>
		<td style="width:30px" >1.5/4</td>
	</tr>
</table><p>
Let there be no doubt: worst May Sweeps EVER.    How bad?  Two words: Wife Swap.   ABC&#8217;s <strong><em>Wife Swap</em></strong> won the 18-49 demographic for the 8pm hour with a 2.5/8 (rating/share).  If <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_sagan">Carl Sagan</a> were still alive he&#8217;d be asking, &#8220;How can it be so?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong><em>American Idol</em></strong> was on, so FOX won the night even though Idol has billions and billions fewer viewers this year.   OK, although Sagan was not exaggerating about the billions, I am, but you knew that.  It only lost about 6 million viewers.  Last year it pulled 28.20m, this year 22.39m.  It&#8217;s 18-49 base is eroding too it had a 10.8/28 in the demo last year, but this year only an 8.0/21.  Still, Bill Gorman will not be asking &#8220;<em>American Idol</em>: Renew or Cancel?&#8221; anytime soon.</p>
<p>FOX&#8217;s comedy lineup of <strong><em>‘Til Death</em></strong> and <strong><em>Back to You</em></strong> is struggling a bit.  Only <em>Back to You</em> could even pull a 2.0 in the 18-49 demo. And Just a 2.0.  With almost three million fewer viewers <strong><em>America&#8217;s Next Top Model</em></strong> was able to pull off a 2.0 in the 18-49 year old demographic for the 8pm hour.  Go Tyra!  But that other show on the CW, the one we apparently imported from Holland, <strong><em>Farmer Wants a Wife</em></strong> lost half of those 18-49 year olds for the CW.</p>
<p>In the 8pm hour <strong><em>Deal or No Deal</em></strong> faced off with <strong><em>The Price is Right</em></strong> and in the 8pm hour, Deal Won!  Barely, but a win is a win.  Deal and TPIR both had 7.59 million viewers from 8pm-9pm but Deal just edged TPIR out in 18-49 viewers : 1.9/5 versus 1.8/5.  Sucks to be Drew.  Other than that CBS had a pretty good night with <strong><em>Criminal Minds</em></strong> and <strong><em>CSI: NY</em></strong>.  <em>CSI: NY</em> bested NBC&#8217;s <strong><em>Law &amp; Order</em></strong> at 10pm by almost 4 million viewers.  The race was tighter in the 18-49 demographic but <em>CSI: NY</em> still won with a 3.3/9 vs. L&amp;O&#8217;s 2.9/8.</p>
<p>Fewer cared about <strong><em>Barbara Walters&#8217; Journey</em></strong>, but I was surprised it was able to net a 2.0 in the 18-49 demo.  I&#8217;d have bet $20 against that.  Go Babs!</p>
<p>The DVR will be working overdrive tonight as I plan to do something I almost never do: watch CBS&#8217; <strong><em>CSI</em></strong>.  The crossover episode of <em>CSI</em> written by the folks at <strong><em>Two and Half Men</em></strong> airs tonight at 9pm and is appropriately titled &#8220;Two and a Half Deaths&#8221;.  Mostly though, I&#8217;m looking forward to <strong><em>LOST</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Wednesday night&#8217;s details: <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/nielsen-ratings-may-7-2008-worst-may-sweeps-ever/3678#more-3678" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/05/08/nielsen-ratings-may-7-2008-worst-may-sweeps-ever/3678/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
